Chen, Yanwen

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition (Neo-ICI) in melanoma is an emerging therapeutic strategy that induces pathologic responses with significant prognostic implications for survival. Tumor burden in nonresectable melanoma has a major impact on immunotherapy efficacy, yet little is known on its impact in the Neo-ICI setting. We evaluated the association between tumor burden, measured by the sum of diameters (SoD), and pathological response in melanoma patients treated with Neo-ICI. A meta-analysis of published trials in resectable stage III/IV melanoma was conducted, extracting data on patient characteristics, treatment regimens, pathological response, and survival outcomes. A total of 451 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 47% (95% confidence interval: 35–58%; P < 0.001). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant association between SoD and pCR (moderator = −0.36; P = 0.032), with greater tumor burden associated with lower pCR rates. No significant association was observed between SoD and recurrence-free survival (RFS). This study identifies higher tumor burden as a potential risk factor for lower pathologic response rates to neoadjuvant therapy, underscoring the need to incorporate tumor burden into future clinical research and potentially clinical decision-making.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in the United States. Incidence of GBM increases with age, and younger age‐at‐diagnosis is significantly associated with improved prognosis. While the relationship between candidate GBM risk SNPs and age‐at‐diagnosis has been explored, genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have not previously been stratified by age. Potential age‐specific genetic effects were assessed in autosomal SNPs for GBM patients using data from four previous GWAS. Using age distribution tertiles (18–53, 54–64, 65+) datasets were analyzed using age‐stratified logistic regression to generate p values, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and then combined using meta‐analysis. There were 4,512 total GBM cases, and 10,582 controls used for analysis. Significant associations were detected at two previously identified SNPs in 7p11.2 (rs723527 [p54–63 = 1.50x10−9, OR54–63 = 1.28, 95%CI54–63 = 1.18–1.39; p64+ = 2.14x10−11, OR64+ = 1.32, 95%CI64+ = 1.21–1.43] and rs11979158 [p54–63 = 6.13x10−8, OR54–63 = 1.35, 95%CI54–63 = 1.21–1.50; p64+ = 2.18x10−10, OR64+ = 1.42, 95%CI64+ = 1.27–1.58]) but only in persons >54. There was also a significant association at the previously identified lower grade glioma (LGG) risk locus at 8q24.21 (rs55705857) in persons ages 18–53 (p18–53 = 9.30 × 10−11, OR18–53 = 1.76, 95%CI18–53 = 1.49–2.10). Within The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) there was higher prevalence of ‘LGG’‐like tumor characteristics in GBM samples in those 18–53, with IDH1/2 mutation frequency of 15%, as compared to 2.1% [54–63] and 0.8% [64+] (p = 0.0005). Age‐specific differences in cancer susceptibility can provide important clues to etiology. The association of a SNP known to confer risk for IDH1/2 mutant glioma and higher prevalence of IDH1/2 mutation within younger individuals 18–53 suggests that more younger individuals may present initially with ‘secondary glioblastoma.’

Abstract BACKGROUND: Incidence of glioma varies significantly by sex, and most glioma histologies occur with greater incidence in males. Previous analyses have examined the impact of estrogen exposure as a risk factor for these tumors, but have found results of varying significance and low effect size. There may be differences in effect of previously discovered risk alleles that contribute to sex differences. METHODS: Using data collected for three previous glioma GWAS in European-ancestry populations (MD Anderson Cancer Center, the San Francisco Adult Glioma Study, and the Glioma International Case Control Study) we assessed sex-specific effects for 14 previously identified and 13 newly identified glioma risk SNPs (27 total) overall and for glioblastoma (GBM) and non-GBM tumors separately. There were 3,892 male cases (59% GBM), 4,522 male controls, 2,500 female cases (52% GBM) and 4,940 female controls. Sex-specific odds ratios (ORM and ORF), 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and p values (pM and pF) were generated using stratified logistic regression models. Data from each study were analyzed separately and combined using inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. Results were considered statistically significant at p&lt;6.2x10-4. RESULTS: In GBM, rs11979158 (7p11.2, pM=1.01x10-10, ORM=1.43 [95% CI: 1.28-1.59]; pF=3.43x10-3, ORF=1.22 [95% CI: 1.07-1.39]) and rs2562152 (16p13.3, pM=5.59x10-4, ORM=1.23 [95% CI: 1.09-1.39]; pF=1.22x10-1, ORF=1.12 [95% CI: 0.97-1.29]) had significant effect in males only. In non-GBM gliomas, rs12076373 (1q44, pM=3.56x10-7, ORM=1.41, 95% CI: 1.23-1.61; pF=1.76x10-2, ORF=1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.38), rs11979158 (7p11.2, pM=1.77x10-5, ORM=1.32 [95% CI: 1.16-1.49]; pF=2.73x10-1, ORF=1.08 [95% CI: 0.94-1.24]), and rs3751667 (16p13.3, pM=9.44x10-7, ORM=1.30 [95% CI: 1.17-1.44]; pF=5.18x10-2, ORF=1.13 [95% CI: 1.00-1.28]) had significant effect in males only. Effect size for rs55705857 (8q24.21) varied significantly by sex, with ORM=2.63 (95% CI: 2.24-3.09, pM=4.42x10-32), as compared to ORF=3.95 (95% CI: 3.28-4.76, pF=1.82x10-47). A sensitivity analysis was performed due to allele frequency heterogeneity by study and results did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences and other demographic differences in cancer susceptibility can provide important clues to etiology, and these differences can be leveraged for discovery in genetic association studies. Significant differences in effect size may suggest variation in genetic effect of risk alleles or in unidentified risk factors that vary in prevalence or effect by sex. There may also be differences in the distribution of molecular subtypes within each histology by sex. Further investigation using an agnostic approach may further elucidate the relationship between effect of risk alleles and sex. Citation Format: Quinn T. Ostrom, Ben Kinnersley, Margaret Wrensch, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Georgina Armstrong, Terri Rice, Yanwen Chen, John Wiencke, Lucie McCoy, Helen Hansen, Christopher Amos, Jonine L. Bernstein, Elizabeth B. Claus, Dora Il'yasova, Christoffer Johansen, Daniel Lachance, Rose Lai, Ching C. Lau, Ryan T. Merrell, Sara H. Olson, Siegal Sadetzki, Joellen Schildkraut, Sanjay Shete, Richard S. Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Beatrice Melin, Melissa Bondy, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan. Estimating sex-specific effects of genetic loci associated with glioma risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1315. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1315

Abstract Background: Genetic influences may be discerned in families that have multiple affected members and may manifest as an earlier age of cancer diagnosis. In this study, we determine whether cancers develop at an earlier age in multiplex Familial Barrett's Esophagus (FBE) kindreds, defined by 3 or more members affected by Barrett's esophagus (BE) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Methods: Information on BE/EAC risk factors and family history was collected from probands at eight tertiary care academic hospitals. Age of cancer diagnosis and other risk factors were compared between nonfamilial (no affected relatives), duplex (two affected relatives), and multiplex (three or more affected relatives) FBE kindreds. Results: The study included 830 nonfamilial, 274 duplex, and 41 multiplex FBE kindreds with 274, 133, and 43 EAC and 566, 288, and 103 BE cases, respectively. Multivariable mixed models adjusting for familial correlations showed that multiplex kindreds were associated with a younger age of cancer diagnosis (P = 0.0186). Median age of cancer diagnosis was significantly younger in multiplex compared with duplex and nonfamilial kindreds (57 vs. 62 vs. 63 years, respectively, P = 0.0448). Mean body mass index was significantly lower in multiplex kindreds (P = 0.0033), as was smoking (P &lt; 0.0001), and reported regurgitation (P = 0.0014). Conclusions: Members of multiplex FBE kindreds develop EAC at an earlier age compared with nonfamilial EAC cases. Multiplex kindreds do not have a higher proportion of common risk factors for EAC, suggesting that this aggregation might be related to a genetic factor. Impact: These findings indicate that efforts to identify susceptibility genes for BE and EAC will need to focus on multiplex kindreds. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(2); 376–83. ©2011 AACR.