Back to Authors

Prasad, Ganapathy A.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

The Risk of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Setting of Clopidogrel Use
Namasivayam, Vikneswaran , Prasad, Ganapathy A., Lutzke, Lori S., Dunagan, Kelly T., Borkenhagen, Lynn S., Okoro, Ngozi I., Tomizawa, Yutaka , Buttar, Navtej , Michel, Wongkeesong Louis, Wang, Kenneth K. , Buttar, Navtej S, Tomizawa, Yutaka

ISRN Gastroenterology | April 27, 2014 | Volume: 2014 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-5

10.1155/2014/494157 Get It

Objective. Guidelines on antiplatelet medication use during endoscopy are based on limited evidence. We investigate the risk of bleeding and ischemic events in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of esophageal lesions in the setting of scheduled cessation and prompt resumption of clopidogrel. Design. Single centre retrospective review. Patients. Patients undergoing EMR of esophageal lesions. Interventions. Use of clopidogrel before EMR and resumption after EMR. Patients cease antiplatelets and anticoagulants 7 days before EMR and resume clopidogrel 2 days after EMR in average risk patients. Main Outcomes. Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and ischemic events (IE) within 30 days of EMR. Results. 798 patients underwent 1716 EMR. 776 EMR were performed on patients on at least 1 antiplatelet/anticoagulant (APAC). 17 EMR were performed following clopidogrel cessation. There were 14 GIB and 2 IE. GIB risk in the setting of recent clopidogrel alone (0%) was comparable to those not on APAC (1.1%) (P=1.0). IE risk on clopidogrel (6.3%) was higher than those not on APAC (0.1%) (P=0.03). Limitations. Retrospective study. Conclusions. Temporary cessation of clopidogrel before EMR and prompt resumption is not associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding but may be associated with increased ischemic events.
Variation in Age at Cancer Diagnosis in Familial versus Nonfamilial Barrett's Esophagus
Chak, Amitabh , Vengoechea, Jaime , Canto, Marcia I., Elston, Robert C. , Falk, Gary W. , Guda, Kishore , Kinnard, Margaret, Markowitz, Sanford D. , Mittal, Sumeet K. , Prasad, Ganapathy A., Shaheen, Nicholas J. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Chen, Yanwen , Grady, William M. , Willis, Joseph , Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | February 7, 2012 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 376-383

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0927 Get It

Abstract Background: Genetic influences may be discerned in families that have multiple affected members and may manifest as an earlier age of cancer diagnosis. In this study, we determine whether cancers develop at an earlier age in multiplex Familial Barrett's Esophagus (FBE) kindreds, defined by 3 or more members affected by Barrett's esophagus (BE) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Methods: Information on BE/EAC risk factors and family history was collected from probands at eight tertiary care academic hospitals. Age of cancer diagnosis and other risk factors were compared between nonfamilial (no affected relatives), duplex (two affected relatives), and multiplex (three or more affected relatives) FBE kindreds. Results: The study included 830 nonfamilial, 274 duplex, and 41 multiplex FBE kindreds with 274, 133, and 43 EAC and 566, 288, and 103 BE cases, respectively. Multivariable mixed models adjusting for familial correlations showed that multiplex kindreds were associated with a younger age of cancer diagnosis (P = 0.0186). Median age of cancer diagnosis was significantly younger in multiplex compared with duplex and nonfamilial kindreds (57 vs. 62 vs. 63 years, respectively, P = 0.0448). Mean body mass index was significantly lower in multiplex kindreds (P = 0.0033), as was smoking (P < 0.0001), and reported regurgitation (P = 0.0014). Conclusions: Members of multiplex FBE kindreds develop EAC at an earlier age compared with nonfamilial EAC cases. Multiplex kindreds do not have a higher proportion of common risk factors for EAC, suggesting that this aggregation might be related to a genetic factor. Impact: These findings indicate that efforts to identify susceptibility genes for BE and EAC will need to focus on multiplex kindreds. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(2); 376–83. ©2011 AACR.