Citations

ABSTRACT Objective To describe the practice patterns of point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) and compare its usage across subgroups (adult vs. paediatric practitioners, physicians vs. nurse practitioners [NPs], high income [HI] vs. low and middle ‐income [LMI] countries). Methods Survey distributed via the Society of Critical Care Medicine in May–June 2024. Respondents reported the percentage of eligible patients in the past year for whom POCUS was used for vascular access and diagnostic purposes. Responses (0%, < 25%, 25%–50%, 50%–75%, > 75%) were converted into binary categories (> 50% use) and compared across subgroups using logistic regression. Results The survey was completed by 503 respondents from 39 countries (6% response rate): 77.7% from HI countries, 20.9% paediatric practitioners and 18.3% Nurse Practitioner (NPs)/Physician assistants (PAs). POCUS was commonly used for vascular access, and similar usage was found among NP/PAs, physicians, and adult and paediatric practitioners. Practitioners from LMI countries were less likely to use POCUS for vascular access. Basic diagnostic applications, such as assessing pleural effusion (72.5%) and left ventricular function (69.2%), were more commonly used than advanced applications like pulmonary artery pressure measurement (22%). Physicians were more likely than NPs (for some indications), and adult practitioners were more likely than paediatric practitioners (for most indications) to use POCUS for diagnostic purposes. Practitioners in LMI countries reported higher use of diagnostic applications than practitioners in HI countries. Conclusions POCUS is widely adopted in critical care but is less accepted for diagnostic use among paediatric practitioners and NP/PAs. Diagnostic utilisation is higher in LMI countries, while procedural use is lower. Impact Statement Point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in intensive care units to guide diagnosis and procedures. Despite its importance, little is known about how consistently it is used by different types of clinicians around the world. This international survey of critical care practitioners from 39 countries shows that POCUS is widely used, particularly for procedures, but diagnostic use remains uneven. Paediatric clinicians and advanced practice providers report lower diagnostic use, while clinicians in low‐ and middle‐income countries report higher diagnostic adoption. These findings highlight opportunities to improve access to training and support broader, more equitable use of POCUS in critical care.

ABSTRACT Introduction Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life‐saving intervention for refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Despite advancements reducing complications, ECMO remains associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), often requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Studies report up to 45% of ECMO patients needing KRT, significantly increasing mortality. A prior meta‐analysis suggested a declining mortality trend in recent years. Methodology Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched (2000–2024) for randomized and observational studies on adult ECMO patients requiring KRT. Data extraction covered study characteristics, patient demographics, ECMO type, KRT timing, and clinical outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4.1 under a random‐effects model, with mortality as the primary outcome. Result A total of 24 studies (6347 patients) met the inclusion criteria, including 23 observational studies and one RCT. The mean age of ECMO + KRT patients was 51 years in observational studies and 61.2 years in the RCT, with cardiogenic shock as the most common ECMO indication. Meta‐analysis showed a significantly higher mortality in ECMO + KRT patients (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.63–2.12, p < 0.001), with infections and bleeding as key contributors. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant survival difference based on KRT timing, while Veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) was associated with worse outcomes than Veno‐venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV‐ECMO). The RCT reported 61.9% mortality at 30 days in ECMO + KRT patients. Conclusion KRT during ECMO is associated with increased mortality, likely due to the severity of illness and complications like infections and bleeding. The optimal timing of KRT initiation remains unclear, and no significant survival benefit was found for early KRT. Further large‐scale RCTs are needed to optimize management strategies.

Objectives: Smoking is a key risk factor for pancreatitis, contributing to pathogenesis and disease progression. Data regarding second-hand smoking, or passive smoking (PS) exposure, are lacking. We therefore aimed to assess the impact of PS exposure across the pancreatitis spectrum. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the PROCEED study, a multicenter study in the United States including patients with acute (AP), recurrent acute (RAP), and chronic (CP) pancreatitis. Participants detailed their individual smoking history and PS exposure, which was compared between AP, RAP, and CP subgroups. Participant factors and clinical characteristics were compared by level of individual and PS exposure. Results: Among 1369 participants (190 AP, 498 RAP, 681 CP), 346 (25.3%) were current and 409 (29.9%) were former smokers. The CP subgroup had the highest proportion of current smokers (36.7% CP vs 15.1% RAP, 11.1% AP, P < 0.001). PS exposure was also significantly higher in the CP subgroup (68.6% CP vs 58.2% RAP, 55.3% AP, P < 0.001). A minority (16.3%) with CP reported no smoking exposure (by self or passive) while nearly half smoked ≥20 pack-years. The mean PS duration was significantly higher in CP participants (21.8 y) compared with those with AP (17.8 y) or RAP (18.9 y) ( P < 0.0166). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, we affirmed an association with smoking use and intensity with CP-related complications. For the first time, we report a high prevalence of prior exposure to passive smoking in all pancreatitis subtypes, which requires further study to understand the impact on disease outcomes.

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are observed in ~20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the U.S., ivosidenib (ivo) is approved with or without azacitidine (aza) in the frontline (FL) and as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1-mutated (mut) AML. Olutasidenib (oluta) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH1-mut AML. Enasidenib (ena) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH2-mut AML. This study describes real-world IDH inhibitor (IDHi) administration patterns and evaluates their outcomes in on-label settings. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with IDH1/2-mut AML who received ivosidenib, olutasidenib, or enasidenib was conducted at 12 academic institutions in the U.S. Best response at any time during treatment, including complete response (CR) and complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), were graded using European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria. Results: A total of 387 patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mut AML were treated with an IDHi in the FL or R/R setting. Median follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 0.03-90.7). Demographics include 79% White, 14% Black, 3% Asian, and 4% other/unknown race; 5% were Hispanic ethnicity; 46% were female; the median age was 70 years (range, 28-95). 70% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 26% had secondary AML, and 10% had therapy-related AML. Per the ELN 2024 less-Intensive risk classification, 58% were favorable risk, 29% intermediate, 7% adverse, and 6% unknown. Overall, 209 of 387 patients (54%) received IDHi regimens on-label. In FL IDH1-mut AML (n=45), 11 received ivo monotherapy, 25 aza/ivo, and 9 used off-label combinations: 3 hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (ven) + ivo, 5 decitabine/ivo, 1 intensive chemotherapy (IC)/ivo. Among R/R IDH1-mut AML (n=109), 47 received ivo monotherapy, 7 oluta monotherapy, and 55 off-label (31 HMA/ivo, 16 HMA/ven/ivo, 3 IC/ivo, and 5 other). 44 received off-label ena for FL treatment of IDH2-mut AML (25 ena monotherapy, 9 HMA/ena, 8 HMA/ven/ena, and 2 IC/ena). In R/R IDH2-mut AML (n=189), 119 patients received ena monotherapy and 70 received off-label combinations (25 HMA/ena, 30 HMA/ven/ena, 7 IC/ena, 6 ena/gilteritinib, and 2 other). In on-label treatment of FL IDH1-mut AML, one of four patients with response assessment of FL ivo monotherapy had a CR/CRh. Of 19 patients with response assessment on FL aza/ivo, 13 patients (68.4%) had a CR as best response (95% CI, 46.0-84.6%). Median OS was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 4.17-NR) for ivo monotherapy (n=11) and 31.9 mo (95% CI, 9.1-NR) for aza/ivo (n=25), with 0 and 2 patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), respectively. In R/R IDH1-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh was 35.5% (95% CI, 21.1-53.1) for on-label ivo monotherapy. All 4 patients with response assessment for on-label oluta monotherapy had a CR. Median OS was 14.0 mo (95% CI, 10.1-22.4) for ivo monotherapy and NR for oluta monotherapy (95% CI, 10.1-NR), with 10 and 0 receiving allo-SCT, respectively. The CR/CRh rate for ivo was 38.1% (8 of 21 assessed; 95% CI, 20.8-59.1) in age &lt; 70, and 30.0% (3 of 10 assessed; 95% CI, 10.8-60.3) in age ≥ 70. Median OS was 15.2 mo (95% CI 9.3-NR) in age &lt; 70 (n=27) and 10.4 mo (95% CI 8.0-18) in age ≥ 70 (n=20). In R/R IDH2-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh for on-label ena monotherapy was 38.2% (95% CI, 27.6-50.1). Median OS was 12.1 mo (95% CI, 8.2-16.6), with 5 having received allo-SCT. In demographic subgroups for ena monotherapy, 52 non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with response assessment had a CR/CRh rate of 42.3% (95% CI, 0.30-0.56). Only 1 of 13 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with response assessment had a CRh (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33.0) as best response, with none attaining CR. Median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI 10.3-26.3) in NHW (n=82), 11.2 mo (95% CI, 6.1-NR) in NHB (n=18), and 69.1 mo (95% CI, 52.6-NR) in Hispanic patients (n=8). The CR/CRh rate was 48.6% (17 of 35 assessed; 95% CI, 33.0-64.4) for age &lt; 70, and 27.3% (9 of 33 assessed; 95% CI, 15.1-44.2) for age ≥ 70. Median OS was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 9.9-22.1) in age &lt; 70 (n=48) and 5.8 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) in age ≥ 70 (n=69). Conclusion: Practice patterns for IDH inhibitors in AML vary considerably, with high amounts of off-label use. Response rates for ivosidenib and enasidenib in the real-world setting are comparable to those of clinical trials. Descriptive analyses of demographic subgroups highlight areas in need of further research.

Abstract Background: Hypomethylating agent (HMA) with venetoclax (VEN) is used in clinical practice for frontline management of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) based on encouraging data from phase 1 clinical trial (Garcia JS et al. Blood 2025). While the randomized clinical trial (VERONA-NCT04401748) did not show a survival benefit of azacitidine-VEN, the study had important differences such as exclusion of therapy related MDS and being conducted in several non-academic US centers. To better understand the impact of this regimen and its effects in subgroups, we conducted a real-world analysis of frontline MDS patients treated mainly at academic medical centers with HMA-VEN and compared to HMA monotherapy. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study of 19 US academic medical centers. We included contemporary cohorts of adults (age≥18 years) with MDS (intermediate, high or very high risk by IPSS-R) who were treated outside of clinical trials with either upfront combination of HMA-VEN or HMA monotherapy. Data on patient-related, disease-related and treatment-related variables were collected through chart review. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS: progression, leukemic transformation, death as events) analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method. Determinants of outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression models. All analyses were conducted at a significance level of p&lt;0.05. Results: Among 1198 patients with intermediate, high or very-high risk MDS, 313 patients received upfront VEN in combination with HMA [HMA-VEN] and 885 patients received HMA monotherapy. Median age was 70 (63-76) years and majority of patients had MDS with excess blasts-1 (34% overall, HMA-VEN=26%, HMA=37%) or MDS with excess-blasts-2 (41% overall, HMA-VEN=60%, HMA=34%). Disease risk by IPSS-R was intermediate (29% overall, HMA-VEN=18%, HMA=33%), high (30% overall, HMA-VEN=31%, HMA=30%) or very-high risk (41% overall, HMA-VEN=51%, HMA=37%, p&lt;0.001). Therapy related MDS (t-MDS) was seen in 27% of patients (HMA-VEN=33%, HMA=25%, p=0.004), 34% had TP53 mutation (HMA-VEN=40%, HMA=32%, p=0.005) and 33% underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) (HMA-VEN=42%, HMA=30%, p&lt;0.001). The most common mutations detected at baseline included TP53 (34%), ASXL1 (22%), DNMT3A (16%), RUNX1 (16%), TET2 (14%), SRSF2 (13%), and U2AF1 (11%). The response rate by IWG 2006 criteria was significantly higher with HMA-VEN than HMA monotherapy (overall 81% vs 39%, CR: 17% vs 9.6%; marrow CR: 56% vs 14%, p&lt;0.001). In multivariable analysis accounting for upfront treatment, AHSCT, genomic mutations, baseline bone marrow blasts and t-MDS, patients treated with HMA-VEN in the upfront setting had significantly improved EFS (median EFS 10.7 vs. 7.8 mon, HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.72-0.96, p=0.01) and OS (median OS 22.4 vs. 18.1 mon, HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.64-0.97, p=0.02). In addition, TP53 mutation status (OS: HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.57-2.26, p&lt;0.001, EFS: HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.65, p&lt;0.001), subsequent AHSCT (OS: HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.27-0.41, p&lt;0.001; EFS: HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.54, p&lt;0.001), and therapy related MDS (OS: HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.00-1.44, p=0.04, EFS: HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.27, p=0.2) were significant predictors on multivariable analysis. When separately investigated in subgroups, an OS benefit of HMA-VEN over HMA was seen in patients undergoing subsequent AHSCT (median OS 40.6 vs. 30 mon, p=0.05), bone marrow blast 10-19% (median OS 25.1 vs. 17.4 mon, P=0.01), de novo MDS (median OS 30 vs. 20.1 mon, P=0.003) and absence of TP53 mutation (median OS 34.9 mon vs. 23.1 mon, p=0.004). The benefit of HMA-VEN over HMA was also seen across molecular mutations including presence of ASXL1 mutation (median OS 35.2 vs 20.9 mon, p=0.03). Conclusions: In this large multicenter retrospective analysis from US academic medical centers, we found that HMA-VEN therapy significantly improved OS in certain subsets of high risk MDS including patients with 10-19% blasts, denovo MDS, subsequent AHSCT and those without TP53 mutation. While our analysis is limited by its retrospective design, prospectively exploring subgroups of MDS patients who could benefit from HMA-VEN therapy is needed.

Abstract Introduction: Nucleophosmin 1 mutations (NPM1-m) drive leukemogenesis in approximately 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases. Ziftomenib is a potent, highly selective, oral, investigational menin inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical activity as both monotherapy and in combination for adults with NPM1-m or lysine methyltransferase 2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) AML. KOMET-007 (NCT05735184) is an ongoing, open-label, dose-escalation (phase 1a) and expansion (phase 1b) study of ziftomenib in combination with standard chemotherapies in NPM1-m or KMT2A-r AML. Here we present phase 1b safety and clinical activity in patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-m AML who received the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ziftomenib 600 mg in combination with venetoclax and azacitidine (Ven/Aza). Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed NPM1-m AML who were not eligible for intensive chemotherapy were enrolled in phase 1b and received ziftomenib 600 mg once daily plus standard doses of Ven/Aza. Ziftomenib was orally administered once daily continuously from Cycle 1 Day 8 onward. Phase 1b primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and complete remission (CR) per ELN 2022. Secondary endpoints included composite CR (CRc; defined as CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery), overall response, and duration of response. Local measurable residual disease (MRD) was assessed by next-generation sequencing, RT-qPCR, and multiparameter flow cytometry. Results: As of June 25, 2025, 39 patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-m AML were enrolled and treated with ziftomenib 600 mg once daily plus Ven/Aza in phase 1b. Median age was 75 years (range 53–93), 54% were female, 46% had ECOG PS 0–1; 12 (31%) had FLT3 co-mutations and 9 (23%) had IDH co-mutations. Median duration of follow-up was 16.3 weeks (range 1.6–41.1). Twenty-nine patients (74%) had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs, most commonly (≥20% of patients) decreased neutrophil count (31%) and decreased platelet count (23%). Grade ≥3 ziftomenib-related AEs occurred in 14 patients (36%), most commonly decreased neutrophil count (15%) and decreased platelet count (13%). No ziftomenib treatment discontinuations occurred due to AEs. Differentiation syndrome occurred in 1 (3%) patient (grade 2), which successfully resolved with protocol-specified mitigation. One patient (3%) had investigator-assessed ziftomenib-associated QTc prolongation (grade 3); however, there were concomitant significant electrolyte abnormalities and event resolved with electrolyte repletion. At time of data cutoff, 31 NPM1-m patients were response-evaluable (≥1 response assessment or death). CRc rate was 84% (26/31) after a median time to first CRc of 3.5 weeks (range 2.4–9.4), with local MRD-negativity rates among tested CRc responders of 54% (13/24) after a median time to first MRD-negativity of 8.4 weeks (range 2.9–17.4). CR rate was 58% (18/31) and overall response rate was 94% (29/31), with responses and MRD-negativity rates continuing to evolve. During continuous ziftomenib administration in patients who achieved CRc, median time to neutrophil recovery (≥1×109/L) was 36 days, and median time to platelet recovery (≥100×109/L) was 28 days. The median duration of response and median overall survival were not reached as of the data cutoff, at a median follow-up of 16.3 weeks. The study is ongoing, with 81% (25/31) of NPM1-m patients still on-study and 77% (24/31) still on ziftomenib treatment. Updated safety and clinical activity results will be presented.Conclusions: In the ongoing KOMET-007 study, ziftomenib RP2D of 600 mg once daily combined with Ven/Aza was well tolerated and demonstrated robust clinical activity in patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-m AML, including 84% CRc after a median of 3.5 weeks and 54% CRc MRD-negativity after a median of 8.4 weeks. Low rates of ziftomenib-related cytopenia and no additional myelosuppression were observed with this combination. One case each of differentiation syndrome (grade 2) and investigator-assessed QTc (grade 3) were successfully resolved. Taken together, these data support the RP2D determination and advancement of this ziftomenib-based combination in the KOMET-017 (NCT07007312) randomized phase 3 study in patients with newly diagnosed NPM1-m AML.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use during liver transplantation is a complex and evolving aspect of critical care. This retrospective analysis presents the largest North American case series to date, offering a detailed comparison of survival outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients supported by ECMO. A total of 15 patients were supported with ECMO, eight were supported on venoarterial (VA) ECMO and the remaining seven on venovenous (VV) ECMO. The median duration of ECMO support was 10 days. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–158) and 49.2 days (IQR: 1–121), respectively. Overall survival was 33.3%, comparable to published rates (20–30%). Survival was based on ECMO initiation timing: preoperative 33.3% (1/3); intraoperative 50% (3/6); postoperative, 16.6% (1/6). All the patients (five) discharged from hospital were alive at 1 year follow-up. Significant ECMO-related complications included acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (40%, n = 6/15), neurological complications (40%, n = 6/15), and bleeding requiring transfusion (26.6%, n = 4/15). Literature review suggests better outcomes with intraoperative or postoperative ECMO. While ECMO use is increasing in LT, outcomes remain poor. Improved survival may depend on careful patient selection, optimal timing of initiation, and distinguishing reversible pathology from irreversible one.

Backround: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication following veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), leading to further complications from anticoagulation or stroke. The Artificial Intelligence AF Prediction Dashboard developed at Mayo Clinic generates two predictive outputs: (1) a continuous probability score and (2) a binary threshold-based signal to predict the likelihood of AF at an individual level after 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is obtained. Using both continuous risk (%) and binary (yes/no) likelihood, we present a novel method to understand AF risk after VV-ECMO cannulation based on pre-ECMO 12-lead ECG. Methods: We reviewed a total of 147 patients on ECMO between 2018 and 2024, from which 85 VV-ECMO patients with complete data were included. AI Dashboard outputs were quantified as binary (1/0) or percent likelihood for AF. R was utilized for statistical analysis. Results: 85 patients met our inclusion criteria from which AF after cannulation occurred in 31 (36%). 17 patients had a history of AF prior to VV-ECMO initiation. The mean age of our cohort was 49 years with a mean BMI of 29.3. Baseline AI Dashboard continuous assessment identified 39 patients (46%) compared to the binary assessment identifying 31 patients (36%). Logistic regression in the binary assessment demonstrated an odds ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 1.04 – 1.12) with a p value of <0.001. The binary AF Prediction yielded a 58% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 58% PPV, and 76% NPV, with an accuracy of 67%. The continuous AF Probability score achieved 72% balanced accuracy with sensitivity 74%, specificity 70%, PPV 59% and NPV 83%, indicating fair overall performance and suggesting good utility for ruling out AF in low-risk patients. Although both outputs provided moderate predictive accuracy, the continuous score reported before ECMO cannulation demonstrated stronger overall performance with fewer false negatives and higher rule-out value. Conclusions: We demonstrate the novel use of an AI predictive model in the VV-ECMO population for the prediction of AF risk with both continuous and binary risk cutoffs from baseline ECG. This data highlights the need for further development in ECMO-specific AI models to help mitigate risk after the onset of atrial arrhythmias. As AI-driven tools become increasingly integrated into care, their performance must be continuously validated and recalibrated for specific populations to ensure their safe and effective use.