Lewis-Gonzalez, Jessica

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are observed in ~20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the U.S., ivosidenib (ivo) is approved with or without azacitidine (aza) in the frontline (FL) and as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1-mutated (mut) AML. Olutasidenib (oluta) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH1-mut AML. Enasidenib (ena) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH2-mut AML. This study describes real-world IDH inhibitor (IDHi) administration patterns and evaluates their outcomes in on-label settings. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with IDH1/2-mut AML who received ivosidenib, olutasidenib, or enasidenib was conducted at 12 academic institutions in the U.S. Best response at any time during treatment, including complete response (CR) and complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), were graded using European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria. Results: A total of 387 patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mut AML were treated with an IDHi in the FL or R/R setting. Median follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 0.03-90.7). Demographics include 79% White, 14% Black, 3% Asian, and 4% other/unknown race; 5% were Hispanic ethnicity; 46% were female; the median age was 70 years (range, 28-95). 70% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 26% had secondary AML, and 10% had therapy-related AML. Per the ELN 2024 less-Intensive risk classification, 58% were favorable risk, 29% intermediate, 7% adverse, and 6% unknown. Overall, 209 of 387 patients (54%) received IDHi regimens on-label. In FL IDH1-mut AML (n=45), 11 received ivo monotherapy, 25 aza/ivo, and 9 used off-label combinations: 3 hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (ven) + ivo, 5 decitabine/ivo, 1 intensive chemotherapy (IC)/ivo. Among R/R IDH1-mut AML (n=109), 47 received ivo monotherapy, 7 oluta monotherapy, and 55 off-label (31 HMA/ivo, 16 HMA/ven/ivo, 3 IC/ivo, and 5 other). 44 received off-label ena for FL treatment of IDH2-mut AML (25 ena monotherapy, 9 HMA/ena, 8 HMA/ven/ena, and 2 IC/ena). In R/R IDH2-mut AML (n=189), 119 patients received ena monotherapy and 70 received off-label combinations (25 HMA/ena, 30 HMA/ven/ena, 7 IC/ena, 6 ena/gilteritinib, and 2 other). In on-label treatment of FL IDH1-mut AML, one of four patients with response assessment of FL ivo monotherapy had a CR/CRh. Of 19 patients with response assessment on FL aza/ivo, 13 patients (68.4%) had a CR as best response (95% CI, 46.0-84.6%). Median OS was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 4.17-NR) for ivo monotherapy (n=11) and 31.9 mo (95% CI, 9.1-NR) for aza/ivo (n=25), with 0 and 2 patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), respectively. In R/R IDH1-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh was 35.5% (95% CI, 21.1-53.1) for on-label ivo monotherapy. All 4 patients with response assessment for on-label oluta monotherapy had a CR. Median OS was 14.0 mo (95% CI, 10.1-22.4) for ivo monotherapy and NR for oluta monotherapy (95% CI, 10.1-NR), with 10 and 0 receiving allo-SCT, respectively. The CR/CRh rate for ivo was 38.1% (8 of 21 assessed; 95% CI, 20.8-59.1) in age < 70, and 30.0% (3 of 10 assessed; 95% CI, 10.8-60.3) in age ≥ 70. Median OS was 15.2 mo (95% CI 9.3-NR) in age < 70 (n=27) and 10.4 mo (95% CI 8.0-18) in age ≥ 70 (n=20). In R/R IDH2-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh for on-label ena monotherapy was 38.2% (95% CI, 27.6-50.1). Median OS was 12.1 mo (95% CI, 8.2-16.6), with 5 having received allo-SCT. In demographic subgroups for ena monotherapy, 52 non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with response assessment had a CR/CRh rate of 42.3% (95% CI, 0.30-0.56). Only 1 of 13 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with response assessment had a CRh (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33.0) as best response, with none attaining CR. Median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI 10.3-26.3) in NHW (n=82), 11.2 mo (95% CI, 6.1-NR) in NHB (n=18), and 69.1 mo (95% CI, 52.6-NR) in Hispanic patients (n=8). The CR/CRh rate was 48.6% (17 of 35 assessed; 95% CI, 33.0-64.4) for age < 70, and 27.3% (9 of 33 assessed; 95% CI, 15.1-44.2) for age ≥ 70. Median OS was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 9.9-22.1) in age < 70 (n=48) and 5.8 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) in age ≥ 70 (n=69). Conclusion: Practice patterns for IDH inhibitors in AML vary considerably, with high amounts of off-label use. Response rates for ivosidenib and enasidenib in the real-world setting are comparable to those of clinical trials. Descriptive analyses of demographic subgroups highlight areas in need of further research.

Background: Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a heterogenous subtype of B-ALL defined by the presence of gene expression profiling similar to Ph+ ALL in the absence of a BCR::ABL1 fusion. Ph-like ALL has lower response rates to standard frontline therapies and carries a poorer prognosis when compared to other B-ALL subtypes. However, the role in which specific patient characteristics may impact responses is not well described. Our aim for this retrospective study was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with Ph-like ALL across multiple institutions, including describing key patient characteristics, treatments, and factors that may contribute to minimal residual disease (MRD) status and treatment response. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult pts with Ph-like ALL diagnosed and treated at the University of New Mexico, Mayo Clinic Phoenix, University of Chicago, and University of Michigan between 1/1/18 - 2/1/2024. Pts were eligible if they carried a diagnosis of B-ALL, and were determined to have Ph-like ALL according to each institutional diagnostic algorithm. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Fisher's exact test were employed to summarize various clinical characteristics and their associations. Cox regression analysis was utilized to estimate the median survival time and assess the relationship between clinical characteristics and survival outcomes, including overall survival and progression-free survival. All statistical analyses were conducted using the R statistical software. Results: 67 pts were identified with a median age of 34.2 (IQR 28.5) and 35.8% were female. Twenty-eight pts identified as Hispanic or Latino (H/L) (43.1%), 25 (38.5%) identified as non-Hispanic White/Caucasian (NHW), 10 (15.4%) as American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN), and 2 (3.1%) as Asian/Pacific Islander. Thirteen pts (19.4%) had central nervous system (CNS) involvement at diagnosis, 22.4% of pts had extramedullary disease, and, in those who had NGS or cytogenomic microarray testing (n=49), 51% had an identified mutation/deletion in IKZF1. Initial treatment varied widely with pts receiving most commonly: Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols (22.4%), CALGB 10403 (22.4%), HyperCVAD (11.9%), and CALGB 8811 (10.4%). Fifty-eight percent achieved a CR/CRi and 21% were refractory to initial therapy. Thirteen percent of pts received a Jak inhibitor and 6% of pts were treated with a TKI. Thirty pts (50.8%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant, with 8 of those pts (26.7%) experiencing a relapse post-transplant. Nine pts (13.4%) underwent treatment with CAR-T therapy with few pts experiencing grade 2 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Pts with CNS disease at diagnosis were less likely to achieve a CR/CRi compared to those without CNS disease at diagnosis (33.3% vs 64.0%; p=0.12). Pts identifying as AI/AN were more likely to be refractory to their first treatment compared to other racial/ethnic groups (75%, p=0.002). Forty two percent of pts never achieved MRD negativity (< 0.01% by flow cytometry) during treatment; pts identifying as H/L and AI/AN had a higher rate of MRD positivity after induction compared to NHW pts (56% and 70% vs. 25%; p=0.02). In pts with IKZF1 mutation, 57.1% did not achieve MRD negativity compared to 21.7% in pts without a mutation (p=0.029). The median overall survival (OS) was 66.3 months (mos) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.7 mos. Pts who did not achieve MRD negativity after initial treatment had shorter OS compared to those who did achieve MRD negativity, 33.9 mos vs 66.3 mos (p=0.086). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter for patients who did not achieve MRD negativity after initial treatment compared to those who did, 3.9 mos vs 43.9 mos (p=0.001). PFS was shorter in pts who identify as AI/AN compared to H/L and NHW pts (2 mos vs 35.7 mos and 35.7 mos; p=0.046). Conclusion: Pts with Ph-like ALL experience poor response rates to therapies used to treat B-ALL, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapies and treatment strategies. We identified race/ethnicity and CNS disease at diagnosis as risk factors for poor treatment response. In addition, race/ethnicity and the presence of an IKZF1 mutation was associated with worse rates of MRD negativity during treatment.