Li, Zhiguo

Abstract Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are observed in ~20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the U.S., ivosidenib (ivo) is approved with or without azacitidine (aza) in the frontline (FL) and as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) IDH1-mutated (mut) AML. Olutasidenib (oluta) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH1-mut AML. Enasidenib (ena) is approved as monotherapy for R/R IDH2-mut AML. This study describes real-world IDH inhibitor (IDHi) administration patterns and evaluates their outcomes in on-label settings. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with IDH1/2-mut AML who received ivosidenib, olutasidenib, or enasidenib was conducted at 12 academic institutions in the U.S. Best response at any time during treatment, including complete response (CR) and complete response with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), were graded using European Leukemia Net (ELN) 2022 criteria. Results: A total of 387 patients with IDH1- and IDH2-mut AML were treated with an IDHi in the FL or R/R setting. Median follow-up was 9.6 months (range, 0.03-90.7). Demographics include 79% White, 14% Black, 3% Asian, and 4% other/unknown race; 5% were Hispanic ethnicity; 46% were female; the median age was 70 years (range, 28-95). 70% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, 26% had secondary AML, and 10% had therapy-related AML. Per the ELN 2024 less-Intensive risk classification, 58% were favorable risk, 29% intermediate, 7% adverse, and 6% unknown. Overall, 209 of 387 patients (54%) received IDHi regimens on-label. In FL IDH1-mut AML (n=45), 11 received ivo monotherapy, 25 aza/ivo, and 9 used off-label combinations: 3 hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax (ven) + ivo, 5 decitabine/ivo, 1 intensive chemotherapy (IC)/ivo. Among R/R IDH1-mut AML (n=109), 47 received ivo monotherapy, 7 oluta monotherapy, and 55 off-label (31 HMA/ivo, 16 HMA/ven/ivo, 3 IC/ivo, and 5 other). 44 received off-label ena for FL treatment of IDH2-mut AML (25 ena monotherapy, 9 HMA/ena, 8 HMA/ven/ena, and 2 IC/ena). In R/R IDH2-mut AML (n=189), 119 patients received ena monotherapy and 70 received off-label combinations (25 HMA/ena, 30 HMA/ven/ena, 7 IC/ena, 6 ena/gilteritinib, and 2 other). In on-label treatment of FL IDH1-mut AML, one of four patients with response assessment of FL ivo monotherapy had a CR/CRh. Of 19 patients with response assessment on FL aza/ivo, 13 patients (68.4%) had a CR as best response (95% CI, 46.0-84.6%). Median OS was 14.9 mo (95% CI, 4.17-NR) for ivo monotherapy (n=11) and 31.9 mo (95% CI, 9.1-NR) for aza/ivo (n=25), with 0 and 2 patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), respectively. In R/R IDH1-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh was 35.5% (95% CI, 21.1-53.1) for on-label ivo monotherapy. All 4 patients with response assessment for on-label oluta monotherapy had a CR. Median OS was 14.0 mo (95% CI, 10.1-22.4) for ivo monotherapy and NR for oluta monotherapy (95% CI, 10.1-NR), with 10 and 0 receiving allo-SCT, respectively. The CR/CRh rate for ivo was 38.1% (8 of 21 assessed; 95% CI, 20.8-59.1) in age < 70, and 30.0% (3 of 10 assessed; 95% CI, 10.8-60.3) in age ≥ 70. Median OS was 15.2 mo (95% CI 9.3-NR) in age < 70 (n=27) and 10.4 mo (95% CI 8.0-18) in age ≥ 70 (n=20). In R/R IDH2-mut AML, the rate of CR/CRh for on-label ena monotherapy was 38.2% (95% CI, 27.6-50.1). Median OS was 12.1 mo (95% CI, 8.2-16.6), with 5 having received allo-SCT. In demographic subgroups for ena monotherapy, 52 non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with response assessment had a CR/CRh rate of 42.3% (95% CI, 0.30-0.56). Only 1 of 13 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients with response assessment had a CRh (7.7%; 95% CI, 1.4-33.0) as best response, with none attaining CR. Median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI 10.3-26.3) in NHW (n=82), 11.2 mo (95% CI, 6.1-NR) in NHB (n=18), and 69.1 mo (95% CI, 52.6-NR) in Hispanic patients (n=8). The CR/CRh rate was 48.6% (17 of 35 assessed; 95% CI, 33.0-64.4) for age < 70, and 27.3% (9 of 33 assessed; 95% CI, 15.1-44.2) for age ≥ 70. Median OS was 12.0 mo (95% CI, 9.9-22.1) in age < 70 (n=48) and 5.8 mo (95% CI, 4.1-8.7) in age ≥ 70 (n=69). Conclusion: Practice patterns for IDH inhibitors in AML vary considerably, with high amounts of off-label use. Response rates for ivosidenib and enasidenib in the real-world setting are comparable to those of clinical trials. Descriptive analyses of demographic subgroups highlight areas in need of further research.

Abstract Background: Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is not curable with standard therapies. Effective outpatient treatment, allowing patients to maintain a good quality of life, while offering a meaningful chance of remission, is an appealing alternative to prolonged admission required for currently available multi-agent regimens. Vincristine sulfate liposomal injection (Marqibo) was approved in 2012 for treatment Ph-ALL in second or greater relapse, originally developed to overcome pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic limitations of vincristine. Approved dosing is 2.25 mg/m 2 without a dose cap. Pre-clinical studies showed it increases plasma circulation time, increases tumor tissue delivery, accumulates in tumor tissue, and slowly releases vincristine in tumor tissues rather than into systemic circulation. In a phase 2 trial, as a weekly administered single agent, CR/CRi rate was 20%, with median duration of 23 weeks and overall response rate of 35%. Blinatumomab is a murine recombinant single-chain antibody construct belonging to a class of bispecific T-cell engager (BITE) immuno-oncology. BITE molecules are designed to direct T-effector memory cells towards target cells, triggering cell-specific cytotoxicity. Blinatumomab specifically targets cells that express CD19 and the presence of both, CD19+ target cells and T cells are required for its cytotoxic activity. In previous phase 2 trials, responses to single agent blinatumomab in the relapsed setting were near 60%, although only 34% (44%, including partial and incomplete hematologic recovery) in the pivotal phase 3. Median duration of remission was only 7.3 months and half were very heavily pretreated. Here, we describe a trial designed to target ALL cells with Marquibo as a microtubule inhibitor and blinatumomab as a BiTE immuno-oncology therapy and evaluate whether this combination results in an effective and safe therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory ALL patients. We anticipate additive benefits of the regimen and define a clinically meaningful outcome as >75% (CR/CRi) rate and median progression-free survival (PFS) of ≥1 year. This higher rate of response is expected as many patients are using blinatumomab at first relapse, and therefore we anticipate less prior therapy than overall in the pivotal phase 3 study. Further, we hypothesize that the combination will result in a high rate of response, allowing enhanced immunologic recovery. Study Design/Methods: This is a phase 2, single arm, trial to evaluate the efficacy of blinatumomab and vincristine sulfate liposomal injection. The study will include up to 35 participants who are ≥18years of age, with Ph-, CD19+ ALL, and are either relapse or refractory to ≥2 prior regimens, have ≥5% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood or persistent extranodal/marrow site or have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2. The active study period includes a 3-week screening phase, followed by a treatment period (induction phase and consolidation phase) of up to 58 weeks (6 cycles), a safety follow-up 30 days later and a long-term follow-up period of up to 18 months. The induction phase includes two cycles of blinatumomab and liposomal vincristine. A single cycle is defined as 6 weeks in duration, which includes 4 weeks of continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) of blinatumomab (initial dose 9 μg/day for first 7 days, then escalated to 28 μg/day starting on day 8 (week 2) through day 29 (week 4), followed by a 2-week treatment-free interval and 3 weekly doses of liposomal vincristine, administered intravenously at 2.25 mg/m 2, with no dose cap (per label),in the outpatient setting over 1 hour. Subjects who achieve at least stable disease within 2 induction cycles may continue to the consolidation phase to receive up to a maximum of 6 cycles under the same treatment schedule. The primary objectives are to evaluate whether the combination will result in a median PFS of ≥1 year, and if the CR/CRi rate is ≥75% following 2 cycles and duration of remission. Secondary outcomes will include evaluation of the rate of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and duration, the proportion of patients who are able to progress to allogeneic transplantation, the safety of blinatumomab and liposomal vincristine sulfate in combination and the effect of the combination and response on measures of immune reconstitution. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rizzieri: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acrotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mustang: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Leonard: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding. Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah: Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier Genetics: Other; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Amgen: Consultancy.