Citations

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses, as well as occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM). The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of nasopharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.

Abstract BMT CTN (Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network) 1506 (“MORPHO”) was a randomized study of gilteritinib compared with placebo as maintenance therapy after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients with FLT3-ITD–mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A key secondary end point was to determine the impact on survival of before and/or after HCT measurable residual disease (MRD), as determined using a highly sensitive assay for FLT3-ITD mutations. Generally, gilteritinib maintenance therapy was associated with improved relapse-free survival (RFS) for participants with detectable peri-HCT MRD, whereas no benefit was evident for those lacking detectable MRD. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the data and found that the level of MRD detected with this approach correlated remarkably with RFS and relapse risk, and that MRD detectable at any level negatively affected RFS. In the placebo arm, 42.2% of participants with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD relapsed compared with 13.4% of those without detectable MRD. We found that 14.8% of participants had multiple FLT3-ITD clones detected as MRD and had worse survival irrespective of treatment arm. Finally, we examined the kinetics of FLT3-ITD clonal relapse or eradication and found that participants on the placebo arm with detectable MRD relapsed rapidly after HCT, often within a few weeks. MRD-positive participants on the gilteritinib arm relapsed either with FLT3 wild-type clones (assessed by capillary electrophoresis), after cessation of gilteritinib with persistent MRD, or on progression of multiclonal disease. These data demonstrate the potential of FLT3-ITD MRD to guide therapy with gilteritinib for this subtype of AML. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02997202.

Abstract Disclosure: R.J. Auchus: Consulting Fee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, OMass Therapeutics, H Lundbeck A/S, Adrenas Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Diurnal, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Spruce Biosciences. O. Hamidi: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati Rare Diseases, Amryt Pharma, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Xeris, Lantheus. R. Pivonello: Advisory Board Member; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati AG, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, H. Lundbeck A/S. Research Investigator; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati AG, Strongbridge Biopharma, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. I. Bancos: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati Rare Diseases, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Diurnal, Spruce Biosciences, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, Adrenas Therapeutics. Research Investigator; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. G. Russo: Advisory Board Member; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Diurnal. Speaker; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Diurnal. S.F. Witchel: Research Investigator; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. A.M. Isidori: Research Investigator; Self; Pfizer, Inc., Merck Serono, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati AG, Corcept. P. Rodien: Consulting Fee; Self; Pfizer, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Lilly USA, LLC, Ipsen, HRA Pharmaceuticals, IBSA Pharma, Recordati Rare Diseases. U. Srirangalingam: Advisory Board Member; Self; Diurnal. Speaker; Self; Diurnal. F.W. Kiefer: Advisory Board Member; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi. Speaker; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly & Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Inc., Sanofi. H. Falhammar: Consulting Fee; Self; Diurnal, Roche Diagnostics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., H Lundbeck A/S, Adrenas Therapeutics. D.P. Merke: Research Investigator; Self; Diurnal, Adrenas Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. N. Reisch: Consulting Fee; Self; Diurnal, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., Spruce Biosciences, H Lundbeck A/S. J. Sturgeon: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. E. Roberts: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. V.H. Lin: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. J.L. Chan: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. R. Farber: Employee; Self; Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.. Introduction: Classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21OHD), a genetic disorder characterized by cortisol deficiency and excess adrenal androgens, typically requires management with supraphysiological glucocorticoid (GC) doses. Crinecerfont is a novel oral CRF1 antagonist that reduced elevated adrenocorticotropic hormone and adrenal androgens in patients with 21OHD in 14-day open-label Phase 2 studies. This Phase 3 study (CAHtalyst: NCT04490915) evaluated whether crinecerfont can reduce daily GC dose while maintaining androgen control in adults with 21OHD. Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with 21OHD, stable GC regimens at doses >13 mg/m2/d in hydrocortisone equivalents (HCe), and normal or elevated androstenedione (A4) were randomized (2:1) to crinecerfont 100 mg BID or placebo for 24 weeks. GC dosing was maintained stable for 4 weeks, followed by a planned GC down-titration over 8 weeks to achieve a GC dose of 8-10 mg/m2/d. GC doses were adjusted as needed during the last 12 weeks to maintain A4 control (≤120% of baseline or ≤upper limit of normal [ULN]) by week 24. Results: In the 182 randomized participants (51% male, mean age 31 years), demographics and baseline characteristics were similar between treatment arms (122 crinecerfont, 60 placebo). Mean GC dose at baseline was 17.6 mg/m2/d HCe (32 mg/d), with 58% on HC alone, 29% taking predniso[lo]ne, and 13% taking dexamethasone; mean pre-GC A4 (620 ng/dL) was elevated >2-3-fold the ULN. Over 95% of participants completed the double-blind treatment period. At week 24, the crinecerfont arm had a significantly greater percent reduction in GC dose while maintaining A4 control vs placebo (-27% vs -10%; least squares mean difference [LSMD]: -17%; p<0.0001) (primary endpoint). At week 4 (end of GC-stable period), a greater reduction in A4 prior to the morning GC dose was observed with crinecerfont vs placebo (LSMD: -345 ng/dL; p<0.0001) (key secondary endpoint). At week 24, a higher percentage of participants reached a protocol-defined physiological GC dose (≤11 mg/m2/d) while maintaining A4 control with crinecerfont (63% vs 18% for placebo; p<0.0001) (key secondary endpoint). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) in the crinecerfont arm were fatigue (25% vs 15% for placebo), headache (16% vs 15%), and COVID-19 (14% vs 9%). There were few serious AEs (3% overall), with none assessed as related to the study drug. Conclusions: Crinecerfont, an oral CRF1 antagonist, represents a novel treatment option to improve androgen control for patients with 21OHD. In the largest interventional Phase 3 study conducted to date in adults with 21OHD, crinecerfont led to a significant reduction in A4 while GC dose was stable, enabling a significant percent reduction in GC dose while maintaining A4 control at 24 weeks. Crinecerfont was overall well tolerated. Presentation: 6/1/2024

The NCCN Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening describe various colorectal screening modalities as well as recommended screening schedules for patients at average or increased risk of developing sporadic CRC. They are intended to aid physicians with clinical decision-making regarding CRC screening for patients without defined genetic syndromes. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on select recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, including a section on primary and secondary CRC prevention, and provide context for the panel’s recommendations regarding the age at which to initiate screening in average-risk individuals and those with increased risk based on personal history of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer.

Abstract The Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network conducted a phase 3 randomized trial comparing gilteritinib with placebo after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS); however, patients with FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) peri-HCT had significantly longer RFS with gilteritinib. This analysis investigates the effect of post-HCT gilteritinib vs placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), and EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) at post-HCT randomization; day 29; months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24; and/or end of therapy. HRQOL and clinically meaningful differences were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using mixed model repeated measures to evaluate longitudinal change from baseline and stratified Cox model to evaluate time to improvement. HRQOL completion rate was acceptable (>70%) across all time points and measures. There were no differences in HRQOL scores at any time point between cohorts. Clinically meaningful and time to improvement in HRQOL were similar in both arms. Despite higher treatment-emergent adverse effects with gilteritinib, response to the question of being “bothered by side effects of treatment” did not differ between groups. Subgroup analysis of MRD-positive and negative patients demonstrated no differences in HRQOL between arms. For patients with FLT3-ITD+ AML undergoing HCT, gilteritinib maintenance was not associated with any difference in HRQOL or patient-reported impact of side effects. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02997202.

ImportanceThere is substantial interest in capturing cancer treatment tolerability from the patient’s perspective using patient-reported outcomes (PROs).ObjectiveTo examine whether a PRO question, item 5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General General Physical Wellbeing Scale (GP5), was associated with early treatment discontinuation (ETD) due to adverse events.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective survey study was conducted from February to April 2023. Among participants in the ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 trial (a phase 3, parallel design trial conducted between 2013 and 2019), patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomized to receive bortezomib (VRd) or carfilzomib (KRd) plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone as induction therapy. The GP5 item was administered at baseline (pretreatment) and at 1 month, 2.8 months, and 5.5 months postbaseline. Eligible participants included patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated at community oncology practices or academic medical centers in the US.ExposuresGP5 response options were “very much,” “quite a bit,” “somewhat,” “a little bit,” and “not at all.” Responses at each assessment while undergoing treatment (1 month, 2.8 months, and 5.5 months) were categorized as high adverse event bother (ie, “very much,” and “quite a bit”) and low adverse event bother (ie, “somewhat,” “a little bit,” or “not at all”). In addition, change from baseline to each assessment while undergoing treatment was calculated and categorized as worsening by 1 response category and 2 or more response categories.Main Outcome and MeasureETD due to adverse events (yes vs no) was analyzed using logistic regression adjusting for treatment group, performance status, gender, race, and disease stage.ResultsOf the 1087 participants in the original trial, 1058 (mean [SD] age 64 [9] years; 531 receiving VrD [50.2%]; 527 receiving KRd [49.8%]) responded to item GP5 and were included in the secondary analysis. A small proportion (142 patients [13.4%]) discontinued treatment early due to AEs. For those with high adverse-effect bother, GP5 while undergoing treatment was associated with ETD at 1 month (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.20; 95% CI, 1.25-3.89), 2.8 months (aOR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.01-5.80), and 5.5 months (aOR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.69-12.83). Worsening by 2 or more response categories on the GP5 was associated with ETD at 2.8 months (aOR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.64-5.54) and 5.5 months (aOR, 5.49; 95% CI, 1.45-20.76).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this survey study of the E1A11 trial, worse GP5 response was associated with ETD. These findings suggest that simple assessment of adverse-effect bother while receiving treatment is an efficient way to indicate treatment tolerability and ETD risk.

PURPOSE Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) improves outcomes for patients with AML harboring an internal tandem duplication mutation of FLT3 ( FLT3-ITD) AML. These patients are routinely treated with a FLT3 inhibitor after HCT, but there is limited evidence to support this. Accordingly, we conducted a randomized trial of post-HCT maintenance with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02997202 ) to determine if all such patients benefit or if detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) could identify those who might benefit. METHODS Adults with FLT3-ITD AML in first remission underwent HCT and were randomly assigned to placebo or 120 mg once daily gilteritinib for 24 months after HCT. The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and the effect of MRD pre- and post-HCT on RFS and OS. RESULTS Three hundred fifty-six participants were randomly assigned post-HCT to receive gilteritinib or placebo. Although RFS was higher in the gilteritinib arm, the difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR], 0.679 [95% CI, 0.459 to 1.005]; two-sided P = .0518). However, 50.5% of participants had MRD detectable pre- or post-HCT, and, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, gilteritinib was beneficial in this population (HR, 0.515 [95% CI, 0.316 to 0.838]; P = .0065). Those without detectable MRD showed no benefit (HR, 1.213 [95% CI, 0.616 to 2.387]; P = .575). CONCLUSION Although the overall improvement in RFS was not statistically significant, RFS was higher for participants with detectable FLT3-ITD MRD pre- or post-HCT who received gilteritinib treatment. To our knowledge, these data are among the first to support the effectiveness of MRD-based post-HCT therapy.

PURPOSE The phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in combination with either bevacizumab or cetuximab. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and gene expression using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and NanoString data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (FoundationOne CDx). Tumor tissue from 925 patients was tested for NanoString gene expression using an 800-gene panel. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were the time-to-event end points. RESULTS High HER2 expression (dichotomized at median) was associated with longer PFS (11.6 v 10 months, P = .012) and OS (32 v 25.3 months, P = .033), independent of treatment. An OS benefit for cetuximab versus bevacizumab was observed in the high HER2 expression group ( P = .02), whereas a worse PFS for cetuximab was seen in the low-expression group ( P = .019). When modeled as a continuous variable, increased HER2 expression was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93]; adjusted P = .0007) and PFS (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.91]; adjusted P = .0002), reaching a plateau effect after the median. In patients with HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with cetuximab was associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.71]; adjusted P = .0027) and OS (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59]; adjusted P = .03) compared with that with bevacizumab. A significant interaction between HER2 expression and the treatment arm was observed for OS ( P intx = .017), PFS ( P intx = .048), and objective response rate ( P intx = .001). CONCLUSION HER2 gene expression was prognostic and predictive in CALGB/SWOG 80405. HER2 tumor expression may inform treatment selection for patients with low HER2 favoring bevacizumab- versus cetuximab-based therapies.