Citations

Abstract Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a known precursor and sequelae to diagnosed cardiovascular disease (CVD). ED severity predicts CVD severity. AUA guidelines recommend evaluating serum lipids and using an ED diagnosis as an opportunity to discuss and address cardiovascular risk. Serum plasma ceramides are novel predictors of adverse cardiovascular events independent of traditional risk factors such as LDL and hsCRP levels. Ceramide levels improve with lifestyle modification. Objective We aimed to evaluate the utility of ceramide levels in ED patients utilizing self-reported erectile function results (IIEF-6). Methods We initiated ceramide testing in all patients with ED and Peyronie’s disease in late 2019 (in addition to lipids, Hgba1c, etc). We retrospectively analyzed ceramide levels from electronic records with IIEF-6 results. For the statistical analysis we dichotomized our cohort by ED symptom severity (moderate/severe ED: IIEF ≤17 vs. no/mild ED: IIEF ≥18) and ceramide levels by CV risk strata (moderate or higher >6). A Fisher exact test was performed. Results A total of 354 patients were reviewed, of these 253 (71.4%) had moderate ED or higher. A statistically significant difference in abnormal ceramide values was found in patients with mild to moderate symptoms severity or higher, and the odds of getting an abnormal ceramide test was increased based on the IIEF scoring alone (OR 2.3 [1.04– 5.12]; p value = 0.034) [Figure]. Conclusions Patients undergoing management for erectile dysfunction may benefit from serum ceramide testing and subsequent cardiac referral. In our cohort, men with moderate to severe ED were twice as likely to have actionable ceramide levels. Further study is warranted to optimize utility of ceramide in men with ED and potentially drive lifestyle change. Disclosure No.

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is associated with high patient satisfaction and improved sexual quality of life in medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). While reported patient satisfaction with this surgery is high, there are a variety of factors that can influence patient satisfaction after PP surgery. Objective We aimed to identify factors responsible for patient dissatisfaction after PP surgery. Methods We initiated a registry of patients undergoing surgery for placement of a PP. After consent, Perioperative study assessments and follow-ups were conducted. After surgery, patients were directed to fulfill a survey at 6 months and 12 months. Patients who completed both surveys were included in the analysis. Results A total of 304 patients had a PP placement, of these 101completed at least the first survey. Patients reported using their PP a median of 4 (2-8) times per month at 6 months, and 5 (2-9) at 12 months (p = 0.651). Main reasons of lack of use of the PP can be seen in Fig. 1A. The most frequent reported reason was lack of interest from partner (20.3% at 6-months, 18.8% at 12-months). Patient reported reasons for dissatisfaction are seen in Fig. 1B. Examples include penile pain (19% at 6-months, 11% at 12-months), difficulty with orgasm (39% at 6-months, 37% at 12-months), unsatisfactory penile cosmesis (28% at 6-months, and 25% at 12-months), problems inflating of the prosthesis (14.9% at 6-months, and 21.5% at 12-months), and problems deflating of the prosthesis (33.7% at 6-months, and 31.6% at 12-months). Despite these concerns, most patients found PP easy to use (83.2% at 6-months, and 82.1% at 12-months) and a reported a very or somewhat natural sensation with their erections (66.4% at 6-months, and 62.8% at 12-months) Fig. 1C. Conclusions There was a higher than anticipated rate of penile pain, difficulty achieving climax, and unsatisfactory cosmesis that warrant further investigation. Despite this, the majority of patients found their PP easy to use and a reported natural sensation when having erections. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study.

AbstractBackgroundNeoadjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy offers a modest survival advantage in muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) for patients with pathologic response. B7‐H3 (CD276), an immune checkpoint overexpressed in various cancers, including urothelial‐cell carcinoma (UCC), has been associated with chemoresistance and poor oncologic outcomes. We aimed to explore if B7H3 expression on bladder biopsy samples was a predictive biomarker for pathologic response to neoadjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study among MIBC patients receiving neoadjuvant platinum‐based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. All patients underwent routine preoperative biopsy of their tumour. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate B7‐H3 expression from pre‐operative specimens. The primary outcome of interest was pathologic complete response (pCR). Statistical analysis included Mann–Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox regression for survival analysis.ResultsAmong 87 patients analysed, high B7‐H3 expression was found in 44.8% (n = 39) of patients. The median follow‐up periods were similar between the high and low B7‐H3 groups (high expression; 4.29 years [SD 3.04], low expression 3.94 years [SD 3.04], p = 0.60). Only 20.5% of patients with high B7‐H3 expression achieved pCR, compared to 41.7% in the low expression group (p = 0.04). Cox regression showed no significant differences in recurrence‐free or cancer‐specific survival between the high and low B7‐H3 expression groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionHigh B7‐H3 expression is associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving pCR in MIBC patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This suggests B7‐H3's potential as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response. Further research is needed to explore the role of B7‐H3 on platinum‐based chemotherapy response in urothelial cancer.

Introduction: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) is characterized by clonal cell deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin causing renal manifestations without overt malignancy. MIDD is a subtype of MGRS characterized by deposition of monoclonal light (LCDD), heavy chains (HCDD), or both (LHCDD) along the renal glomerular and tubular basement membranes. Virtually all organs can be involved, and if left untreated, MIDD can progress to MM and end stage renal disease. Although these patients classically did not receive treatment, current MIDD management is primarily focused on controlling the underlying clonal plasma cell disorder. Case description: We present a 56-year-old male with atypical MIDD treated successfully with plasma cell directed therapy consisting of daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DARA-CYBOR-D). Despite a primary diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease, renal biopsy suggested myeloma-related MIDD based on linear immunofluorescent staining for IgG and kappa light chains along the tubular and glomerular basement membranes. Notably there were no electron dense deposits in the mesangium or tubular basement membranes typical to MIDD electron microscopy. Despite the presentation of MIDD on IF only, DARA-CYBOR-D treatment led to hematologic and renal improvement and remission from MIDD, with a GFR increase from 22 to 59 mL/min/BSA and a drop in urine protein from up to 9 to 0.6 g/dL. Conclusions: In conclusion, our case illustrates the efficacy of the DARA-CYBOR-D regimen in a patient with IF-only MIDD. We highlight the importance of obtaining a kidney biopsy when there are other potential causes for real decline and enhance our understanding of pathological and clinical spectrum of MIDD.

Background: Approximately 30% of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cases present with de novo metastatic disease, while 20% to 30% of those with localized disease will develop metastases following surgical resection. Various drug classes have been investigated to treat RCC, including cytokine-based therapies, small molecule Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody-based therapies. Up to 58% of patients fail to respond to primary immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, and nearly all initial responders experience disease progression due to the development of secondary resistance. Consequently, novel treatment options are being investigated. Objective: Review the rapidly evolving ADC therapeutic landscape in metastatic RCC including recent trials, emerging ADCs targets, and future directions for ADCs in the treatment of advanced RCC. Methods: Literature review using the MEDLINE database on important trials and presentations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) conferences. Key words used included “renal cell carcinoma,” “RCC,” “metastatic RCC,” “advanced RCC,” “antibody-based therapies,” “immunotherapy,” “clinical trials,” and “emerging drugs.” Specifically for review of ADCs in RCC, the following search string was used with additional review of bibliographies from retrieved papers: “((antibody drug conjugate) OR (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity) OR (chimeric antigen receptor)) AND ((kidney cancer) OR (renal cell carcinoma))”. Results: Several promising targets including MMP14, EGFR, MCT4, CA9, MET, CDH13, B7-H3, and PSMA were identified with relevant preclinical and clinical studies reviewed. Conclusions: While ADCs therapeutics have not shown benefit to date for renal cell carcinoma, there are ample promising candidates and targets for future research.

AbstractPatient‐derived cancer organoids (PDOs) hold considerable promise for personalizing therapy selection and improving patient outcomes. However, it is challenging to generate PDOs in sufficient numbers to test therapies in standard culture platforms. This challenge is particularly acute for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) where most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage with non‐resectable tumors and where patient tissue is in the form of needle biopsies. Here the development and characterization of microfluidic devices for testing therapies using a limited amount of tissue or PDOs available from PDAC biopsies is described. It is demonstrated that microfluidic PDOs are phenotypically and genotypically similar to the gold‐standard Matrigel organoids with the advantages of 1) spheroid uniformity, 2) minimal cell number requirement, and 3) not relying on Matrigel. The utility of microfluidic PDOs is proven by testing PDO responses to several chemotherapies, including an inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase (GSKI). In addition, microfluidic organoid cultures are used to test effectiveness of immunotherapy comprised of NK cells in combination with a novel biologic. In summary, our microfluidic device offers considerable benefits for personalizing oncology based on cancer biopsies and may, in the future, be developed into a companion diagnostic for chemotherapy or immunotherapy treatments.

Abstract In the past decade, vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has become clinical reality for reconstruction after face and hand trauma. It offers patients the unique opportunity to regain form and function in a way that had only been achieved with traditional reconstruction or with the use of prostheses. On the other hand, prostheses for facial and hand reconstruction have continued to evolve over the years and, in many cases, represent the primary option for patients after hand and face trauma. We compared the cost, associated complications, and long-term outcomes of VCA with prostheses for reconstruction of the face and hand/upper extremity. Ultimately, VCA and prostheses represent 2 different reconstructive options with distinct benefit profiles and associated limitations and should ideally not be perceived as competing choices. Our work adds a valuable component to the general framework guiding the decision to offer VCA or prostheses for reconstruction after face and upper extremity trauma.

The snATAC + snRNA platform allows epigenomic profiling of open chromatin and gene expression with single-cell resolution. The most critical assay step is to isolate high-quality nuclei to proceed with droplet-base single nuclei isolation and barcoding. With the increasing popularity of multiomic profiling in various fields, there is a need for optimized and reliable nuclei isolation methods, mainly for human tissue samples. Herein we compared different nuclei isolation methods for cell suspensions, such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC, n = 18) and a solid tumor type, ovarian cancer (OC, n = 18), derived from debulking surgery. Nuclei morphology and sequencing output parameters were used to evaluate the quality of preparation. Our results show that NP-40 detergent-based nuclei isolation yields better sequencing results than collagenase tissue dissociation for OC, significantly impacting cell type identification and analysis. Given the utility of applying such techniques to frozen samples, we also tested frozen preparation and digestion (n = 6). A paired comparison between frozen and fresh samples validated the quality of both specimens. Finally, we demonstrate the reproducibility of scRNA and snATAC + snRNA platform, by comparing the gene expression profiling of PBMC. Our results highlight how the choice of nuclei isolation methods is critical for obtaining quality data in multiomic assays. It also shows that the measurement of expression between scRNA and snRNA is comparable and effective for cell type identification.

e17535 Background: High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is the most frequent and deadliest type of ovarian cancer (OC). With the recent advances in transcriptomic and epigenomic profiling of cancer at single cell resolution, it has become clear that intra-tumor heterogeneity driven by genetic and epigenetic factors may be the basis of drug resistance. Current treatments are not homogeneously effective against all the cancer cell subpopulations, thus enabling resistance. With single cell sequencing technology, characterization of cell signatures and regulatory mechanisms may translate to prognostic markers and novel drug targets. Methods: The transcriptomic and epigenomic landscape of HGSOC was mapped for five tumor samples from debulking surgeries and one tissue patient-derived xenograft (PDX) using the 10X genomics sequencing platform. This strategy permits the combination of single cell ATAC-seq and single cell RNA-seq within the same nucleus (Multiome). Isolation of nuclei, library preparation and sequencing were performed following 10X genomics protocols. Sample quality and library quality were assessed by nuclear morphology and fragment size analysis, respectively. Sequenced reads were mapped to the human genome and downstream analysis including copy number variant prediction, pathway enrichment, motif enrichment and gene regulatory network analysis were performed. The sampled patients continue to be followed for clinical outcomes, such as response to therapy. Clinical data including patient age, grade, and stage of cancer, debulking status, CA-125 levels, and neoadjuvant status, were used in conjunction with the genomics data to characterize patient specific molecular regulatory signatures. Results: Cells from the six samples (total N= 26,421) were projected via UMAP. Immune and stromal cells were shown to cluster by cell-type while cancer cells clustered by patient. Cancer cells were identified as cycling cells, ciliated cells, cells with enrichment of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, and cells exhibiting cancer stemness signatures. Transcription factor motifs and binding-site enrichment in open chromatin regions reveal transcription regulation-based subpopulations. Using the combined gene expression and open chromatin information from these cells, there is potential to uncover the genetic regulatory network(s) that drives treatment resistance. Conclusions: With single cell technology, specific clusters of cancer and tumor microenvironment cells can be classified. Beyond characterizing patient specific signatures, multiome enables the discovery of genomic, transcriptomic and epigenomic signatures that provide insight in tumor progression and treatment resistance.