Oyemade, Kafayat A.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of graft fixation using interrupted, full-thickness sutures on graft detachment after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK). Methods: All DSEK procedures performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from 2015 through 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Risk factors for graft detachment were defined as previous incisional glaucoma surgery, previous penetrating keratoplasty, or absence of the normal lens–capsule barrier. Cases were categorized into sutured, high-risk grafts; unsutured, high-risk grafts; and unsutured, low-risk grafts. The primary outcome was graft detachment, and secondary outcomes were early graft failure and graft clarity at 12 months after surgery. Results: Demographics between the high-risk groups were similar for sex and age at the time of surgery. Graft detachment occurred in 4 of 97 sutured, high-risk eyes (4.1%) and 24 of 119 unsutured high-risk eyes (20.2%) (P = 0.002). In comparison, graft detachment occurred in 18 of 181 unsutured low-risk eyes (9.9%). The incidence of early graft failure was 2.1%, 5.0%, and 3.3% and late graft failure by 12 months was 9.8%, 12.8%, and 4.2%, respectively. Conclusions: In eyes with high-risk factors for graft detachment, suture fixation of the graft in DSEK decreased graft detachment to a rate at least as low as that in low-risk eyes.

AbstractBackgroundGiven that abdominal aorta is a retroperitoneal structure, increased body mass index (BMI) may have an adverse effect upon the quality of aortic ultrasonographic imaging.PurposeTo assess the hypothesis that increased BMI is associated with worsening point‐of‐care abdominal aortic ultrasonographic image quality.MethodsThis is a retrospective single‐center study of point‐of‐care abdominal aortic ultrasound examinations performed in an academic emergency department (ED) with fellowship‐trained emergency ultrasonography faculty performing quality assurance review.ResultsMean ± SD BMI was 27.4 ± 6.2, among the 221 included records. The overall quality rating decreased as BMI increased (correlation coefficient − 0.24; P < .001) and this persisted after adjustment for age and sex (P < .001). Although BMI was higher on average in the records that were of insufficient quality for clinical decisions when compared with those of sufficient quality (mean BMI 28.7 vs 27.0), this did not reach statistical significance in a univariable setting (P = .11) or after adjusting for age and sex (P = .14).ConclusionThis study data shows a decrease in point‐of‐care abdominal aorta ultrasound imaging quality as BMI increases, though this difference did not result in a statistically significant impairment in achieving the minimum quality for clinical decisions. This finding may help ameliorate some clinician concerns about ultrasonography for patients with high BMI.

AbstractBackgroundMany clinicians believe that a patient's body mass index (BMI) affects the likelihood of obtaining high quality ultrasound images.ObjectivesTo assess the hypothesis that increased BMI is associated with worsening focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) image quality.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective single‐center study of FAST examinations performed in a large academic emergency department (ED) with fellowship‐trained emergency ultrasonography faculty performing quality assurance review.ResultsMean (SD) BMI was 28.0 (6.6) among the 302 included studies. The overall quality rating tended to decrease as BMI increased but did not achieve statistical significance in a univariable setting (P = .06) or after adjustment for age and sex (P = .06). Operators perception of image adequacy was largely unaffected by BMI, with the exception of the pericardial view.ConclusionThis study did not identify a statistically significant difference in FAST quality with increased BMI. This result may help assuage clinician concerns about ultrasonography for patients in the ED.

In recent years, the use of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in clinical practice has increased substantially . Many medical schools have introduced ultrasound skills training into their curriculum which starts early in anatomy courses . Few, if any, of these programs assess students’ ultrasound knowledge and skills in a simulated clinical team environment. Anatomy Ultrasound Objective Structural Practical Examination (OSPE) implemented as a part of practical examination provides such an opportunity to asses both traditional and non‐traditional discipline‐independent skills, competencies and attributes. As part of the seven‐week anatomy course at Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, first‐year medical students attended four ultrasound sessions. Each session included a short didactic module followed by hands‐on practice guided by near‐peer teachers. For the final examination, four‐member student teams were required to work collaboratively to perform four different scans during which students interacted with multiple standardized patients and rotated responsibility for obtaining an image, orienting the image, and identifying assigned structures. Students were graded using a rubric and received a team‐score based on tasks associated with individual roles of team members. In addition to ultrasound skills, the nature of their professional interactions with patient, communication skills, and situational awareness were assessed. The average team score was 96%. The students completed a survey at the conclusion of the anatomy course in which they rated the OSPE experience very positively. Team‐based OSPE examination was a clinically relevant and effective mechanism to simultaneously evaluate anatomic knowledge, clinical skills, and non‐traditional discipline‐independent skills that were emphasized during the anatomy course. Support or Funding Information