Hyde, Robert J.

Introduction Individuals ascending to elevations above 2500 m are at risk of developing altitude illness. We sought to establish the incidence and to determine what risk factors, if any, increased the likelihood of developing acute mountain sickness (AMS) in adolescents at Philmont Scout Ranch (PSR) in Cimarron, New Mexico. PSR, with elevations ranging from 2011 to 3792 m, attracts thousands of adolescent participants each year, many of whom arrive from lower elevations with little or no experience ascending to high altitude. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of adolescent participants aged 14 to 19 years who ascended to a minimum of 3000 m while trekking from June to July 2021. Prior to the start of each participant's trek, pretrek survey data were obtained at PSR's basecamp (2011 m). During the trek at 3048 m, the Lake Louise AMS score was used to diagnose AMS. Results The incidence of AMS in our study was 13.7%. Participants reporting a history of daily headaches had more than four times the risk of developing AMS. A history of gastrointestinal problems carried three times the risk of developing AMS, and a prior history of AMS increased the risk of developing AMS by 44%. Conclusions Our findings enhance our understanding of AMS risk in adolescents and may provide guidance to youth for developing AMS. For individuals with a history of headaches or gastrointestinal problems or a prior history of AMS, there may be an opportunity to reduce the risk of developing AMS.

AbstractBackgroundGiven that abdominal aorta is a retroperitoneal structure, increased body mass index (BMI) may have an adverse effect upon the quality of aortic ultrasonographic imaging.PurposeTo assess the hypothesis that increased BMI is associated with worsening point‐of‐care abdominal aortic ultrasonographic image quality.MethodsThis is a retrospective single‐center study of point‐of‐care abdominal aortic ultrasound examinations performed in an academic emergency department (ED) with fellowship‐trained emergency ultrasonography faculty performing quality assurance review.ResultsMean ± SD BMI was 27.4 ± 6.2, among the 221 included records. The overall quality rating decreased as BMI increased (correlation coefficient − 0.24; P < .001) and this persisted after adjustment for age and sex (P < .001). Although BMI was higher on average in the records that were of insufficient quality for clinical decisions when compared with those of sufficient quality (mean BMI 28.7 vs 27.0), this did not reach statistical significance in a univariable setting (P = .11) or after adjusting for age and sex (P = .14).ConclusionThis study data shows a decrease in point‐of‐care abdominal aorta ultrasound imaging quality as BMI increases, though this difference did not result in a statistically significant impairment in achieving the minimum quality for clinical decisions. This finding may help ameliorate some clinician concerns about ultrasonography for patients with high BMI.