Citations

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an alternative to surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis, but data are limited on younger, low-risk patients. This analysis compares outcomes in low-surgical-risk patients aged <75 years receiving TAVR versus surgery. METHODS: The Evolut Low Risk Trial randomized 1414 low-risk patients to treatment with a supra-annular, self-expanding TAVR or surgery. We compared rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke, associated clinical outcomes, and bioprosthetic valve performance at 3 years between TAVR and surgery patients aged <75 years. RESULTS: In patients <75 years, 352 were randomized to TAVR and 351 to surgery. Mean age was 69.1±4.0 years (minimum 51 and maximum 74); Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 1.7±0.6%. At 3 years, all-cause mortality or disabling stroke for TAVR was 5.7% and 8.0% for surgery ( P =0.241). Although there was no difference between TAVR and surgery in all-cause mortality, the incidence of disabling stroke was lower with TAVR (0.6%) than surgery (2.9%; P =0.019), while surgery was associated with a lower incidence of pacemaker implantation (7.1%) compared with TAVR (21.0%; P <0.001). Valve reintervention rates (TAVR 1.5%, surgery 1.5%, P =0.962) were low in both groups. Valve performance was significantly better with TAVR than surgery with lower mean aortic gradients ( P <0.001) and lower rates of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch ( P <0.001). Rates of valve thrombosis and endocarditis were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in rates of residual ≥moderate paravalvular regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk patients <75 years treated with supra-annular, self-expanding TAVR had comparable 3-year all-cause mortality and lower disabling stroke compared with patients treated with surgery. There was significantly better valve performance in patients treated with TAVR. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02701283.

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor type 1 ( ITPR1 ), 2 ( ITPR2 ), and 3 ( ITPR3 ) encode the IP3 receptor (IP3R), a key player in intracellular calcium release. In four unrelated patients, we report that an identical ITPR3 de novo variant—NM_002224.3:c.7570C>T, p.Arg2524Cys—causes, through a dominant-negative effect, a complex multisystemic disorder with immunodeficiency. This leads to defective calcium homeostasis, mitochondrial malfunction, CD4 + lymphopenia, a quasi-absence of naïve CD4 + and CD8 + cells, an increase in memory cells, and a distinct TCR repertoire. The calcium defect was recapitulated in Jurkat knock-in. Site-directed mutagenesis displayed the exquisite sensitivity of Arg 2524 to any amino acid change. Despite the fact that all patients had severe immunodeficiency, they also displayed variable multisystemic involvements, including ectodermal dysplasia, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, short stature, and bone marrow failure. In conclusion, unlike previously reported ITPR1-3 deficiencies leading to narrow, mainly neurological phenotypes, a recurrent dominant ITPR3 variant leads to a multisystemic disease, defining a unique role for IP3R3 in the tetrameric IP3R complex.

e20097 Background: Malignant Mesothelioma (MMe) is a neoplasm of mesothelium and has a very poor survival rate. Over half the patients of MMe express programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) which binds to the PD-1 receptor on T-cells which in turn suppresses their ability to kill tumors. Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 inhibitor antibody and it has shown efficacy in combating MMe. Our analysis aims to summarize data related to objective response rates (ORR) and adverse effects of Pembrolizumab therapy in MMe patients. Methods: We conducted an online search through PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from their inception till January 25, 2024, to identify studies that reported the use of Pembrolizumab in patients with MMe. Data were extracted and analyzed and proportions with their 95% confidence interval have been reported. Onlinemeta v1.0 was used for all analyses. Results: A total of six studies with 549 patients reported the use of Pembrolizumab in patients with MMe. ORR was observed in 36.2% (32.3% - 40.4%; p < 0.01) of patients receiving Pembrolizumab while 20.4% (17.2%- 24.0%; p < 0.01) of patients experienced adverse effects of the therapy. Median survival ranged from 9.5 to 17.3 months whereas progression-free survival ranged from 2.5 to 7.1 months in patients. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab has an ORR and safety profile comparable to other immunotherapies. Further studies are needed to extensively study the drug and its effects in detail in patients with MMe. [Table: see text]

e18073 Background: Selpercatinib is a highly selective RET inhibitor that is used for the treatment of RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancers, but its efficacy and safety is not fully understood. Our objective is to summarize available literature on the safety and efficacy profile of Selpercatinib. Methods: A search was conducted on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from foundation to 31st January 2024. Patients aged above 18 with Advanced RET-Altered Medullary Thyroid Cancers who received Selpercatinib were identified. Data abstraction was done based on objective response rate, complete response rate, any grade adverse effect (AE) and grade ≥3 AE. Analysis was done using R (v.4.3) and reported as proportions with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) on forest plots. Results: Four studies were identified that reported the use of Selpercatinib in Advanced RET-Altered Medullary Thyroid Cancers. Our analysis showed that the pooled proportion of objective response rate and complete response rate was 74.8% (95% CI: 70.1% – 79%) and 4.9% (95% CI: 3.1% – 7.7%) respectively. Pooled proportion of patients experiencing any grade AE and grade ≥3 AE was 93.4% (95% CI: 90.4% – 95.6%) and 46.2% (95% CI: 41.1% – 51.3%) respectively. Conclusions: Selpercatinib is a novel RET inhibitor which has potential use against RET-Altered Thyroid Cancers. It has an overall acceptable safety and efficacy profile. However it requires further studies to establish its adverse effects and clinical application. [Table: see text]

e16531 Background: Hypoxia-inducible Factor-2α (HIF-2α) is a transcription factor that accumulates in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and is responsible for genes involved in oncogenesis. Belzutifan is a HIF-2α inhibitor that has shown promising anti-tumor effects in patients with ccRCC. Our objective is to summarize the available literature on the safety and efficacy profile of the drug. Methods: An electronic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane from inception till January 31st, 2024. We identified patients aged ≥ 18 years with ccRCC who received Belzutifan. We extracted data on objective response rate, complete response rate, any grade adverse effect (AE) and grade ≥3 AE. Data was analyzed using R (v.4.3) and reported as proportions with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) on forest plots. Results: Three studies (n=168 patients) were identified that reported the use of Belzutifan in ccRCC. Our analysis showed that pooled proportion of objective response rate and complete response rate was 35% (95% CI: 24% – 47%) and 1% (95% CI: 0% – 5%) respectively. Pooled proportion of patients experiencing any grade AE and grade ≥3 AE was 98% (95% CI: 95% – 99%) and 49% (95% CI: 29% – 69%) respectively. Conclusions: Belzutifan is a novel drug that inhibits HIF-2α which in turn results in anti-tumor effects of the drug against ccRCC. The drug has an acceptable safety and efficacy profile from limited data but more studies are needed to establish a complete picture of drug’s adverse effects and clinical benefits. Pooled proportion of patients developing (A) Objective Response, (B) Complete response (C) Any adverse effect and (D) Grade ≥3 adverse effects. [Table: see text]

e24003 Background: Cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy suffer from a variable degree of cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction and heart failure (HF). It is known that sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with HF independent of diabetes mellitus and left ventricular ejection fraction; our study aims to investigate the potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitory therapy specifically in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods: We performed an electronic search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, from the inception of databases till January 29, 2024, to identify all the articles that compared the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in adult (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and exposure to cardiotoxic antineoplastic therapy, subsequently diagnosed with cardiomyopathy, heart failure, or LVEF < 40%. The data was extracted and pooled using a random effects model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with a respective 95% confidence interval (CI). R software (v.4.3) was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Our search identified three observational studies with a total of 3,164 patients (SGLT2- inhibitor group: 1,550; Control group: 1,614). We found that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.25 [0.20, 0.31]; I2 = 16%; p < 0.001), hospitalizations from heart failure (OR: 0.25 [0.10, 0.62]; I2 = 0%; p = 0.003), and acute exacerbation of heart failure (OR: 0.35 [0.27, 0.47]; I2 = 0%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest a favorable association between the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and reduced mortality, as well as improved cardiac clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, further validation through large-scale studies and randomized controlled trials across diverse malignancies is warranted to establish the efficacy of these drugs. [Table: see text]

ObjectiveNeuroinflammatory adverse events have been observed among new users of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. No studies to date have compared the real‐world risk of TNFs with other new users of biologic or targeted synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). The objective of this study is to describe the risk of neuroinflammatory disease after initiation b/tsDMARDs.MethodsThis new user comparative effectiveness cohort study used a large US‐based electronic health records database to describe the unadjusted incidence of neuroinflammatory adverse events over a 3‐year period. The cohort included patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis initiating treatment with a TNF inhibitor (n = 93,661) or other b/tsDMARD (n = 38,354).ResultsAmong 132,015 patients included in the analysis, the most common first biologic agent was a TNF inhibitor; the unadjusted incidence of neuroinflammatory events was numerically lower among new users of TNF inhibitors (incidence 1.34 per 1,000 patient‐years) as compared with the combined non‐TNF group (1.69 per 1,000 patient‐years). There was no significant association between TNF exposure and neuroinflammatory events as compared with the combined non‐TNF b/tsDMARDs overall (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.75–1.36) and within each disease group.ConclusionThe overall risk of neuroinflammatory events among new users of TNF inhibitors did not differ substantially as compared with new users of other b/tsDMARDs. Meta‐analyses of randomized trials should be conducted to corroborate these findings, which may be affected by channeling bias.

Abstract ELEVATE-RR demonstrated noninferior progression-free survival and lower incidence of key adverse events (AEs) with acalabrutinib vs ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. We further characterize AEs of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib via post hoc analysis. Overall and exposure-adjusted incidence rate was assessed for common Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor–associated AEs and for selected events of clinical interest (ECIs). AE burden scores based on previously published methodology were calculated for AEs overall and selected ECIs. Safety analyses included 529 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 266; ibrutinib, n = 263). Among common AEs, incidences of any-grade diarrhea, arthralgia, urinary tract infection, back pain, muscle spasms, and dyspepsia were higher with ibrutinib, with 1.5- to 4.1-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rates. Incidences of headache and cough were higher with acalabrutinib, with 1.6- and 1.2-fold higher exposure-adjusted incidence rate, respectively. Among ECIs, incidences of any-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding were higher with ibrutinib, as were exposure-adjusted incidence rates (2.0-, 2.8-, and 1.6-fold, respectively); incidences of cardiac events overall (the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities system organ class) and infections were similar between arms. Rate of discontinuation because of AEs was lower for acalabrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.93). AE burden score was higher for ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib overall and for the ECIs atrial fibrillation/flutter, hypertension, and bleeding. A limitation of this analysis is its open-label study design, which may influence the reporting of more subjective AEs. Overall, event-based analyses and AE burden scores demonstrated higher AE burden overall and specifically for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hemorrhage with ibrutinib vs acalabrutinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02477696.

Objective To evaluate whether transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR or SAVR) affects clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in symptomatic patients with moderately-severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods Echocardiographic evidence of severe AS for enrolment in the Evolut Low Risk trial was based on site-reported measurements. For this post hoc analysis, core laboratory measurements identified patients with symptomatic moderately-severe AS (1.0<aortic valve area (AVA)<1.5 cm2, 3.0<peak velocity<4.0 m/s and 20≤mean gradient (MG) <40 mm Hg). Clinical outcomes were reported through 2 years. Results Moderately-severe AS was identified in 113 out of 1414 patients (8%). Baseline AVA was 1.1±0.1 cm2, peak velocity 3.7±0.2 m/s, MG 32.7±4.8 mm Hg and aortic valve calcium volume 588 (364, 815) mm3. Valve haemodynamics improved following TAVR (AVA 2.5±0.7 cm2, peak velocity 1.9±0.5 m/s and MG 8.4±4.8 mm Hg; p<0.001 for all) and SAVR (AVA 2.0±0.6 cm2, peak velocity 2.1±0.4 m/s and MG 10.0±3.4 mm Hg; p<0.001 for all). At 24 months, the rates of death or disabling stroke were similar (TAVR 7.7% vs SAVR 6.5%; p=0.82). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score assessing quality of life improved from baseline to 30 days after TAVR (67.0±20.6 to 89.3±13.4; p<0.001) and SAVR (67.5±19.6 to 78.3±22.3; p=0.001). Conclusions In symptomatic patients with moderately-severe AS, AVR appears to be beneficial. Determination of the clinical and haemodynamic profile of patients who can benefit from earlier isolated AVR needs further investigation in randomised clinical trials.