Citations

Abstract Objective Pediatric epilepsy surgery is well established, but contemporary global data on referral and presurgical evaluation practices are lacking. This International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Task Force study provides an updated overview of current trends and regional differences. Methods Group‐level data were collected from 61 epilepsy surgery programs (49 pediatric‐only) across 29 countries and six continents, identified through ILAE networks, and included all children and adolescents treated in 2023 who underwent presurgical evaluation/epilepsy surgery. Results Group‐level data were available for 2427 patients. Mean age at surgery was 9.1 ± 4.9 years; mean epilepsy duration was 5.3. At surgery, 3.2% were <1 year old (highest in Oceania: 5.1%), and 6.1% were nonpharmacoresistant (highest in Europe: 15.0%). Prior neurosurgery was reported in 14.2% (highest in North America: 28.8%), including 8.0% resections (6.1% for epilepsy, 1.5% for tumors; highest in Oceania: 16.5%), 2.3% disconnections (1.3% corpus callosotomy; highest in South America: 4.7%), and 4.2% neuromodulation (3.7% vagal nerve stimulation, .2% responsive neurostimulation, one deep brain stimulation; highest in North America: 12.2%). Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) at surgery included Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (7.4%), infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (5.1%), and DEE with spike–wave activation in sleep (1.5%). Presurgical investigations included fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (52.6%; highest in Oceania: 79.7%), genetic testing (46.8%; highest in Asia: 54.3%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) postprocessing (32.4%; highest in South America: 53.0%), functional MRI (fMRI; 15.2%; highest in North America: 40.3%), magnetoencephalography (11.9%; highest in North America: 39.3%), single photon emission computed tomography (9.6%; highest in North America: 22.2%), high‐density electroencephalography (EEG; 1.9%; highest in Europe: 4.7%), source localization (1.6%; highest in Oceania: 7.6%), Wada test (1.2%; highest in North America: 3.5%), and EEG‐fMRI (.5%; highest in Europe: 1.1%). Significance Despite some early surgeries, including in infancy and before pharmacoresistance, mean epilepsy duration before surgery remains >5 years. Reoperations are common, with resection more frequent than neuromodulation. Genetic testing in nearly half of patients reflects its growing relevance, and the high rate of DEEs underscores the complexity of surgical candidates.

Importance Preoperative and perioperative nivolumab improve event-free survival in resectable non–small cell lung cancer. The role of adjuvant nivolumab after upfront surgery is unknown. Objective To determine whether adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with resected non–small cell lung cancer with any tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and in those with at least 50% PD-L1 expression. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, randomized phase 3 study enrolled participants from May 2016 through September 2019, with median follow-up of 72.6 months at the data cutoff in December 2025. The study was conducted at 378 centers in the US National Clinical Trials Network. Patients were identified through a screening trial. Those with resected tumors at least 4 cm and/or who were lymph node positive (N1/N2) were eligible for inclusion after completion of planned standard adjuvant therapy if the tumor was adenocarcinoma without sensitizing sequence variants in EGFR and ALK or squamous cell carcinoma. Intervention Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 1 year or standard care observation. Main Outcomes and Measures Co–primary end points were disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population and in those with tumoral PD-L1 expression at least 50%. Overall survival was examined if the corresponding test of disease-free survival was statistically significant. Results A total of 466 patients (median age, 66 years; 241 [52%] male) were assigned to receive nivolumab and 469 (median age, 67 years; 245 [52%] male) to undergo standard care observation. The median duration of follow-up was 72.6 months. The trial was stopped for futility at 75% information. In the intention-to-treat population, median disease-free survival was 71.3 months with nivolumab and 68.8 months with observation (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.97 [97% CI, 0.79-1.20]; [95% CI, 0.81-1.17]; 1-sided P = .39). In the subset of participants with PD-L1 of at least 50%, median disease-free survival was 89.8 months with nivolumab and 78.5 months with observation (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.86 [98% CI, 0.55-1.34]; [95% CI, 0.59-1.25]; 1-sided P = .22). Conclusions and Relevance Adjuvant nivolumab was not associated with improved disease-free survival in patients with resected non–small cell lung cancer without sensitizing EGFR and ALK alterations when given after planned adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02595944

Abstract Background Sepsis is a life-threatening condition in which delayed recognition and treatment are associated with increased mortality. While predictive models such as Epic’s Early Detection of Sepsis Model (ESM) were developed to support early intervention, their real-world impact after integration into clinical workflows remains difficult to evaluate. Objectives To evaluate the real-world impact of ESM integrated into clinical workflow on clinical outcomes, antibiotic use, and harm-benefit tradeoffs. Methods We conducted a quasi-experimental study in a single healthcare system using encounter-level data from inpatient settings. Inpatient mortality, prolonged hospitalization, antibiotic use, and sepsis prevalence were compared between the pre-implementation period (3 June 2023 to 20 August 2024) and the online period (21 August 2024 to 26 December 2024) when the model became visible to clinicians. We also applied a counterfactual framework using models trained on pre-implementation data to estimate expected outcomes without ESM and to quantify harms related to overtreatment and delayed treatment. Results Among 101,138 encounters, 86,884 occurred during the pre-implementation period and 14,254 during the online period. In unadjusted analyses, the online period had lower inpatient mortality, prolonged hospitalization, antibiotic use, and sepsis prevalence (all p≤0.002). In the counterfactual analyses, observed outcomes were lower than expected without ESM for mortality (1.21% vs 1.82%; p<0.001), prolonged hospitalization (5.56% vs 7.95%; p<0.001), and antibiotic use (43.52% vs 47.04%; p<0.001). False positive harm (37.72% vs 41.68%; p<0.001) was also lower than expected. Conclusions Integration of ESM into clinical workflow was associated with improved patient outcomes, reduced antibiotic use, and decreased harm from overtreatment, without evidence of increased harm from delayed treatment, supporting a positive net clinical benefit and the safety and effectiveness of ESM under Software as a Medical Device principles.

Abstract Purpose: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is an attractive target for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Phase I of the LuMIERE study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04939610) investigated the safety of [177Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 (177Lu-FAP-2286) in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors and identified the recommended phase II dosage (RP2D). Patients and Methods: LuMIERE is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, phase I/II, multicenter study. Phase I followed a Bayesian optimal interval design evaluating four escalating activity levels of 177Lu-FAP-2286 (3.70, 5.55, 7.40, and 9.25 GBq). Patients were selected by positive [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 (68Ga-FAP-2286, also known as [68Ga]Ga-HKG301) PET/CT imaging on all target lesions [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥1.5× SUVmean of mediastinal blood pool]. 177Lu-FAP-2286 was administered intravenously every 6 weeks for ≤6 cycles. The primary endpoint was dosage-limiting toxicities (DLT) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Results: Of 35 patients imaged with 68Ga-FAP-2286, 27 received 177Lu-FAP-2286 (3.70 GBq, n = 3; 5.55 GBq, n = 6; 7.40 GBq, n = 7; 9.25 GBq, n = 11). Two DLTs were observed: one patient who received 5.55 GBq of 177Lu-FAP-2286 experienced grade 4 lymphopenia, and one patient who received 9.25 GBq experienced grade 3 hemoptysis; these were the only treatment-related grade ≥3 TEAEs. All-cause grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported for 11 patients (40.7%). The RP2D for 177Lu-FAP-2286 monotherapy was determined to be 9.25 GBq. Preliminary Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors efficacy findings demonstrated a partial response in 1 patient and stable disease in 10 patients (maintained for at least two assessments in 6 patients). Conclusions: 177Lu-FAP-2286 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. The safety and preliminary efficacy findings support its continued development in phase II.

Background: There is growing support for high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS), but escalation (ESC) approaches remain common. Objective: To describe decision-making in a pragmatic trial of early high-efficacy treatment (EHT) versus ESC. Methods: DELIVER-MS is a multi-center, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a parallel observational study (OBS), which enrolled treatment-naïve people with RRMS in 31 UK/US sites. Primary outcome was as follows: 36-month brain volume loss according to initial treatment approach (EHT vs. ESC). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to predict participation in RCT versus OBS and choice of EHT versus ESC within the OBS cohort. Results: In total, 816 people with MS were enrolled. Participants declined randomization due to preference for a particular DMT (85%), efficacy concerns (20%), and safety concerns (9%). RCT versus OBS participation was associated with lower relapse rate ( p = 0.043) and greater brain parenchymal fraction ( p = 0.002). Among 374 in the OBS cohort, 125 (33%) chose ESC and 249 (67%) chose EHT. People commencing EHT had higher education attainment ( p < 0.001) and relapse rate ( p = 0.025). Conclusion: Baseline DELIVER-MS data demonstrate that participants with milder disease are more likely to participate in RCT. The choice of EHT versus ESC was associated with demographic factors and disease activity. Clinical trial registration: NCT03535298

PURPOSE In immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis, amyloid fibrils cause organ dysfunction. Anselamimab, a monoclonal antibody, selectively binds to amyloid fibrils, accelerating their clearance. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with European modification of Mayo 2004 stage IIIa or IIIb AL amyloidosis were randomly assigned to receive anselamimab or placebo with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (with or without daratumumab). The primary end point was a hierarchical composite of time to all-cause mortality (ACM) and frequency of cardiovascular hospitalizations (CVHs), analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld test and win ratio estimation. RESULTS Among 406 randomly assigned patients, the primary end point win ratio for anselamimab versus placebo was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.83, 1.50; P = .332) and the hazard ratio (HR) for ACM was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57, 1.13; P = .290). CVH rates in the anselamimab and placebo groups were 0.59 (95% CI, 0.42, 0.83) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.55, 1.43), respectively ( P = .145). Among patients with kappa isotype (n = 72), the win ratio was 2.06 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.31; P = .100) and anselamimab reduced ACM by 62% versus placebo (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.86; nominal P = .012), and CVH by 71% (IRR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.87; nominal P = .028) with improvements in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Score. There was no clinical benefit observed in the lambda population. Anselamimab was generally well-tolerated; safety data were comparable between treatment arms overall. CONCLUSION Treatment with anselamimab, an antifibril antibody used alongside antiplasma cell dyscrasia therapy, while not meeting the primary end point in the overall population, significantly improved ACM and CVH in patients with kappa AL, potentially offering a new therapeutic option for this isotype.

Abstract Repetitive head impacts sustained during American football have been associated with neuropathological changes such as white matter shear injuries. However, the impact of specific factors, such as age of first exposure and cumulative head impact burden, on white matter integrity remains unclear. This study investigated in vivo white matter microstructural changes using diffusion tensor imaging and tract-based spatial statistics in 165 male former American football players (mean age 57.3 years, range 45–74) and 52 unexposed asymptomatic male controls (mean age 59.4 years, range 45–74) in the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. Compared to controls, former football players exhibited significantly higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in 1.97% of the white matter skeleton (1552 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.587) and higher tissue-corrected FA (FAt) in 1.48% of the white matter skeleton (1004 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.616). No significant differences were observed for mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, or free water between football players and controls. Among football players, there were no significant differences in the white matter microstructure between players diagnosed with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome and those without the diagnosis. Lower FA was significantly associated with older age (P &lt; 0.00001) and an earlier age of first exposure to tackle football (P &lt; 0.01), while lower FAt was associated with greater cumulative head impact burden, specifically higher linear acceleration (P &lt; 0.04) and rotational force (P &lt; 0.02). This study highlights the influential role of exposure factors on white matter microstructure in former American football players, as well as the utility of diffusion tensor imaging to aid in characterizing the long-term effects of repetitive head impacts in contact sport athletes.

Background/objectives: To develop expert consensus on peripheral venous access devices (PVAD) and associated care practices, and to formulate guidance recommendations aimed at improving peripheral venous access and management, including the integration of vein visualization technology. This is particularly important for patient populations with peripheral venous depletion, who often present with compromised vasculature that complicates successful PVAD access and increases the risk of complications. Preserving vascular integrity in these patients is essential for maintaining treatment pathways and preventing long-term vascular damage. Methods: A multi-phase approach to consensus development was used consisting of the following: (1) a literature review, (2) a survey and consultation with a vascular access expert panel ( n = 9), and (3) a consultation meeting with patient and public representatives ( n = 2). Results: Survey results and consultation findings from the expert panel demonstrated consensus for 14 of 24 statements. Further analysis resulted in a total of four key problem statements on peripheral venous access and care, and 11 recommendations for future development. Following review by patient and public representatives, three additional recommendations were added, and three existing recommendations were refined. The final consensus statement reflects four problem statements with 14 recommendations. Conclusion: This expert consensus presents 14 evidence-informed statements designed to strengthen practice, improve patient safety, and enhance clinician confidence and competence. Central to these recommendations is the adoption of routine structured pre-insertion vessel assessment using vein visualization technology where appropriate to minimize vessel trauma, and promote more consistent, high-quality vascular access care.

TPS5632 Background: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC); however, outcomes remain suboptimal in patients with high-risk disease. Recent studies suggest that integration of immunotherapy (IO) with definitive chemoradiation, or induction chemotherapy prior to CCRT improves outcomes. Whether treatment intensification with induction systemic therapy and IO prior to CCRT and IO further improves disease control remains unknown. Induction chemotherapy may reduce tumor burden, eradicate micrometastatic disease, and improve tumor immunogenicity prior to definitive CCRT. Preclinical and clinical data support synergy between systemic therapy or radiotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade, providing the rationale for evaluating an induction strategy incorporating chemotherapy and immunotherapy before standard CCRT with immunotherapy, followed by maintenance immunotherapy. Optional tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative analyses, including immune and molecular biomarkers associated with response, resistance, and patterns of failure. Methods: NRG-GY037 is a prospective, multi-institutional phase III randomized trial conducted through NRG Oncology. A total of 336 patients will be enrolled (168 per arm). Patients will be stratified by FIGO stage (III vs. IVA) and presence or absence of para-aortic lymph nodes (N2). The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). The study has 90% power to detect PFS hazard ratio of 0.65 in the experimental arm. Treatment: Patients with previously untreated, high-risk LACC are randomized to receive either induction chemotherapy with pembrolizumab for 6 weeks followed by CCRT with pembrolizumab and pembrolizumab maintenance, or standard CCRT with pembrolizumab followed by pembrolizumab maintenance. Major Eligibility Criteria: Eligible patients have histologically confirmed cervical carcinoma (squamous, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous), TNM T3 and T4 disease, N0-2, ECOG performance status 0–1, and no prior definitive therapy for cervical cancer. Current Enrollment Status: The trial is actively accruing patients. No efficacy or safety data are available at the time of submission. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07061977. Clinical trial information: NCT07061977 .