Back to Authors

Demange, Arnaud

Mayo Clinic

Advanced Applications (United States)

Citations 2

Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein with [177Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors in the Phase I LuMIERE Trial
McConathy, Jonathan , Koshkin, Vadim S. , Goenka, Ajit H., Moy, Ryan H. , Morse, Sophie , Demange, Arnaud, Blumenstein, Lars, Babaoğlan, Burcu, Aimone, Paola , Menda, Yusuf , Rodon, Jordi , Goenka, Ajit Harishkumar , Moy, Ryan H , Morse, Sophie , Demange, Arnaud , Blumenstein, Lars , Babaoglan, Burcu , Aimone, Paola , Hope, Thomas A , McConathy, Jonathan , Menda, Yusuf , Rodon, Jordi Ahnert , Goenka, Ajit H. , Hope, Thomas A.

Clinical Cancer Research | June 1, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: OF1-OF11

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4356 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is an attractive target for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Phase I of the LuMIERE study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04939610) investigated the safety of [177Lu]Lu-FAP-2286 (177Lu-FAP-2286) in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors and identified the recommended phase II dosage (RP2D). Patients and Methods: LuMIERE is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, phase I/II, multicenter study. Phase I followed a Bayesian optimal interval design evaluating four escalating activity levels of 177Lu-FAP-2286 (3.70, 5.55, 7.40, and 9.25 GBq). Patients were selected by positive [68Ga]Ga-FAP-2286 (68Ga-FAP-2286, also known as [68Ga]Ga-HKG301) PET/CT imaging on all target lesions [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥1.5× SUVmean of mediastinal blood pool]. 177Lu-FAP-2286 was administered intravenously every 6 weeks for ≤6 cycles. The primary endpoint was dosage-limiting toxicities (DLT) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Results: Of 35 patients imaged with 68Ga-FAP-2286, 27 received 177Lu-FAP-2286 (3.70 GBq, n = 3; 5.55 GBq, n = 6; 7.40 GBq, n = 7; 9.25 GBq, n = 11). Two DLTs were observed: one patient who received 5.55 GBq of 177Lu-FAP-2286 experienced grade 4 lymphopenia, and one patient who received 9.25 GBq experienced grade 3 hemoptysis; these were the only treatment-related grade ≥3 TEAEs. All-cause grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported for 11 patients (40.7%). The RP2D for 177Lu-FAP-2286 monotherapy was determined to be 9.25 GBq. Preliminary Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors efficacy findings demonstrated a partial response in 1 patient and stable disease in 10 patients (maintained for at least two assessments in 6 patients). Conclusions: 177Lu-FAP-2286 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. The safety and preliminary efficacy findings support its continued development in phase II.
Analysis of patient diaries in the NETTER-1 Study of 177Lu-DOTATATE versus high-dose octreotide in progressive midgut neuroendocrine tumors.
Wolin, Edward M. , Chasen, Beth, Kulke, Matthew H. , Caplin, Martyn , Baum, Richard P. , Hobday, Timothy J. , Hendifar, Andrew , Santoro, Paola, Broberg, Per, Demange, Arnaud, Öberg, Kjell E., Ruszniewski, Philippe, Ravasi, Laura, Krenning, Eric P. , Strosberg, Jonathan , Bushnell, David

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 4111-4111

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.4111 Get It

4111 Background: The primary statistical analysis for the NETTER-1 trial showed a clinically and statistically significant PFS benefit with 177Lu-DOTATATE vs. high-dose octreotide. 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment was also correlated with a significant delay in time to deterioration in HRQoL. In addition to HRQoL questionnaires, patients were asked to record presence or absence of a range of symptoms in a daily diary. Methods: A Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used to analyze the change, compared to baseline, of the occurrence of abdominal Pain, diarrhea and cutaneous flushing as these symptoms were regarded as the most relevant to judge the overall disease status. For each visit (week = 0, 4, 8, etc.) the number of days with symptoms during the previous period was calculated. At baseline, the number of days with symptoms was counted over the previous 6 weeks, whereas the time frame between visits lasted 4 weeks. Results: The estimated number of days with symptoms declined significantly more in the 177Lu-dotatate arm compared to the octreotide arm. The difference in change and the confidence intervals for the symptoms abdominal pain, diarrhea and flushing of skin are, respectively: -3.11 [-4.88; -1.34], -3.11 [-5.04; -1.18] and -1.98 [-3.88; -0.08]. Conclusions: Analysis of symptom diaries confirms that 177Lu-Dotatate can palliate clinically relevant symptoms when compared to high-dose octreotide.