Patients with Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) Undergoing High Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) have Superior Outcomes As Compared to Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Abstract Abstract 600 Background: Both MM and AL are plasma cell neoplasms. The underlying clone in both diseases appears to be different not only in terms of “tumor burden” but also in terms of their underlying biology. The overall “fitness” of patients with these two diseases is also different, with AL patients having more major organ dysfunction. Therapy for both diseases is directed at killing the underlying clone. ASCT is one method of reducing the clone size and thereby improving overall survival. Post-ASCT outcomes between the two diseases have never been formally compared. Methods: We compiled all patients with a diagnosis of AL or MM who received ASCT at the Mayo Clinic Rochester between June 1996 and January 2011 to compare outcomes. Patients were retrieved from two prospectively maintained clinical transplant data bases (M.A.G.). Differences between groups were compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon tests. Survival was calculated using the method of Kaplan-Meier, and differences between survival outcomes were calculated by log rank. Cox regression modeling was done to determine how non-disease specific variables—i.e. age, time period of ASCT, number of prior regimens, time to ASCT from diagnosis and acquisition of complete response (CR)—affected outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using JMP (SAS, NC) software. This study was approved by the Mayo IRB. Results: The data set was comprised of 454 patients with AL and 1116 patients with MM. There were significant differences between the two respective groups of patients in terms of number of prior regimens (0 vs 1, p<0.0001), time to ASCT (3.95 months vs 7.20 months, p<0.0001), intensity of conditioning regimen (non-attenuated in 69.4% vs 89.1%, p<0.0001), serum creatinine (1.1mg/dl vs 1mg/dl p<0.0001), creatinine clearance (72.5 ml/minute vs 80 ml/minute p<0.0001), albumin (2.61g/dl vs 3.50g/dl, p<0.0001) CRP (0.40mg/dl vs 0.63mg/dl p<0.0001), LDH (196 U/l vs 182U/l, p<0.0001), and bone marrow plasmacytosis at transplant (6% vs 9%, p<0.0001). Hematologic response rates were also significantly different between the groups, with higher overall hematologic response in the MM group (90.9% vs 79.5%, p<0.0001) and higher complete response (CR) rates (40.1% vs 29.4%, p<0.0001) in the AL group. With a median follow-up of surviving patients of 68 months, the respective median overall survival (OS) for the AL and MM patients was 113 and 59.5 months, p<0.0001. Notably, the 5-year OS of AL and MM patients achieving CR were 91.4% and 57.7%, respectively, p<0.0001. If only those patients who were transplanted within 1 year of their diagnosis are included in the analysis, the respective 5-year OS of AL and MM patients achieving CR were 90.4% and 61.3%, p<0.0001 (Figure 1). To correct for imbalances in non-disease specific parameters, 3 multivariate analyses were performed using: 1) all patients; 2) only those achieving CR; and 3) only those who achieved a CR and were transplanted within 12 months of their diagnosis (Table 1). Among those patients achieving CR, MM patients had nearly a 4-fold risk of death as compared to patients with AL. Conclusion: Although ASCT is not available to all patients with either AL or MM, there is a significant difference in outcomes based on the diagnosis. Patients with AL who undergo ASCT enjoy a superior survival as compared MM patients undergoing the same procedure. This difference is most notable among those patients who achieve CR suggesting very different plasma cell biology between the two diseases. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
MYC Translocations Are Associated with Poor Overall Survival in DLBCL Patients in Both the Chemotherapy and Immunochemotherapy Eras.
Abstract Abstract 443 Background: MYC translocations have been reported to have inferior outcome in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Here we present MYC translocation prevalence and outcome from two cohorts of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated in the chemotherapy (C) and immunochemotherapy (IC) eras. Methods: Tissue microarrays were created from 302 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic with availabel paraffin tissue. 233 DLBCL patients first diagnosed from March 1986-July 2001 were retrospectively identified based on a diagnosis of DLBCL and treatment with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 69 DLBCL patients diagnosed from March 2002-October 2005 and treated with immunochemotherapy were prospectively enrolled in the University of Iowa / Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource. Central pathology review was performed on all samples to confirm the diagnosis of DLBCL. Interphase FISH was performed using a breakapart strategy for MYC and BCL6 gene regions and a dual fusion strategy for t(14;18)(IGH&/BCL2). Results: Chemotherapy (C) era patients were primarily treated with CHOP (88%); immunochemotherapy (IC) era patients were all treated with an R-CHOP based regimen. The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range, 22-92) for C patients and 65 years (range, 20-82) for IC patients. Median follow-up for C patients was 11.3 years (range, 2.7-21.3) with 145 (62%) deaths; for IC patients, the median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 2.1-6.4) with 17 deaths (25%). FISH was successful in 195 of 302 patients (65%). MYC translocations were identified in 6 of 141 C patients (4%) and 3 of 54 IC patients (6%). MYC translocations were associated with inferior overall survival in the C patients (p=0.001), the IC patients (p=0.04), and in the combined group (p≤0.001). Median survival of patients with MYC translocations was 19 months and 16 months for C and IC respectively, compared to 112 months (C) and unreached (IC) for DLBCL patients without MYC translocations. 4 of the 9 MYC translocation patients had a double hit (2 with both MYC and BCL2 translocations and 2 with translocations of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6). Associations of MYC and outcome remained significant in all patients after adjusting for treatment and IPI (p<0.05). Conclusions: MYC translocations are present in approximately 5% of DLBCL patients and are associated with poor outcome in patients treated with C or IC. New treatment approaches are needed for DLBCL patients with MYC translocations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Similar 1 Year Survival of Patients Receiving Plerixafor (Mozobil*®) Plus G-CSF Versus Placebo Plus G-CSF Mobilized Autologous Grafts: Results From Two Phase 3 Randomized Trials in Patients with NHL or MM Undergoing Autologous Transplantation After Front-L
Abstract Abstract 2319 Poster Board II-296 Background: Data from two phase 3 clinical trials indicate that plerixafor plus G-CSF is safe and more effective than G-CSF alone in mobilizing CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) for autologous HSC transplantation (auto-HSCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or multiple myeloma (MM). Herein we report 1-year overall survival in patients with NHL or MM who have undergone auto-HSCT with cells mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF compared to placebo plus G-CSF. Furthermore, we also report 1-year overall survival in patients with NHL who failed mobilization on either arm and entered a rescue protocol. Methods: Data were obtained from two prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SQ) plus G-CSF (10 mg/kg/day) with placebo plus G-CSF for mobilization of HSC for autologous HSCT in patients with NHL or MM. In the NHL study, patients in either study arm who failed mobilization (&0.8 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg in 2 days or &2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 4 days) were eligible to enter the rescue protocol and received plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization. Overall survival in patients was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In the NHL study, 135/150 (90.0%) patients in the plerixafor group compared with 82/148 (55.4%) patients in the placebo group, underwent transplantation (p&0.001) with a median (range) of 5.41 (1.95-17.6) and 3.85 (1.98-8.74) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (p&0.001). A total of 62 patients (10 from the plerixafor arm and 52 from the placebo arm) failed mobilization and proceeded to rescue mobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF. Of these, 52 patients (84%) proceeded to transplantation with a median (range) of 3.8 (1.1-10.5) x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year overall survival for patients in the plerixafor and placebo groups in the primary ITT population (rescue patients were censored as of consent date for rescue) were 76.0% and 64.7%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1-year overall survival in the rescue group was 83.7%. The Log rank p-value comparing all 3 survival estimates (plerixafor, placebo and rescue) was 0.765 (Figure 1A). In the MM study, 142/148 (95.9%) patients in the plerixafor group and 136/154 (88.3%) patients in the placebo group underwent transplantation (p=0.014) with a median (range) of 5.40 (1.20-16.74) and 3.96 (1.76-16.88) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (p&0.001). In this trial, Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year overall survival in the plerixafor and placebo groups were 93.6% and 95.8%, respectively (Log-rank p-value=0.771; Figure 1B). Conclusions: These data suggest that overall survival at 1 year is similar between patients with MM or NHL mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF compared to placebo plus G-CSF. Furthermore, in the NHL study, patient survival in the rescue protocol was similar to that seen in the phase III trial. Collection of follow-up data on overall survival is ongoing. Disclosures: Micallef: Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Bolwell:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hsu:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.
Persistent mediastinal FDG uptake on PET-CT after frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: biopsy, treat or observe?
PURPOSE In patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), most relapses occur within the first 2 years of diagnosis. We sought to define the rate and outcome of late relapses that occurred after achieving event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24). METHODS We prospectively followed 1,324 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL from 2002 to 2015 and treated with immunochemotherapy. Cumulative incidences of late DLBCL and indolent lymphoma relapses were analyzed as competing events. Postrelapse survival was defined as time from first relapse to death from any cause. RESULTS In 847 patients who achieved EFS24, the cumulative incidence of late relapse was 6.9% at 3 years, 9.3% at 5 years, and 10.3% at 8 years after EFS24. The incidence of DLBCL relapse was similar in patients with DLBCL alone at diagnosis (6.3% at 5 years), compared with patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis (5.2%; P = .46). However, the rate of indolent lymphoma relapse was higher in patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma (7.4% v 2.1% at 5 years; P < .01). In patients with DLBCL alone, the rate of DLBCL relapse was similar in the germinal center B-cell–like (GCB) (4.1% at 5 years) and non-GCB (4.0%; P = .71) subtypes, whereas the rate of indolent lymphoma relapse was higher in patients with the GCB subtype (3.9% v 0.0% at 5 years; P = .02). Postrelapse survival was inferior for patients who relapsed with DLBCL than for those who relapsed with indolent lymphoma (median 29.9 months v unreached; P < .01). CONCLUSION Patients with DLBCL with a concurrent indolent lymphoma and those with the GCB subtype had a higher rate of late relapse, owing to increased relapses with indolent lymphoma. Patients who relapsed with DLBCL had a worse prognosis than those who relapsed with indolent lymphoma.
Combination of everolimus with R-CHOP (ever R-CHOP) as an initial therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): A phase I and feasibility study (NCCTG N1085 [Alliance]).
AbstractPredicting early clinical failure in patients with untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) is important but difficult. This study aimed to determine the incidence and patterns of extranodal (EN) and spleen disease using PET/CT, and assess their utility in predicting early clinical failure. PET/CT images from 613 cases of untreated FL (2003‐2016) were reviewed. The location and number of EN sites, patterns of bone involvement, and splenic involvement were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using event‐free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and early clinical failure at 24 months (EFS24). So, 49% (301/613) of patients had PET/CT‐detected EN involvement, and 28% (171/613) had spleen involvement. The presence of ≥2 EN sites, spleen, bone or soft tissue involvement all predicted failure to achieve EFS24. Presence of ≥2 EN sites and bone involvement pattern were also predictive of OS in a univariate analysis. In a multivariate analysis with FLIPI‐2 factors, spleen involvement, pattern of bone involvement, and soft tissue involvement independently predicted a lower EFS (HR 1.49 (1.11‐2.00),P= .007; HR 1.71 (1.10‐2.65),P= .017; and HR 1.67 (1.06‐2.62),P= .026, respectively). When the multivariate analysis was performed using PRIMA‐PI factors (marrow and B2M), the number of EN sites was an independent prognostic factor for inferior OS (HR 2.28;P= .05). Baseline PET/CT identifies EN involvement in nearly half of patients with untreated FL. The presence of ≥2 EN sites, bone, soft tissue, or splenic involvement predicts early clinical failure. These results, when combined with other factors, may better identify high‐risk patients and guide therapy.
QOL at 3 years after diagnosis in aggressive lymphoma survivors.
Bendamustine and rituximab and lenalidomide (BRR) in the treatment of relapsed and refractory low grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): Final results of phase 1 study NCCTG N1088/ALLIANCE.