Johnston, Patrick

Abstract Introduction: Liso-cel is an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB CAR T cell product. TRANSFORM (NCT03575351) is a global, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of liso-cel versus SOC as second-line therapy in adults with R/R LBCL. In the TRANSFORM study, liso-cel showed superior, more durable efficacy versus SOC, with a potential long-term survival benefit and a favorable safety profile, highlighting the curative potential of liso-cel for second-line R/R LBCL. Upon completion of TRANSFORM, patients who received liso-cel could enroll into a separate, long-term follow-up (LTFU) study (NCT03435796). Here, we report results after approximately 4 years of follow-up in patients from TRANSFORM who consented to the LTFU study. Methods The TRANSFORM study compared liso-cel versus SOC (chemotherapy [R-DHAP, R-ICE, or R-GDP] followed by high-dose chemotherapy [HDCT] + ASCT) in adults aged ≤ 75 years with LBCL primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy and eligible for ASCT. Patients in the liso-cel arm underwent lymphodepletion followed by liso-cel (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells). Crossover to receive liso-cel was allowed for patients in the SOC arm. The LTFU study enrolled patients who received liso-cel and discontinued early or completed TRANSFORM; liso-cel was not administered during the LTFU study and subsequent therapies were administered at investigator discretion. Selected AEs considered related to liso-cel (malignancies, neurologic, hematologic, or rheumatologic/autoimmune disorders) and OS would be assessed at each visit (month 3 and then every 6 months from years 1 to 5, and then annually) for up to 15 years from liso-cel infusion until study withdrawal or death, whichever occurred first. OS for the combined study was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. PFS for the combined TRANSFORM and LTFU studies incorporated data from TRANSFORM, assessed by an independent review committee, and from LTFU, assessed by investigators, and was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression or death from any cause. For LTFU only, OS and PFS were measured from LTFU consent to event or censoring. In cases where the patient was censored at last assessment date (without receiving new therapy) in TRANSFORM and enrolled in LTFU, LTFU data were used. For patients from the liso-cel arm of TRANSFORM who did not enroll in the LTFU study, the data from TRANSFORM were considered (ie, either an event or censored) at their last adequate assessment date or before starting new therapy. Results are reported descriptively. Results In total, 184 patients were randomized in TRANSFORM (92 per arm); key demographics and baseline characteristics were previously reported (Abramson, et al. Blood 2023). The LTFU study enrolled 67 patients who received liso-cel (liso-cel arm, n = 43; crossover from SOC arm, n = 24). The median follow-up (range) for the liso-cel arm was 16.9 months (1.3–29.7) in the LTFU study and 40.1 months (2.2–61.9) combining the TRANSFORM and LTFU studies. The median follow-ups for OS and PFS for the liso-cel arm in the LTFU study were 17.1 (16.1–21.9) and 16.9 months (16.0–21.8), respectively. In patients from the LTFU study in the liso-cel arm (n = 43), median PFS and OS were both not reached (NR) with 95% CIs of NR–NR. The 24-month rates (95% CI) of PFS and OS were 94.7% (87.4–100.0) and 95.1% (88.4–100.0), respectively. In the 92 patients randomized to the liso-cel arm, using combined data from the TRANSFORM and LTFU studies, median (95% CI) PFS was NR (12.6–NR); 48-month PFS rate was 52.2% (41.5–62.8). Median (95% CI) OS was NR (NR–NR); 48-month OS rate was 61.5% (51.2–71.7). Safety results from the LTFU study in the liso-cel arm showed no new signals compared with previous reports from TRANSFORM. AEs of any grade occurred in 2 patients (hypogammaglobulinemia and dyspnea; n = 1 each), with no second primary malignancies or serious infections. AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 1 patient (dyspnea). No AEs led to death.Conclusions: After a median follow-up of approximately 4 years combining data from the TRANSFORM and LTFU studies, liso-cel continued to demonstrate long-term clinical benefit with high PFS and OS rates in patients with second-line R/R LBCL. The safety profile of liso-cel continued to be manageable with no new safety signals observed during LTFU. These results further support liso-cel as an effective second-line treatment with curative potential for R/R LBCL.

Abstract Background Neurolymphomatosis (NL) is a rare and frequently underrecognized manifestation of lymphoma, characterized by infiltration of peripheral or cranial nerves by malignant lymphocytes. Limited data exist to guide optimal management. We present the largest single-enterprise (included the 3 Mayo Clinic sites) cohort to date, evaluating disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in patients (pts) with NL. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts ≥18 years (yrs) diagnosed with clinical, radiographic, or biopsy-confirmed NL at Mayo Clinic between January 2002 and December 2024. Baseline characteristics were compared using independent t-tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact or Pearson's chi-square tests for categorical variables. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary endpoint. Kaplan–Meier methods, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess survival outcomes and associated factors. Results We included 149 pts. Median age at diagnosis was 64 yrs (range 22–83), and 23% were female. Most presented with stage IV disease (89%), and NL was part of the initial lymphoma presentation in 42% (primary NL). Diagnostic confirmation was based on histopathology and imaging in 55%, imaging alone in 26%, histopathology alone in 16%, and clinical features in 4%. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common histology (61%), followed by marginal zone lymphoma (7%), and T-cell lymphoma (7%). Clinical presentation included painful neuropathy (65%), concurrent CNS involvement (37%), systemic disease (43%), elevated LDH (46.9%), and ECOG ≥2 (38%). Pattern of involvement included cranial nerves (29%), peripheral nerves (28%), and spinal nerve roots (27%). Median follow-up was 92 months (95% CI, 63–119). Among 137 treatment-evaluable pts, first-line regimens included methotrexate-based (MTX) (62%), bendamustine-based (B) (11%), cytarabine-based (Ara-C) (4%), and rituximab-based (R) (excluding MTX, B, or Ara-C) (15%) therapies. Radiation was used in 18%, and 21% underwent autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Among 103 response-evaluable pts, the ORR was 67% (52% complete response [CR], 16% partial response [PR]). ORRs by regimen were 78% (MTX), 92% (B), and 86% (R). On univariate analysis, primary NL (OR 4.3) and frontline ASCT (OR 8.47) were associated with higher odds of response (p<0.05), while ECOG ≥2 (OR 0.24) and localized disease (OR 0.33) were associated with lower odds. On multivariable analysis (MVA), primary NL (OR 5.0 [1.5–12.1], p=0.02) and ECOG >1 (OR 0.2 [0.06–0.79], p=0.018) remained significant predictors of response. Median PFS was 13 months (95% CI, 9–36), with a 2-yr PFS of 43% (95% CI, 35–53). On MVA, concurrent CNS involvement (HR 2.4, p=0.05), systemic disease (HR 2.7, p=0.02), and ECOG >1 (HR 2.4, p=0.02) were associated with inferior PFS, while primary NL was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.3, p=0.002). Patients undergoing frontline ASCT had a median PFS of 108 months (95% CI, 58–not reached) with a 7-yr PFS of 62% (95% CI, 46–84). Among those receiving second line and beyond (2+) therapy, 24 received MTX-based regimens, 10 received CAR-T, and 8 received tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Post-ASCT median PFS was 30 months (95% CI, 15–NR). Among CAR-T recipients, evaluable responses (n=8) included 4 CR, 1 PR, and 3 PD. Median OS was 56 months (95% CI, 29–133), with a 5-yr OS of 50% (95% CI, 41–60). On MVA, ECOG ≥2 (HR 2.5, p=0.02) predicted worse OS, while receipt of ASCT (HR 0.4, p=0.04) and primary NL (HR 0.5, p=0.04) were associated with improved OS. Conclusion This study represents the largest single-enterprise cohort of pts with NL, providing comprehensive insight into its clinical presentation, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Primary NL and preserved PS were independently associated with improved response rates and survival, while CNS and systemic involvement at diagnosis portended poorer PFS. MTX and bendamustine-based regimens achieved high ORR, and frontline ASCT was associated with significantly prolonged remission duration and OS. These findings highlight the prognostic importance of baseline disease burden and functional status, support the early incorporation of high-intensity regimens in eligible patients, and underscore the urgent need for prospective studies to guide evidence-based management in this rare and understudied population.

Abstract Introduction: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is feasible with an acceptable safety profile in older patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) (Tun et al, AJH 2024). However, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is a frequent and challenging toxicity in older pts, and its characteristics and associated risk factors are not well defined. Methods: Seven centers participated in this retrospective study. Pts aged ≥65 years (yrs) with RR LBCL treated with a commercial CART product were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment, CART toxicity, and outcomes were collected. ICANS was graded by the ASTCT criteria in most pts. Cumulative incidences of ICANS were estimated using deaths/progressions as competing risks, and associations between incidences and variables were assessed by Gray's test. A 30-day landmark was set after infusion to reduce immortal time bias. Progression-free survival (PFS; time from the landmark to disease progression or death) and overall survival (OS; time from the landmark to death) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were done in JMP v18. Results: A total of 224 pts were included. Median age at infusion was 71 yrs (range 65–89; ≥80 yrs, 12%. 142 (63%) were male and 27 (13%) had an ECOG PS scale of ≥2. The median HCT CI was 1 (range 0–6). LDH was elevated in 110 (51%) pts, 23 (19%) had bulky disease ≥7 cm, 176 (82%) had advanced-stage, and 145 (71%) had extranodal disease. Median number of prior treatments was 2 (range 1–8), and 44 (20%) had prior bendamustine. Prior stem cell therapy was done in 47 (21%) pts (autologous stem cell transplant [SCT], n = 45; allogeneic SCT, n=2). Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was most frequently used (58%; n=131) followed by lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) (16%, n=36) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) (25%, n=57). Median duration of ICANS was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3–11; range 1–303). Median time to ICANS onset was 6 days (IQR 3.8–8.0; range 0–24). The 30-day cumulative incidence of all grade ICANS was 50.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44.7–57.9) and grade ≥3 ICANS was 29.8% (95% CI 24.0–37.0). There was no significant difference in incidence of all grade (P=0.39) and grade ≥3 (P=0.49) ICANS as well as duration of ICANS (≥14 vs <14 days; P=0.08) according to the age groups (≥65–69 vs ≥70–74 vs ≥75–79 vs ≥80–89). In contrast, pts with an ECOG PS scale of ≥2 were associated with a higher incidence of all grade (30-day estimate, 66.7% vs 47.0%; P=0.02) and grade ≥3 ICANS (30-day estimate, 53.8% vs 25.6%; P=0.002). In addition, pts with an elevated LDH level had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 ICANS than those without (30-day estimate, 37.5% vs 18.8%;P=0.004). The incidence of ICANS varied among various CART products, with 30-day estimates of 64.9% vs 33.3% vs 29.8% (P<0.0001) for all grades and 40.1% vs 13.2% vs 18.0% (P=0.004) for grade ≥3 ICANS in pts treated with axi-cel vs tisa-cel vs liso-cel, respectively. A trend toward higher grade ≥3 ICANS was seen in pts treated with ≥3 prior lines than those treated with 2 or 1 (30-day estimate, 35.7% vs 28.1% vs 10.5%; P = 0.07). ICANS was managed with steroids in 47 (41%) pts, levetiracetam +/- other agents in 46 (40%) pts, biologic agents +/- other drugs in 15 (13%) pts, and supportive care in 6 (5%) pts. Median follow-up from the 30-day landmark post-infusion was 17.2 months (95% CI 14.2–22.4). Median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.7–18.2) and OS was 18.2 months (95% CI 13.3 vs 27.5). There was no difference in PFS and OS in pts who experienced ICANS vs no ICANS (median PFS 14.7 vs 10.1 months; P=0.65 and median OS 18.2 vs 24.7 months; P=0.49). However, there was a trend toward inferior PFS and OS in pts who experienced high-grade ICANS compared to those who had grade 0-2 ICANS (median PFS 9.2 vs 21.2; P=0.14 and median OS 11.7 =vs 22.9; P=0.39). Conclusions: This large study of older pts with RR LBCL demonstrated acceptable risks of ICANS, comparable to that in pivotal registration trials, with a relatively higher rate of grade ≥3 ICANS. The risks of ICANS were similar regardless of patient age, including those aged ≥80 yrs, but different among CART products. Similar to younger pts, high tumor burden disease and poor performance status at CART infusion were associated with higher risks of ICANS. A comprehensive neurologic and frailty assessment is warranted to identify suitable CART candidates.

Abstract Abstract 4359 Routine serial chimerism analysis after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) has been used as a risk factor for post-Allo-SCT cancer relapse. In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients treated with autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (APHSCT), a specific predictor during routine follow-up that could be used to ascertain risk for post-APHSCT relapse has not been identified. Thus, we set out to investigate if absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) measured at post APHSCT follow-up could serve as a marker of post-APHSCT NHL relapse. ALC was obtained at the time of confirmed relapse at follow-up and at last no evidence of relapse follow-up. From 1993 until 2005, 269 patients treated with APHSCT for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), were included in this study. Patients at last follow-up with no relapse (N=137) had a higher ALC compared with those with confirmed relapsed at follow-up post-APHSCT (N= 132) [median ALC x 109/L of 1.66 (range: 0.13-3.69) vs 0.71 (range: 0.03-4.75), p <0.0001, respectively]. ALC at follow-up was a strong predictor for relapse with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86 (p<0.0001). An ALC of 1.0 × 109/L was identified as the optimal cut-off point. An ALC < 1.0 × 109/L at the time of confirmed relapse had a positive predictive value of 89% and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.4 to predict relapse post-APHSCT. Patients with an ALC ≥ 1.0 × 109/L (N = 147) had a cumulative incidence of relapse of 19% versus 92% for patients with an ALC < 1.0 × 109/L (N = 122) (p<0.0001) at follow-up post-APHSCT. This study suggests that ALC at follow-up can be used as a marker to assess risk of DLBCL relapse during routine follow-up after APHSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3211 Poster Board III-148 Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become standard of care for many patients with hematologic malignancies, many patients fail to collect a minimum number of CD34 + stem cells to support high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Recently, plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, was FDA approved for use in combination with G-CSF for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with NHL or Multiple Myeloma. In February 2009, we commenced a risk adapted approach to the utilization of plerixafor. The study was restricted to patients mobilized with GCSF alone and patients undergoing chemotherapy primed PBSC mobilization were excluded. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization was commenced with G-CSF at 10 mcg/kg/day. On day 4, a peripheral blood (PB) CD34 count was measured. For patients whose PB CD34 was ≥10/μL, apheresis was commenced the following morning. For patients whose PB CD34 was <10/μL, it was measured again on day 5; if ≥10/μL then apheresis was commenced the following morning. If PB CD34 was <10/μL on day 5, plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg sc) was administered on the evening of day 5 and apheresis was commenced the following day (Group A). In addition, during apheresis, for patients whose collection yield was < 0.5 × 106 CD34/kg, in the absence of instrument failure or problems with the collection procedure, plerixafor was added (Group B). Morning administration of G-CSF and evening dosing of plerixafor continued daily until apheresis was complete. From February to July 2009, 174 mobilization attempts occurred; 27 with chemotherapy and 147 with cytokines alone. The 147 pts who underwent mobilization with cytokines alone are presented here. The underlying diagnosis was as follows: Myeloma 61 pts, NHL 54 pts, Amyloid 17 pts, Hodgkin 10 pts, POEMS 4 pts and 1 pt with a solid tumor. For the entire group the median number of CD34 cells collected was 5.5 × 106 CD34/kg (range 0.1-17). The median number of apheresis was 3 (range 1-12). 67 patients (46%) received plerixafor; 37 patients started plerixafor during mobilization (Group A) and 30 patients during collections due to a poor yield (Group B). 12 pts of the 37 received plerixafor on day 4 because of prior mobilization failure or high risk of mobilization failure and are included in Group A. Table 1 outlines the details of mobilization and collection by groups. By disease category, of the 61 patients with MM, 28 (46%) received plerixafor (8 Group A and 20 Group B). Median apheresis in all the MM pts was 2 (range 1-12) with a total of 6.8 × 106 CD34/kg (2.2-16.7). In the 54 NHL pts, 32 (59%) received plerixafor (24 Group A and 8 Group B). Median apheresis for all pts with NHL was 3 (range 1-7) with a total of 4.6 × 106 CD34/kg (range 0-11.4). Overall, only 7 of 147 (5%) mobilization attempts failed to achieve a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34/kg. This compares to a 22% failure rate prior to institution of this risk adapted approach. In conclusion, implementing this risk adapted approach allows poor mobilizers to be identified promptly and for plerixafor to be initiated during mobilization and collection, thereby reducing the number of mobilization failures. In patients who predictably would not have successful collection based on a PB CD34 <10/μL, addition of plerixafor results in a majority of patients achieving an adequate collection. This risk adapted approach may be more cost effective than reattempting mobilization after a prior failure or utilizing combination G-CSF and plerixafor for upfront mobilization. Table 1. Mobilization and Collection data. All patients N=147 Group A1 N=37 Group B2 N=30 No Plerixafor N=80 PB CD34 day 4 Median 11 0 7 19 Range 0-331 0-7 0-32 0-331 PB CD34 day 5 Median 10 4.5 12 15 Range 0-51 2-9 11-23 9-51 Apheresis Yield Median 5.5 4.4 6.0 6.2 Range 0.1-17 3.1-12.7 3.0-12.2 2-17 Number of Apheresis Median 3 3 5 2 Range 1-12 1-7 4-12 1-8 Days of Plerixafor Median n/a 3 2 n/a Rang 1-7 1-8 1 Group A – Plerixafor initiated prior to apheresis 2 Group B – Plerixafor initiated during apheresis Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1669 Poster Board I-695 Background The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy significantly improved the results of therapy in aggressive non-Hodgkin's B cell lymphoma (NHL). However, significant number of the patients relapse following initial therapy. Lenalidomide was shown to have significant single agent activity in relapsed aggressive B cell lymphoma (J Clin Oncol 26:4952-7, 2008) however the safety in combination with standard first line immunochemotherapy is unknown. We initiated a phase I/II trial of R2-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone rituximab and lenalidomide) to establish the safety and efficacy of this therapy in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed aggressive B cell NHL. Herein, we report the results of phase I portion of this study. Methods A phase I study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide administered on days 1-10 with R-CHOP chemotherapy (rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, all on day 1, prednisone 100 mg/m2 days 1-5 of 21 day cycle) utilizing 3+3 dose escalation design. Lenalidomide dose escalation levels were 15 mg, 20 mg and 25 mg. All patients received 6 mg pegfilgrastim injection on day 2. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 or more non-hematological toxicity or a hematological toxicity requiring a delay of the next cycle of chemotherapy due to cytopenia. The latter criterion was to ensure maintenance of the dose intensity and schedule of RCHOP; a potentially curative therapy in this setting. Eligible patients were adults newly diagnosed with CD20 positive diffuse large cell or follicular grade III B cell lymphoma, ECOG PS 0-2 and good organ function. There was no upper age restriction to participate in this study. Results Twelve patients were enrolled in phase I of this study. The median age was 69 years (range, 49-82) and 58% (7/12) of patients were males. Ten patients (83%) had DLBCL and two (17%) patients had follicular grade 3B lymphoma. International prognostic index was intermediate, high- intermediate and high in 6, 4 and 2 patients respectively. Patients distribution by lenalidomide dose was: 3 patients received 15 mg/day, 3 received 20 mg/day and 6 received 25 mg/day on days 1-10. Non-hematological toxicities included: grade 3 toxicity - neuropathy in one patient (8.3%), grade 2 toxicities were: infection in 17% (2/12) patients (skin in one patient, otitis media, and urinary tract infection in one patient); nausea 8% (1/12), rash 8% (1/12) and alopecia 41% (5/12). The most common toxicity to R2-CHOP was myelosuppresion. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 17% (2/12) and 41% (5/12) of patients, respectively. The neutropenia was of short duration, and no patients developed neutropenic complications. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in 8% (1/12). Most importantly, there were no delays in chemotherapy due to cytopenias. No DLT was seen. The 25 mg/day days 1-10 dose of lenalidomide was taken forward to an ongoing phase 2 trial. Conclusion Lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg/day for days 1- 10 combined with R-CHOP chemotherapy is well tolerated. The addition of lenalidomide did not affect hematological recovery and did not result in treatment delays. This dose and schedule is now being evaluated in the phase II part of the trial. Disclosures Zent: Genentech, Bayer, Genzyme, Novartis: Research Funding. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 443 Background: MYC translocations have been reported to have inferior outcome in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Here we present MYC translocation prevalence and outcome from two cohorts of newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients treated in the chemotherapy (C) and immunochemotherapy (IC) eras. Methods: Tissue microarrays were created from 302 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients evaluated at the Mayo Clinic with availabel paraffin tissue. 233 DLBCL patients first diagnosed from March 1986-July 2001 were retrospectively identified based on a diagnosis of DLBCL and treatment with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. 69 DLBCL patients diagnosed from March 2002-October 2005 and treated with immunochemotherapy were prospectively enrolled in the University of Iowa / Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource. Central pathology review was performed on all samples to confirm the diagnosis of DLBCL. Interphase FISH was performed using a breakapart strategy for MYC and BCL6 gene regions and a dual fusion strategy for t(14;18)(IGH&/BCL2). Results: Chemotherapy (C) era patients were primarily treated with CHOP (88%); immunochemotherapy (IC) era patients were all treated with an R-CHOP based regimen. The median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range, 22-92) for C patients and 65 years (range, 20-82) for IC patients. Median follow-up for C patients was 11.3 years (range, 2.7-21.3) with 145 (62%) deaths; for IC patients, the median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 2.1-6.4) with 17 deaths (25%). FISH was successful in 195 of 302 patients (65%). MYC translocations were identified in 6 of 141 C patients (4%) and 3 of 54 IC patients (6%). MYC translocations were associated with inferior overall survival in the C patients (p=0.001), the IC patients (p=0.04), and in the combined group (p≤0.001). Median survival of patients with MYC translocations was 19 months and 16 months for C and IC respectively, compared to 112 months (C) and unreached (IC) for DLBCL patients without MYC translocations. 4 of the 9 MYC translocation patients had a double hit (2 with both MYC and BCL2 translocations and 2 with translocations of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6). Associations of MYC and outcome remained significant in all patients after adjusting for treatment and IPI (p<0.05). Conclusions: MYC translocations are present in approximately 5% of DLBCL patients and are associated with poor outcome in patients treated with C or IC. New treatment approaches are needed for DLBCL patients with MYC translocations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.