Citations

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), comprised primarily of microtubule‐associated protein tau. NFTs are defining hallmarks of AD and its accumulation into pathological oligomers and fibrils has been associated with cognitive decline in AD and other tauopathies. Despite its pivotal role in the disease process, we still have a poor understanding of how their formation, toxicity, and spread across brain regions is regulated via tau‐associated proteins that regulate the oligomerization, pathological accumulation, and seeding of tau in affected cell types and vulnerable brain regions.MethodWe have established two proximity‐dependent biotin‐identification (BioID) models as novel approaches to identify the composition and proximal molecular environment of tau aggregates. Using an in vitro and ex vivo model approach coupled with mass spectrometry, we have identified proteins that were primarily associated with mutant tau aggregates vs. soluble wildtype tau and stratified them based on significance, molecular pathway and druggability. Immunoblotting and immunofluorescence were performed to assess the interaction of endogenous and overexpressed top candidates with tau, along with visualization with NFTs in the context of human AD pathology to assess their impact on tau‐aggregate formation and toxicity.ResultTo determine the physiological and aggregate specific interacting partners of tau, we are comparing wild type tau (TauWT) with mutant tau (Tau3xMUT) carrying three tauopathy‐associated mutations (A152T/P301L/S320F). The proteomic analysis from our combined proteomic datasets revealed that significantly changed proteins included candidates involved in RNA processing, as well as protein ubiquitination and proteasome degradation. We have begun validating proteins that are enriched in mutant tau in human tissue of AD, as well as primary tauopathies, that may be druggable targets for tauopathies.ConclusionThis study provides novel insights into cellular pathways and molecular mechanisms of neurodegeneration, by identifying in the context of living neurons and brain tissue different functional classes of tau‐associated proteins with relevance for AD pathophysiology. These are expected to include proteins that may mediate the toxic effect of NFTs, facilitate the formation or degradation of pathological tau aggregates, and catalyze posttranslational modifications of tau oligomers and associated proteins.

AbstractBackgroundInter‐cellular communication within the gliovascular unit (GVU) is critical for cerebral blood flow regulation, and maintenance of the blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) properties. The breakdown of BBB in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is well‐established, but precise underlying molecular changes remain unclear. Additionally, whether GVU molecular alterations observed in AD brains are also detected in blood from living patients is unknown. Further, these GVU molecular perturbations require further investigation in different model systems to identify both human brain‐specific and cross‐species conserved alterations. In this study, we investigated prioritized GVU molecules altered in AD brains for their conservation in blood and cross‐species model systems.MethodsWe performed single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue in AD and control brains. We analyzed this data to detect cell‐specific GVU molecular perturbations and their interactions. We investigated molecular interactions between vascular and astrocyte clusters, the major cell types of the GVU of the BBB. To determine whether GVU transcriptional alterations detected in the brain are preserved in the blood, existing blood expression, genetic, and neuroimaging data from two longitudinal antemortem cohorts were analyzed. Using model systems, including mouse, drosophila, and zebrafish, we evaluated the cross‐species conservation of the top GVU alterations detected in AD brains.ResultsBrain snRNAseq revealed transcriptional profiles of 6,541 astrocytes and 2,210 vascular cells. The latter formed three distinct vascular clusters characterized as pericytes, endothelia and perivascular fibroblasts. We identified differentially expressed genes and their enriched pathways within these clusters and observed the highest levels of transcriptional changes within pericytes. Vascular targets that interact with astrocytic ligands have biological functions in cell signaling, angiogenesis, amyloid ß metabolism, and cytoskeletal architecture. We discovered that genetic variants influencing blood expression levels of some of the prioritized GVU genes were associated with neuroimaging burden of cerebrovascular disease in living human cohorts. Our ongoing studies in model systems revealed conservation of some of the top prioritized molecular perturbations across species.ConclusionOur findings prioritized by multiscale, cross‐tissue human data revealed GVU perturbations within interacting pericyte and astrocyte molecules, which are conserved across multiple cross‐species models. These results nominate new molecular targets and mechanistic insights for BBB disruptions in AD.

AbstractBackgroundAlthough we have greatly increased our ability to identify the presence of neurodegenerative pathology during life, additional techniques and targets are still needed to increase diagnostic specificity. Recently, it has become evident that the neuroinflammatory response might be tailored towards distinct diseases resulting in disease specific “neuroinflammatory signatures”. Therefore, a detailed comparison of neuroinflammatory molecules present among distinct neurodegenerative diseases could provide novel information of disease specific therapeutic targets or differential biomarkers.MethodTo better examine potential neuroinflammatory signatures, a 71 immune‐related protein multiplex ELISA panel was utilized to analyze anterior cingulate grey matter from 127 individuals neuropathologically diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and argyrophilic grain disease (AGD). A partial least square regression analysis was used for unbiased clustering and identifying proteins that were distinctly correlated with each disease correcting for age and gender. Receiver operator characteristic and binary logistic regression analyses were then used to examine the ability of each candidate protein to distinguish diseases. Validation in postmortem cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 15 AD and 14 CTE cases was performed to determine if candidate proteins could act as possible biomarkers. Finally, histology was performed using candidate proteins to visualize cell type expression for better understanding of potential mechanistic pathways.ResultFive clusters of neuroimmune proteins were identified and compared to determine if clusters were specific to distinct disease. Each cluster was found to correlate with either CTE, AD, PSP, CBD, or AGD. When examining which proteins were the strongest driver of each cluster, it was observed the most distinctive protein for CTE was CCL21, AD was FLT3L, and PSP was IL13. Individual proteins that were specific to CBD and AGD were not observed. CCL21 was observed to be elevated in CTE CSF compared to AD, further validating the use as possible biomarkers.ConclusionOverall, these results highlight that different neuroinflammatory responses might underlie unique mechanisms in related neurodegenerative pathologies. Additionally, the use of distinct neuroinflammatory signatures could help differentiate between neuropathologies and act as novel biomarker candidate to increase specificity for in‐life diagnoses.

AbstractBackgroundGlial activation plays a critical role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis and is associated with amyloid‐β plaques and neurofibrillary tangles composed of phosphorylated tau (phospho‐tau). With approximately 40%‐60% of AD cases having limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), TDP‐43 pathology has become more the rule than the exception in AD brains. However, the effect of LATE‐NC in AD‐related glial activation is unknown.MethodWe analyzed the effect of TDP‐43 pathology on glial activation in three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Twenty cases of each subtype (n = 60 total) were selected from the FLorida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic (FLAME) cohort. Cases were immunohistochemically evaluated on serial sections of the hippocampus in the CA1 and subiculum subsectors, and superior temporal, inferior parietal, and mid‐frontal cortices with antibodies to CD68 (phagocytosis), GFAP (astrogliosis), GT‐38 (conformation‐specific AD‐type tau), 6F/3D (amyloid‐β), and phospho‐Serine 409/410 of TDP‐43 (pTDP‐43). Digital pathology was employed to quantify immunohistochemical staining. Multivariable regression modeling was utilized to understand the relationship between glial activation and AD pathologies.ResultThe level of glial activation, defined as % of immunoreactive surface area for CD68 and GFAP, was lowest in HpSp AD (0.54%, 13%), whereas typical AD (1.3%, 33%) and limbic predominant AD (1.3%, 30%) had similar levels suggesting a ceiling effect, or plateau, of gliosis levels (both p<0.001). HpSp AD was more often male (p<0.001) and younger at disease onset (p<0.001) compared to both typical AD and limbic predominant AD. Multivariable regression modeling of CD68 (subiculum R2 = 0.60) identified advanced tau to be a significant predictor of CD68 in all brain regions. LATE‐NC stage predicted increased CD68 levels in limbic brain regions. Multivariable regression modeling of GFAP (CA1 R2 = 0.60) showed that Aβ was the strongest predictor of astrogliosis in CA1 and subiculum (p<0.001). Advanced tau in CA1 and parietal cortex, LATE‐NC in subiculum and temporal cortex, and APOE4 genotype in CA1 predicted a significant increase in GFAP.ConclusionThese findings highlight the significant role TDP‐43 pathology plays in affecting the microenvironment and interplay between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration and have important implications for therapeutic strategies in AD with co‐morbid LATE‐NC.

AbstractBackgroundLewy body dementia (LBD) is one of the most common causes of dementia and is characterized by the deposition of extracellular amyloid plaques and intracellular accumulation of alpha‐synuclein in the form of Lewy bodies and neurites. Many of these individuals also have concomitant neuropathological changes such as vascular disease, tangles, and TDP‐43. Like in Alzheimer’s disease, APOE4 is the most significant genetic risk factor for the development of LBD. We sought to survey the landscape of transcriptional changes in the cingulate cortex from a large cohort of LBD cases (>400) compared to normal controls of both sexes.MethodWe performed bulk tissue RNAseq and aligned reads to a human reference genome that is informed on the sex chromosome complement of the sample. Differentially expressed genes were determined after genome‐wide correction.ResultWe found a core set of transcriptional changes that were shared between both sexes in pathways related to neuronal functions and inflammation. However, we also identified numerous changes in genetic female samples that were not significantly altered in genetic males, or that were significantly altered but in the opposite direction. Similar male‐specific changes were also found. These alterations were present for genes on both sex chromosomes as well as autosomes. Though cohort sizes were smaller, we also compared this dataset to Alzheimer’s disease and found shared but unique transcriptional alterations.ConclusionOverall, genetic males and females exhibit sex‐shared and sex‐specific gene expression patterns in dementia with Lewy bodies. We are currently assessing splice alterations, running causal gene network analysis, and performing histological validation.

AbstractBackgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), or AD‐TDP, can be diffuse or limbic‐predominant. Understanding whether diffuse AD‐TDP has genetic, clinical, and pathological features that differ from limbic AD‐TDP could have clinical and research implications. We aimed to better characterize the clinicopathologic features of diffuse AD‐TDP and differentiate it from limbic‐predominant AD‐TDP pathology.MethodThree hundred sixty‐three participants were prospectively recruited and followed in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and Neurodegenerative Research Group and died between May 1999 and August 2021. All underwent genetic, clinical, neuropsychologic, and neuropathologic evaluations. At postmortem evaluation, they showed Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and TDP‐43‐immunoreactive inclusions. The distribution of TDP‐43 pathology was assessed using the Josephs 6‐stage scheme. Participants with TDP‐43 stages 1‐3 were classified as Limbic, while those with stages 4‐6 were classified as Diffuse. Neuropathologically defined frontotemporal lobar degeneration cases were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinicopathological features that predicted diffuse TDP‐43 pathology at postmortem. We hypothesized that the Diffuse group would show impairment in cognitive domains beyond episodic memory and more hippocampal sclerosis.ResultsThe cohort was 61% female and old at onset (median:76 years [IQR:70‐82]) and death (median:88 years [IQR:82‐92]). Fifty‐four percent (n = 197) were classified as Limbic and 46% (n = 166) as Diffuse. A “clinical” multivariate logistic regression fit to 85 participants with all clinical variables of interest showed that later age at onset (OR:1.09, 95%CI:1.01‐1.19;P = 0.03), longer disease duration (OR:1.17, 95%CI:1.02‐1.36;P = 0.03) and higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores (OR:1.14, 95%CI:1.01‐1.28;P = 0.03) all independently increased the odds of being Diffuse, while higher Trails Making Test‐B (OR:0.99, 95%CI:0.98‐0.99;P = 0.02) and Block Design Test scores (OR:0.91, 95%CI:0.85‐0.99;P = 0.023) independently decreased the odds of being Diffuse. A “pathology” multivariate logistic regression fit to 233 cases with all neuropathological data revealed that widespread amyloid‐β pathology corresponding to Thal phases 3‐5 all significantly decreased the odds of diffuse pathology by 80‐90%, while hippocampal sclerosis increased it sixfold (OR:6.18, 95% CI:2.93‐13.03;P<0.001).ConclusionsDiffuse AD‐TDP shows clinicopathological features that differ from Limbic AD‐TDP, which could have public health implications relating to treatment and research on AD and dementia.

AbstractBackgroundStructural variants range from simple loss or gain of genetic material to complex events that restructure entire chromosomes. This heterogeneity coupled with variant size greater than sequencing read‐length makes structural variant mapping from short‐read sequencing data difficult and error‐prone. Consequently, the role of structural variants is poorly explored in many phenotypes, including dementia.MethodWe used the GATK‐SV pipeline that combines four external structural variant mapping algorithms with machine‐learning to build high‐quality consensus structural variant calls. We applied GATK‐SV to short‐read whole‐genome sequencing data of 2,601 frontotemporal dementia‐amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spectrum (FTD/ALS) patients, 2,612 Lewy body dementia (LBD) patients, and 4,132 neurologically unaffected participants.ResultAfter stringent quality‐control, we performed genome‐wide association studies on 2,307 ALS/FTD patients versus 3,677 controls with 4,699 common structural variants and 2,355 LBD patients versus 3,700 controls with 4,889 common structural variants. In the FTD/ALS cohort, we identified well‐known risk variants at the C9orf72 (p‐value = 4.99×10‐18, OR = 14.47, 95% CI = 7.90–26.49) and MAPT loci (p‐value = 3.48×10‐6, OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68–0.86) corroborating the ability of our pipeline to identify disease‐associated structural variants. Moreover, we discovered, replicated, and validated TPCN1 as a novel risk locus for LBD (p‐value = 9.18×10‐6, OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.22–1.67). Further, we identified rare exonic variants with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic effects, such as an SNCA gene duplication in LBD and a deletion of exons 1 and 2 in CHCHD10 in FTD/ALS. We additionally observed structural variants in regulatory regions, e.g. a deletion of a key PSEN2 enhancer, which resulted in an approximate 0.70 fold‐change in PSEN2 expression in LBD. Finally, we built an interactive web app where structural variants can be visualized and explored (https://ndru-ndrs-lng-nih.shinyapps.io/non_ad_dementias_sv_app/).ConclusionCommon and rare structural variants play a role in LBD and FTD/ALS. Our structural variant resource is publicly available and can be used to further explore the role of structural variants in LBD and FTD/ALS.

AbstractBackgroundCerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by the accumulation of amyloid‐beta in the cerebrovasculature, effects blood vessel integrity leading to brain hemorrhages and an accelerated cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. In a previous genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of 853 neuropathologically confirmed AD cases, we identified a LINC‐PINT splice variant that associated with lower CAA levels amongst individuals that did not have a copy of the APOEe4 AD risk allele (Reddy. J et al 2021). In this study, we perform GWAS to identify further genetic risk factors for CAA and AD neuropathology (Braak stage, Thal phase) in additional AD cases, and participants lacking significant AD pathology (non‐AD).MethodWe expanded the original AD cohort (N = 853) with 400 additional AD cases genotyped using the Infinium Omni2.5+Exome array. We also identified 110 AD and 502 non‐AD donors from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, with existing CAA scores and genome‐wide genotypes. We performed QC and imputation of these genotypes to TOPMed. We will conduct GWAS in AD only (N = 1,363), non‐AD only, as well as the combined cohort (N = 1,865). We will test imputed variant dosages for association with square root transformed CAA, Braak and Thal, using linear regression in PLINK, adjusting for relevant covariates. We will perform interaction analysis of CAA‐associated variants with APOEe4 and sex; and pursue stratified analyses. Summary statistics will be utilized to perform SNP‐based gene set enrichment analysis to identify biological pathways implicated in CAA.ResultWe expect that the increased power of this expanded dataset will lead to the identification of additional novel genetic risk factors for CAA and AD neuropathology. Genetic interaction analysis with sex and APOEe4 may further elucidate the role of these risk factors. The addition of 1,102 participants will enable assessment of the LINC‐PINT locus for association with CAA in an independent dataset.ConclusionWe expect this study will provide further insights into the genetic architecture underlying risk for CAA, both in the context of significant AD pathology, and without. Characterization of genetic variants in the context of neuropathology may lead to new avenues of research aimed at identifying biomarkers and therapies to treat CAA, and AD.

AbstractBackgroundTau proteins aggregate into spatially and morphologically distinct lesions in primary and secondary tauopathies. These signature lesions result from deposition of tau proteins that are distinctly modified via missense mutation and/or post‐translational modification for each disease strain. Identifying the unique tau protein abnormalities that lead to specific neurodegenerative diseases is beneficial in their early diagnosis and treatment. This is especially true for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy a primary tauopathy with clinical symptoms mirroring Parkinsonian syndromes and frontotemporal dementias.MethodBiochemical analysis of tau aggregates from patients with a pathological diagnosis of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (n = 60) demonstrate that the tau protein modifications observed in this disease result from tau that is specifically modified and thereby forms the basis of the distinct disease strains observed. Here data collected using the sarkosyl‐insoluble tau fractions from tissue samples of pathologically diagnosed patients with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy without comorbidities allows for the direct observation of the modifications. Most interesting is the variability of the tau proteins that actually accumulate for this disease opening up the possibility that tau strains may exist within any given tauopathy even as the clinical manifestations appear similar. This indicates that early and specific identification and detection of these strains is critical for the development of therapies for these diseases.ResultExtraction and examination of sarkosyl‐insoluble tau proteins from deceased patients pathologically diagnosed with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy indicate that multiple tau strains exist within this primary tauopathy. Western blotting of these extracts from patient tissues demonstrates a unique banding pattern of insoluble tau in a subset of the cases that exhibit extreme hyperphosphorylation as indicated by additional high molecular weight tau banding. These patients also had an earlier age of onset and age of death indicating a more aggressive disease strain. Additional data is presented comparing the structure and seeding capability of this insoluble tau and the distribution and burden of insoluble tau in these Progressive Supranuclear Palsy patients compared to those with typical onset and insoluble tau signature.ConclusionMultiple pathological tau strains exist in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex, multicellular disease with immunological and genetic components. Previous studies demonstrated associations between AD and the missense variants ABI3‐rs616338‐T and PLCG2‐rs72824905‐G. The perturbed expression of these genes has been demonstrated to disrupt microglial function. To date, the transcriptomic profiles of variant carriers in the context of microglial subtype and state have not been explored in human brain. This represents a knowledge gap in our understanding of AD risk and resilience. We have developed and optimized a single nucleus RNAseq (snRNAseq) approach to study the impact of ABI3 and PLCG2 variants on microglial enriched nuclei from frozen human brain.MethodDOCK8 was identified as a nuclear microglial marker based on previous brain snRNAseq data. DOCK8 based microglial enrichment using fluorescent activated nuclei sorting (FANS) was validated using RT‐qPCR and snRNAseq in human cerebellum and temporal cortex (TCX), respectively. We are applying this enrichment and snRNAseq approach to TCX tissue from a cohort of 30 donors harboring ABI3 or PLCG2 missense mutations, or neither. Standard snRNAseq alignment and quality control pipelines will be applied, and nuclei annotated based on putative microglial markers. Differential gene expression will be assessed using pseudo bulk and MAST approaches, for association with ABI3 and PLCG2 genotype, diagnosis groups, risk factors, and pathology scores.ResultDOCK8 has several commercially available antibodies, making it an ideal microglia‐selection marker. Using RT‐qPCR in microglia enriched nuclei, we demonstrated an enrichment of microglia marker genes and depletion of other brain cell type markers. This is further supported by snRNA‐seq data from DOCK8‐sorted TCX tissue that yielded a 5x increase in microglia proportion (56% vs. 11% in unselected nuclei), enabling analyses of microglia sub‐populations. Leveraging this approach, we will investigate affected genes and pathways and uncover the resilience and risk mechanisms within microglia sub‐populations in ABI3 and PLCG2 variant‐carriers.ConclusionOur study presents a novel method for enriching microglial nuclei from frozen human brains and enables transcriptomic profiling of microglial subpopulations in ABI3 and PLCG2 missense variant‐carriers. We expect these insights will reveal novel genes and pathways that may play a key role in microglial function in AD.