Rutledge, Matthew H.

Abstract Background Monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid‐β (Aβ), including aducanumab, have been tested to treat Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, limited data exist on neuropathology following treatment and the effects of amyloid‐related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). We report on such data from five aducanumab‐treated study participants with AD of whom two experienced ARIA. Methods Aducanumab‐treated study participants who came to autopsy ( n = 5) were matched to AD controls ( n = 12) based on the presence/type of autosomal dominant AD mutation, APOE genotype, age at cognitive symptom onset, and sex. We assessed cognitive measures, 18 F‐florbetapir PET centiloid, ARIA risk factors, and AD neuropathologic change. Using multiplex immunofluorescence, brain regions affected along Thal Aβ phases were stained for Aβ isoforms and phosphorylated tau, as well as for ARIA‐associated markers, including Perls’ Prussian blue to detect ferric iron, fibrinogen‐α for blood brain barrier integrity, membrane attack complex (C5b‐C9) for complement activation, and activated microglia (IBA1, CD68). Results Study participants included four males and one female, all carrying at least one APOE ε4 allele. Two participants carried a PSEN1 NM_000021.4:c.817G>A , p.Glu273Lys mutation. Cumulative aducanumab dosage ranged between 5–241 mg/kg, with death occurring 5–41 months after the last infusion. Amyloid burden on PET declined in all participants (range 15‐100 centiloids). Two participants experienced ARIA. Compared to AD controls, Aβ aa1‐8 and Aβ 42 were selectively reduced in cortical layer I of aducanumab‐treated study participants ( p <0.05) but not in the total cortex, as shown for the middle frontal cortex in Figure 1. No differences were observed in phosphorylated tau burden. Prussian blue‐stained hemosiderin was present in both treated and untreated AD cases. However, in participants with ARIA, hemosiderin accumulated in superficial cortical layers near CAA‐laden meningeal and penetrating vessels, which also exhibited extensive complement and microglial activation (Figure 2). Conclusions Aβ clearance and ARIA‐related findings were localized predominantly in superficial cortical layers, suggesting that aducanumab biodistribution is more pronounced in these regions rather than deeper cortical layers.

Abstract Neurofibrillary tangles are dynamic neuropathologic hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease with a hypothesized lifespan morphologically-defined by three maturity levels: pretangles, mature tangles, and ghost tangles. To better understand the progression of tangle pathophysiology, we characterized tangle maturity level predilection of 15 tau antibodies recognizing a broad range of linear, phosphorylation, conformational, and truncation epitopes in the hippocampus of 24 postmortem brains. We developed the tangle maturity scoring system to semi-quantitatively evaluate each tangle maturity level. Based on proportions of tangle maturity levels, we classified antibodies as “early” (mostly pretangles and mature tangles), “middling” (mature tangles with pretangles and ghost tangles), and “advanced” (mostly ghost tangles and mature tangles) tangle maturity markers. To summarize tangle maturity predilection, we developed the tangle maturity scale to integrate individual tangle maturity scores. Correlations showed stronger relationships between tangle maturity scale and subsector thickness for more advanced tangle maturity markers in CA1 and subiculum, whereas Braak tangle stage remained consistently correlated throughout markers of the tangle lifespan. To aid in scoring hippocampi, we used machine learning to recognize tangle maturity levels, which performed comparably to a domain expert and showed similar relationships by Spearman correlation. Pattern recognition software was used to assess tangle and neuritic tau burden separately, which generally correlated with Braak stage and neuronal counts. However, tangle-derived tau burden more consistently correlated with hippocampal subsector thickness. In conclusion, we developed manual and automated scoring systems to evaluate tangle maturity levels, demonstrating early 4R, phosphorylated, and oligomeric tau accumulation preceding more advanced 3R and truncated tau. Our study provides supportive evidence of disease-relevant ordering of tau posttranslational modifications in the brain, which may have implications for theragnostic development. These findings underscore the promise of computerized quantitative analyses (i.e., pathomics) for high-throughput feature extraction from whole-slide images to enhance our understanding of microscopically observed morphologic changes.

AbstractBackgroundThere is a gap in knowledge concerning which tangle maturity levels (Moloney, Alzheimers Dement, 2021) are associated with antemortem measures (tau‐PET, MRI, cognitive testing). We hypothesized antemortem measures would be more strongly correlated with markers recognizing middling to advanced tangle maturity. We additionally sought to assess the strength of the relationship with tangle and neuritic pathology recognized by tangle maturity markers.MethodPosterior hippocampi from n = 30 cases with antemortem measures ≤3 years prior to death were cut (5µm) and immunostained with tau antibodies to evaluate early (AT8), middling (PHF‐1), or advanced (2E9) tangle maturity. GENIE (pattern recognition software) separated tangle from neuritic burden (Figure). Hippocampus, parahippocampus, and fusiform were analyzed to correlate digital pathology with flortaucipir tau‐PET standard uptake value ratio (SUVr, cerebellar crus normalization), MRI volume/thickness, and cognitive measures which included Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) delayed recall, Mini‐Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).ResultThe strongest relationships observed with flortaucipir were with PHF‐1 and 2E9 burden (Table). AT8 tangle and neuritic burden correlations with flortaucipir were relatively similar in the hippocampus but were stronger with neuritic pathology in parahippocampus and fusiform. PHF‐1 tangle and neuritic burden correlations were relatively similar with flortaucipir. 2E9 correlations were stronger with neuritic pathology in hippocampus. MRI measures were more strongly correlated with PHF‐1 and 2E9 burden. AT8 tangle and neuritic burden were correlated with fusiform thickness. The correlations between MRI measures and 2E9 tangle and neuritic burden were similar. Correlations between cognitive measures were similar between tangle maturity markers. AVLT delayed recall correlated with all tangle maturity markers, but neuritic burden was stronger for AT8 and 2E9 in hippocampus compared to tangle burden. MMSE correlated with neuritic burden for all tangle maturity markers. CDR remained statistically non‐significant.ConclusionInterpretation of the strength of the relationship between tau burden and antemortem measures differed across tangle maturity markers. Neuroimaging measures may be more sensitive to middle/advanced maturity markers with limited differences between tangle and neuritic pathology. These findings may be biologically relevant and imply either a limited recognition of tangles depending on antibody epitope, and/or may represent the clinicoradiologic impact of increasing neuritic burden.

AbstractBackgroundIncreasing evidence suggests that transactive response DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), or AD‐TDP, can be diffuse or limbic‐predominant. Understanding whether diffuse AD‐TDP has genetic, clinical, and pathological features that differ from limbic AD‐TDP could have clinical and research implications. We aimed to better characterize the clinicopathologic features of diffuse AD‐TDP and differentiate it from limbic‐predominant AD‐TDP pathology.MethodThree hundred sixty‐three participants were prospectively recruited and followed in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, and Neurodegenerative Research Group and died between May 1999 and August 2021. All underwent genetic, clinical, neuropsychologic, and neuropathologic evaluations. At postmortem evaluation, they showed Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes and TDP‐43‐immunoreactive inclusions. The distribution of TDP‐43 pathology was assessed using the Josephs 6‐stage scheme. Participants with TDP‐43 stages 1‐3 were classified as Limbic, while those with stages 4‐6 were classified as Diffuse. Neuropathologically defined frontotemporal lobar degeneration cases were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinicopathological features that predicted diffuse TDP‐43 pathology at postmortem. We hypothesized that the Diffuse group would show impairment in cognitive domains beyond episodic memory and more hippocampal sclerosis.ResultsThe cohort was 61% female and old at onset (median:76 years [IQR:70‐82]) and death (median:88 years [IQR:82‐92]). Fifty‐four percent (n = 197) were classified as Limbic and 46% (n = 166) as Diffuse. A “clinical” multivariate logistic regression fit to 85 participants with all clinical variables of interest showed that later age at onset (OR:1.09, 95%CI:1.01‐1.19;P = 0.03), longer disease duration (OR:1.17, 95%CI:1.02‐1.36;P = 0.03) and higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores (OR:1.14, 95%CI:1.01‐1.28;P = 0.03) all independently increased the odds of being Diffuse, while higher Trails Making Test‐B (OR:0.99, 95%CI:0.98‐0.99;P = 0.02) and Block Design Test scores (OR:0.91, 95%CI:0.85‐0.99;P = 0.023) independently decreased the odds of being Diffuse. A “pathology” multivariate logistic regression fit to 233 cases with all neuropathological data revealed that widespread amyloid‐β pathology corresponding to Thal phases 3‐5 all significantly decreased the odds of diffuse pathology by 80‐90%, while hippocampal sclerosis increased it sixfold (OR:6.18, 95% CI:2.93‐13.03;P<0.001).ConclusionsDiffuse AD‐TDP shows clinicopathological features that differ from Limbic AD‐TDP, which could have public health implications relating to treatment and research on AD and dementia.