Citations

Introduction: Overall outcomes have improved significantly for MM with a 5-year relative survival rate currently of >60%. With effective treatments, patients from all clinical strata and age groups are expected to have meaningful benefit, but despite excellent therapeutic advancements, some patients continue to have early mortality. We conducted this study to investigate factors associated with early mortality. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for adult patients with NDMM between 2004 and 2021. We excluded patients with multiple primary malignancies or lost to follow-up (unknown vital status or last contact). Early mortality was defined as death within 6 months from MM diagnosis. Patient demographics and socioeconomic factors available in NCDB were collected. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate the likelihood of early mortality in this large cohort of MM patients using multi-variate analysis. Results: Out of 255,579 eligible patients with MM, 35,302 (13.8%) died within the first 6 months of diagnosis and 108,534 (42.5%) died after the first 6 months of MM diagnosis. The early mortality cohort had significantly higher mean age at MM diagnosis (73.9 vs. 68.5 years, p<0.001) but no significant differences were noted for gender distribution. There was a statistically significant difference for racial/ethnic distribution (p=0.019), but the percentages were very similar among non-Hispanic White (69% vs 68.1%), non-Hispanic African American (18% vs 18.7%) and Hispanic patients (4.7% vs 4.8%). Patients in the early mortality cohort were less likely to be treated at academic institutions (28.4% vs 37.8%, p<0.001) and have significantly different distribution by insurance type (less likely to have private insurance; 17.3% vs. 30%, more likely to have Medicare; 72.1% vs. 58.7%, p<0.001) although overall insurance access was similar between the two groups (95.3% vs 95.2%, p=0.283). Early mortality was associated with higher morbidity scores as per the Charlson-Comorbidity Index (CCI) (p<0.001) and were more likely to have not received any treatment for MM (53.2% in early mortality group vs. 28.4% in late mortality, p<0.001). Early mortality was also associated with a lower literacy rate (high school graduation rate 21.2% vs. 19.7%, p<0.001) and lower household income (<$46,277; 19.1% vs. 17.7%, p<0.001). Conclusion: This large real-world analysis shows that despite therapeutic advances in recent years, there is a significant percentage of patients with NDMM in the U.S. who suffer from early mortality. There are several sociodemographic and economic factors that were found to be associated with early mortality, with some showing clear trends (older age, treatment facility type, insurance type, income, education, CCI), while others like racial differences were significant but somewhat ambiguous. Identifying and addressing these factors at diagnosis will help provide personalized care plans and minimize early mortality.

Background : Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 and can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Nonetheless, a significant number of patients experience disease progression or relapse post-rituximab therapy. CD19-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in B-NHL treatment. However, few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of CD20 CAR-T cells in rituximab-refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-NHL patients, particularly those treated with rituximab for a short time. Here, we conducted a prospective study, aimed to assess the long-term remission and survival in patients with rituximab-R/R B-NHL after treatment with U16 (CD20 CAR-T cells). Methods : This first-in-human study is an open-label, single center investigator-initiated trial (IIT) to determine the safety and efficacy of CD20 CAR-T in R/R B-NHL after previous rituximab treatment failure (no. ChiCTR2000036350). CD20 CAR-T was administered at a target dose of 1.0×107 CAR-T cells/kg after a 3-day conditioning chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of CD20 CAR-T. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded according to ASTCT 2019 criteria. The secondary objectives were to evaluate efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK). Response was assessed per Lugano 2014 criteria. Results:A total of 16 patients with R/R B-NHL were enrolled.The median age was 49 years (range, 28-66). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 2-5). All patients had received rituximab therapy; of these, 9 had done so within the 3 months before CAR-T infusion. CRS occurred in all patients, with 11 patients (68.75%) experiencing grade 1 or 2 CRS and 5 patients (31.25%) experiencing grade 3 CRS. No patient developed grade 4 CRS , and only one patient had ICANS.The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events observed after infusion included leukopenia (93.3%), anemia (40%) and thrombocytopenia (60%). An overall response rate of 100% was observed among enrolled patients, with 11 patients (68.75%) achieving complete remission(CR) and 5 patients (32.25%) achieving partial remission(PR) within 3 months. The median follow-up time was 11.7 months(range 0.69-47.47). The median overall survival was not reached, and the median progression-free survival was 14.5 months. 9 patients remained CR or PR for 12 months, with 7 of them continuing in CR for up to 24 months. The pharmacokinetics of CD20 CAR-T cells were assessed using quantitative PCR to determine the expansion and persistence ability. Peak CAR amplification were detected 7-14 days after infusin. Patients 1, 2 and 4 achieved long-term remission, and persistent positive CAR-T cell copy numbers were detected for 15 months, 30 months and 26 months, respectively. However, patients 7, 8 and 12 relapsed within 3 months, and the CAR-T cell copies of all three patients were reduced to fewer than 1×103 copies/μg of DNA within 3 months. The qPCR results indicated that the maintenance of efficacy was closely related to the persistence of CAR-T cells. Notably, patients who received rituximab less than 3 months before CAR-T infusion had a poorer prognosis, with higher relapse rates (77.8% vs. 28.6%) and shorter progression-free survival, regardless of the degree of response. Conclusion : Long-term follow-up demonstrated that CD20 CAR-T therapy can produce a deep and durable response with a favorable safety profile in patients with rituximab-refractory/relapsed B-NHL. Notably, patients who had received rituximab within 3 months had a poorer prognosis.

Background: While myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (MF), are usually sporadic, adult-onset neoplasms, an increasing number of germline risk alleles have been described (e.g. EGLN1, ETV6, SH2B3, and ATM) in these disorders. DDX41MT Germline Predisposition Syndrome (GPS) is the most common myeloid GPS in adults and while there is extensive data on MDS/AML, little is known regarding MPN occurring in this context. We carried out this study to define the prevalence and characteristics of DDX41MT-GPS associated MPN. Methods: After IRB approval, we retrospectively assessed the Mayo Clinic cohort of 174 patients with DDX41MT-GPS, which included both pathogenic and clinically relevant germline variants of undetermined significance (VUS), based on our previous analysis (Badar et al Haematologica 2023). Standard statistical measures were applied. Results: We identified 12 (6.9%) patients with MPN (ET-5, PV-2, PMF-4, MPN-NOS-1). The median age at MPN diagnosis was 61.2 years (range, 8.-70.4); 58.3% (n=7) were male, and 83.3% (n=10) were Caucasian. A family history of hematologic malignancy was present in 16.7% (n=2, AML and T-LGL), while 50% (n=6) had a family history of visceral malignancies and 41.7% (n=5) had no family history of malignancies. Among ET patients (n=5) with DDX41MT-GPS, JAK2V617F was the MPN driver in 4 (80%) while type 1-CALR (L367fs*46) was a driver in 1 (20%). This included a 9-year-old child diagnosed with JAK2V617FMT ET. The DDX41 variant was classified as pathogenic in 40% (n=2; E113Kfs*14, D140Gfs*2) and VUS in 60% (n=3; V544L, V591I, P38L). Bone marrow (BM) aspirates in the ET patients were hypercellular in 40% (n=2), normocellular in 40% (n=2) and hypocellular in 20% (n=1), and none had increased blasts, or reticulin fibrosis (RF). In addition to JAK2V617F, somatic mutations seen included SF3B1 (K666T, VAF 16%) in 1 patient and IDH2 (R140Q, VAF 6%) and DNMT3A (R882H, VAF 7%) in 1 patient, respectively. With a median follow-up from diagnosis of 3.9yrs (range 2.9-8.9), there were no thrombotic events and no disease progressions was documented. There were 2 patients with JAK2V167FMT PV in whom the DDX41MT were clinically significant VUS (c.138+5G>T and M155I). Both patients had hypercellular BM, with no increase in blasts, no RF, normal karyotypes and no additional somatic mutations. With a median follow up of 7.5yrs (range, 2.1-12.9), 1 patient developed a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and there were no fibrotic or leukemic transformations. There were 4 patients with PMF; 3 (75%) with JAK2V617F and 1(25%) with a type 1-CALR driver mutation (L367fs*46). DIPPS-plus scores ranged from 1 to 4 (median 2.5). The DDX41 variants were pathogenic in 50% (n=2, E256K and P78Qfs*3) and VUS in 50% (n=2, P510S and M155I). The median grade of RF at PMF diagnosis was grade 2 (range, 2-3). BM were hypercellular in 75% (n=3) and hypocellular in 25% (n=1), and 1 patient had 3% peripheral blasts (and no BM blasts). Somatic co-mutations included TET2 in 1 patient with a JAK2V617F, and CBL, EZH2 and SRSF2 in 1 patient with a CALR driver-mutation, respectively. PMF patients were treated with ruxolitinib (n=3), stem cell transplant (n=1), and pIFNα (n=1). With a median follow up of 3.9yrs (range,1.1-21.9), all patients were alive, and none had leukemia transformation. There was 1 patient with a JAK2V617F MPN-NOS with trisomy 9, where the DDX41MT-GPS was a VUS (I215L). There were no somatic co-mutations and at last follow up (3.1 years), there was no evidence for progression. Conclusions: While associations between late onset MDS/AML and DDX41MT-GPS has been well established, we systematically describe the MPN landscape seen in this context. MPN was diagnosed in 7% of our cohort, with JAK2V617F being the most common driver mutation. Most importantly, unlike in AML/MDS, where somatic DDX41 mutations are frequently associated with neoplastic transformation (30-50%; R525H being most common), none of our MPN patients had a somatic DDX41 mutation. Our work underscores the importance of germline mutation testing in patients with MPN.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of plasma cells with nearly 70% of all new diagnoses occurring in adults aged ≥ 65 years. For older adults, medical comorbidities and functional deficits become increasingly more prevalent with increased age and can impact disease outcomes and survival. There are unmet medical needs in this vulnerable patient population who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation to optimize the frontline therapy for better survival and less toxicity. This randomized phase 3 clinical trial is designed to focus on real world patient population to identify an optimal frontline three drug regimen in frail or a subset of intermediate fit newly diagnosed MM patients. Diagnostic criteria and response criteria will be based on IMWG guidelines. Participants must have a calculated myeloma frailty index (Myeloma Frailty Score Calculator (http://www.myelomafrailtyscorecalculator.net/) categorized as frail or intermediate fit (regardless of age) within 28 days prior to registration (NCT05561387). The two most commonly used induction/maintenance regimens in this patient population will be compared, including RVd-Lite (lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (dex) followed by R maintenance) and DRd (Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dex followed by R or R-daratumumab maintenance). The study will include three cohorts: (1) RVd-Lite induction followed by Rev maintenance (2) DRd induction followed by Rev maintenance (3) DRd induction followed by D-R maintenance. Induction phases will be 9 cycles in total of 28 days each, followed by maintenance for cycle 10 and beyond in all cohorts until disease progression: V 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, R 15 mg days 1-21, dex 20 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22 for induction phase and R 10 mg days 1-21 for maintenance phase in cohort 1 (VRd-Lite); SubQ Dara 1800 mg (on days 1, 8, 15, 22 for C1-2, on days 1, 15 for C3-6, on day 1 for C7-9), R 15 mg day 1-21, dex 20 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22 for induction phase and R 10 mg days 1-21 for maintenance in cohort 2 (DRd-R); SubQ Dara 1800 mg (on days 1, 8, 15, 22 for C1-2, on days 1, 15 for C3-6, on day 1 for C7-9), R 15 mg day 1-21, dex 20 mg days 1, 8, 15, 22 for induction phase and Dara 1800mg on day 1 and R 10mg days 1-21 for maintenance in cohort 3 (DRd-DR). The dual primary objectives are (A) to compare progression free survival (PFS) between cohorts 1 (VRd-Lite) and 2 (DRd-R); (B) to compare overall survival (OS) between cohorts 1 (VRd-Lite) and 3 (DRd-DR). Quality of life objectives are to compare patient reported global health status between treatment arms at the end of induction therapy using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. A total of 459 eligible patients will be enrolled in this randomized three cohort trial. It is hypothesized that Cohort 1 will have a median PFS of 2.667 years and a median OS of 5 years. With 153 eligible participants per cohort accrued over 5 years, and an additional follow-up period of 3 years, this trial has 80% power to detect an increase in the median PFS in Cohort 2 from 2.667 years to 4 years, and 83.4% power to detect an increase in the median OS in Cohort 3 from 5 years to 8.5 years, each with a one-sided type I error rate of 2%. This trial will be conducted among the NCI cooperative groups SWOG, ALLIANCE, and ECOG/ACRIN and incorporate substantial involvement from NCORP and VA member sites. This study is anticipated to provide practice changing data for this transplant-ineligible real world population to achieve deeper and longer remissions with less side effects and better quality of life.

Background Abnormal karyotype is not infrequent in polycythemia vera (PV) and has been associated with shortened survival (BJH 2018;182:437). In the current study, we utilized a large institutional database, in order to describe the spectrum and prevalence of specific cytogenetic abnormalities in PV, during different stages of the disease, and examine their clinical, molecular, and prognostic correlates, in the context of previously established risk factors. Methods After institutional review board approval, we identified 669 cytogenetically-annotated patients with PV, evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1973 and 2023, and met the International Consensus Classification diagnostic criteria (Arber et al. Blood 2022;140;1200). Cytogenetic reporting was in accordance with the International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature. Results i) Prevalence of cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis and at different stages of the disease 436 of 669 (65%) patients with PV underwent cytogenetic evaluation within one year of diagnosis, 116 (17%) within 1-10 years, 47 (7%) after 10 years, and 70 (10%) at time of fibrotic or leukemic transformation. In patients with cytogenetic information obtained within 1 year of diagnosis, karyotype was normal in 369 (85%), showed loss of Y chromosome (-Y) in 15 (3%), and other abnormalities in 52 (12%). Most common abnormalities included trisomy 9 (n=11; 3%), del(20q) (n=10; 2%), trisomy 8 (n=4; 1%), other sole abnormalities (n=16; 4%), and ≥ 2 abnormalities (n=11; 3%) including complex karyotype (n=4; 0.9%). Frequency of abnormal karyotype was higher with longer disease duration; 15% within a year of diagnosis, 28% in 1-10 years, 49% over 10 years after diagnosis, and 50% at time of fibrotic or leukemic transformation (p<0.01). Sole del (20q), single abnormalities excluding 20q-, +8, +9, or -Y, and ≥ 2 abnormalities including complex karyotype were progressively acquired; respective frequencies within a year of diagnosis, over 10 years after diagnosis, and at time of fibrotic or leukemic transformation were 2%/21%/10% (del (20q), 4%/17%/14% (single abnormality excluding 20q-, +8, +9, or -Y), 3%/11%/19% (≥ 2 abnormalities), 1%/ 2%,/10% (complex karyotype) (all p-values <0.01). In addition, sole +8 displayed highest frequency at fibrotic transformation compared to within a year of diagnosis (5% vs 0.9%; p=0.04). ii) Phenotypic and Molecular Correlates 436 patients with PV (51% males; median age; 64 years) who underwent cytogenetic testing within one year of diagnosis were examined for clinical and molecular correlations. Abnormal karyotype compared to normal karyotype, correlated with older age (median: 70 vs 63 years, p<0.01), male gender (64% vs 48%, p=0.02) and lower platelet count (370 vs 465 × 109/L, p<0.01). Sole del (20q) compared to normal karyotype was associated with older age (median: 76 vs 63 years, p<0.01); sole +8 exclusively occurred in patients ≥ 60 years (p=0.03); sole +9 was associated with venous thrombosis history (45% vs 17%, p=0.03). TET2 and SRSF2 mutations were found to cluster with normal karyotype (18% vs 4%; p=0.04 and 5% vs 0%; p=0.14 in normal vs abnormal karyotype, respectively). iii) Prognostic Impact of Cytogenetic Abnormalities At a median follow-up of 7.4 years (range; 0.04-42.4 years), a total of 163 (37%) patients have died, 50 (11%) and 14 (3%) underwent fibrotic and leukemic transformation, respectively. In univariate analysis for overall survival (OS), abnormal karyotype compared to normal karyotype, was associated with inferior survival (median OS; 10.5 vs 16.3 years, p<0.01). In multivariate analysis, the adverse impact of abnormal karyotype remained significant (p=0.02; HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3), along with age ≥60 years, leukocyte count ≥15 × 109/L, and SRSF2 mutations. Abnormal karyotype was also an independent predictor of myelofibrosis-free survival (p<0.01; HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.8-7.8), along with SRSF2 mutations. Analysis of leukemia-free survival revealed abnormal karyotype to be a significant risk factor in univariate (p<0.01), but not multivariate analysis that included SRSF2 mutation (p>0.1). Conclusions The current study provides the distribution of cytogenetic abnormalities at different stages of PV and affirms the prognostic significance of abnormal karyotype at the time of diagnosis, highlighting the importance of incorporating cytogenetic studies in the diagnostic evaluation of PV.

Introduction: Pembrolizumab Gemcitabine Vinorelbine and Liposomal Doxorubicin (P-GVD) has become a commonly employed regimen for the treatment of relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), often preceding autologous stem cell transplant in patients with good response. The utilization of P-GVD is based on a 38-evaluable patient prospective trial (Moskowitz et al. JCO 2021). There remains minimal data regarding the efficacy of this regimen in a larger, real-world cohort. Methods:Patients with CHL who received P-GVD at 9 United States centers were retrospectively evaluated to estimate efficacy and safety, with a focus on the second line use of this regimen. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records. Responses reflected Lugano criteria per local investigator assessment. Study objectives were overall response rates (ORR), complete response rates (CRR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Results: Patients and Treatment: We identified 65 CHL patients who received P-GVD between July 2019 and June 2024, including 43 who were treated in the second line. Enrolled patients included a median age of 31 years (range 17-69 years), 36.9% (24) females, 75.4% (49) nodular sclerosing subtype, and 60% (39) stage III-IV at diagnosis. Patients included 64.6% (42) White and non-Hispanic, 15.4% (10) Hispanic or White and Hispanic, 10.8% (7) Black, 3.1% (2) Asian/Pacific Islander, 3.1% (2) other, and 3.1% (2) unknown. The median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 0-12); these included 3.1% (2) who had prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), 50.8% (33) who had prior brentuximab vedotin (BV), and 3.1% (2) who had prior transplant. Patients with primary refractory disease [no initial complete response (CR)] comprised 58.5% (38), and 35.4% (23) had relapse within 1 year of completing initial therapy. The median number of cycles received was 3 (range 1-5). Treatment in a community practice setting was noted for 21.5% (14) patients. Efficacy: At a median follow up of 17.7 months, ORR and CRR after P-GVD were 95% (62/65) and 74% (48/65), respectively. This increased to 95% ORR and 81% CRR when limited to 43 patients who were treated 2nd line. Responses by line included: 1st [n=1; 100% ORR and CRR]; 3rd [n=15; 100% ORR, 73.3% CRR], 4th [n=3; 100% ORR, 33.3% CRR], 5th [n=2; 100% ORR, 0% CRR], and 13th [n=1; SD]. CRR in BV- and CPI-exposed patients were 60.6% and 50%, respectively. Ninety one percent (39) of 2nd line treated patients proceeded to autologous transplant, as well as all 3 patients > age 60. Among 41 response-evaluable second-line patients, CR was achieved in 94% (30/32) who received 2 or 3 cycles of P-GVD, and 56% (5/9) who received 4 cycles of P-GVD. For the entire cohort at 12 and 24 months after starting P-GVD, PFS was 95% (95% CI: 89-100%), 91% (95% CI: 83-100%) and OS was 98% (95% CI: 94-100%), 94% (95% CI: 86-100%), respectively. Ninety five percent (41) of 2nd line transplanted patients remain alive and in remission at a median of 18.5 months (range 3.5-38.7 months). In the primary refractory subset, PFS and OS at 24 months were 91% and 97%, respectively. For the cohort with 2 or more prior lines of therapy, PFS and OS at 24 months were 91% and 94%, respectively. Safety: Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) were reported in 20% (13) of patients, of which grade 3 IRAEs per NCCN criteria version 1.2024 comprised 38.5%; all others were grades 1-2. Non-IRAE grade 3-4 toxicities per CTCAE version 5.0 were reported in 22% (14) patients. Of 29 patients evaluable for treatment-related interruptions, 7% (2) had therapy discontinued, and 34% (10) had holds, dose reductions, and/or delays. No deaths were attributed to P-GVD treatment. Conclusions:This retrospective study confirms the utility of P-GVD in treating relapsed/refractory CHL in a real-world population. Though fewer CRs and higher rates of grade 3 adverse events were observed, the vast majority of patients were able to proceed to transplant, and outcomes to date are highly encouraging.

Background: Randomized studies in newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients with a FLT3 mutation show that adding 14 days of a FLT3 inhibitor to each intensive chemotherapy cycle improves overall survival. For patients unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy due to older age or comorbidities, the presence of a FLT3-ITD mutation is associated with high rates of early relapse and short remission duration. There is a limited survival benefit of venetoclax (ven) plus azacitidine (aza) compared to aza alone among patients with AML with a FLT3-ITD mutation. Accordingly, there is significant interest in adding FLT3-targeted therapy to lower intensity chemotherapy for patients with ND AML and FLT3 mutations, but to date no randomized data have demonstrated a survival benefit for this approach.Gilteritinib (gilt) is a highly potent and FLT3-selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is the standard therapy of relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML, based upon superior survival in randomized studies. Gilt can also be combined safely with ven and/or aza, though myelosuppression remains a concern. Despite this, single institution studies of ven, aza, and gilt therapy of ND AML patients with FLT3-mutations show that this three-drug regimen is associated with near-universal complete remission rates (CR 90%, CRi 6%) and a majority of studied patients eliminate detectable FLT3-ITD (<1 x10-5) within four cycles by an ultrasensitive, amplicon-based NGS assay (Short, et al. JCO 2024). Rates of CR with full count recovery and survival appear superior to historical comparisons, but myelosuppression is potentially increased with the triplet regimen. These data demonstrate a need for multi-institutional comparative trials, not only to determine whether adding FLT3-inhibitors to ven and aza improve deep remission rates, but also to refine schedules of the triplet combination that improve tolerability for widespread use.Methods: This tier 1 MyeloMATCH substudy is an open-label, randomized phase 2 trial that will enroll ND AML patients older than age 60 or individuals judged by their treating physician to be best served by azanucleoside + ven-based therapy due to comorbidity. Subjects provide samples to the central MyeloMATCH Master Screening and Reassessment Protocol (MSRP, NCT05564390 ) and are assigned to the MM1OA-EA02 substudy (NCT06317649) based upon the presence of a FLT3-ITD or FLT3-TKD (D835) mutation by NGS. Subjects are randomized to one of three arms (regimens 1, 2, or 3), stratified by age (<70 years vs. older) and FLT3-ITD burden (ITD VAF>33% vs. lower VAF or D835). All study arms contain aza and ven administered in 28-day cycles with two study arms also including gilt. Regimen 1 is ven and aza administered as per the pivotal VIALE-A study. Regimen 2 adds gilt 80 mg once daily on days 1-28 and regimen 3 adds gilt on days 8-21 only. A marrow biopsy is performed during the first cycle (day 14-21, depending on study arm) and all chemotherapy is held until count recovery if a morphologic leukemia-free state or aplasia is seen. Patients receive up to two induction cycles to achieve remission and then receive ongoing consolidation cycles of therapy with a similar pattern of gilt administration up to 2 years. To minimize risk of cumulative myelosuppression, during consolidation azacitidine administration is reduced to days 1-5 on regimens 2 and 3 and ven limited to days 1-7 on regimen 2 and days 1-14 on regimen 3. For all arms, treatment-related adverse events prompt further reduction in ven, aza, or gilt dose or duration. Response will be measured after cycles 2 and 4, including centrally-performed MRD by flow cytometry. The primary endpoint is the rate of MRD(-) CR (<1 x 10-3) after up to 4 cycles. Key secondary endpoints include safety data, response rate, EFS, and OS. The study is powered to detect a 25% absolute improvement in MRD(-) CR rate in either triplet arm from a target accrual of 147 patients. A safety run-in for regimens 2 and 3 to confirm tolerability and feasibility will be performed after 20 subjects enroll to these arms; an interim futility analysis will be performed once response assessment of 50% of all planned accrual occurs. Study was activated on June 6, 2024 and is expected to continue until December 2025.

Background: Chromosomal rearrangements involving the KMT2A gene and mutations involving the nucleophosmin (NPM1) gene have been associated with response to menin inhibitors in multiple studies of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients characterized by these genetic alterations. Both alterations are more common in younger AML patients and those with NPM1 mutations historically perform better. However, the prevalence and outcomes of older (≥60 years) AML patients with these alterations who are treated with current therapies is less well understood. We present results from the Beat AML Master Trial (BAMT) that analyze the outcomes of this large, but less common subset of patients in an older AML population. Methods: Patients were consented and enrolled on this precision medicine-based Beat AML Master Trial (NCT03013998) from November 2016 to June 2024. Patients were included in this analysis if they harbor either the classic NPM1 mutation or a KMT2A rearrangement (over 10 different gene partners). Additionally, 2 patients with a NUP98 rearrangement were included with the KMT2A cohort as they are known to have similar biology in terms of menin dependence. These patients were treated with the following therapies: a sub-study specific targeted therapy for the dominant clone, venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven/HMA), intensive chemotherapy (IC), alternative non-intensive therapy (NIT), or no therapy. Clinical/genetic characteristics and median overall survival (OS) were analyzed in each group separately. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from master consent and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 1096 AML patients enrolled on the BAMT, 246 patients had either an NPM1 (N=207, 18.9%) or KMT2A (N=39, 3.6%) genetic alteration. The baseline characteristics for the NPM1 cohort were median age 72 years (range: 60-92), 50% female, and ECOG performance status: 0-16%, 1-58%, 2-25% and 3-1%. Additional disease characteristics include treatment related AML at 11% and complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities) at 3%. Median OS for the entire NPM1 cohort was 18.4 months (95% CI: 14.2-24.7). Patients were treated on a sub-study (35%), Ven/HMA (19%), IC (26%), NIT (8%) or no treatment (9%). Between treatment groups, median OS was 21 months (95% CI: 12.8-31.7) for those treated on a sub-study, 22 months (95% CI: 12.6-not reached (NR)) for Ven/HMA, 41.6 months (95% CI: 18.2-NR) for IC, and 6.3 months (95% CI: 1.3-23) for NIT, which was significantly different (p<0.0001). The baseline characteristics for the KMT2A cohort were median age 69 years (range: 60-88), 44% female, and ECOG performance status: 0-19%, 1-45%, 2-35% and 3-0%. Treatment related AML occurred in 23% of patients and complex karyotype in 31%. Median OS for the KMT2A cohort was 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.6-31.6). Patients were treated on a sub-study (38%), Ven/HMA (15%), IC (15%), NIT (15%), or no treatment (5%). Between treatment groups, median OS was 31.6 months (95% CI: 3.2-NR) for sub-study, 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0-NR) for Ven/HMA, 12.7 months (95% CI: 4.9-NR) for IC, and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-NR) for NIT, which was also significantly different (p<0.0001). Conclusions: In this cohort of older AML patients who possess NPM1 or KMT2A mutations, initial demographics and clinical characteristics upon presentation are as expected. Within each cohort and depending on the type of therapy received, there were interesting differences in survival. Median OS was the highest for the NPM1 cohort that received IC while the KMT2A cohort had the highest median OS when enrolled on a KMT2A targeted sub-study; a finding that supports precision-based medicine for this high-risk KMT2A group characterized by poor outcomes. As menin inhibitor combinations with induction chemotherapy or Ven/HMA move to the frontline setting, we anticipate seeing significant improvement in outcomes for AML patients in both of these genomic subsets. Further multivariable analysis will be performed to validate treatment effect on OS. Our analyses for these two cohorts also provide valuable outcome benchmarks for the design of future precision oncology studies that seek to improve survival in these subsets of older AML patients.

Background: Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) manifests as multi-organ infiltration of clonal histiocytes with mutations primarily in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. The revised classification of histiocytosis (2016) categorizes ECD with typical bilateral, symmetric osteosclerosis of the lower extremity long bones as classical (C) and as non-classical (NC) if otherwise. The clinical and biological significance of this classification is unclear. This study compared the clinical and genotypic findings of the 2 subtypes within a large cohort of ECD patients. Methods: We included patients seen at our institution since 1990 meeting the following criteria: A) had an ECD diagnosis based on the revised criteria by Haroche J, et al. (Blood 2020;135:1311-1318); B) completed whole-body imaging studies including long bones of the legs. Classification as C-ECD required symmetric osteosclerosis of the distal femur and/or proximal tibia/fibula. Results: A total of 145 patients were enrolled, comprising a male-to-female ratio of 2:1 (66.2% male). C-ECD was diagnosed in 77.2% of cases, and NC-ECD in 22.8%. The median age at diagnosis was similar with 58.5 years (range, 18-82) in C-ECD and 55 years (range, 20-81) in NC-ECD, (p=0.65). The most frequently affected systems included skeletal (81.4%), renal (60.0%), vascular (45.5%), cardiac (40.0%), central nervous (38.6%), sinus (37.2%), pulmonary (36.6%), and adrenal (32.4%). The numbers of organs involved were significantly higher in C-ECD compared to NC-ECD (median 5 vs 3, p<0.01). Higher rates of skeletal (100% vs. 18.2%, p<0.01), adrenal gland (37.5% vs. 15.2%, p=0.02), and sinus (44.6% vs. 12.1%, p<0.01) involvement were observed in C-ECD. Arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) was exclusively observed in C-ECD (20.7% vs. 0%, p<0.01). NC-ECD had a higher rate of cardiac involvement (69.7% vs. 31.3%, p<0.01). No significant differences were found in other systems. The overall median time between onset of the first symptoms/signs to diagnosis was 15 months with no significant difference between C-ECD and NC-ECD (17.5 vs. 12 months, p=0.18). The median time to diagnosis of ECD in patients with AVP-D was 38.5 months, compared to 12 months without AVP-D (p=0.09). Genetic testing was conducted in 86.2% of patients and B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) alterations were identified in 59.2% of the tested cases. BRAFV600E was more prevalent in C-ECD (61.3% vs. 21.9%, p<0.01), whereas non-V600 mutations were more commonly found in NC-ECD (12.5% vs. 1.1%, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the frequency of BRAF fusions. NC-ECD patients exhibited a higher rate of MAP2K1 mutations (25.0% vs. 5.4%, p<0.01). Other frequently mutated genes included KRAS (4.0%), NRAS (2.4%), and CSF1R (2.4%), although no significant difference was observed in their frequency between C-ECD and NC-ECD. Testicular involvement appeared to be more common in patients with MAP2K1 mutations (23.1% vs. 8%, p=0.08). Two patients with pathogenic CSF1R mutations both had central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Among C-ECD patients, BRAFV600E conferred a higher rate of CNS involvement (50.9% vs. 25%, p=0.01). No significant difference was observed in NC-ECD patients (71.4% vs 36%, p=0.09). Among NC-ECD cases, MAP2K1 mutations conferred a reduced risk of cardiac involvement (37.5% vs. 79.2%, p=0.03) and no such difference was observed in patients with C-ECD (40% vs 34.1%, p=0.79). The median numbers of organs involved in patients with BRAF, MAP2K1, and KRAS/NRAS mutations were 5, 3, and 3, respectively, with no significant difference. Conclusions: C-ECD affects more organs and more frequently involves bones, adrenal glands, and sinuses. AVP-D was exclusively observed in C-ECD. Conversely, NC-ECD showed a higher prevalence of cardiac involvement. BRAFV600E was more commonly identified in C-ECD, whereas non-V600 mutations and MAP2K1 mutations were more prevalent in NC-ECD. Among C-ECD patients, BRAFV600E was correlated with a greater likelihood of CNS involvement. Conversely, NC-ECD patients with MAP2K1 mutations had a reduced risk of cardiac involvement. This study highlights the distinct clinical and molecular features of C-ECD and NC-ECD, underscoring the importance of subclassifying ECD into classical and non-classical forms. Further studies are needed to explore differences in the clinical outcomes between the 2 forms.

Background: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), a precursor of myeloid neoplasms (MN), is characterized by one or more persistent cytopenias, and acquired mutations in myeloid malignancy-associated genes. ZRSR2, located at Xp22.2, is one of the MN-associated genes and a member of the spliceosome family of genes. Aim: Describe the clinical characteristics, pattern of progression, and genetics of ZRSR2 mutation (ZRSR2m)-harboring CCUS patients. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for 9320 patients between 2016-2023 at Mayo Clinic. After obtaining IRB approval, clinical characteristics and results of bone marrow morphology, cytogenetics, and molecular studies were abstracted. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier, from the date of NGS until death or last follow-up. The ZRSR2m MN control cohort included 125 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and MDS/MPN overlap. BlueSky Statistics V10.3.1 was used for statistical analysis. Results: ZRSR2m was detected in 39 CCUS patients, all of whom were males. Concurrent hematological neoplasms were identified in 8 patients (21%). Five (13%) had plasma cell proliferative disorders including 3 multiple myeloma, 1 MGUS, and 1 AL amyloidosis. There were also 2 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 1 with VEXAS syndrome. Prior chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, was given to 4 patients (10.3%), whereas 13 patients (33%) had received previous immunotherapy. Abnormal cytogenetics were detected in 11 patients (29%), with the most common abnormality being +8 (n=5, 13%). In 23 patients (59%), an absolute monocyte count of ≥0.5 x 10^9/L was documented which could be classified as clonal cytopenia with monocytosis of unknown significance (CCMUS). ZRSR2 median gender-corrected VAF among CCUS patients was 32% (range, 1-45). Isolated ZRSR2m was found in 6 patients (15%), and 1 (3%) had multiple ZRSR2m. The median number of co-mutations was 1 (range, 0-3). Sequential NGS, available in 13 patients, showed that 1 patient developed 3 ZRSR2 mutations and 2 ZRSR2 VUS. TET2 was the most common co-mutation (n=25, 64%). Additionally, TET2 was an isolated co-mutation in 18 patients (46%). ASXL1 co-mutation was the second most common (n=8, 20.5%), while other less common co-mutations were IDH1, IDH2, SRSF2, SF3B1, TP53, GATA2, and KDM6A. Pre-ZF1 was the most commonly mutated region in ZRSR2 mutations (n=23, 59%). With a median follow-up of 32 months, 9 (23%) of the ZRSR2m CCUS patients progressed to MNs, none progressed to AML. Five (55.6%) progressed to MDS, 4 were subclassified as low blast (LB) and 1 as increased blast-1 (IB1). Four (44.4%) progressed to MDS/MPN overlap syndrome, with 3 subclassified as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). None of the patients with isolated ZRSR2m progressed to MDS or CMML. None of the patients who received prior immunotherapy progressed to MDS. Thirty-six (92.3%) patients had high-risk CCUS (Malcovati et al, Blood 2017) while 3 had intermediate risk with no low-risk patients. None of the intermediate-risk patients progressed to MDS, while 5 patients of the high-risk (13.9%) progressed to MDS (p=1). Twelve (31%) patients died, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 56 months. Higher hemoglobin levels improved OS (HR=0.59, p=0.02), while higher adjusted ZRSR2 VAF worsened OS (HR=1.05, p=0.017). Patients with TET2 as isolated co-mutations showed better mOS than the rest of the cohort (not reached vs 41 months, p= 0.03). ZRSR2m CCUS patients showed a trend suggestive of better mOS than ZRSR2m with MNs including AML (56 vs 30 months, p=0.14), and with excluding AML (56 vs 39 months, p=0.24). On multivariate analysis, both Hgb (HR=0.61, p=0.03) and isolated TET2 co-mutation (HR=0.19, p=0.04) retained statistical significance. mOS was not affected by prior history of treatment, number of co-mutations, isolated ZRSR2, ASXL1 co-mutation, or MDS progression. Conclusion: ZRSR2m CCUS cohort was exclusively males. There was a significant number of patients with concurrent hematological malignancy or a history of prior chemo- and/or immuno-therapy (36%). Most patients had high-risk CCUS but showed a low rate of progression to MNs, especially in those with isolated ZRSR2. Additionally, patients with isolated TET2 co-mutation had better survival, indicating that TET2 confers a favorable prognosis among ZRSR2m CCUS patients.