Citations

Background— Ejection fraction (EF) as a marker of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and the appropriate thresholds for diagnosing severe or mild/moderate LV dysfunction in mitral regurgitation are doubted and poorly followed in clinical practice. We aimed at assessing the role of EF in a large registry of organic mitral regurgitation to objectively establish thresholds for various degrees of LV dysfunction and to analyze whether mitral surgery remains beneficial in those subsets of patients. Methods and Results— We investigated the relation between EF and mortality in 1875 patients with mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflets in sinus rhythm (65±13 years; median EF, 66% [60%–71%]) enrolled in the Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) registry. With EF <60%, mortality after diagnosis increased precipitously under medical management (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.59 [1.19–2.12]) and during the entire follow-up (adjusted HR, 1.51 [1.22–1.87]). Severe LV dysfunction, if defined by EF <30%, would affect a minuscule number of patients (0.3%). Conversely, EF <45% was more frequent (2.9%) and was associated with considerable mortality under medical management (adjusted HR, 2.43 [1.50–3.95]) and during the entire follow-up (adjusted HR, 2.46 [1.67–3.61]). The group with EF of 45% to 60% represented a large proportion of patients (23%), exhibited rarely overt symptoms, and had higher mortality compared with EF >60%. Above 60%, no EF threshold further determined survival. The benefit of surgery remained considerable in the groups with EF <45% (adjusted HR, 0.28 [0.17–0.56]) and with EF of 45% to 60% (adjusted HR, 0.34 [0.21–0.64]). Conclusions— EF is valuable in defining presence and severity of LV dysfunction in organic mitral regurgitation. Patients with EF <45% have severe LV dysfunction, catastrophic outcome under medical management, and should not be denied surgery. Although there is no survival gain with EF ranges >60%, with EF dropping <60%, mortality increases precipitously and prompt surgical referral is critical to outcome.

Abstract In the Breast International Group (BIG) and North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) co-led phase III adjuvant breast cancer trial, ALTTO (Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation), two central laboratories, the European Institute of Oncology (IEO; Milan, Italy) and Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), are responsible for confirming the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), estrogen receptor α(ER), and progesterone receptor status of the primary breast tumors for the Rest of World (excluding China, which conducts a separate central review) and North American patients, respectively, prior to patient study entry. As of December 2009, discordance in HER2 and ER testing between local and central laboratories was observed by both central laboratories. For IEO, 14.5% of 8,037 HER2 cases locally positive [by either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)] were not able to be confirmed as centrally positive; whereas for Mayo, 5.8% of 412 HER2 cases locally positive were not able to be confirmed as centrally positive (Table 1). Central and local IHC ER discordance was 12.1% and 11.7% for 9,021 IEO screened cases and 419 Mayo screened cases, respectively (Table 2). In particular, IEO observed more false-positive (locally positive/centrally negative) HER2 findings than Mayo and Mayo observed more false-positive ER findings than IEO. Purpose: Motivated by the above findings, we launched a ring study to assess whether the central lab results of a subset of local/central discordant ALTTO cases could be confirmed in the other central lab. Methods: IEO and Mayo exchanged and retested a subset of FFPE breast tumors collected in ALTTO. IEO sent 20 HER2 false-positive, 5 ER false-positive, and 5 ER false-negative (locally negative/centrally positive) ALTTO breast tumors to Mayo. Mayo sent 5 HER2 false-positive, 20 ER false-positive, and 5 ER false-negative ALTTO breast tumors to IEO. IEO and Mayo performed IHC for ER according to their own methodology: DAKO cocktail of ER 1D5 and 2.123 monoclonal antibodies and monoclonal ER 1D5 antibody, respectively. The two laboratories performed IHC for HER2 according to the HercepTest® manufacturers’ instructions (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) and FISH for HER2 using the PathVysion HER2 DNA probe kit and the HER2/centromere 17 probe mixture (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL). Results: IEO and Mayo confirmed the central HER2-negative result in 100% of 25 cases. Analyses of ER are ongoing and ER results will be presented. Conclusions: In this subset of patients, enrollment ineligibility did not change when HER2 testing was performed by either IEO or Mayo Clinic central laboratories. Table 1. HER2 Local/Central Lab Results Table 2. ER Local/Central Lab Results Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-10-36.

Background— Better insight into the psychosocial factors associated with prehospital delays in seeking care for acute coronary syndromes is needed to inform the design of future interventions. Delay in presenting for care after the onset of symptoms is common, limits the potential benefit of acute reperfusion, and has not been reduced by interventions tested thus far. Methods and Results— Seven hundred ninety-six patients with suspected ischemic heart disease scheduled for clinically indicated imaging stress tests completed questionnaires concerning psychological distress and attachment styles (worthiness to receive care, trustworthiness of others to provide care). The primary dependent variable for this study was response to a question from the rapid early action for coronary treatment trial concerning intention to “wait until very sure” before seeking care for a possible “heart attack.” Responses to this question were strongly associated with actual emergency department-reported and self-reported care delay in the rapid early action for coronary treatment trial. In multivariable ordinal regression models, a more negative view of the trustworthiness of others, greater physical limitations from angina, and no previous revascularization were independently associated with increased intention to wait to seek care for a myocardial infarction. Intention to wait was not associated with inducible ischemia or self-perceived risk of myocardial infarction. Conclusions— Intention to delay seeking care for acute coronary syndromes is associated with a patient’s view of the trustworthiness of others, previous experience with revascularization, and functional limitations, even after adjustment for objective and perceived acute coronary syndromes risk. These findings provide insight into novel factors contributing to longer delay times and may inform future interventions to reduce delay time.

Background— Papillary muscle rupture (PMR) is an infrequent but catastrophic complication of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Although always considered, surgical treatment is often denied because of high operative mortality. Moreover, the effects of surgery for PMR on long-term outcome, particularly compared with expected outcome after MI, are undefined. Methods and Results— Fifty-four consecutive patients (age, 70±8 years; 74% male) underwent mitral surgery for post-MI PMR from January 1980 through December 2000. Severe presentation (cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, or cardiac arrest) was noted in 91% preoperatively. Performance of coronary artery bypass graft was associated with lower operative mortality (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.83; P =0.011), whereas there was a trend for lower mortality after surgery after 1990 (odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.3). Thus, operative mortality (overall, 18.5%) decreased from 67% up to 1990 without coronary artery bypass graft to 8.7% after 1990 with coronary artery bypass graft. Overall 5-year survival was 65±7%, and survival free of congestive heart failure was 52±7%. Five-year survival of 30-day operative survivors was 79±4%, identical ( P =0.24) to that of matched controls with MI (similar age, sex, ejection fraction, MI location, and MI year). Survival free of congestive heart failure was similar in PMR cases and MI controls (10-year survival, 28±8% versus 36±6%; P =0.46). Conclusions— Surgery for post-MI PMR involves a notable operative mortality, but there are recent trends for lower operative risk, particularly with associated coronary artery bypass graft. Long term after surgery, outcome is restored to that of similar MI without PMR. These encouraging observations emphasize the importance of prompt diagnosis and aggressive therapeutic approach for patients incurring PMR after MI.

Abstract B7x is the newest member of the B7-CD28 family and is thought to dampen immune responses via negative costimulation. Tumor expression of B7x was recently described in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and was associated with poor outcome. We developed an assay to detect serum-soluble B7x (sB7x) and investigated 101 patients with clear cell RCC who underwent nephrectomy between 2003 and 2007. For controls, we obtained serum from 101 sex-matched blood donors within the same age range. Following an ELISA for sB7x, detectable levels (&gt;0.1 ng/mL) of sB7x were observed in 53 RCC patients compared with 18 controls (P &lt; 0.001). Median (range) concentrations of sB7x for RCC patients and controls were 14.4 ng/mL (0.1–56.9) and 2.7 ng/mL (0.2–37.1), respectively. For RCC patients with detectable sB7x, median levels were significantly higher for patients with a tumor thrombus (19.2 versus 6.6 ng/mL; P = 0.007), positive lymph nodes (41.3 versus 10.3 ng/mL; P = 0.018), and distant metastases at nephrectomy (43.3 versus 8.5 ng/mL; P = 0.002) and tended to be higher in patients with high-grade tumors (18.8 versus 8.5; P = 0.090). Additionally, median sB7x levels for tumor-node-metastasis stage I to IV RCC were 6.6, 10.3, 14.5, and 43.3 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.012). In this first evaluation of sB7x in RCC, we show that RCC patients are more likely to have detectable sB7x compared with controls and higher sB7x levels correlate with advanced tumor stage. These early results merit further investigation of this serum marker for potential diagnostic and prognostic purposes. [Cancer Res 2008;68(15):6054–8]

Background— Bicuspid aortic valve is frequent and is reported to cause numerous complications, but the clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with normal or mildly dysfunctional valve is undefined. Methods and Results— In 212 asymptomatic community residents from Olmsted County, Minn (age, 32±20 years; 65% male), bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed between 1980 and 1999 with ejection fraction ≥50% and aortic regurgitation or stenosis, absent or mild. Aortic valve degeneration at diagnosis was scored echocardiographically for calcification, thickening, and mobility reduction (0 to 3 each), with scores ranging from 0 to 9. At diagnosis, ejection fraction was 63±5% and left ventricular diameter was 48±9 mm. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 90±3%, identical to the general population ( P =0.72). Twenty years after diagnosis, heart failure, new cardiac symptoms, and cardiovascular medical events occurred in 7±2%, 26±4%, and 33±5%, respectively. Twenty years after diagnosis, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic surgery, or any cardiovascular surgery was required in 24±4%, 5±2%, and 27±4% at a younger age than the general population ( P <0.0001). No aortic dissection occurred. Thus, cardiovascular medical or surgical events occurred in 42±5% 20 years after diagnosis. Independent predictors of cardiovascular events were age ≥50 years (risk ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.7; P <0.01) and valve degeneration at diagnosis (risk ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.5; P =0.016; >70% events at 20 years). Baseline ascending aorta ≥40 mm independently predicted surgery for aorta dilatation (risk ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 77.3; P <0.01). Conclusions— In the community, asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no or minimal hemodynamic abnormality enjoy excellent long-term survival but incur frequent cardiovascular events, particularly with progressive valve dysfunction. Echocardiographic valve degeneration at diagnosis separates higher-risk patients who require regular assessment from lower-risk patients who require only episodic follow-up.