Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Standard of care (SOC) and patient survival in glioblastoma have changed little in the past 17 years. We evaluated in a phase 3 trial whether adding an autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (murcidencel) to SOC extends survival. Patients and METHODS Newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were randomized 2:1 to either murcidencel or placebo. Under a crossover design, all patients could receive murcidencel following tumor recurrence. All parties remained blinded regarding treatments before recurrence. Patients thus received murcidencel at new diagnosis (nGBM) or at recurrence (rGBM) following crossover from placebo. The primary and secondary endpoints compare overall survival (OS) with contemporaneous, matched external controls. Four sets of analyses were conducted to ensure rigorous matching of the controls, reduce biases, and confirm the robustness of the results. RESULTS 331 patients were enrolled. With the crossover, 89% received murcidencel. Median OS (mOS) for nGBM patients (n = 232) was 19.3 months from randomization (22.4 months from surgery) with murcidencel vs. 16.5 months from randomization in the controls (HR = 0.80, p = 0.002). Survival at 48 months from randomization was 15.7% vs. 9.9%, and at 60 months was 13% vs. 5.7%. For rGBM (n = 64), mOS was 13.2 months from relapse vs. 7.8 months in the controls (HR = 0.58, p < 0.001). Survival at 24 months post-recurrence was 20.7% vs. 9.6%, and at 30 months post-recurrence was 11.1% vs 5.1%. In nGBM patients with methylated MGMT (n = 90), mOS was 30.2 months from randomization (33 months from surgery) with murcidencel vs. 21.3 months from randomization in the controls (HR = 0.74, p = 0.027). The treatment was well tolerated, with only 5 serious adverse events deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. CONCLUSION Clinically meaningful and statistically significant survival extension was seen in both nGBM and rGBM patients treated with murcidencel and SOC compared with contemporaneous, matched external controls who received SOC alone.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Immunotherapies targeting PD-1 in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) have shown limited activity. We hypothesize combining therapies targeting immunosuppressive pathways with cytotoxic and antiangiogenic therapies will improve survival. This nonrandomized, noncomparative Phase II study examines safety and efficacy of an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (retifanlimab), hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), and bevacizumab, with or without an IDO1 inhibitor (epacadostat), in patients with rGBM. METHODS This is an open-label Phase II study of two regimens. Regimen A examines retifanlimab (500mg IV Q4W) + bevacizumab (10mg/kg IV Q2W) + HFRT (3.5Gy/day x 10) in patients with IDH1/2-WT rGBM. Regimen B adds epacadostat. Key inclusions include dexamethasone ≤ 4 mg/day and reirradiation candidacy. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) probability at 9 months (OS-9). An increase of OS-9 from 38% (bevacizumab alone) to 60% was considered clinically relevant and required 24 efficacy evaluable patients. RESULTS Regimen A accrual is complete; interim results are as follows: 26 rGBM enrolled, with 24 evaluable [median age 64.2 years (42.1-81.8); 29% female; 29% MGMT promotor methylated; 33.3% with multi-focal disease; median KPS 90 (70-100); median baseline dexamethasone 0 mg (0-4) and ALC 1,000 cells/µl (300-3,700)]. Patients received a median of 6 cycles as of May 2022 (2-24). Median follow-up is 16.0 months. Interim median PFS is 7.0 months (95%CI: 4.5~11.1) and median OS is 12.2 months (95%CI 7.1~18.0). Regimen A met primary endpoint with OS-9 of 67% (95%CI: 44~82%). Overall response rate is currently 58% (95%CI: 36.94~77.2%). There were five possible immune-related grade 3+ toxicities to date (n = 1 each colitis, vomiting, and seizure; n = 2 diarrhea). Regimen B is enrolling. CONCLUSIONS Interim analysis suggests combination retifanlimab, HFRT, and bevacizumab in rGBM is generally well-tolerated, with encouraging OS and PFS at the time of submission. Correlative analysis is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract INTRODUCTION First classified in 2000, pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) is an uncommon intracranial malignancy. Given recent codification and rarity, there is no consensus on management and treatment is often provider dependent. METHODS Within an institutional database, we identified 10 patients with PPTID diagnosed between 2009 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, presenting symptoms, extent of disease, surgical interventions, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Progression free survival, overall survival, and neurocognitive outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 36 (range 13-73), 40% women, 60% Caucasian. Nine patients had tumor involvement limited to the pineal region and one patient had multifocal intracranial tumor involvement with leptomeningeal disease. Two patients had gross total resection (GTR) alone, three had GTR followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), two had subtotal resection (STR) followed by craniospinal irradiation (CSI), two had biopsy followed by adjuvant RT, and one had biopsy with CSI and chemotherapy. At median follow up of 31 months (range 3-88 months), only one patient, who had received biopsy, CSI, and chemotherapy, had progression of disease and no patients are deceased. Two patients treated with CSI had adverse neurocognitive outcomes, which was not observed with focal RT. CONCLUSIONS Our limited case series suggests GTR followed by surveillance, GTR followed by focal RT, and any extent resection followed by CSI may all achieve durable disease control in patients with PPTID. Treatment selection should be individualized and potential neurocognitive toxicities should be considered.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Medulloblastomas (MB) are embryonal tumors arising in the cerebellum, predominantly affecting pediatric patients. Recognition of molecularly defined subgroups has advanced management. Factors influencing the prognosis and management of adult MB patients remain poorly understood. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our experience with adult (> 18 years at initial diagnosis) MB patients, diagnosed between 1992-2020. Molecular subtyping corresponding to the 2021 WHO Classification was performed. Kaplan-Meier estimates (Log-rank test assessing for group differences) were performed for univariate survival analysis with cox regression used for multivariate (subgroup, age, gender, disseminated disease, extent of resection) analyses. RESULTS Our cohort included 76 adult MB patients (62% male), with a median age of 31.7 years (range: 18-66) at diagnosis, and median follow-up of 7.7 years (range: 0.6-26.9). 58 patients had sufficient tissue for molecular characterization by immunohistochemistry and corresponded to the SHH-activated (n=37; 64%), non-WNT/non-SHH (n=12; 21%), WNT-activated (n=9; 15%) subgroups. At initial diagnosis, all patients underwent radiotherapy, with 97% (n=66) receiving craniospinal irradiation with a boost either to the posterior fossa (75%) or tumor bed (22%); and underwent gross total resection (n=51; 67%) and chemotherapy (n=56; 75%). Median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort was 14.8 years (93% 2-year OS; 86% 5-year OS; 64% 10-year OS) and was longer for younger patients (< 30: > 15.4 years, > 30: 9.9 years; Log-rank p< 0.001). No significant OS difference was identified by MB molecular subgroup (SHH, TP53-wt: 14 years, WNT: 11.4 years, non-WNT/non-SHH: > 14.8 years; Log-rank p=0.1167) or extent of resection. Only age at diagnosis remained significant in multivariate survival analyses. DISCUSSION We report one of the largest retrospective cohorts in adult MB patients with molecular subtyping. Survival and molecular subgroup frequencies were similar to previous reports. Survival was longer for younger patients and was not significantly different by MB molecular subgroup or extent of resection.

AbstractIntroductionData on utilization, major complications, and in‐hospital mortality of catheter ablation (CA) for sarcoidosis‐related ventricular tachycardia (VT) are limited. We sought to determine the outcomes of sarcoidosis‐related VT, and incidence and predictors of complications associated with the CA procedure.MethodsWe queried the 2002–2018 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients aged ≥18 years with sarcoidosis admitted with VT. A 1:3 propensity score‐matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare patient outcomes between CA and medically managed groups. Multivariable regression was performed to determine independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality and procedural complications associated with the CA procedure.ResultsOf 3220 sarcoidosis patients with VT, 132 (4.1%) underwent CA. Patients who underwent CA were younger, male predominant, more likely Caucasian, had differences in baseline comorbidities including more likely to have heart failure, less likely to have prior myocardial infarction, COPD, or severe renal disease, had a higher mean household income, and more likely admitted to a larger/urban teaching hospital. After PSM, we examined 106 CA cases and 318 medically managed cases. There was a trend toward a lower in‐hospital mortality rate in the CA group when compared to the medically managed group (1.9% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.08). The most common complications were pericardial drainage (5.3%), postoperative hemorrhage (3.8%), accidental puncture periprocedure (3.0%), and cardiac tamponade (2.3%). Independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality and procedural complications among the CA group included congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7–104.2) and mild to moderate renal disease (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.1–13.3).ConclusionsCompared to patients with sarcoidosis‐related VT who received medical therapy alone, those who underwent CA have a trend for a lower mortality rate despite procedure‐related complications occurring as high as 9.1%. Additional studies are recommended to better evaluate the benefits and risks of VT ablation in this group.

ImportanceCytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.ObjectiveTo determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.ExposuresImmunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.ResultsThe median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified genetic loci associated with the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the molecular mechanisms by which they confer risk are largely unknown. We conducted a metabolome-wide association study (MWAS) of AD-associated loci from GWASs using untargeted metabolic profiling (metabolomics) by ultraperformance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). We identified an association of lactosylceramides (LacCer) with AD-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ABCA7 ( P = 5.0 × 10 −5 to 1.3 × 10 −44 ). We showed that plasma LacCer concentrations are associated with cognitive performance and genetically modified levels of LacCer are associated with AD risk. We then showed that concentrations of sphingomyelins, ceramides, and hexosylceramides were altered in brain tissue from Abca7 knockout mice, compared with wild type (WT) ( P = 0.049–1.4 × 10 −5 ), but not in a mouse model of amyloidosis. Furthermore, activation of microglia increases intracellular concentrations of hexosylceramides in part through induction in the expression of sphingosine kinase, an enzyme with a high control coefficient for sphingolipid and ceramide synthesis. Our work suggests that the risk for AD arising from functional variations in ABCA7 is mediated at least in part through ceramides. Modulation of their metabolism or downstream signaling may offer new therapeutic opportunities for AD.

Abstract Summary Quantifying pairwise sequence similarities is a key step in metagenomics studies. Alignment-free methods provide a computationally efficient alternative to alignment-based methods for large-scale sequence analysis. Several neural network-based methods have recently been developed for this purpose. However, existing methods do not perform well on sequences of varying lengths and are sensitive to the presence of insertions and deletions. In this article, we describe the development of a new method, referred to as AsMac that addresses the aforementioned issues. We proposed a novel neural network structure for approximate string matching for the extraction of pertinent information from biological sequences and developed an efficient gradient computation algorithm for training the constructed neural network. We performed a large-scale benchmark study using real-world data that demonstrated the effectiveness and potential utility of the proposed method. Availability and implementation The open-source software for the proposed method and trained neural-network models for some commonly used metagenomics marker genes were developed and are freely available at www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~yijunsun/lab/AsMac.html. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.