Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4607 citation(s) found for "Im, Brian".

Integrating oncology advanced practice providers and clinical pharmacists into clinical cancer research
Braun‐Inglis, Christa , Myers, Jamie, O’Brien, Bridget, Kottschade, Lisa A. , Flannery, Marie , DeTroye, Alisha , Elko, Theresa A. , Leatherwood, Amy, Mader, Alyssa, Wong, Siu Fun, Foust, Melyssa , Benson, Al B., Primeaux, Brian , Demirhan, Kimberly , Statler, Tiffany, Vogel, Wendy , Kottschade, Lisa, Braun-Inglis, Christa M , Myers, Jamie , O'Brien, Bridget, Leatherwood, Amy Eiko , Bakitas, Marie , Benson, Al B. , Berenberg, Jeffrey L. , Rosenzweig, Margaret Quinn , Statler, Tiffany M. , Sun, Virginia Chih-Yi

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | April 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnci/djag125 | PMID 42015388 Get It

Abstract Oncology Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), including Advanced Practice Registered Nurses, Physician Assistants, and Clinical Pharmacists (CPs), play a vital role in delivering high-quality, patient-centered cancer care across the United States. Despite their widespread presence in oncology practices, APPs remain underutilized in cancer clinical research, representing a missed opportunity to expand trial access and improve patient outcomes. Clinical trials are essential to advancing oncology care, yet participation remains critically low among adult patients. Given Oncology APPs’ and CPs’ central role in cancer care delivery, their meaningful engagement in oncology clinical trial research is imperative as the standard of oncology care. This position article, with contributions from 5 professional societies, presents solutions and resources to barriers limiting APPs’ and CPs’ involvement in cancer clinical research, including gaps in education, role expectations, limited protected time, restrictive policies, insufficient financial support, and underrecognition of contributions. Integrating APPs and CPs more fully into the clinical research enterprise is essential to improving trial access, patient outcomes, closing equity gaps, and accelerating innovation in oncology care.
Features of Importance in the Nasal Exam in Rhinoplasty
Longino, Elizabeth S., Kandathil, Cherian K. , Ahmad, Jamil , Baker, Stephen B., BERKOWITZ, R. LAURENCE, Bhrany, Amit D., Friedman, Oren A., Gryskiewicz, Joe M. , Hamilton, Grant S., Knott, Daniel, Marcus, Ben C., Oyer, Sam L., Patel, Priyesh N. , Pearlman, Steven J., Rohrich, Rod J., Totonchi, Ali , Weinfeld, Adam B., Wong, Brian J.F., Most, Sam P., Marcus, Ben C , Barrera, Jose Enrique , Cobo, Roxana , Friedman, Oren A , Hamilton, Grant S., Knott, P. Daniel, Oyer, Samuel L. , Rohrich, Rod J., Shah, Manish I., Spataro, Emily A. , Wong, Brian J. F. , Most, Sam P.

Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine | April 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/26893614261431085 | PMID 41997893 Get It

Background: The most critical exam components in patients seeking rhinoplasty have not been established. Objective: To identify concordance among experienced rhinoplasty surgeons regarding the most important exam features for various deformities. Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed to board-certified facial plastic and plastic surgeons experienced in rhinoplasty, with seven nasal deformity categories: dorsal hump, crooked nose, boxy tip, pinched tip, droopy tip, saddle nose, and nonallergic nasal obstruction. For each, respondents were asked to rank the three most important anatomic regions to examine from the following: nasal bones, midvault cartilage, skin, radix, facial profile, lip, tip, septum, internal nasal valve, nostrils, inferior and middle turbinates. For each ranked region, up to three important features were chosen. Normalized Attention Scores (NAS) were calculated to determine agreement amongst surgeons. Results: A total of 13 facial plastic and 8 plastic surgeons were invited to participate and completed the questionnaire. All cases had high agreement demonstrated by NAS, with the dorsal hump case exhibiting the greatest variability in responses. Conclusions: In this survey of 21 rhinoplasty surgeons, there was general agreement regarding the most relevant anatomical structures and features, which may provide a conceptual foundation for identifying key exam features for seven common complaints in patients seeking rhinoplasty.
Treating Initial and Recurrent C. difficile: A Retrospective Analysis of 100 Referred Patients
Burdette, Rahim A. , Whitt, Caroline C., Phillips, Krystyna J. Cios, Worthington, M. T., Behm, Brian W. , Warren, Cirle A. , Cios Phillips, Krystyna J, Cios, Krystyna J.

Microorganisms | April 17, 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 911

10.3390/microorganisms14040911 | PMID 42075307 Get It

Treatment guidelines for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) have been published by infectious disease and gastroenterology professional societies; however, adherence in clinical practice remains poorly characterized, particularly for recurrent disease. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 100 patients with CDI (350 episodes: 115 initial, 235 recurrent) referred to a tertiary complicated CDI clinic between 2018 and 2023. Guideline adherence was assessed by comparing treatment with IDSA/SHEA and ACG recommendations, and referring diagnoses were compared with final specialist diagnoses. Guideline adherence was significantly higher in initial compared to recurrent episodes (70.4% vs. 41.3%, p < 0.0001). Among guideline non-adherent recurrent episodes, 51.3% used standard antibiotic regimens inappropriate for the recurrence tier. Specialist review reclassified 12.0% of episodes, with colonization increasing from 2.6% to 8.9%. Misdiagnosed colonization cases had a 6.2-fold higher treatment failure rate than confirmed CDI (39.3% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.0001). Guideline non-adherence showed a non-significant trend toward treatment failure (10.0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.31). Guideline adherence for recurrent CDI is inadequate in pre-referral settings, and diagnostic misclassification is common. Early specialist involvement may improve both diagnostic accuracy and treatment appropriateness for patients with recurrent CDI.
The prevalence and incidence of narcolepsy in the United States: a real-world observational study using a validated narcolepsy case definition
Ghosh, Somraj , Hoffman, Veena , Calingaert, Brian , Plante, David T. , Krahn, Lois E., Cai, Alice, Anthony, Mary S. , Dave, Shreya , Rao, Satish, Crawford, Stephen , Davé, Shreya

SLEEP Advances | April 17, 2026 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag043 | PMID 42111657 Get It

Abstract Study Objectives Narcolepsy is a chronic condition affecting the sleep/wake cycle that is challenging to diagnose. Epidemiological data from large US-focused studies remain limited, with no validated claims-based case selection definitions for narcolepsy. We estimated the prevalence/incidence of diagnosed narcolepsy (type 1 [NT1], type 2 [NT2], overall) in an insured US population using validated, claims-based narcolepsy case definitions. Materials and Methods This observational study used HealthVerity administrative claims-linked electronic medical records to develop case definitions identifying individuals with NT1, NT2, and overall narcolepsy from diagnosis, medication, and procedure codes. Claims-based case definition performance (NT1, NT2, overall narcolepsy) was assessed using positive predictive values (PPVs). Prevalence (per 100 000 persons, on December 31, 2023) and annual incidence (per 100 000 person-years [PY], 2020 − 2023) were calculated/adjusted using PPVs for each case definition. Results Unadjusted point prevalence among individuals with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment were 15.5/100 000 (NT1), 51.1/100 000 (NT2), and 67.0/100 000 (overall narcolepsy). Unadjusted incidence rates were stable from 2020 − 2023 for NT1 (range, 2.0 − 2.3/100 000 PY) but declined across years for NT2 (9.1 − 7.6/100 000 PY) and overall narcolepsy (11.3 − 9.6/100 000 PY). PPVs (95% confidence interval) of NT1, NT2, and overall narcolepsy were 0.81 (0.72 − 0.88), 0.84 (0.75 − 0.91), and 0.80 (0.71 − 0.87), contributing to epidemiologic estimates being reduced by ~20% after PPV adjustment. Prevalence and incidence were higher in females than males. Individuals with NT1 were ~ 4 years younger versus NT2. Conclusions Validated definitions for narcolepsy can reduce potential misclassification. Our findings highlight a relatively low NT1 prevalence in the US. In contrast, NT2 prevalence estimates were &gt; 3 times higher than NT1.
A framework for inclusion: fostering representation in physical medicine and rehabilitation and beyond through dedicated mentorships and workshops
Adeniyi, Adedeji , Farah, Raysha , Schibler, Brian M , Pham, Yolanda , Iuso, Anthony M , Samuel-Larbi, Phillip , Fuentes, Shane , Nguyen, Sean , Stein, Joel , Rickenbach, Kristian J. von , Schibler, Brian , Pham, Yolanda N , von Rickenbach, Kristian J , Fuentes, Shane

Academic Medicine | April 17, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/acamed/wvag122 | PMID 41992808 Get It

Abstract Problem The Association of American Medical Colleges has urged actions to promote inclusivity in medical education for historically underrepresented groups. Studies suggest that underrepresentation may be addressed through structured mentorship and workshops at the premedical level and generate interest in less familiar specialties including physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R). Approach The authors implemented a novel half-day multi-institutional workshop in spring 2024 featuring physicians and medical students from New York City medical centers. The workshop included structured mentorship and pertinent PM&R-related topics, including disability health and adaptive sports, to which premedical students often have limited exposure. Participants were invited to complete pre- and postworkshop surveys to evaluate the workshop’s impact. The authors collaborated with prehealth chapters of organizations such as the American Medical Women’s Association and the Minority Association of Pre-Medical Students to distribute surveys. Outcomes The preworkshop survey was completed by 147 premedical students, and 81 registered for the workshop. Ultimately, 55 attended the workshop, with 71% completing the postworkshop survey. Most participants had no previous exposure to PM&R (n = 77, 53.5%) and to adaptive sports (n = 116, 80.6%). Furthermore, although 76 (52.8%) had shadowed a physician, only 6 (4.2%) had experience shadowing a PM&R physician. The authors gathered a diverse representation of responses, including those identifying as female (n = 119, 81.0%) and underrepresented in medicine (n = 84, 57.1%). Pre–post comparative analysis showed a statistically significant rise in students’ motivation to apply to medical school (P = .018), along with a statistically significant increase in the interest and understanding of PM&R and adaptive sports (P &lt; .001). Next Steps Future work will focus on developing longitudinal mentorship, improving accessibility through hybrid formats, and expanding the curriculum through interspecialty collaborations to support broader implementation and evaluation.
Lack of association between rifaximin and drug-resistant infections: a global multicenter inpatient cirrhosis cohort
Bajaj, Jasmohan S, Kamath, Patrick S, Wong, Florence, Xie, Qing, Topazian, Mark, Seto, Wai-Kay, Torre, Aldo, Hayes, PC, Silva, Mario, Bush, Brian J., Choudhury, Ashok, Investigators, On behalf of the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR Registry, Fisseha, Henok , Fisseha, Henok , Bajaj, Jasmohan S. , Kamath, Patrick S. , Wong, Florence , Xie, Qing , Idılman, Ramazan , Seto, Wai‐Kay , George, Jacob , Alvares-da-Silva, Mario, BUSH, BRIAN J. , Silvey, Scott , Choudhury, Ashok

Clinical and Molecular Hepatology | April 15, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1321-1332

10.3350/cmh.2026.0228 | PMID 42120075 Get It

Background/Aims: Infections with drug-resistant organisms (DROs) are associated with poor outcomes in cirrhosis. Rifaximin, widely used for hepatic encephalopathy (HE), could promote cross-resistance, but data regarding clinical impact are conflicting. Aim: Determine predictors of DROs in a global cirrhosis inpatient cohort focusing on preadmission rifaximin use.Methods: From the global CLEARED consortium, we focused on cirrhosis inpatients with infections on/during admission. Clinical/demographic/medication, especially rifaximin details were recorded. The primary outcome was DRO development. Multivariable regression for DRO including clinical, medications, and country income was performed.Results: 2,949 infected inpatients (55.3 years, 62.9% male) were included. 12.2% of all and 24.4% of culture-positive infections developed DROs; these patients had higher HE (39 vs. 31%, <i>P</i>=0.003), hepatorenal syndrome (25 vs. 19%, <i>P</i>=0.006), lactulose (55 vs. 47%, <i>P</i>=0.008) and rifaximin use (34 vs. 27%, <i>P</i>=0.006) on crude comparisons but country-income distributions were similar. 29.7% were on pre-admission rifaximin, mostly HE-related; they had more advanced cirrhosis and from low/low-middle-income countries. Daptomycin was used in 1.5%, linked with DROs (5.0 vs. 1.0%, <i>P</i><0.0001) without a difference in rifaximin use (1.4 vs.1.7%, <i>P</i>=0.61). On adjusted analysis, MELD-Na (1.03, 95% CI 1.02–1.04, <i>P</i><0.001) increased, whereas male sex (0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92, <i>P</i>=0.008) and hepatitis-B (0.65, 95% CI 0.45–0.92, <i>P</i>=0.020) decreased DRO. Rifaximin was not associated with DROs overall (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.80–1.43, <i>P</i>=0.65) or within income strata (high: 1.07, 95% CI 0.59–1.92, <i>P</i>=0.82, upper-middle: 1.18, 95% CI 0.74–1.85, <i>P</i>=0.49, low/low-middle: 1.04, 95% CI 0.60–1.81, <i>P</i>=0.90) despite sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: In this large global cohort of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and infections, 12% developed infections involving DROs. 30% had pre-admission rifaximin use which was not linked with daptomycin use or with DRO development on adjusted analysis overall or across country income groups.
Evaluation of Regorafenib in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma: GBM AGILE Phase II/III Bayesian Randomized Platform Trial
Wen, Patrick Y. , Berry, Donald A. , Buxton, Meredith , Colman, Howard , Groot, John de , Lim, Michael, Mellinghoff, Ingo K. , Perry, James, Weller, M, Blondin, Nicholas A., Butt, Omar H. , Damek, Denise M., Fuente, Macarena I. de la , Drappatz, Jan, Dunbar, Erin, Giglio, Pierre , Hyddmark, Emma Viktoria, Iwamoto, Fabio, Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Kim, Lyndon, Kling, Heather M., Lee, Eudocia Q., Mantica, Megan , Mikkelsen, Tom, Newton, Herbert B. , Walbert, Tobias , Weathers, Shiao‐Pei , Lassman, Andrew B. , Group, for the GBM AGILE Regorafenib Study, Alexander, Brian, Anker, Lars , Berry, Nicholas , Cloughesy, Tim, Connelly, Jennifer , Detry, Michelle A. , Fitzgerald, Mark, Gordon, Gary, Graves, Todd, Hu, Jethro , Hyddmark, Emma Maria Viktoria, Johnson, Adam, Kalabic, Marija, Lesser, Glenn J., Marion, Joe , Owen, Scott, Perry, James R, Peters, Katherine B., Powell, Ashley, Saunders, Christina T., Tanner, Kirk, Untch, Sarah, Wilcox, Emma, Yung, W. K. Alfred, Lim, Michael , Buxton, Meredith , de Groot, John , Mellinghoff, Ingo K , Weller, Michael , De La Fuente, Macarena , Lee, Eudocia Q , Mantica, Megan , Nabors, Louis Burt , Newton, Herbert B , Olson, Jeffrey J. , Schiff, David , Walbert, Tobias , Weathers, Shiao-Pei , Cloughesy, Timothy F , Lassman, Andrew B , Berry, Donald , Colman, Howard , Blondin, Nicolas, Drappatz, Jan , Iwamoto, Fabio M., Lee, Eudocia Q. , Mikkelsen, Tom , Nabors, Burt , Newton, Herbert B. , Cloughesy, Timothy F. , Anderson, Mark D., Cavenee, Webster K. , Connelly, Jennifer , Ellingson, Benjamin M. , Galanis, Evanthia , Gordon, Gary, Graber, Jerome J. , Khasraw, Mustafa , Lesser, Glenn J. , McGlothlin, Anna , Peters, Katherine B. , Saunders, Christina T. , Sulman, Erik P. , Tanner, Kirk, Yung, W.K. Alfred

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 14, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 1676-1686

10.1200/jco-25-01137 | PMID 41980234 Get It

PURPOSE GBM AGILE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03970447 ) is a phase II/III Bayesian adaptive platform registration trial testing multiple arms against a common control; the primary end point is overall survival (OS). Regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, showed OS benefit in recurrent (RD) glioblastoma in the phase II REGOMA trial and entered GBM AGILE as the first investigational arm. METHODS Patient subtypes included in the regorafenib arm of GBM AGILE were newly diagnosed unmethylated (NDU) and RD glioblastoma. Prospective defined sets of subtypes, or arm signatures, were NDU, RD, and all (NDU + RD). As the first investigational arm in GBM AGILE, regorafenib was equally randomized to the control arm. Treatment in the control arm is temozolomide + radiotherapy (in newly diagnosed) or lomustine (in RD). Efficacy was assessed by OS hazard ratio (HR), arm/control, and demonstrated when the Bayesian probability of benefit (HR <1.00) was ≥98%. Analysis was performed monthly for limited efficacy, which occurs when the Bayesian predictive power is <25% for all signatures, and determines stopping enrollment. Follow-up continued for 12 months after accrual stopped. RESULTS When the predictive power was <25% in all predefined signatures for regorafenib, accrual stopped for limited efficacy. The final analysis did not demonstrate OS improvement in the regorafenib arm in RD nor NDU glioblastoma. Median HRs were 1.05 (NDU), 1.07 (RD), and 1.07 (all) with final probabilities of benefit (HR <1.00) of 0.421 (NDU), 0.312 (RD), and 0.296 (all). Regorafenib was associated with increased toxicity relative to control. CONCLUSION GBM AGILE did not show superiority of regorafenib over control in RD (lomustine) or NDU (temozolomide + radiotherapy) glioblastoma, yet caused increased toxicities. Regorafenib has been removed from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as a treatment option for RD.
Distinct evolutionary patterns of endemic and emerging parvoviruses and the origin of a new pandemic virus
López-Astacio, Robert A. , Wasik, Brian R. , Lee, Hyunwook , Voorhees, Ian E. H. , Weichert, Wendy S. , Adu, Oluwafemi F. , Truyen, Uwe , Parrish, Colin R. , Truyen, Uwe , Parrish, Colin R , Goodman, Laura B. , Hafenstein, Susan

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | April 14, 2026 | Volume: 123 | Issue: 16 | Pages: No page available

10.1073/pnas.2515274123 | PMID 41980105 Get It

Emergence of epidemic viruses in new hosts threatens both human and other animal populations, and often involves virus evolution to overcome barriers that normally prevent efficient infection and spread in that host. After transfer the separated viruses will evolve in parallel as they spread within the original and new hosts. Here we examine the details of a virus involved in such a host-jumping event, where we define the natural evolution of feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) over 60 y, clarify the origins of the new pandemic canine parvovirus (CPV) that arose in the 1970s, and compare the separate evolution of those viruses over 47 y in cats or dogs. Several live-attenuated FPV vaccine viruses originated from early-1960s isolates or were a recombinant of an early virus, and many sequences in databases proved to be vaccine-derived. The sequences of wild viruses showed that FPV-like strains evolved at less than one-third the rate observed for CPV in dogs, and the higher rate of CPV evolution has been consistent since 1979, when a genetic variant became widespread. The common ancestor of the CPV lineage was related to FPVs from Europe and contained several unique host-adaptive capsid changes associated with canine transferrin receptor type-1 binding. Although the FPV vaccine strains are around 60 y old, little selection for antigenic variation was observed. The distinct evolutionary patterns of these closely related viruses circulating for decades in different hosts emphasize the complex evolution associated with viral epidemic emergence and spread in endemic and new hosts.
Historical outcomes for patients with stage IA NLPHL: Global NLPHL One Working Group retrospective analyses
Flerlage, Jamie E. , Eichenauer, Dennis A. , Fuchs, Michael, Hartmann, Sylvia , Eich, Hans Theodor, Savage, Kerry J. , Skinnider, Brian, Akhtar, Saad , Steiner, R., Milgrom, Sarah A., Vega, Francisco, Alomari, Mohammed , Zhang, Xiaoyin , Collins, Graham P., Advani, Ranjana H, Kumar, Priyadarshini , Wirth, Andrew, Tsang, Richard, Smith, SD, Hendrickson, Peter G. , Hopkins, David, McKay, Pamela, Ng, Andrea K. , Koenig, Julie L. , Sakthivel, Gukan, Baron, Jonathan A, Roberts, Kenneth B. , Gao, Sarah, Alkendi, Jalila , Rahbi, Nasser Al, Balogh, Alexander George, Ricardi, Umberto, Sridhar, Akshay, Torka, Pallawi , Specht, Lena , Silva, Ravi De , Shah, Nimish, Osborne, Wendy , Henry, Michael, Chang, Isabela , Halperin, Daniel, Miall, Fiona , Brady, J.L. , Mikhaeel, G., Brennan, Bernadette , Penn, Anthony, Reeves, Marie, Terezakis, Stephanie A, Pepa, R Della, Picardi, Marco, Kirova, Youlia, Fergusson, Paige, Hawkes, Eliza A. , Lee, Denise , Ku, Matthew , Hamad, Nada, Mutsando, Howard , Tedjaseputra, Aditya , Gilbertson, Michael, Marconi, Tamara , Viiala, Nicholas , Palese, Monica , Kelly, Kara M, Borchmann, P, Hoppe, Richard T. , Advani, Ranjana H. , Hopkins, David , Baron, Jonathan , Vega, Francisco , Kumar, Priyadarshini , Dickinson, Michael , Smith, Sonali M , McKay, Pamela , Koenig, Julie , Casulo, Carla , Al Kendi, Jalila , Levis, Mario , Torka, Pallawi , Specht, Lena , De Silva, Ravindu , Pickard, Keir , Smith, Christine M , Brady, Jessica , Senchenko, Maria Anatolevna , Volchkov, Egor Vasilevich , Hoppe, Bradford S , Hawkes, Eliza , Lee, Denise , Doo, Nicole Wong , Barraclough, Allison , Cheah, Chan Yoon , Salvaris, Ross , Ku, Matthew , Hamad, Nada , Tedjaseputra, Aditya , Shankar, Ananth , Maurer, Matthew , Natkunam, Yasodha , Hoppe, Richard T , Binkley, Michael Sargent , Savage, Kerry J , Advani, Ranjana H , Hopkins, David , Baron, Jonathan , Eichenauer, Dennis A , Flerlage, Jamie E , Fuchs, Michael, Eich, Hans Theodor, Hodgson, David C. , Skinnider, Brian, Rauf, M. Shahzad , Maghfoor, Irfan , Pinnix, Chelsea C. , Alomari, Mohammed, Collins, Graham P. , Dickinson, Michael , Tsang, Richard , Prica, Anca A. , Major, Ajay , Kelsey, Chris R. , Constine, Louis S , Casulo, Carla , Plastaras, John Peter , Balogh, Alexander G., Levis, Mario , Ricardi, Umberto , Sridhar, Akshay, Shah, Nimish , Pickard, Keir , Blazin, Lindsay , Henry, Michael, Smith, Christine M. , Hoppe, Bradford S. , Talaulikar, Dipti , Pepa, Roberta Della , Picardi, Marco , Kirova, Youlia , Northend, Michael , Doo, Nicole Wong , Barraclough, Allison , Opat, Stephen , Cheah, Chan Y. , Hamad, Nada , Gilbertson, Michael , Maurer, Matthew J. , Natkunam, Yasodha , Kelly, Kara M. , Borchmann, Peter , Binkley, Michael S.

Blood Advances | April 14, 2026 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 5338-5347

10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020012 | PMID 41979337 Get It

Abstract We evaluated outcomes by management type for patients with stage IA nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) in the Global NLPHL One Working Group retrospective database of 2243 patients with stages I to IV disease diagnosed from 1992 to 2021 at 38 international institutions. A total of 779 patients had stage IA disease with median age of 35 years (range, 3-89) and median follow-up of 6.1 years. The 6-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 86.3% and 97.7%, respectively. Outcomes were analyzed for the 2 groups: complete resection and unresected disease. Patients with a complete resection and observation alone (n = 99) had a 6-year PFS of 65.5% vs 90.5% for those who received radiotherapy (RT) (n = 53). Patients with unresected disease (n = 627; 80.5%) had a 6-year PFS of 62.0% for rituximab alone (n = 31), 89.6% for RT alone (n = 325), 76.8% for ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) alone (n = 40), and 94.3% for ABVD plus RT (n = 130). A total of 127 patients relapsed (16.3%), of which 25 (19.7%) had transformation. Our analysis suggests the following: (1) RT improves the PFS in patients with completely resected disease; (2) rituximab or ABVD alone does not appear to achieve a durable response; and (3) chemotherapy was not observed to add additional PFS benefit when used in combination with RT. Thus, for stage IA NLPHL, RT alone is likely sufficient for definitive treatment.