Citations

Magnesium is an essential element that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, division and differentiation. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that a diet poor in magnesium is associated with an increased risk of developing cancer. There are few studies investigating whether magnesium deficiency is associated with a poor prognosis in lymphomas. The recent discovery of X-linked immunodeficiency with magnesium defect, Epstein-Barr virus, and neoplasia (XMEN) disease, suggests a role of magnesium in the development of hematologic malignancies and lymphocyte function. Furthermore, a recently published study found that hypomagnesemia prior to chemotherapy is associated with inferior overall survival (OS) in patients with Burkitt Lymphoma. We hypothesized that low magnesium levels prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) may lead to inferior outcomes via impaired lymphocyte recovery. We evaluated whether low serum magnesium levels were associated with inferior survival in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) between January 1998 and May 2020 using a retrospective study design. We cross-referenced our search with patients who had a magnesium level as part of their pre-transplant workup between 7 and 28 days prior to their first transplant. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi square/Fischer's exact test were used to compare the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to perform all time to event analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox-proportional hazards. Our study included 581 patients of which 82 (14.1%) had hypomagnesemia (magnesium < 1.7 mg/dL) prior to AHSCT. Our study found that hypomagnesemia was associated with inferior OS and event-free survival (EFS) defined as re-transplant, relapse or death, compared to those with a normal magnesium level; median OS: 7.3 years (95% CI: 2.91 - upper limit not estimable) versus 9.7 years (95% CI: 6.92 - 12.3 years), p=0.0041; and median EFS: 3.9 years (95% CI: 1.63 - 8.98 years) versus 6.29 years (95% CI: 4.73 - 8.95 years), p = 0.016 respectively(B). Higher serum magnesium (HR 0.199 per doubling, 95% CI 0.078 - 0.503; p<0.001) and higher albumin (HR 0.090 per doubling, 95% CI 0.021 - 0.394; p=0.001) were associated with lower mortality rates, and higher creatinine (HR 1.669 per doubling, 95% CI 1.03 - 2.52; p=0.04) was associated with greater mortality up to 1 year post-transplantation. In a multivariate Cox regression excluding albumin, hypomagnesemia (p < 0.001) and elevated creatinine (p = 0.038) were independent predictors of poor overall survival(A). There was no significant difference between day 15 absolute lymphocyte count between patients with normal magnesium levels and low serum magnesium levels prior to their conditioning regimen. Although we hypothesized that we would find a significant difference between 15 day absolute lymphocyte count recovery and hypomagnesemia, this was not apparent. However, magnesium is an important nutrient for immune function and immune recovery is important after the bone marrow is restored post ablative therapy. Thus, low serum magnesium levels may lead to impaired OS and EFS via impaired lymphocyte function. In vitro studies will be necessary to understand this mechanism further. Magnesium may simply be a marker of illness and replacement of magnesium may not improve outcomes. However, further investigations are needed to determine whether outcomes would improve with replacement of magnesium in patients with hypomagnesemia, which our study did not address. Overall, our preliminary data suggests that hypomagnesemia is an independent prognostic factor and predictor of inferior OS and EFS in this cohort of patients. Figure Disclosures Ansell: ADC Therapeutics:Research Funding;AI Therapeutics:Research Funding;Trillium:Research Funding;Affimed:Research Funding;Regeneron:Research Funding;Seattle Genetics:Research Funding;Bristol Myers Squibb:Research Funding;Takeda:Research Funding.Witzig:Spectrum:Consultancy;Celgene:Consultancy, Research Funding;Immune Design:Research Funding;Karyopharm Therapeutics:Research Funding;Acerta:Research Funding;Incyte:Consultancy;AbbVie:Consultancy;MorphSys:Consultancy.

Chromosome region maintenance protein1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anti-cancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first in class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), has been limited by substantial adverse effects (AEs). To address this clinical problem, we focused on identifying novel strategies to boost the potency, reduce toxicity, and broaden the applicability of CRM1 inhibitors to a wider range of malignancies. We discovered that salicylates could markedly enhance the anti-tumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. KPT-330 was chosen as the prototypical CRM1 inhibitor given its current FDA approval status and characterized pharmacokinetics; and choline salicylate (CS) was chosen as the prototypical salicylate given its favorable pharmacokinetics and reduced antiplatelet, renal, neurological and gastrointestinal AEs in humans compared to other salicylates. By using cell lines belonging to different hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, we demonstrated ex vivo that the combination of KPT-330 and CS (K+CS) could induce unique and significant antitumor effect at much lower dose of KPT-330 (at 25% of the dose used in the clinic), thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical AEs (Figure 1a-d, and e-g). This significant synergetic antitumor effect observed with K+CS ex vivo was also validated in vivo by using an NSG mouse model of mantle cell lymphoma (Figure 1h). Moreover, the K+CS combination did not show this potent toxic effect on non-malignant cells in vivo and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in NSG mice. Mechanistically, protein profiling through mass spectroscopy revealed that K+CS uniquely affects the cellular pathways of DNA damage repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. Studies involving immunoblotting, cell cycle analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy assessing nucleocytoplasmic molecular export and DNA damage, reporter assay to assess homologous recombination repair proficiency and immunohistochemistry showed that, compared to KPT-330 treatment alone, K+CS decreased the expression of CRM1, Rad51 and thymidylate synthase proteins in vitro and in vivo, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, and importantly a unique cell cycle arrest in S-phase, thus leading to cell apoptosis. These effects on cellular proteins and pathways were unique to K+CS treatment and were not observed with KPT-330 or CS single agent treatment. Pathway analyses through RNA sequencing also paralleled the findings of proteomic studies thus further validating the unique effect of K+CS treatment on the aforementioned cellular pathways. Importantly, K+CS treatment exerted unique and significant antitumor effect ex vivo on primary malignant cells obtained from patient's with high-risk hematologic malignancies such as double hit DLBCL, BTK and BCL2 inhibitor resistant mantle cell lymphoma, TP53 deleted/mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high-risk multiple myeloma thus signifying its broader applicability as a treatment option for these aggressive hematologic malignancies where there is a dire need to find new treatment strategies (Figure 1i). In summary, we describe a unique all-oral drug combination with a novel constellation of mechanisms of action on cellular pathways that are exploited by cancer cells. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple cancer types and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for therapy of blood cancers. Disclosures Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphSys: Consultancy; Immune Design: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy.

Background: Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) tend to present at an older age. Frailty, resulting from comorbidities and reduced organ function, poses unique challenges to the management of WM in the elderly. Age above 65 years, is an established unfavorable prognostic factor in WM. However, data specifically pertaining to the very elderly patient population are scant. The impact of advanced age (≥75 years at diagnosis) on the clinical features and outcomes of patients with symptomatic/active WM were studied. Methods: Patients with active WM, evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1996 and December 2018 were included in the study. The characteristics and laboratory parameters at presentation of the cohort of patients with the age ≥75 years were compared to those of the younger (age <75 years) cohort. The median follow-up and overall survival (OS) were assessed from active disease to last follow-up or death using the Kaplan Meier method. Because older age is a confounding factor for deaths from unrelated causes, the cause-specific survival (CSS) was calculated. Deaths were deemed WM-related if patients died from progressive disease, transformation with antecedent WM, concomitant light chain (AL) amyloidosis, infection associated with WM or anti-WM therapy related toxicity, while patients who died from other causes were considered to have a WM-unrelated death. The patients who died from causes unrelated to WM were censored at death for CSS analysis. The OS of the cohort of the very elderly patients was compared to that of a cohort of the general US population, matched for age, sex as well as follow-up from the calendar-year of diagnosis, to assess the degree to which WM impacts survival. Results: Among 949 consecutive patients, with a median follow-up of 8.4 years [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 7.7-9.3 years] from active disease, the median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range: 31-93 years). Of 177 patients (19%) who were ≥75 years of age at the onset of active WM, 173 (98%) received anti-WM therapy. The baseline characteristics of the 2 cohorts (patients ≥75 years of age versus <75 years) are outlined in Table 1. The patients in the age ≥75 years cohort were noted to have lower IgM levels and serum albumin, and higher serum LDH and serum β-2 microglobulin compared to the age <75 years cohort. A higher proportion of patients in the age <75 years cohort had coexisting AL amyloidosis at diagnosis. The frequency of MYD88L265P mutation was similar between the 2 cohorts (p=0.2). During the 23-year period, there was an increase in the proportion of patients ≥75 years who were diagnosed with active WM (12% during the 1996-2003 period, 18% during 2004-2010, 25% during 2011-2018; P<0.0001). In the elderly WM cohort, the most frequently used frontline treatment was rituximab monotherapy (36%), followed by rituximab-alkylating agent-based regimen (31%). Of 177 patients with age ≥75 years, 89 (50%) patients were deceased at the time of last follow-up and 58% (52/89) of all deaths in age ≥75 years were attributable to WM. By contrast, 303 (39%) out of the 772 patients in the age <75 years cohort were deceased at last follow-up, with 73% (224/303) deaths attributable to WM. The CSS for patients with age ≥75 years was 10.9 years (95% CI: 7.3-11.7 years) versus 14.7 years (95% CI: 13.2-15.7 years) for age <75 years [Risk ratio 2.1(95% CI: 1.5-2.8); p<0.0001]. At the 1 and 2 year follow-up, WM-related mortality was 6.8% and 11.9%, respectively, for patients with age ≥75 years versus 2.6% and 4.9%, respectively, for the younger cohort. The median OS of patients with age ≥75 years from the diagnosis of active WM was 5.9 years (95% CI: 4.2-7.3 years) compared to the OS of 8.3 years for an age, sex and calendar-year-matched cohort, derived from the general US population (p<0.001), Figure 1. Conclusion: Patients who are ≥75 years of age at the time of diagnosis of active WM present with certain poor prognostic features, including higher serum LDH and β-2 microglobulin and lower serum albumin compared to their younger counterparts. The impact of advanced age is underscored by a poorer WM-specific survival for the subset of patients with the age ≥75 years compared to the younger cohort. Furthermore, although active/symptomatic WM is typically an indolent malignancy, it adversely affects OS of the very elderly patients as suggested by the comparison with an age, sex and calendar-year matched cohort of the general US population. Disclosures Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AI Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Gertz:Ionis/Akcea: Other: personal fee; Alnylam: Other: personal fee; Prothena: Other: personal fee; Spectrum: Other: personal fee, Research Funding; Annexon: Other: personal fee; Appellis: Other: personal fee; Amgen: Other: personal fee; Medscape: Other: personal fee, Speakers Bureau; Physicians Education Resource: Other: personal fee; Abbvie: Other; Celgene: Other; Research to Practice: Other; Sanofi: Other; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Proclara: Other; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Aurora Bio: Other; Janssen: Other: personal fee. Nowakowski:NanoString: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Kymera: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Witzig:Spectrum: Consultancy; Immune Design: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; MorphSys: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Intellia: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy. Kumar:Sanofi: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectar: Other; Genecentrix: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Takeda: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Carsgen: Other, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Other: Independent Review Committee; IRC member; Genentech/Roche: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Tenebio: Other, Research Funding; Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments; Celgene/BMS: Other: Research funding for clinical trials to the institution, Consulting/Advisory Board participation with no personal payments. Kapoor:Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anticancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first-in-class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for relapsed multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been limited by substantial toxicity. We discovered that salicylates markedly enhance the antitumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. Using salicylates in combination enables targeting of a range of blood cancers with a much lower dose of selinexor, thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical adverse effects. Choline salicylate (CS) with low-dose KPT-330 (K+CS) had potent, broad activity across high-risk hematological malignancies and solid-organ cancers ex vivo and in vivo. The K+CS combination was not toxic to nonmalignant cells as compared with malignant cells and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in mice. Mechanistically, compared with KPT-330 alone, K+CS suppresses the expression of CRM1, Rad51, and thymidylate synthase proteins, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, cell-cycle arrest in S-phase, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors further potentiates the K+CS antitumor effect. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple types of blood cancers and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for cancer therapy in general.

Abstract Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm. To date, there is a lack of U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved treatments in adult LCH to establish optimal first-line therapy. We conducted a retrospective, single-center case series evaluating the use of BRAF inhibitors in adult patients with BRAFV600E- LCH proven by biopsy. Our case series is the first to report the use of BRAF inhibitors as first-line therapy in adults with LCH. We also report the efficacy with single-agent dabrafenib in adult LCH. All but one of our patients had favorable response to targeted therapy.

Abstract Constitutive activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling is a major driving mechanism for the proliferation and survival of various B-cell lineage non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Blocking BCR signaling using the first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, has proved effective and is currently FDA approved for the treatment of several B-cell lymphomas. Unfortunately, significant subsets of patients possess either primary or acquired resistance to ibrutinib, often resulting in worse prognosis and poorer responses to subsequent therapies. Therefore, overcoming ibrutinib resistance is an urgent clinical need requiring new tools to both delineate the molecular mechanisms of resistance and develop viable therapeutics. To that end, we developed a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line, MCIR1, from a patient with clinically acquired ibrutinib resistance. MCIR1 is a bona fide MCL cell line featuring CD19+/CD5+/CD10-/CD23-/t(11;14)+/TP53+/-; and lacking the previously described mutations in BTK (C481S) and phospholipase C-gamma-2 (R665W, L845F). Importantly, MCIR1 cells possess hallmarks of ibrutinib resistance, including the insensitivity of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to ibrutinib in vitro, and the irresponsiveness of MCIR1 xenograft tumors to ibrutinib treatment in mice as compared with ibrutinib-sensitive Jeko-1 tumors. To delineate the molecular mechanism(s) of ibrutinib resistance, we identified by RNA-Seq analysis that MCIR1 cells possess robust activity of the non-canonical NFkB pathway and elevated expression of NFkB target genes, suggesting that this pathway likely drives their resistance to ibrutinib. Finally, we demonstrated the utility of MCIR1 as a tool for testing new drugs to combat ibrutinib resistance in vitro by showing its sensitivity to the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein inhibitor, venetoclax. To our knowledge, MCIR1 is the first patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant cell line to be established. Hence, MCIR1 is especially useful because uniquely possesses the relevant clinical and biological features of patients with ibrutinib-resistant MCL. We propose MCIR1 as a tool to further the understanding of molecular mechanisms conferring ibrutinib resistance by providing a clinically relevant system with the capacity for molecular and genetic manipulations. Further, these features make MCIR1 an ideal model to screen drugs for combating ibrutinib resistance through both in vivo and in vitro approaches. Citation Format: Kevin E. Nowakowski, Jithma P. Abeykoon, Mary J. Stenson, Michael M. Timm, Curtis A. Hanson, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Anne J. Novak, Xiaosheng Wu, Thomas E. Witzig. MCIR1: A patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma line for the study of ibrutinib resistance and drug discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 650.

e20048 Background: No literature exists regarding whether hypomagnesemia at the time of diagnosis in Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) is associated with inferior survival. Methods: Patients with new diagnosis of BL who were seen at Mayo Clinic, MN from 2000-2019 with a serum magnesium level available prior to chemotherapy were included. Patients were allocated to two groups; Abnormal Magnesium Group (AMG), defined as a magnesium level < 1.7 mg/dL and Normal Magnesium Group (NMG), defined as ≥ 1.7 – 2.3mg/dL. Two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi square/Fischer’s exact test were used to compare the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to perform all time to event analysis which were done from time of treatment. Hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox-proportional hazards. Results: Of 90 patients with a diagnosis of BL, 42 patients had a magnesium level at or before time of diagnosis. The Table lists the baseline characteristics and significant findings of the AMG/NMG groups. The median follow-up was 30 months. Hypomagnesemia was predictive for inferior EFS at 30 months - 34.3% (95% CI: 8.7–74.0) for AMG and 79.3% (95% CI: 60.8-90.4) for NMG (p = 0.038). OS at 30 months for AMG was 42.9% (95% CI: 14.4-77.0) and for NMG was 93.7% (95% CI: 78.1-98.4%) (p = 0.002). Other parameters significant on univariate analysis included the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.034), creatinine (p = 0.009), and number of treatments (p = 0.048). In the multivariate analysis, creatinine (p = 0.005) and number of treatments (p = 0.004) were significant. Likelihood ratio testing of predictors associated with inferior OS were significant for hypomagnesemia (likelihood ratio 3.99, p = 0.046). Conclusions: Patients with hypomagnesemia at the time of BL diagnosis have inferior outcomes compared to BL patients with a normal magnesium level. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding and test Mg replacement strategies to mitigate the effects of hypomagnesemia. [Table: see text]