Nowakowski, Kevin E.

Abstract Background: Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma characterized by heterogeneous clinical behavior and variable progression patterns. While MYD88L265Pand CXCR4 mutations are frequently encountered, the broader genomic landscape underpinning disease evolution from smoldering WM (SWM) to active treatment naïve WM (TNWM), post-treatment remission WM (PTWM) and relapsed/refractory WM (RRWM) remains incompletely understood. To address this gap, we studied the mutational profile across the WM disease spectrum. Methods We performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on sorted (CD19 and/or CD138) bone marrow aspirates of patients across the spectrum of WM. Paired germline sequencing was performed using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Unique molecular identifier-tagged reads were deduplicated using fgbio. WES data were processed through the Sarek pipeline. Any valid mutation from either caller, present on the index or in COSMIC was considered. Copy number variations (CNVs) were inferred via CNVkit and summarized at the gene and arm level (≥50% directional change). Mean tumor and germline coverages were 174X and 74X, respectively. Fisher's exact test was used for enrichment and hypergeometric test for overlap analyses. Results A total of 78 high-quality WM samples [15 SWM, 44 TNWM, 13 RRWM, 6 PTWM in remission (all with paired TNWM samples)] were sequenced. The mutational burden varied across disease states (median SWM=1.48 m/Mb, TNWM= 1.12 m/Mb, RRWM = 1.59 m/Mb; p=0.04). Density plots revealed bimodal VAF distributions, consistent with clonal and subclonal architectures in WM. Overall, 77% harbored a MYD88L265P mutation by WES. Among MYD88^WT^ patients, AS-PCR identified MYD88L265P in 4 (25%) not detected by WES, raising the overall mutation rate to 83%, plus one with a non-L265P variant. Low VAF (<10%) MYD88L265P mutations were seen in 6% of matched PBMCs. MYD88 copy number gain was seen in 2 (17%) MYD88WT TNWM patients. CXCR4 mutations were detected in 38% by WES (18% each frameshift and nonsense). Two (4%) CXCR4WT samples were positive by PCR, giving an overall rate of 40%. CXCR4 mutations were more frequent in RRWM (54%) vs TNWM (41%) and SWM (27%), though not statistically significant. Del(6q) and Del(17p) were noted in 16% (n=12) and 7% (n=5) of patient samples. All del(17p) events were noted in TNWM samples and in one paired post-treatment sample. Overall rate of del(17p) and TP53 mutation was 14% (n=11). RRWM was enriched in ARID1A alterations, a gene implicated in chromatin remodeling and plasma cell identity formation [38% (n=5) in RRWM vs. 11% (n=6) in TNWM and SWM], compared to TNWM and SWM p=0.03]. Alterations in NF-kB signaling gene MAP3K14 were more frequent in RRWM (31%, n=4) compared to the SWM/TNWM cohort [(7%), n=4; p=0.036). We noted an enrichment in the TP53 mutation rate in RRMW [n=3, 23%, OR 7.7] compared to TNWM and SWM cohorts [n=2, 4%), p=0.04]. Mutations in FUBP1 (p=0.03), an upstream regulator of MYC, and CARD11 (p=.043), a B-cell signaling scaffold protein were also more frequent in RRWM. Notably, none of the SWM patients harbored an ARID1A alteration (p=0.057), suggesting acquisition during progression. CNV analysis revealed that MAP3K14 amplifications were frequent in RRWM (n=3, 23%) compared to SWM/TNWM [n=2 (4%), p=0.043]. RRWM samples showed increased CD79B mutations (15%) and significant overlap with the C5/ABC diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) genomic cluster (Chapuy et al., Nat. Med. 2018; p=0.007). This overlap remained significant after excluding MYD88L265P (p=0.019), driven by CARD11, CD79B, and IGLL5, suggesting that a subset of RRWM may acquire an ABC DLBCL-like mutational profile. These findings warrant further investigation using transcriptional profiling. Conclusions This study provides a genomic map of WM evolution from precursor to relapse. Increasing somatic mutations and CNVs support stepwise progression. Enrichment of genes involved in chromatin remodeling and plasma cell identity formation (ARID1A), NF-kB or BCR signaling (CARD11, MAP3K14), and DNA damage repair (TP53) were noted at relapse, all of which have been shown to drive aggressive disease biology. Emergence of an ABC-like genotype in a proportion of RRWM indicates convergent evolution with aggressive lymphomas. Transcriptional studies are warranted to explore this further.

Abstract Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can result in a cytokine storm that is associated with poor outcomes in patients. The activation of a NOD-like receptor pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome following SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown to play a major role in inflammatory immune responses. In this study, we show that open reading frame 8 (ORF8) protein is abundantly secreted as a glycoprotein in vitro. The glycosylated ORF8 stimulates human CD14+/CD16+ monocytes to cause upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine production and cell surface marker expression within 24 hours. The data suggests that stimulation of human monocytes by ORF8 is not receptor mediated. Rather, ORF8 is likely phagocytosed by human monocytes. ORF8 then stimulates the monocytes by independently binding to the NACHT and LRR domains of the NLRP3 protein. Pharmacologic inhibition of NLRP3 significantly diminished the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from ORF8-stimulated human monocytes. Finally, this study shows that the ORF8 protein is also secreted in patients with newly diagnosed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Levels of ORF8 in the blood of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 correlated with disease mortality and trajectory of disease. ORF8 stimulation of monocytes causes pro-inflammatory cytokine production that leads to the development of severe COVID-19.

AbstractErdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a histiocytic neoplasm that predominantly harbors mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway variants. MAPK inhibitors typically are effective treatments, but mutations outside the MAPK pathway, such as CSF1R variants, may cause refractory ECD. We describe a patient with a novel somatic mutation in CSF1R (CSF1RR549_E554delinsQ) that resulted in refractory ECD affecting the central nervous system. Cell model studies, RNA sequencing analysis, and in silico protein modeling suggested that she had a gain‐of‐function mutation occurring in a region critical for autoinhibition. The patient was treated with pexidartinib, a CSF1R inhibitor, and has had a complete clinical and metabolic response lasting more than 1.5 years to date. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe successful treatment of a patient with ECD by using an agent that specifically targets CSF1R. This case also highlights the critical role of individualized molecular profiling to identify novel therapeutic targets in ECD.

AbstractBackgroundDespite the unprecedented success of ibrutinib in lymphoma therapy, the development of ibrutinib resistance due to acquired BTK or PLCγ2 mutations has become a new clinical problem. However, not all resistance is mediated by these mutations and these mechanisms are poorly understood due to a lack of study tools that truly recapitulate this clinical scenario.MethodsWe established a novel patient‐derived ibrutinib‐resistant mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) line named MCIR1. Using immunological, molecular, and cytogenetic approaches, we comprehensively characterized MCIR1 and further demonstrated its utility in the study of resistance mechanisms and treatments to overcome this resistance.ResultsWe show that MCIR1 is a bona fide ibrutinib‐resistant MCL cell line with normal BTK‐/PLCγ2 but ibrutinib‐resistant ERK1/2 and AKT1 signaling. RNA‐Seq analysis revealed a robust non‐canonical NF‐kB signaling that drives the ibrutinib resistance. We also demonstrate the potential utility of a MCIR1‐based cell and mouse model for the discovery of new treatments to overcome BTK inhibitor resistance.ConclusionsWe have established the first patient‐derived ibrutinib‐resistant MCL cell line MCIR1 that lacks BTK or PLCγ2 mutations but exhibits a hyperactive non‐canonical NF‐kB pathway. We further demonstrate its utility in the discovery and validation of new drugs to overcome this resistance.

Introduction Due to the higher metabolic demand, malignant cells have an increased dependency on the nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of proteins, as compared to normal cells. Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1), encoded by the XPO1 gene, is the main protein receptor which facilitates export of molecules, including tumor suppressor proteins, from the nucleus to the cytoplasm thereby making them inactive. Expression of CRM1 in tumor tissue has been shown to be an independent prognostic marker in several solid tumors and in acute myeloid leukemia; high CRM1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was associated with more aggressive disease and shorter survival. Importantly, selinexor, a first in class small molecule inhibitor of CRM1, was recently approved for the treatment of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The expression of CRM1 on tumor cells and the assessment of its prognostic impact have not been studied in patients (pts) with DLBCL or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas (PMBCL). Methods Paraffin embedded tumor tissue from pts with DLBCL or PMBCL treated with immunochemotherapy was assessed for CRM1 expression through IHC on tissue microarray (TMA). CRM1 anti-rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling, catalog-no: 46249) was used at 1:100 dilution. Tumor cell grading was based on CRM1 staining in tumor cells compared to background non-malignant lymphocytes and non-malignant lymphocytes in spleen and tonsillar tissue controls. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was used as a positive control [known high levels of CRM1 staining (Inoue et al, J Urol, 2012)]. Two expert hematopathologists (RLK & AJW) independently scored CRM1 nuclear staining and assigned a grade of 0-3; 0 (no definitive nuclear staining, equal to background lymphocytes), 1 (dim nuclear staining), 2 (consistent nuclear staining, nuclear detail still visible behind the stain) and 3 (strong nuclear staining obscuring most nuclear detail, staining equivalent to RCC control). The average CRM1 score per case across all available cores on the TMA was calculated. Low CRM1 expression for a case was arbitrarily defined as a score of 0-2.0; high CRM1 expression was score 2.1-3.0. Scoring reliability between reviewers and between cores was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient; score 0.75-0.90 was considered as a good scoring reliability. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to progression, relapse, retreatment, or death. The association of CRM1 expression and risk of failing to achieve EFS at 24 months after diagnosis (EFS24) was estimated using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from logistic regression models, while the association of CRM1 expression with continuous EFS and overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI from Cox regression models. Results Tumor tissue from 282 pts was studied for CRM1 staining, including 275 pts with DLBCL and 7 pts with PMBCL. Median age of the study population was 61 years (range: 18-93) and 59% were male. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 88.6 months. The first-line treatment regimens and baseline patient characteristics at diagnosis are outlined in Figure 1A. Of the 282 pts, 200 (71%) had high level of CRM1 expression and 82 (29%) had low CRM1 expression [only 4 (1.4%) had no or 0 staining]. Intra-class correlation coefficient to measure scoring reliability was 0.8. There was no difference in International Prognostic Index (IPI), ECOG performance score, lactate dehydrogenase or age at diagnosis among the groups with high CRM1 expression compared to low CRM1 expression (Figure 1A). The EFS24 failure was 29% for pts with low CRM1 expression while 26% in pts who had high CRM1 expression, OR=1.16, 95% CI 0.63-2.07; p=0.63. Null associations were also observed for EFS (HR=1.21, 95% CI 0.80-1.83; p=0.38) and OS (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.61-1.69; p=0.95), (Figure 1B, C). Results were similar when adjusted for gender and IPI. Conclusion CRM1 expression by IHC on paraffin embedded tumor tissue is feasible in DLBCL and PMBCL. These data demonstrate that the CRM1 protein, the target for selinexor, is indeed expressed in the vast majority of these tumors; only 1.4% had no staining. However, CRM1 expression by IHC is not a prognostic marker for EFS24, EFS or OS. Whether CRM1 staining predicts selinexor response has not been studied but should be included in any new studies using CRM1 inhibitors. Disclosures Maurer: Nanostring: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene / BMS: Research Funding. Cerhan:BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; NanoString: Research Funding. Witzig:Acerta: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; MorphSys: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Chromosome region maintenance protein1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anti-cancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first in class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), has been limited by substantial adverse effects (AEs). To address this clinical problem, we focused on identifying novel strategies to boost the potency, reduce toxicity, and broaden the applicability of CRM1 inhibitors to a wider range of malignancies. We discovered that salicylates could markedly enhance the anti-tumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. KPT-330 was chosen as the prototypical CRM1 inhibitor given its current FDA approval status and characterized pharmacokinetics; and choline salicylate (CS) was chosen as the prototypical salicylate given its favorable pharmacokinetics and reduced antiplatelet, renal, neurological and gastrointestinal AEs in humans compared to other salicylates. By using cell lines belonging to different hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, we demonstrated ex vivo that the combination of KPT-330 and CS (K+CS) could induce unique and significant antitumor effect at much lower dose of KPT-330 (at 25% of the dose used in the clinic), thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical AEs (Figure 1a-d, and e-g). This significant synergetic antitumor effect observed with K+CS ex vivo was also validated in vivo by using an NSG mouse model of mantle cell lymphoma (Figure 1h). Moreover, the K+CS combination did not show this potent toxic effect on non-malignant cells in vivo and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in NSG mice. Mechanistically, protein profiling through mass spectroscopy revealed that K+CS uniquely affects the cellular pathways of DNA damage repair, DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. Studies involving immunoblotting, cell cycle analysis, immunofluorescence microscopy assessing nucleocytoplasmic molecular export and DNA damage, reporter assay to assess homologous recombination repair proficiency and immunohistochemistry showed that, compared to KPT-330 treatment alone, K+CS decreased the expression of CRM1, Rad51 and thymidylate synthase proteins in vitro and in vivo, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, and importantly a unique cell cycle arrest in S-phase, thus leading to cell apoptosis. These effects on cellular proteins and pathways were unique to K+CS treatment and were not observed with KPT-330 or CS single agent treatment. Pathway analyses through RNA sequencing also paralleled the findings of proteomic studies thus further validating the unique effect of K+CS treatment on the aforementioned cellular pathways. Importantly, K+CS treatment exerted unique and significant antitumor effect ex vivo on primary malignant cells obtained from patient's with high-risk hematologic malignancies such as double hit DLBCL, BTK and BCL2 inhibitor resistant mantle cell lymphoma, TP53 deleted/mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high-risk multiple myeloma thus signifying its broader applicability as a treatment option for these aggressive hematologic malignancies where there is a dire need to find new treatment strategies (Figure 1i). In summary, we describe a unique all-oral drug combination with a novel constellation of mechanisms of action on cellular pathways that are exploited by cancer cells. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple cancer types and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for therapy of blood cancers. Disclosures Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphSys: Consultancy; Immune Design: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy.

Abstract Chromosome region maintenance protein 1 (CRM1) mediates protein export from the nucleus and is a new target for anticancer therapeutics. Broader application of KPT-330 (selinexor), a first-in-class CRM1 inhibitor recently approved for relapsed multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been limited by substantial toxicity. We discovered that salicylates markedly enhance the antitumor activity of CRM1 inhibitors by extending the mechanisms of action beyond CRM1 inhibition. Using salicylates in combination enables targeting of a range of blood cancers with a much lower dose of selinexor, thereby potentially mitigating prohibitive clinical adverse effects. Choline salicylate (CS) with low-dose KPT-330 (K+CS) had potent, broad activity across high-risk hematological malignancies and solid-organ cancers ex vivo and in vivo. The K+CS combination was not toxic to nonmalignant cells as compared with malignant cells and was safe without inducing toxicity to normal organs in mice. Mechanistically, compared with KPT-330 alone, K+CS suppresses the expression of CRM1, Rad51, and thymidylate synthase proteins, leading to more efficient inhibition of CRM1-mediated nuclear export, impairment of DNA-damage repair, reduced pyrimidine synthesis, cell-cycle arrest in S-phase, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors further potentiates the K+CS antitumor effect. K+CS represents a new class of therapy for multiple types of blood cancers and will stimulate future investigations to exploit DNA-damage repair and nucleocytoplasmic transport for cancer therapy in general.

Abstract Constitutive activation of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling is a major driving mechanism for the proliferation and survival of various B-cell lineage non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Blocking BCR signaling using the first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, ibrutinib, has proved effective and is currently FDA approved for the treatment of several B-cell lymphomas. Unfortunately, significant subsets of patients possess either primary or acquired resistance to ibrutinib, often resulting in worse prognosis and poorer responses to subsequent therapies. Therefore, overcoming ibrutinib resistance is an urgent clinical need requiring new tools to both delineate the molecular mechanisms of resistance and develop viable therapeutics. To that end, we developed a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line, MCIR1, from a patient with clinically acquired ibrutinib resistance. MCIR1 is a bona fide MCL cell line featuring CD19+/CD5+/CD10-/CD23-/t(11;14)+/TP53+/-; and lacking the previously described mutations in BTK (C481S) and phospholipase C-gamma-2 (R665W, L845F). Importantly, MCIR1 cells possess hallmarks of ibrutinib resistance, including the insensitivity of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to ibrutinib in vitro, and the irresponsiveness of MCIR1 xenograft tumors to ibrutinib treatment in mice as compared with ibrutinib-sensitive Jeko-1 tumors. To delineate the molecular mechanism(s) of ibrutinib resistance, we identified by RNA-Seq analysis that MCIR1 cells possess robust activity of the non-canonical NFkB pathway and elevated expression of NFkB target genes, suggesting that this pathway likely drives their resistance to ibrutinib. Finally, we demonstrated the utility of MCIR1 as a tool for testing new drugs to combat ibrutinib resistance in vitro by showing its sensitivity to the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein inhibitor, venetoclax. To our knowledge, MCIR1 is the first patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant cell line to be established. Hence, MCIR1 is especially useful because uniquely possesses the relevant clinical and biological features of patients with ibrutinib-resistant MCL. We propose MCIR1 as a tool to further the understanding of molecular mechanisms conferring ibrutinib resistance by providing a clinically relevant system with the capacity for molecular and genetic manipulations. Further, these features make MCIR1 an ideal model to screen drugs for combating ibrutinib resistance through both in vivo and in vitro approaches. Citation Format: Kevin E. Nowakowski, Jithma P. Abeykoon, Mary J. Stenson, Michael M. Timm, Curtis A. Hanson, Daniel L. Van Dyke, Anne J. Novak, Xiaosheng Wu, Thomas E. Witzig. MCIR1: A patient-derived ibrutinib-resistant mantle cell lymphoma line for the study of ibrutinib resistance and drug discovery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 650.

Abstract Targeting the B-cell receptor and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mTOR signaling pathways has shown meaningful, but incomplete, antitumor activity in lymphoma. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) α and β are 2 homologous and functionally overlapping serine/threonine kinases that phosphorylate multiple protein substrates in several key signaling pathways. To date, no agent targeting GSK3 has been approved for lymphoma therapy. We show that lymphoma cells abundantly express GSK3α and GSK3β compared with normal B and T lymphocytes at the messenger RNA and protein levels. Utilizing a new GSK3 inhibitor 9-ING-41 and by genetic deletion of GSK3α and GSK3β genes using CRISPR/CAS9 knockout, GSK3 was demonstrated to be functionally important to lymphoma cell growth and proliferation. GSK3β binds to centrosomes and microtubules, and lymphoma cells treated with 9-ING-41 become arrested in mitotic prophase, supporting the notion that GSK3β is necessary for the progression of mitosis. By analyzing recently published RNA sequencing data on 234 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, we found that higher expression of GSK3α or GSK3β correlates well with shorter overall survival. These data provide rationale for testing GSK3 inhibitors in lymphoma patient trials.