Citations

Introduction: Inclusion of asymptomatic patients in randomized trials comparing revascularization to medical therapy has been questioned if they have been previously symptomatic. Hypothesis: Duration of asymptomatic status is not associated with better outcomes following endarterectomy (CEA) or stenting (CAS). Methods: Patients in CREST were classified as asymptomatic if they had not had a TIA or stroke ipsilateral to the study artery within 6 months prior to randomization. We compared those patients who had always been asymptomatic (AA) to those who had been previously symptomatic (PS) ≥ 6 months prior to randomization. Proportional hazards models adjusting for age and treatment were used to assess risk of 30-day stroke or death (S+D), and risk of any 30-day S+D plus ipsilateral stroke at 4 years by asymptomatic status Results: Among the 1056 asymptomatic patients who received the assigned procedure within 30 days of randomization, 977 (93%) were AA and 79 (7%) were PS. There was no difference in the 30-day and 4 year outcomes (Table). Conclusion: In CREST, 93% of the asymptomatic patients were always asymptomatic. Similar outcomes for the previously symptomatic patients (7%) supports the inclusion of such patients in randomized trials comparing CEA and CAS to medical treatment.

Objectives The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) showed no difference in the composite endpoint of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis (CS). We compared restenosis or occlusion, and repeat revascularization, between CAS and CEA over 2 years of follow-up. Methods Restenosis, occlusion, and repeat revascularization were assessed at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months post-randomization. Hemodynamically significant restenosis (≥70% diameter reduction) was defined by a peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥300 cm/second on standardized duplex ultrasonography (DUS), occlusion by an absence of flow within the target artery on DUS, and repeat revascularization by any additional procedure (CEA, angioplasty or CAS) performed on the index artery. Studies were performed in CREST-certified laboratories and interpreted in the CREST Ultrasound Core Lab. Patients included in this report were those who received their assigned treatment within 30 days of randomization and had an ultrasound reviewed at the Core Lab (n=2191). Treatment differences were assessed using proportional hazards models adjusting for age, sex, and symptomatic status. Results In the analytic cohort, 1086 patients received CAS and 1105 received CEA. Over 2 years 113 patients developed restenosis, 56 (rate 5.8%) in the CAS group and 57 (rate 5.8%) in the CEA group; and 8 developed an occlusion, 3 (rate 0.3 %) in the CAS group and 5 (rate 0.5%) in the CEA group. The combined restenosis-occlusion rate was 6.0% (n=58) for CAS and 6.3% (n=62) for CEA (HR=0.90, 95% CI=0.63-1.29, p=0.58). Forty-three patients of the 2191 underwent repeat revascularization (20 CAS, 23 CEA, p=0.69) of which 28 had restenosis by our criteria and so were included ( Figure ). Stroke occurred in 13 (4 CAS; 9 CEA) of the 120 patients with restenosis or occlusion; 1 of the 4 CAS strokes occurred after restenosis was detected, and 5 of 9 CEA strokes occurred after restenosis was detected. Conclusions This analysis of carotid restenosis is the largest reported to date from any randomized clinical trial. Restenosis and occlusion were infrequent and similar up to 2 years following CAS or CEA among 2191 patients. The rates of revascularization likewise did not differ between CAS and CEA. Follow-up out to 10 years is ongoing. Figure. Kaplan-Meier curves of restenosis and occlusion over 2 years.

Purpose: The safety of revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis, and the efficacy of medical therapy for stroke prevention have improved. Therefore, results of prior randomized trials may not apply to current treatment decisions. The NINDS-funded CREST-2 will compare carotid endarterectomy and intensive medical therapy (IMT) versus IMT alone (n=1240), and carotid stenting and IMT versus IMT alone (n=1240) in asymptomatic patients with≥70% stenosis. Materials & Methods: CREST-2 consists of two parallel randomized clinical trials to be conducted at a target of ≈120 centers, including within NINDS StrokeNet. The composite primary outcome is stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral ischemic stroke thereafter up to 4 years. Blinded assessment of cognition will be done periodically. Centrally directed IMT includes tight control of blood pressure (systolic target <140 mm Hg) and cholesterol (LDL target <70 mg/dl) as well as lifestyle coaching. Results: As of June 12, 2015, 94 centers have been approved by the Site Selection Committee. Credentialing is ongoing, with 198 approved surgeons and 64 approved interventionists; 124 additional conditionally approved interventionists will be able to submit additional cases for review under the CREST-2 Registry. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid will offer CAS reimbursement for Registry enrollees. As of June 12, 2015, there are 39 actively enrolling centers, and 37 patients have been randomized. Conclusion: CREST-2 is designed to identify the best approach for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The first patient was randomized in December, 2014. An update will be provided regarding the numbers of patients randomized, centers certified, as well as surgeons and interventionists fully approved. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02089217

Background: Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for the prevention of stroke in most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke and intracranial bleeding than warfarin and, therefore, may reduce risk of dementia among patients with AF. Hypothesis: AF patients initiating DOACs for stroke prevention will have lower risk of dementia than patients initiating warfarin. Methods: We used data from two US healthcare claim databases, MarketScan (2007-2015) and Optum Clinformatics (2009-2015). Using validated algorithms, we identified patients with AF who initiated oral anticoagulation. Dementia was defined as having an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code of 290.xx, 294.xx, or 331.0. Comorbidities and use of other medications were defined based on inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. We performed a series of head-to-head comparisons of different oral anticoagulants (warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) in propensity score-matched cohorts. In each database, multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident dementia for each comparison of propensity score-matched cohorts, adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, use of other medications, and markers of socioeconomic status (in the Optum database only). We meta-analyzed database-specific results using a random-effects model. Results: The analysis included 307,099 AF patients from the MarketScan database and 161,346 from the Optum database, of which 6,572 and 4,391 respectively had a diagnosis of incident dementia. Mean follow up ranged between 0.7 to 2.3 years and incident of diagnosed dementia between 7 to 14 cases per 1000 person-years across different oral anticoagulant initiator groups. Patients initiating DOACs had a lower risk of incident dementia than those initiating warfarin (dabigatran: HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.71, 1.01; rivaroxaban: HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76, 0.94; apixaban: HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.65, 0.97). There were no differences in risk of incident dementia comparing DOAC user groups (dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban: HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.79, 1.32; dabigatran vs. apixaban: HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.63, 1.36; apixaban vs. rivaroxaban: HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.86, 1.19). Conclusions: Patients with AF initiating DOACs experienced lower rates of incident dementia than warfarin users. No obvious benefit was observed for any particular DOAC in relation to dementia rates.

Background: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are recommended for AF patients for the prevention of thromboembolic events, including stroke. Stroke risk stratification scores (e.g., CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc) are used to tailor therapeutic recommendations for patients in different risk groups. However, these were derived before the advent of direct OACs. At present, there is no tool that estimates a patient’s stroke risk, given their individual characteristics, by type of OAC. Methods: We used healthcare utilization data from two independent US databases (MarketScan and Optum) to construct and validate a predictive model of ischemic stroke in patients with AF initiating OACs. Patients with non-valvular AF initiating OACs were identified from the MarketScan data for years 2007-2015. Using bootstrapping methods and backward selection of 44 candidate variables, we developed a model which selected variables predicting stroke. The final model was validated in patients with non-valvular AF in the Optum Clinformatics database in the period 2009-2015. Results: Among 135,523 patients with AF initiating OAC in the MarketScan dataset, 2,028 experienced an ischemic stroke after anticoagulant initiation. The stepwise model identified 15 variables (including type of OAC) associated with ischemic stroke (Table). The discrimination (c-statistic) of the model was adequate [0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.70], showing excellent calibration (χ 2 = 7.7 p=0.57). The model was then applied to the 84,549 AF patients in the Optum data set (1408 stroke events). The model showed similar discrimination (c-statistic 0.67, 95%CI 0.65-0.70) and calibration (χ 2 = 12.8 p=0.17). However, previously-developed predicted models had similar discriminative ability (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 0.67, 95%CI 0.65-0.68; ATRIA 0.67, 95%CI 0.65-0.68) Conclusion: A novel model using extensive administrative healthcare data for the identification of patients at higher risk of ischemic stroke by type of anticoagulant did not perform better than established simple models.

Background: Presence of atherosclerotic disease in more than one vascular bed (polyvascular disease) is associated with an increased risk of long-term vascular events. In the setting of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the predictors of disease in other vascular beds is not well delineated. Objective: To identify the frequency and predictors of disease in other vascular beds the CREST 2 randomized trial population with hemodynamically significant stenosis. Methods: Recorded baseline characteristics among CREST 2 participants included: demographics, past medical history, lifestyle factors, and laboratory studies. Each variable was tested against three potential definitions of disease in other beds (cardiac, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or disease in cardiac + PAD). Statistical analysis was done with Chi square and t tests as appropriate. Results: Data from 1447 patients were available for analysis. In these subjects with carotid disease, 51% also had cardiac disease, 24% also had PAD, and 16% had disease in in both cardiac and PAD. There was no relationship between age or race and presence of disease in other beds. Those with cardiac disease were more likely to be male. Diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and former history of smoking were all more common in those with either cardiac and PAD (TABLE). Elevated triglyceride and low HDL levels were also associated with all three definitions of disease in other beds. Those with either PAD or cardiac + PAD were more likely to be current smokers. Conclusions: Among CREST 2 participants, several medical conditions and lifestyle factors were associated with an increased frequency of disease in other vascular beds. Smoking, in particular, appears to be more common in those with PAD. Future analyses will address whether those with disease in other beds have higher rates of stroke or death.

Baseline Differences in Risk Factor Control and Medication Use Between 2 Trials Employing Intensive Medical Management (SAMMPRIS & CREST2) Background: The CREST2 trial Intensive Medical Management (IMM) protocol was adapted from the SAMMPRIS trial. However, since the 2011 publication of initial results of SAMMPRIS, there has been a greater appreciation for the importance of risk factor control in patients at risk of stroke associated with atherosclerosis. Therefore, we sought to determine differences in baseline risk factor control and medication use between SAMMPRIS and CREST2. Methods: Baseline risk factor and medication use data from 451 patients enrolled in SAMMPRIS (2008-2011) with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis and 1473 patients enrolled in CREST2 (2014-2019) with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis were compared using the Chi-square test and t-test. Results: The Table shows baseline risk factor values and medications. SAMMPRIS patients were younger but had significantly worse risk factor control than CREST2 patients for all measures. There was no significant difference in statin use at baseline, but the mean SAMMPRIS subjects’ LDL was 16.1 mg/dL higher than in CREST2. CREST2 patients had higher rates of use of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and thiazides, but lower rates of use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Conclusions: Despite being older, CREST2 patients have significantly better baseline risk factor profiles than SAMMPRIS patients. This could be due to greater appreciation of the importance of risk factor control and healthy lifestyle habits for stroke prevention or more aggressive treatment targets in guideline recommendations. Although risk factor control appears to be improving since SAMMPRIS, many CREST2 patients are still not meeting recommended risk factor goals at baseline and may benefit from IMM protocols.

Abstract Background and Aims Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by hepatic oxalate overproduction. Excess oxalate is excreted by the kidneys, leading to recurrent kidney stones, nephrocalcinosis, and progressive kidney disease. Patients with PH1 generally experience a slow decline in kidney function over time that can be punctuated by abrupt worsening precipitated by infection, obstructing stones, or dehydration. Approximately half of patients with PH1 progress to kidney failure by early adulthood, and nearly all by 60 years of age. Lumasiran is an RNAi therapeutic indicated for the treatment of PH1 in all age groups. In clinical trials, treatment with lumasiran resulted in substantial reductions in urinary and plasma oxalate in pediatric and adult patients, with an acceptable safety profile. This analysis evaluates the change in kidney function of patients with PH1 with an eGFR of ≥30 mL/min/1.73m2 enrolled in clinical trials of lumasiran. Method We analyzed kidney function from 75 patients with PH1, age ≥12 months old, eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73m2, enrolled in 3 clinical trials of lumasiran (Phase 2 open-label extension, and Phase 3 ILLUMINATE-A and ILLUMINATE-B). In these trials, eGFR was calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation in adults or the bedside Schwartz equation in children. The effect of lumasiran on eGFR was assessed by baseline eGFR subgroup: ≥90, &lt;90, 60 to &lt;90, 45 to &lt;60, and 30 to &lt;45 mL/min/1.73m2. Results Of 75 patients available for analysis, 46 were treated with lumasiran from the start of the study through the Month 12 visit. eGFR remained stable in all eGFR subgroups. Patients with eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73m2 at baseline (N=16) demonstrated fluctuations in mean values by timepoint, with a mean change (95% CI) from baseline of -1 (-8, 6) mL/min/1.73m2 at Month 12. In patients with eGFR &lt;90 mL/min/1.73m2 (N=30), no change in mean eGFR from baseline was observed at Month 12; the mean change (95% CI) was 0 (-3, 3). When evaluating subgroups with impaired kidney function, variations in the mean change were observed at Month 12 due to small sample sizes. For patients with eGFR 60 to &lt;90 mL/min/1.73m2 (N=22), the mean change (95% CI) was -2 (-5, 1). For patients with eGFR 45 to &lt;60 mL/min/1.73m2 (N=5), the mean change (95% CI) was 3 (-8, 14). For patients with eGFR 30 to &lt;45 mL/min/1.73m2 (N=3), the mean change (95% CI) was 9 (7, 11). Conclusion Patients with PH1 had stable kidney function over time with lumasiran treatment, regardless of kidney function at baseline. Given the progressive kidney function decline that is characteristic of PH1, the eGFR stability observed during 12 months of treatment with lumasiran is encouraging. Kidney function will continue to be monitored for the duration of the lumasiran clinical trials.

BackgroundPhysicians use fixed C‐arm fluoroscopy equipment with many interventional radiological and cardiological procedures. The associated effective dose to a patient is generally considered low risk, as the benefit‐risk ratio is almost certainly highly favorable. However, X‐ray‐induced skin injuries may occur due to high absorbed patient skin doses from complex fluoroscopically guided interventions (FGI). Suitable action levels for patient‐specific follow‐up could improve the clinical practice.There is a need for a refined metric regarding follow‐up of X‐ray‐induced patient injuries and the knowledge gap regarding skin dose‐related patient information from fluoroscopy devices must be filled. The most useful metric to indicate a risk of erythema, epilation or greater skin injury that also includes actionable information is the peak skin dose, that is, the largest dose to a region of skin.Materials and MethodsThe report is based on a comprehensive review of best practices and methods to estimate peak skin dose found in the scientific literature and situates the importance of the Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) standard detailing pertinent information contained in the Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR) and DICOM image headers for FGI devices. Furthermore, the expertise of the task group members and consultants have been used to bridge and discuss different methods and associated available DICOM information for peak skin dose estimation.ResultsThe report contributes an extensive summary and discussion of the current state of the art in estimating peak skin dose with FGI procedures with regard to methodology and DICOM information. Improvements in skin dose estimation efforts with more refined DICOM information are suggested and discussed.ConclusionsThe endeavor of skin dose estimation is greatly aided by the continuing efforts of the scientific medical physics community, the numerous technology enhancements, the dose‐controlling features provided by the FGI device manufacturers, and the emergence and greater availability of the DICOM RDSR. Refined and new dosimetry systems continue to evolve and form the infrastructure for further improvements in accuracy. Dose‐related content and information systems capable of handling big data are emerging for patient dose monitoring and quality assurance tools for large‐scale multihospital enterprises.