Citations

PURPOSE Oncology pharmacists (OPs) play a crucial role in cancer care, treatment, survivorship, and multidisciplinary teams (MDTs). OPs have specialized training in designing, administering, monitoring, and modifying oncology chemotherapy; managing adverse events; and evaluating clinical trials and investigational drugs. Yet, the state of OP has remained largely unknown in the clinical oncology workforce of the West African region. Therefore, this study aimed to understand who reconstitutes chemotherapy and to explain the OP educational and practice needs, challenges, and solutions in Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a concurrent embedded mixed method design, 35 OPs completed a questionnaire, and 12 others responded to a semistructured interview. The data were then subjected to inductive thematic and descriptive analyses. RESULTS The findings showed that 54% of the OPs were responsible for chemotherapy reconstitution, and only 60% of the oncology centers had a biosafety cabinet. 91% of OPs were practicing; however, only 54% were trained in OP, and none of the OPs were board-certified. Most of the OPs spent time weekly on reconstitution, administrative duties, teaching, and training; only 3% spent on oncology clinical trials and conferences and 8% on noninterventional research. We identified four themes: (1) Some OPs are not reconstituting chemotherapy: A Call for MDT, (2) For OP, No Training is Enough, (3) Board Certification will give OPs Recognition, and (4) Introduction of OP Course in Universities. CONCLUSION To improve patient treatment outcomes, training on chemotherapy reconstitution should be prioritized, integration of OPs into MDTs, and the safe handling of chemotherapy in centers should be mandated in the region. The West African Postgraduate College of Pharmacists should be supported in expanding its curriculum and introducing OP fellowships.

The development of automated insulin delivery systems has seen tremendous improvements from individual components to interoperable system combinations of devices and new drugs besides insulin. The components have become progressively smaller, more accurate, and more user friendly. This article summarizes the history of the artificial pancreas from the earliest concepts to fully functional systems to research into further improvements in the future. The authors include many of the developers of this technology who received research support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases at various stages to develop these systems.

The development of automated insulin delivery systems has seen tremendous improvements from individual components to interoperable system combinations of devices and new drugs besides insulin. The components have become progressively smaller, more accurate, and more user friendly. This article summarizes the history of the artificial pancreas from the earliest concepts to fully functional systems to research into further improvements in the future. The authors include many of the developers of this technology who received research support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases at various stages to develop these systems.

PURPOSE Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) chemotherapy is used commonly for pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (pHL) in low- and middle-income countries. The role of radiotherapy (RT) after ABVD in pHL is uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review to explore the use of ABVD with or without RT in pHL. Key clinical questions included the number of cycles of ABVD, indications for and dose of RT, and outcomes by risk group. A search was performed in PubMed. Articles reporting survival outcomes by risk group were included. RESULTS Of 97 articles identified in the literature search, nine met inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy consisted of four to six cycles in limited disease and mostly six cycles in advanced disease. Three studies used RT for all patients within a specified risk group. Six studies dictated an adapted RT approach, with 3%-43% of the patients receiving RT for bulky adenopathy, slow early response (SER), and/or incomplete response. Radiation doses ranged between 20 and 36 Gy. The progression-free survival and overall survival at 4-10 years ranged from 84% to 100% and 93%-100% in limited disease and 50%-84.4% and 75%-95.3% in advanced disease, respectively. Studies did not directly assess the impact of certain chemotherapy or RT strategies. Recommendations were made after reviewing outcomes with particular approaches. CONCLUSION Four cycles of ABVD are recommended for limited disease, and six cycles of ABVD are recommended for advanced disease. In both limited and advanced diseases, RT is recommended with a dose of 20-21 Gy only to sites of bulky and/or SER, with a boost of up to 36 Gy to sites of incomplete response. This approach could spare radiation for at least half of the patients with limited disease and one third of advanced disease.

Objective: Diabetes is a defining disease of the 21st century because of its rising prevalence, association with obesity, and enormous health impact. Abundant evidence shows that lifestyle interventions can delay or prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adults, offer relief, and sometimes achieve complete remission. Despite this empowering message, there are no clinical practice guidelines that focus primarily on lifestyle interventions as first-line management of prediabetes and T2D. Our objective, therefore, is to offer pragmatic, trustworthy, and evidence-based guidance for clinicians in using the 6 pillars of lifestyle medicine—nutrition, physical activity, stress management, sleep, social connectedness, avoidance of risky substances—for managing adults with T2D and in preventing T2D in adults with prediabetes or a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Methods: We used well-established, peer-reviewed guideline methodology to develop evidence-based key action statements (recommendations) that facilitate quality improvement in clinical practice. The guideline development group included 20 members representing consumers, advanced practice nursing, cardiology, clinical pharmacology, behavioral medicine, endocrinology, family medicine, lifestyle medicine, nutrition and dietetics, health education, health and wellness coaching, sleep medicine, sports medicine, and obesity medicine. Recommendation strength was based on the aggregate evidence supporting a key action statement plus a comparison of associated benefits vs harms/costs. Multiple literature searches, conducted by an information specialist, identified 8 relevant guidelines, 118 relevant systematic reviews, and 112 randomized clinical trials. The guideline underwent extensive internal, external, and public review and comment prior to publication. Results: We developed 14 key action statements and associated evidence profiles, each with a distinct quality improvement goal in the context of lifestyle interventions for T2D. Strong recommendations were made regarding advocacy for lifestyle interventions; assessing baseline lifestyle habits; establishing priorities for lifestyle change; prescribing aerobic and muscle strength physical activity; reducing sedentary time; identifying sleep disorders; prescribing nutrition plans for prevention and treatment; promoting peer/familial support and social connections; counseling regarding tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs, and establishing a plan for continuity of care. Recommendations were made regarding identifying the need for psychological interventions and for adjusting (deprescribing) pharmacologic therapy. We include numerous tables and figures to facilitate implementation, a plain-language summary for consumers, and an executive summary for clinicians as separate publications. Conclusions: There is robust research evidence supporting the efficacy of lifestyle interventions in preventing, treating, and achieving remission of T2D in adults. Our multidisciplinary guideline development group successfully synthesized this evidence into 14 key action statements that can be used by clinicians and other healthcare professionals to improve quality of care for adults with, or at-risk for, T2D. Despite the research gaps and implementation challenges we highlight in the guideline we believe strongly that our recommendations have immediate relevance and can help raise awareness and shift the paradigm of T2D management towards optimal use of lifestyle interventions.

This executive summary highlights evidence-based recommendations for using lifestyle interventions in the treatment and remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and prediabetes in adults. The summary and guideline are intended for any clinician or healthcare professional in a community or non-inpatient healthcare setting involved in managing non-pregnant adults with T2D, prediabetes or a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The purpose of this executive summary is to provide a succinct overview of the key action statements (recommendations) from Lifestyle Interventions for Treatment and Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adults: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. This is the first diabetes guideline to emphasize lifestyle interventions as the foundation of management and is also the first to focus on all six pillars of lifestyle medicine (plant-predomination nutrition, regular physical activity, restorative sleep, stress reduction, social connectedness, and avoiding risky substances), including behavior change strategies. This summary is not intended to substitute for the full guideline, which should be read before taking the recommended actions. The guideline on which this summary is based was developed with a priori methodology that has been previously published, refined, and used in over 20 multidisciplinary, trustworthy, and evidence-based national guidelines. The guideline development group included 20 members representing consumers, advanced practice nursing, cardiology, clinical pharmacology, behavioral medicine, endocrinology, family medicine, lifestyle medicine, nutrition and dietetics, health education, health and wellness coaching, sleep medicine, sports medicine, and obesity medicine. We developed 14 key action statements and associated evidence profiles, each with a distinct quality improvement goal in the context of lifestyle interventions for T2D. Strong recommendations were made regarding advocacy for lifestyle interventions; assessing baseline lifestyle habits; establishing priorities for lifestyle change; prescribing aerobic and muscle strength physical activity; reducing sedentary time; identifying sleep disorders; prescribing nutrition plans for prevention and treatment; promoting peer/familial support and social connections; counseling regarding tobacco, alcohol, and recreational drugs, and establishing a plan for continuity of care. Recommendations were made regarding identifying the need for psychological interventions and for adjusting (deprescribing) pharmacologic therapy. We include numerous tables and figures to facilitate implementation, a plain-language summary for consumers, and an executive summary for clinicians as separate publications. Although not a substitute for the full clinical practice guideline, this executive summary can provide insight into the key guideline recommendations, to whom they apply, and to how they might alter care. These recommendations offer detailed, explicit, and evidence-based strategies for successful lifestyle behavior change, making them relevant not only to our guideline but to other guidelines and standards that advocate for lifestyle change in managing adults with T2D.

Abstract Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the response to second treatments for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). Methods Infants aged 2–24 months with IESS were prospectively enrolled in the National Infantile Spasms Cohort study at 21 pediatric epilepsy centers in the United States from 2012 to 2018. We analyzed data from infants who initially received standard treatment (hormonal therapy [adrenocorticotropic hormone, high‐dose prednisolone] or vigabatrin), had continued or recurring epileptic spasms, and received a second treatment. We excluded those with tuberous sclerosis. Treatment groups included hormonal therapy followed by vigabatrin (reference), hormonal‐to‐hormonal, hormonal‐to‐nonstandard, vigabatrin‐to‐hormonal, and vigabatrin‐to‐nonstandard. Nonstandard treatments included other antiseizure medications and dietary therapy. Treatment groups were tested for differences in 3‐month clinical remission using a binary logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs). Results There were 153 infants with IESS who received second treatments. The highest rates of 3‐month remission were among infants in the hormonal‐to‐vigabatrin (22/65, 34%) and vigabatrin‐to‐hormonal (9/26, 35%) groups, followed by vigabatrin‐to‐nonstandard (3/10, 30%), hormonal‐to‐hormonal (4/22, 18%), and hormonal‐to‐nonstandard (1/30, 3.3%). Compared to the hormonal‐to‐vigabatrin group (reference), fewer infants had remission in the hormonal‐to‐nonstandard group (OR = .07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .01–.53), and there was a trend toward fewer infants in the hormonal‐to‐hormonal group (OR = .43, 95% CI = .13–1.4, p = .17). Following initial hormonal treatment, the number needed to treat was three infants for one additional infant to have remission when treated with vigabatrin compared to nonstandard therapy as the second treatment. Significance This updated analysis with an expanded sample size provided power for additional subgroup analysis. Overall response rates were low, and at best only one third had remission after second treatment. Results support a clinical strategy of switching mechanism of action when selecting a second medication for epileptic spasms (i.e., use vigabatrin after hormonal therapy, or hormonal therapy after vigabatrin). Our findings also support the use of standard over nonstandard therapies.

Abstract Objectives In 2023, AMIA’s Inclusive Language and Context Style Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) were approved by the Board of Directors and made a publicly available resource. This work began in 2021 through AMIA’s DEI Task Force and subsequent DEI Committee; many members provided input, feedback, and time to create the Guidelines. In this paper, the authors provide a transparent account of the origin, development, contents, and dissemination of the Guidelines and share plans for their future development and use. Materials and Methods Our approach to drafting, refining, and distributing the Guidelines included consulting existing language guides, AMIA member reviews, external expert reviews, webinars, and workshops. Through an iterative approach to drafting and refining the Guidelines, the authors consulted relevant language guidelines and many experts throughout and beyond the AMIA community. Results The Inclusive Language Context Guidelines were formally approved by the AMIA Board of Directors on February 15, 2023. The Guidelines included four principles to be considered in scientific communications: Plurality, Precision, Transparency, and Destigmatization. Discussion A moment of vulnerability where an AMIA member raised concerns about the use of harmful language during a presentation resulted in the creation of a principled approach to support inclusive language within biomedical and health informatics communications. We envision that the Guidelines will support health equity by challenging dominant public narratives around health, fostering stronger interdisciplinary collaboration and critical thinking about the impact of language, and creating a more welcoming environment for the broader AMIA community. This work could not have been completed without the support of many AMIA members and other researchers in biomedical and health informatics. The Guidelines are a living document that will continue to be updated with input and feedback from the AMIA community into the future.

e21021 Background: West Africa, especially Nigeria, faces a disproportionate burden of cancer incidence and mortality, along with disparities in cancer care and management. Oncology pharmacists (OPs) play a crucial role in cancer care, treatment, and survivorship and MDTs. OPs have specialized training in designing, administering, monitoring, and modifying oncology chemotherapy, managing adverse events, and evaluating clinical trials and investigational drugs. Yet the educational needs and state of OPs have remained largely unknown in the West African region. Methods: Using a concurrent embedded mixed method design, 35 oncology pharmacists (OPs) completed a questionnaire, and 12 others responded to a semi-structured interview. The data were then subjected to inductive thematic and descriptive analysis. Results: The quantitative findings showed that 54% of the OPs were responsible for chemotherapy reconstitution, and only 60% of the oncology centers had a biosafety cabinet. 91% of OPs were practicing oncology pharmacy (OP); however, only 54% were trained in OP, and none of the OPs were board-certified. Most of the OPs spent time weekly on chemotherapy reconstitution, administrative duties, teaching, and training; only 3% spent on oncology clinical trials and conferences and 8% on other research. Respondents ranked developing medication therapy management programs as the topmost priority area for better OP practices, and chemotherapy reconstitution is the area of OP that requires the most attention for improving patient treatment outcomes and survivorship. Inadequate training, lack of equipment, non-recognition of oncology pharmacy, availability of oncology medicines, and non-integration of multi-disciplinary teams (MDT) were the major challenges in OP practice in Nigeria. In the qualitative findings, four themes were identified: (i.) Some oncology pharmacists are not reconstituting chemotherapy: A Call for MDT, (ii.) For Oncology Pharmacy, No Training is Enough, (iii.) Board Certification will give Oncology Pharmacists Recognition, and (iv.) Introduction of Oncology Pharmacy Course in Universities. Conclusions: The findings suggest that oncology pharmacists should be included in MDTs and other cancer management, which is a critical step toward improving patient outcomes in the region. Our findings show that the safe handling of chemotherapy is problematic in this region. Hence, the National Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment and other West African countries should urgently institute a national and state task force to watchdog all oncology chemotherapy centers and ensure that those preparing chemotherapy to save cancer patients are also saved from carcinogens.