Abstract Recently, we have identified serum response factor (SRF) as a mediator of clinically relevant androgen receptor (AR) action in prostate cancer (PCa). Genes that rely on SRF for androgen-responsiveness represent a small fraction of androgen-regulated genes, but distinguish benign from malignant prostate and correlate with aggressive disease. Moreover, the SRF-AR expression signature is associated more strongly with biochemical recurrence than similarly sized sets of AREdriven AR target genes. Thus, understanding the mechanism(s) by which SRF conveys androgen effects to its target genes may provide novel opportunities to target clinically relevant androgen signaling. Here, we explore the role of the RhoA signaling axis, a well-known activating pathway upstream of SRF, in androgen activation of SRF action. PCa cells were treated with inhibitors of RhoA signaling or transfected with siRNAs targeting RhoA, the critical SRF cofactor MAL or control siRNAs in the presence or absence of the synthetic androgen R1881. Real-time RT-PCR and western blotting was done to assess effects on expression of SRF target genes. Cell fractionation experiments evaluated the cellular localization of AR, MAL and SRF. ChIP was performed to assess recruitment of MAL to SRF target genes. Wild-type, dominant-active and dominant-negative versions of RhoA were overexpressed to determine effects on androgen regulation of SRF target genes. Immunohistochemistry was done to evaluate RhoA expression in clinical PCa samples and a tissue microarray derived from a CWR22 PCa xenograft model that mimics progression from androgen-stimulated (AS) to castration-recurrent (CR) disease. Effects on AS and CR PCa cell biology were assessed using proliferation and migration assays. Here, we show that the small GTPase RhoA mediates androgen responsiveness of more than half of SRF target genes tested. Interference with expression of RhoA, activity of the RhoA effector RhoA-associated kinase (ROCK), and actin polymerization necessary for nuclear translocation of the SRF cofactor MAL, all prevented full androgen-regulation of SRF target genes. Androgen treatment increased the nuclear content of MAL and led to MAL recruitment to the promoter of the SRF target gene FHL2. Moreover, in clinical specimens RhoA expression was higher in PCa cells than benign prostate cells, and elevated RhoA expression levels were associated with aggressive disease features and decreased disease-free survival following radical prostatectomy. Overexpression of RhoA markedly increased the androgen responsiveness of select SRF target genes, in a manner that depends on its GTPase activity. Cell lines and a xenograft model that mimics the transition from AS to CR PCa indicate that RhoA levels are not altered during disease progression, suggesting that RhoA expression levels in the primary tumor determine disease aggressiveness. Silencing of RhoA, use of ROCK inhibitors or an inhibitor of SRF-MAL interaction blunted (androgen-regulated) cell viability and attenuated AS and CR PCa cell migration. Taken together, our work demonstrates that the RhoA signaling axis mediates clinically relevant AR action in PCa. In addition, these studies are the first to report on overexpression of RhoA in PCa and its association with aggressive disease and poor outcome. Note: This abstract was not presented at the conference because the presenter was unable to attend. Citation Format: Lucy Schmidt, Thomas Sebo, Donald Tindall, Hannelore Heemers, Kelly Duncan, Neelu Yadav, Kevin Regan, Christine Lohse, Elena Pop, Kristopher Attwood, Gregory Wilding, James Mohler. Androgen regulation of SRF target genes in prostate cancer cells is mediated in part by the small GTPase RhoA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Prostate Cancer Research; 2012 Feb 6-9; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(4 Suppl):Abstract nr A8.
Abstract 2930: Novel colorectal cancer loci in multiplex-proficient mismatch repair families
Abstract A substantial proportion of familial colorectal cancer (CRC) is not a consequence of known susceptibility loci, such as mismatch repair (MMR) genes, supporting the existence of additional loci. To identify novel CRC loci, we conducted a genome-wide linkage scan in 356 white families with no evidence of defective MMR (i.e., no tumors with loss of expression of MMR proteins; no microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors, and no evidence of linkage to MMR genes). This represents the largest linkage analysis of proficient MMR (pMMR) familial CRC to date. Families were ascertained via the NCI-supported Colon Cancer Family Registry multi-site (Colon CFR) consortium, the City of Hope, and Memorial University of Newfoundland. A total of 1,612 individuals (average 5.0 per family, range 2-10 with an average of 2.2 affected and 2.8 unaffected individuals) were genotyped using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism linkage arrays; parametric and non-parametric linkage analysis used MERLIN in a priori-defined family groups. Five lod scores greater than 3.0 were observed, accounting for heterogeneity, in four chromosomal regions. The greatest lod scores were at 4q21.1 among families with mean age of diagnosis less than 50 years (dominant HLOD=4.51, α=0.84, 145.40 cM, rs10518142) and at 12q24.32 among all families (dominant HLOD=3.60, α=0.48, 285.15 cM, rs952093). Among families with four or more affected individuals and among clinic-based families, a common peak was observed at 15q22.31 (101.40 cM, rs1477798; dominant HLOD=3.07, α=0.29; dominant HLOD=3.03, α=0.32, respectively). Analysis of families with only two affected individuals yielded a peak at 8q13.2 (recessive HLOD=3.02, α=0.51, 132.52 cM, rs1319036). These linkage regions comprise previously unreported loci, supporting the hypothesis that novel loci contribute to CRC in familial pMMR cases. These loci are also largely distinct from those identified in case-control GWAS. To follow up on these findings, a custom Agilent Sure Select Target Enrichment panel has been designed for genes in three of these regions, in order to sequence probands using an Illumina HiSeq 2000. This study demonstrates the utility of family-based data and provides evidence for additional alleles for familial CRC. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2930. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-2930
Initial Experience With Larger Laser Sheaths for the Removal of Transvenous Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Leads
Background —In a previous randomized trial, the 12F laser sheath removed pacing leads via the implant vein more successfully than traditional mechanical tools alone. Two larger sizes of laser sheath, the 14F and 16F models, were developed to extract defibrillator leads and large-diameter pacing leads implanted for the chronic. These devices use pulsed ultraviolet laser light to core though fibrotic tissue grown over the lead body to free the lead from the vasculature. A mandatory prospective registry studied the safety and effectiveness profiles of the larger laser sheaths vis-à-vis the 12F laser sheath. Methods and Results —In this study, 863 patients underwent extraction of 1285 leads at 52 sites. Patients treated with the 14F device tended to have older leads than the 12F population; the 16F population, which comprised mostly defibrillator patients, were younger, had younger leads, and were more often male than the 12F population. Clinical success (extracting the entire lead or the lead body minus the distal electrode) was observed in 91% to 92% of cases for all device sizes. The overall complication rate was 3.6%, with 0.8% perioperative mortality. Incidence of complications was independent of laser sheath size. Conclusions —The 14F and 16F laser sheaths offer an extraction option for larger long-term transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator leads that is as safe and effective as the 12F laser sheath.
The memory support system for mild cognitive impairment: randomized trial of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention
AbstractRecently, we have identified serum response factor (SRF) as a mediator of clinically relevant androgen receptor (AR) action in prostate cancer (PCa). Genes that rely on SRF for androgen responsiveness represent a small fraction of androgen-regulated genes, but distinguish benign from malignant prostate, correlate with aggressive disease, and are associated with biochemical recurrence. Thus, understanding the mechanism(s) by which SRF conveys androgen regulation to its target genes may provide novel opportunities to target clinically relevant androgen signaling. Here, we show that the small GTPase ras homolog family member A (RhoA) mediates androgen-responsiveness of more than half of SRF target genes. Interference with expression of RhoA, activity of the RhoA effector Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK), and actin polymerization necessary for nuclear translocation of the SRF cofactor megakaryocytic acute leukemia (MAL) prevented full androgen regulation of SRF target genes. Androgen treatment induced RhoA activation, increased the nuclear content of MAL, and led to MAL recruitment to the promoter of the SRF target gene FHL2. In clinical specimens RhoA expression was higher in PCa cells than benign prostate cells, and elevated RhoA expression levels were associated with aggressive disease features and decreased disease-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Overexpression of RhoA markedly increased the androgen-responsiveness of select SRF target genes, in a manner that depends on its GTPase activity. The use of isogenic cell lines and a xenograft model that mimics the transition from androgen-stimulated to castration-recurrent PCa indicated that RhoA levels are not altered during disease progression, suggesting that RhoA expression levels in the primary tumor determine disease aggressiveness. Androgen-responsiveness of SRF target genes in castration-recurrent PCa cells continued to rely on AR, RhoA, SRF, and MAL and the presence of intact SRF binding sites. Silencing of RhoA, use of Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 inhibitors, or an inhibitor of SRF-MAL interaction attenuated (androgen-regulated) cell viability and blunted PCa cell migration. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the RhoA signaling axis mediates clinically relevant AR action in PCa.
Open and Hybrid Deep Vein Reconstructions: To Do or Not to Do?
Endovascular reconstruction has become the standard treatment of chronic obstruction of large veins. Stenting is done with increasing frequency to treat iliac venous obstructions, with or without associated inferior vena caval or femoral vein occlusions. Open reconstruction with venous bypass is performed today in patients who fail attempts at venous stenting or who are not candidates for endovascular reconstructions. Patients with primary or secondary malignancies invading the vena cava undergo open caval reconstruction at the time of tumour excision. Open venous reconstructions are still preferred in patients with large vein injuries due to blunt or penetrating trauma or in those who suffer iatrogenic venous injuries. Hybrid reconstruction can be performed with endophlebectomy of the common femoral or femoral veins combined with iliofemoral stenting.
Next generation analytic tools for large scale genetic epidemiology studies of complex diseases
Purpose: To review the outcomes of retrograde supra-aortic vessel stent (RSAS) placement combined with open carotid or subclavian artery revascularization. Methods: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients between 1995 and 2010, excluding transfemoral procedures or isolated retrograde stent placement. Results: There were 11 patients (9 females, mean age 65 years). Open revascularization included carotid endarterectomy in 6 patients, carotid-subclavian bypass in 3, and carotid-carotid bypass in 2 patients. There were no operative deaths or neurological events. All symptomatic patients improved. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months, One patient developed common carotid artery (CCA) in-stent dissection and symptomatic restenosis treated with subclavian-carotid bypass. Another 3 patients had asymptomatic restenosis of the carotid bifurcation but required no intervention. Conclusions: Retrograde stenting of the common carotid or innominate artery is a safe and effective method to provide inflow in selected patients with severe supra-aortic vessel disease who require concomitant open carotid or subclavian artery reconstructions.