Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

400 citation(s) found for "D'Souza, A".

What Came First—The Pathology or the Pain?
D’Souza, Ryan S. , Kohan, Lynn , D'Souza, Ryan S , Nelson, Ariana M.

Anesthesia & Analgesia | January 14, 2025 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 489-491

10.1213/ane.0000000000007275 | PMID 39808727 Get It

US multicenter outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with lumen-apposing metal stents for acute cholecystitis
David, Yakira , Kakked, Gaurav, Confer, Bradley , Shah, Ruchit N. , Khara, Harshit S. , Diehl, David L. , Krafft, Matthew , Shah-Khan, Sardar M. , Nasr, John , Benias, Petros C. , Muniraj, Thiruvengadam , Aslanian, Harry R., Chahal, Prabhleen , Rodriguez, John , DuBroff, Jason, Latour, Rabi De, Khanna, Lauren , Haber, Gregory , Hoerter, Nicholas A. , Pandey, Nishi , Bakhit, Mena , Kowalski, Thomas E., Loren, David E. , Chiang, Austin , Schlachterman, Alexander , Nieto, Jose , Ichkhanian, Yervant , Khashab, Mouen A. , Halabi, Maan El , Kwon, Richard S. , Hernandez-Lara, Ariosto, Poneros, John M., Sethi, Amrita, Gonda, Tamas A. , Kushnir, Vladimir , Cosgrove, Natalie , Mullady, Daniel , Al-Shahrani, Abdullah , Buscaglia, Jonathan M. , Bucobo, Juan Carlos , Rolston, Vineet S. , Kedia, Prashant , Kasmin, Franklin, Kumta, Nikhil A. , DiMaio, Christopher J. , Krafft, Matthew Richard , Trindade, Arvind J. , Adler, Douglas G. , Tzimas, Demetrios J. , Goodman, Adam J. , Nieto, José , Deshmukh, Ameya A. , Prabhu, Anoop , Storm, Andrew C. , Berzin, Tyler M. , Sethi, Amrita , D'Souza, Lionel S. , Nagula, Satish

Endoscopy International Open | January 13, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: CP | Pages: No page available

10.1055/a-2495-5542 | PMID 39958659 Get It

AbstractEUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) has excellent technical and short-term clinical success for acute cholecystitis (AC). The goals of this study were to determine the long-term clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs) of EUS-GBD with LAMS.A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted at 18 US tertiary care institutions. Inclusion criteria: any AC patient with attempted EUS-GBD with LAMS and minimum 30-day post-procedure follow-up. Long-term clinical success was defined as absence of recurrent acute cholecystitis (RAC) > 30 days and long-term AE was defined as occurring > 30 days from the index procedure.A total of 109 patients were included. Technical success was achieved in 108 of 109 (99.1%) and initial clinical success in 106 of 109 (97.2%). Long-term clinical success was achieved in 98 of 109 (89.9%) over a median follow-up of 140 days (range 30–1188). On multivariable analysis (MVA), acalculous cholecystitis (odds ratio [OR] 15.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–208.52, P = 0.04) and the occurrence of a LAMS-specific AE (OR 63.60, 95% CI 5.08–799.29, P <0.01) were associated with RAC. AEs occurred in 38 of 109 patients (34.9%) at any time, and in 10 of 109 (9.17%) > 30 days from the index procedure. Most long-term AEs (7 of 109; 6.42%) were LAMS-specific. No technical or clinical factors were associated with occurrence of AEs. LAMS were removed in 24 of 109 patients (22%). There was no difference in RAC or AEs whether LAMS was removed or not.EUS-GBD with LAMS has a high rate of long-term clinical success and modest AE rates in patients with AC and is a reasonable destination therapy for high-risk surgical candidates.
Five-Year Results With Patisiran for Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis With Polyneuropathy
Wixner, Jonas , Polydefkis, Michael , Ueda, Mitsuharu , Bender, Shaun, Jay, Patrick Y. , Yureneva, Elena, group, patisiran Global OLE study, Vita, Giuseppe, Rizzo, Vincenzo , Wiesman, Janice F. , Lau, Vincent , DeLong, Douglas, May, John J., Delmont, Émilien , Pouget, Jean, Grapperon, Aude‐Marie , Campana-Salort, Emmanuelle, Coutinho, Conceição de Azevedo, Campos, Catarina Falcão de , Coelho, Teresa , Reis, Antonio Hipólito, Pérez, Javier Martínez , Silva, Ana Martins da, Alves, Cristina , Cardoso, Márcio , Valdrez, Kátia, Monte, Julia R, Novais, Marta , Guimarães, Nádia, Cardoso, Inês , Freitas, Mónica, Ferreira, Natália , Kuzume, Daisuke , Morimoto, Yuko, Gauvain, Clément , Migaud-Chervy, Maria-Claire, Deplanque, Dominique , Jozefowicz, Elsa, Théaudin-Saliou, Marie, Cauquil-Michon, Cécile, Labeyrie, Céline , Not, Adeline , Lecoq, Anne-Lise , Stephant, Maeva, Echaniz‐Laguna, Andoni , Becquemont, Laurent , Beaudonnet, Guillemette , Eliahou, Ludivine , Slama, Michel , Signaté, Aïssatou , Darche, Paola, Grimaud, Jérôme, Berthelot, Emeline, Inamo, Jocelyn , Gendre, Thierry , Arrouasse, Raphaele , Ernande, Laura , Salhi, Hayet, Choumert, Ariane , Charlin, Cyril, Megelin, Thomas, Brannagan, Thomas H., Tsang, Steven, Wajnsztajn, Fernanda, Shije, Jeffrey, Ulane, Christina, Kleyman, Inna , Weimer, Louis H., Cioroiu, Comana , Kleopa, Kleopas A. , Zamba‐Papanicolaou, Eleni , Tada, Satoshi , Nagai, Masahiro , Ando, Rina, Yamanishi, Yuki , Overcash, J. Scott , Green, Sinikka, Coskun, Derya J, Manos, Paul S. , Zepeda, Karla A, O’Riordan, William, Cortese, Andrea , Bernardo, Daniela, Paolantonio, Andrea Di , Guglielmino, Valeria , Kristen, Arnt V. , Nagel, Christian , Siepen, Fabian aus dem , Hein, Selina , Campistol, Josep M. , Marín, Lida María Rodas, Pelicano, Josep Miquel Blasco, Dávila, Lucía Galán, Cordoba, Vanesa Pytel, Sola, A. Guerrero, Feijoo, Julián García, Isla, Leopoldo Pérez de , Moreira, Carolina Lavigne , Marques, Vanessa Daccach , Beamud, Francisco Muñoz, Borrachero, Cristina, Sanz, Mónica, Oliver, E, Moreno, Juan González, Martinez, J. Michael, Descals, Cristina, Usón, Mercedes, Vega, Francisco Jose, Figuerola, Antoni, Montalà, Carles, Abreu, Aline França de , Silva, Moises Dias da, Rosa, Renata Gervais de Santa, Berensztejn, Amanda Cardoso, Guedes, Mariana de Andrade, Lautre, Andrea, Orellana, Lucas, Briseño, Maria Alejandra González-Duarte, Parra, David Rivera de la, Reyes, Jose Pablo Hernandez, Alba, Maria del Mar Saniger, Parman, Yeşim , Serbest, Nail Güven , Durmuş, Hacer , Karamürsel, Saçit , Elitok, Ali, Inan, Nermin G Sirin, Altinkurt, Emre, Polydefkis, Michael, Allen, Adriane C, Chaudhry, Vinay , Jarrett, R. J., Bressler, Neil M. , Khoshnoodi, Mohammad , Lui, Alvin T, Chung, Tae , Vista, Geno, Shah, Syed Mahmood , Hamaguchi, Hirotoshi , Oda, Tetsuya , Shimomura, Masahiro, Kim, Hee Jin, Misumi, Yohei , Nomura, Toshiya , Tateishi, Takahisa , Mauricio, Elizabeth A. , Dimberg, Elliot L., Fonder, Amie , Hobbs, Miriam, Dyck, P. James B. , Leung, Nelson , Hwa, Yi L. , Kapoor, Prashant , Kumar, Shaji , Dingli, David , Gove, Linde E., Dalia, Samir , Croy, David, Holding, Tim, Gorevic, Peter D., Su, Jen-Jen , Lin, Chao-Wen, Ajroud‐Driss, Senda , Sufit, Robert , Li, John-Michael, Freimer, Miriam , LoRusso, Samantha, Aso, Yasuhiro , Kim, Byoung‐Joon , Kim, JuHyeon, Jeon, Eun‐Seok , Seok, Jin Myoung , Park, Jae Hong , Sekijima, Yoshiki , Kato, Naga-aki, Hineno, Akiyo , Kodaira, Minori , Yoshinaga, Tsuneaki , Takasone, Ken, Miyahara, Teruyoshi, Takahashi, Yusuke , Matsumoto, Kazuhiko , Lin, Kon-Ping, Lee, Yi‐Chung , Wixner, Jonas, Pilebro, Björn, Nordh, Erik, Chermenina, Maria, Nygren, Anneli, Tournev, Ivaylo, Zhelyazkova, Sashka , Cherneva, Zheyna , Sarafov, S., Cherninkova-Gopina, Sylvia, Vorona, Elena, Huesing-Kabar, Anna, Schilling, Matthias , Kabar, Iyad , Martinez–Naharro, Ana , Chacko, Liza , Cohen, Oliver , Law, Steven , Rezk, Tamer , Quan, Dianna , Dixon, Stacy, Fridman, Vera , Low, Soon-Chai , Mezei, Michelle M. , Jack, Kristin, Wade, N. Kevin, Lopate, Glenn, Geisler, Stephanie , Sommerville, R. Brian, Florence, Julaine, Stewart, Graeme J., Taylor, Mark , Suan, Daniel, Dingli, David , Gillmore, Julian D , Lee, Yi-Chung , Karamursel, Sacit , Adams, David , Berk, John L. , Conceição, Isabel , Dispenzieri, Angela , Peltier, Amanda , Bender, Shaun , Capocelli, Kelley, Obici, Laura , group, patisiran Global OLE study, Vita, Giuseppe, Russo, Massimo , Mazzeo, Anna Teresa , Gentile, Luca, Kaku, Michelle C. , Lau, Vincent, Dalton, James, May, John, Attarian, Shahram , Verschueren, Annie , Campana-Salort, Emmanuelle, Neves, Carlos, Santos, Miguel Oliveira , Coelho, Teresa, Correia, Nuno, Perez, Javier M, Silva, Ana Martins da, Ramalho, Joana, Yamasaki, Masahiro , Morimoto, Yuko, Tard, Céline , Hachulla, É. , Lebellec, Loïc , Théaudin, Marie , Al‐Salameh, Abdallah , Algalarrondo, Vincent , Rousseau, Antoine , Planté‐Bordeneuve, Violaine , Ayache, Samar S. , Corvoisier, Philippe Le , Waters, Michael, Manos, Paul, Lozza, Alessandro , Merlini, Giampaolo , Rosti, Vittorio , Sabatelli, Mario , Bisogni, Giulia , Luigetti, Marco , Romano, Ângela , Nienhuis, Hans L. A. , Neshige, Shuichiro , Horga, Alejandro , Feijoo, Julián García, Marques, Wilson , López, Inés AL, Sanz, Monica, Martinez, Jose M Gamez, Waddington‐Cruz, Márcia , Abreu, Aline Souza de, Silva, Moises Dias da, Pinto, Marcus Vinícius , Pinto, Luiz Felipe , Barroso, Fábio , Briseno, Maria Alejandra Gonzalez Duarte, Cárdenas‐Soto, Karla , Cantú-Brito, Carlos Gerardo , Şahin, Erdi , Çakar, Arman , İNAN, NERMİN GÖRKEM ŞİRİN, Polydefkis, Michael, Jarrett, Raquel, Singh, Mandeep , Judge, Daniel P. , Lui, Alvin T, Vista, Geno, Shimomura, Masahiro, Scheid, Christof , Holtick, Udo , Oh, Jeeyoung , Kim, Hee Jin, Shin, Hyun Jin , Choi, Kyomin , Mauricio, Elizabeth A. , Cooper, Leslie T. , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Witzig, Thomas E. , Lin, Yi , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Gertz, Morie A. , Chao, Chi‐Chao , Lee, Ming‐Jen , Hsieh, Sung‐Tsang , Tsai, Li‐Kai , Yeh, Shin‐Joe , Yang, Chih‐Chao , Lee, Ga-Yeon , Cho, Eun Bin , Min, Ju‐Hong , Lee, Hye Lim , Kishida, Dai , Imai, Akira, Lin, Kon‐Ping, Wixner, Jonas, Suhr, Ole B. , Anan, Intissar , Nordh, Erik, Domellöf, Fátima Pedrosa , Chamova, Teodora , Schmidt, Hartmut , Tepasse, Phil‐Robin , Gillmore, Julian D. , Lachmann, Helen J. , Goh, Khean Jin , Geisler, Stephanie, Taylor, Mark, Suan, Dan

JAMA Neurology | January 13, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 228

10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4631 | PMID 39804640 Get It

Importance There is a lack of long-term efficacy and safety data on hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (hATTR-PN) and on RNA interference (RNAi) therapeutics in general. This study presents the longest-term data to date on patisiran for hATTR-PN. Objective To present the long-term efficacy and safety of patisiran in adults with hATTR-PN. Design, Setting, and Participants This global open-label extension (OLE) of the APOLLO randomized clinical trial and phase 2 OLE study enrolled patients from 43 hospitals or clinical centers across 19 countries between July 2015 and August 2017, with follow-up until November 2022. Of 212 eligible patients with hATTR who completed the phase 3 APOLLO or phase 2 OLE parent studies, 211 enrolled in and 138 completed the global OLE. Intervention Patisiran, 0.3 mg/kg, intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 5 years. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes evaluated at year 5 of the global OLE included disability (polyneuropathy disability [PND] score); polyneuropathy severity (Neuropathy Impairment Score [NIS]), nutritional status (modified body mass index [mBMI]), quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life–Diabetic Neuropathy [Norfolk QOL-DN]), and Rasch-Built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS), with no statistical hierarchy. Safety, survival probability, and mortality were also assessed. Results At the global OLE baseline, the mean (SD) age was 61.3 (12.3) years, and 156 patients (73.9%) were male. In 138 patients completing the study, PND scores remained stable or improved in 89 patients (65.0%), NISs showed a mean (SD) change of 10.9 (14.7), and mean (SD) mBMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared times serum albumin in grams per liter) increased by 46.4 (120.7) over 5 years from baseline. Norfolk QOL-DN and R-ODS scores showed mean (SD) changes of 4.1 (16.7) and –3.7 (6.2), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) leading to study withdrawal occurred in 47 patients (22.3%). Infusion-related reactions were the most common treatment-related AE (n = 34 [16.1%]). Overall, 41 patients (19.4%) died during the study. Patisiran treatment in the parent study and low familial amyloid polyneuropathy score at parent study baseline were associated with significantly improved survival. Conclusions and Relevance In the longest study of an RNAi therapeutic for any disease, patisiran treatment resulted in modest changes for patients with hATTR-PN with an acceptable safety profile. These results highlight the importance of initiating early treatment for hATTR and the potential of RNAi therapeutics in medicine. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02510261
Comparing risks in brachial plexus blocks: what you need to know – an infographic
Labandeyra, Hipólito , D’Souza, Ryan S. , D'Souza, Ryan S

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine | January 10, 2025 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 473-473

10.1136/rapm-2024-106313 | PMID 39793994 Get It

A randomized trial of over‐the‐counter hearing aids for adults with cognitive decline due to Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias
Williams, Victoria J. , McAlister, Courtney, Souza, Pamela E. , Mueller, Kimberly Diggle , Chin, Nathaniel A.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.095502 Get It

AbstractBackgroundHearing loss occurs commonly with age and is more prevalent among adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer’s Disease and related dementias (ADRD) than among older adults with typical cognitive abilities. Over‐the‐counter (OTC) hearing aids are a recently approved, lower‐cost method of hearing treatment which can be accessed directly by patients. However, there are almost no data which can guide whether to recommend this treatment for adults with MCI or ADRD. OTC aids also have technology constraints that may limit their benefit for wearers with ADRD, who have specific communication and rehabilitation needs.MethodParticipants in this randomized clinical trial will be recruited at the time of diagnosis of either MCI or early ADRD. The trial design embeds a brief hearing assessment within the structure of a memory assessment at Geriatrics and Neurology clinics, in both urban (Madison, WI) and rural (La Crosse, WI) settings. Trial participants will be randomized to receive either OTC aids or communication strategies tailored for adults with cognitive decline. To maximize access for patients (including patients from rural or underserved areas), treatment will be delivered via telehealth. Outcomes will be measured at baseline and after one month of use of the OTC hearing aids or communication strategies. The primary outcome is subjective assessment of dyadic communication by the listener’s primary communication partner. Additional outcomes include hearing‐related quality of life and a novel assessment of communication ability using structured conversation analysis.ResultThis presentation will describe the trial design, expertise and roles of the multidisciplinary study team, mechanism of treatment delivery via telehealth, and planned outcome measurements.ConclusionResults of this trial will provide important evidence to guide treatment recommendations in community‐dwelling older adults with MCI or early ADRD. This project will also establish feasibility of conducting hearing assessment as part of a memory assessment.
Comparison of tau‐PET tracers for in vivo Braak staging: the HEAD Study
Macedo, Arthur C. , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Servaes, Stijn , Wang, Yi‐Ting , Socualaya, Kely Monica Quispialaya, Lowe, Val J. , Oh, Hwamee , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Baker, Suzanne L. , Therriault, Joseph , Servaes, Stijn , Tissot, Cécile , Lussier, Firoza Zubeida , Arias, Jaime Fernández , Hosseini, Seyyed Ali , Ferreira, Pâmela C.L. , Bellaver, Bruna , Ferrari‐Souza, João Pedro , Aguzzoli, Cristiano Schaffer , Povala, Guilherme , Pascual, Belén , Gordon, Brian A. , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Rosa-Neto, Pedro

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.087615 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTau‐PET tracers allow for in vivo Braak staging of individuals in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum. The impact of tracers’ characteristics for Braak staging using tau‐PET remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a head‐to‐head comparison of Braak staging using first‐ and second‐generation tau‐PET tracers.MethodWe assessed 51 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 49 cognitively impaired participants (mean [SD] age 69.4 [7.5] years) with at least two tau‐PET ligands ([18F]MK6240, [18F]AV1451, and/or [18F]RO948) at McGill University, as part of the HEAD study. We calculated standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in Braak‐like regions of interest (ROI) for each ligand and investigated their association using Spearman’s correlation. Thresholds defined the presence of tauopathy in each Braak ROI, which was used to assign a Braak stage to each participant. Finally, we assessed the agreement between the Braak staging provided by each tracer, both for the traditional (using separate Braak stages – 0, I, II, III, IV, V, and VI) and simplified (using joint Braak stages – 0, I‐II, III‐IV, and V‐VI) frameworks.ResultIn all Braak ROIs, we found positive correlations between the SUVR values of the three tracers (Figure 1). The strongest correlation was between [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948 in Braak II (r=0.94), and the weakest between [18F]AV1451 and [18F]RO948 in VI (r=0.51). Inter‐tracer agreement regarding the latest stage of abnormality was substantial or nearly perfect between pairs of tracers but moderate between the three tracers (Figure 2A). The simplified framework presented greater agreement compared to traditional Braak staging, except between [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948. At the ROI level, the lowest agreements were observed for Braak II and I‐II, when [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948 were compared to [18F]AV1451 (Figure 2B‐C). [18F]AV1451 had the highest probability of overestimating the Braak stage assigned by [18F]MK6240 and by [18F]RO948, especially at earlier stages (Figure 3).ConclusionThe ligands presented moderate to nearly perfect agreement for in vivo staging of AD severity. Off‐target binding of [18F]AV1451 to the choroid plexus might explain disagreements at early stages. Overall, slight improvements in agreements were achieved with the simplified framework, as observed in histopathological staging.
TAU EXACERBATES THE DEVELOPMENT OF DISTINCT NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS IN LATE BRAAK STAGE – THE HEAD STUDY
Amaral, Lívia , Zalzale, Hussein, Abbas, Sarah , Tudorascu, Dana , Lowe, Val J. , Oh, Hwamee , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Baker, Suzanne L. , Aguzzoli, Cristiano Schaffer , Povala, Guilherme , Ferreira, Pâmela C.L. , Lussier, Firoza Zubeida , Bauer‐Negrini, Guilherme , Soares, Carolina , Ferrari‐Souza, João Pedro , Bellaver, Bruna , Rohden, Francieli , Leffa, Douglas Teixeira , Schilling, Lucas Porcello , Zimmer, Eduardo Rigon , Pascual, Belén , Gordon, Brian A. , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Pascoal, Tharick Ali

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.094042 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies showed that neuroinflammation plays a key role in triggering specific neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), such as irritability and agitation, in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While prior studies showed an association between tau pathology and all NPS domains, the extent to which tau influences each specific NPS domain remains unclear. Here, we aim to investigate the association of tau and NPS domains in the AD continuum. We hypothesize that tau plays a comparatively greater effect on the emergence of psychotic symptoms compared to other NPS domains.MethodWe assessed 56 individuals (21 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 23 MCI, and 12 AD dementia) from the HEAD study who underwent clinical assessments with the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) and had positron emission tomography (PET) for amyloid‐ß (Aß) ([18F]AZD4694 or [11C]PiB), and tau tangles ([18F]MK6240) at the same visit. We selected individuals with an NPI‐Q total score =1. Tau SUVR values were tailored with a mask from Braak stages I‐VI, using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as reference region. Leave‐one‐out voxel wise and linear regression tested the association between each NPI‐Q domain and biomarkers accounting for age, sex, cognitive status, and study site.ResultCI individuals had significantly higher NPI‐Q score and Braak VI PET SUVR than CU individuals (Table 1). NPI‐Q score was significantly associated with tau‐PET in the periRolandic and supplementary motor cortex (Figures 1A). Linear regression showed that NPI‐Q associates with tau‐PET in the Braak stage VI (Figure 1B). Leave‐one‐out regression analysis revealed that delusions, motor disturbances, and anxiety contributed most to the association between tau‐PET and NPS (Figure 2A, C). These domains presented a higher magnitude of association compared to each other NPI‐Q domain (Figure 2B). Notably, irritability, agitation, and disinhibition exerted a negative effect to the association, emphasizing that tau may not play a role in the development of these symptoms (Figure 2A, D)ConclusionOur study supports previous evidence suggesting that irritability and agitation may not be triggered by tau, but rather by other pathological process such as neuroinflammation. These findings provide additional rationale for the therapeutics aiming to mitigate irritability and agitation in AD patients.
Comparison of tau‐PET tracers for in vivo Braak staging: the HEAD Study
Macedo, Arthur C. , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Servaes, Stijn , Wang, Yi‐Ting , Socualaya, Kely Monica Quispialaya, Lowe, Val J. , Oh, Hwamee , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Baker, Suzanne L. , Therriault, Joseph , Tissot, Cécile , Lussier, Firoza Zubeida , Arias, Jaime Fernández , Hosseini, Seyyed Ali , Ferreira, Pâmela C.L. , Bellaver, Bruna , Ferrari‐Souza, João Pedro , Aguzzoli, Cristiano Schaffer , Povala, Guilherme , Pascual, Belén , Gordon, Brian A. , Pascoal, Tharick Ali , Rosa-Neto, Pedro

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.093737 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTau‐PET tracers allow for in vivo Braak staging of individuals in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum. The impact of tracers’ characteristics for Braak staging using tau‐PET remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a head‐to‐head comparison of Braak staging using first‐ and second‐generation tau‐PET tracers.MethodWe assessed 51 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 49 cognitively impaired participants (mean [SD] age 69.4 [7.5] years) with at least two tau‐PET ligands ([18F]MK6240, [18F]AV1451, and/or [18F]RO948) at McGill University, as part of the HEAD study. We calculated standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in Braak‐like regions of interest (ROI) for each ligand and investigated their association using Spearman’s correlation. Thresholds defined the presence of tauopathy in each Braak ROI, which was used to assign a Braak stage to each participant. Finally, we assessed the agreement between the Braak staging provided by each tracer, both for the traditional (using separate Braak stages – 0, I, II, III, IV, V, and VI) and simplified (using joint Braak stages – 0, I‐II, III‐IV, and V‐VI) frameworks.ResultIn all Braak ROIs, we found positive correlations between the SUVR values of the three tracers (Fig. 1). The strongest correlation was between [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948 in Braak II (r=0.94), and the weakest between [18F]AV1451 and [18F]RO948 in VI (r=0.51). Inter‐tracer agreement regarding the latest stage of abnormality was substantial or nearly perfect between pairs of tracers but moderate between the three tracers (Fig. 2A). The simplified framework presented greater agreement compared to traditional Braak staging, except between [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948. At the ROI level, the lowest agreements were observed for Braak II and I‐II, when [18F]MK6240 and [18F]RO948 were compared to [18F]AV1451 (Fig. 2B‐C). [18F]AV1451 had the highest probability of overestimating the Braak stage assigned by [18F]MK6240 and by [18F]RO948, especially at earlier stages (Fig. 3).ConclusionThe ligands presented moderate to nearly perfect agreement for in vivo staging of AD severity. Off‐target binding of [18F]AV1451 to the choroid plexus might explain disagreements at early stages. Overall, slight improvements in agreements were achieved with the simplified framework, as observed in histopathological staging.
Tau exacerbates the development of distinct neuropsychiatric symptoms in late braak stage – the head study
Amaral, Lívia , Zalzale, Hussein, Abbas, Sarah , Tudorascu, Dana , Lowe, Val J. , Oh, Hwamee , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Baker, Suzanne L. , Aguzzoli, Cristiano Schaffer , Povala, Guilherme , Ferreira, Pâmela C.L. , Lussier, Firoza Zubeida , Bauer‐Negrini, Guilherme , Soares, Carolina , Ferrari‐Souza, João Pedro , Bellaver, Bruna , Rohden, Francieli , Leffa, Douglas Teixeira , Schilling, Lucas Porcello , Zimmer, Eduardo Rigon , Pascual, Belén , Gordon, Brian A. , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Pascoal, Tharick Ali

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 3, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.092310 Get It

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies showed that neuroinflammation plays a key role in triggering specific neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), such as irritability and agitation, in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While prior studies showed an association between tau pathology and all NPS domains, the extent to which tau influences each specific NPS domain remains unclear. Here, we aim to investigate the association of tau and NPS domains in the AD continuum. We hypothesize that tau plays a comparatively greater effect on the emergence of psychotic symptoms compared to other NPS domains.MethodWe assessed 56 individuals (21 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 23 MCI, and 12 AD dementia) from the HEAD study who underwent clinical assessments with the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) and had positron emission tomography (PET) for amyloid‐β (Aβ) ([18F]AZD4694 or [11C]PiB), and tau tangles ([18F]MK6240) at the same visit. We selected individuals with an NPI‐Q total score ≥1. Tau SUVR values were tailored with a mask from Braak stages I‐VI, using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as reference region. Leave‐one‐out voxel wise and linear regression tested the association between each NPI‐Q domain and biomarkers accounting for age, sex, cognitive status, and study site.ResultCI individuals had significantly higher NPI‐Q score and Braak VI PET SUVR than CU individuals (Table 1). NPI‐Q score was significantly associated with tau‐PET in the periRolandic and supplementary motor cortex (Figures 1A). Linear regression showed that NPI‐Q associates with tau‐PET in the Braak stage VI (Figure 1B). Leave‐one‐out regression analysis revealed that delusions, motor disturbances, and anxiety contributed most to the association between tau‐PET and NPS (Figure 2A, C). These domains presented a higher magnitude of association compared to each other NPI‐Q domain (Figure 2B). Notably, irritability, agitation, and disinhibition exerted a negative effect to the association, emphasizing that tau may not play a role in the development of these symptoms (Figure 2A, D)ConclusionOur study supports previous evidence suggesting that irritability and agitation may not be triggered by tau, but rather by other pathological process such as neuroinflammation. These findings provide additional rationale for the therapeutics aiming to mitigate irritability and agitation in AD patients.