Citations

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe, compare, and understand speech modulation capabilities of patients with varying motor speech disorders (MSDs) in a paradigm in which patients made highly cued attempts to speak faster or slower. Method: Twenty-nine patients, 12 with apraxia of speech (AOS; four phonetic and eight prosodic subtype), eight with dysarthria (six hypokinetic and two spastic subtype), and nine patients without any neurogenic MSD completed a standard motor speech evaluation where they were asked to repeat words and sentences, which served as their “natural” speaking rate. They were then asked to repeat lower complexity (counting 1–5; repeating “cat” and “catnip” 3 times each) and higher complexity stimuli (repeating “catastrophe” and “stethoscope” 3 times each and “My physician wrote out a prescription” once) as fast/slow as possible. Word durations and interword intervals were measured. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess differences related to MSD subtype and stimuli complexity on bidirectional rate modulation capacity as indexed by word duration and interword interval. Articulatory accuracy was also judged and compared. Results: Patients with prosodic AOS demonstrated a reduced ability to go faster; while they performed similarly to patients with spastic dysarthria when counting, patients with spastic dysarthria were able to increase rate similar to controls during sentence repetition; patients with prosodic AOS could not and made increased articulatory errors attempting to increase rate. AOS patients made more articulatory errors relative to other groups, regardless of condition; however, their percentage of errors reduced with an intentionally slowed speaking rate. Conclusions: The findings suggest comparative rate modulation abilities in conjunction with their impact on articulatory accuracy may support differential diagnosis between healthy and abnormal speech and among subtypes of MSDs (i.e., type of dysarthria or AOS). Findings need to be validated in a larger, more representative cohort encompassing several types of MSDs. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22044632

Purpose: Prior studies have shown that communication-related participation restrictions in patients with degenerative disease do not always match clinician judgment or objective indices of symptom severity. Although there is a growing body of literature documenting that discrepancies between patients with dementia and their care partners' perception of participation restrictions exist, it is not known how care partner perceptions of communication participation restrictions specifically match or diverge from the patients' experiences, which may inform the use of care partner proxy in the context of degenerative diseases. Method: Thirty-eight patients with progressive neurologic conditions (progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, and primary progressive aphasia or apraxia of speech) and, in most instances, focal cognitive-communication disorders were included. The patients and their accompanying care partners independently completed the Communicative Participation Item Bank, short form, a 10-question survey about communication participation restrictions in different contexts. Care partners were instructed to complete the form with their perception of the patient's experience. The difference between patient and care partner total scores were calculated and analyzed relative to clinical and demographic variables of interest. Results: Care partner ratings modestly tracked with patient experience and objective indices of symptom severity but did not exactly match patient ratings. The presence of aphasia increased, but did not fully account for, the likelihood of a discrepancy between care partner and patient ratings. Conclusion: Although careful consideration should be given prior to using care-partner report as a proxy for patient experience, it is worthwhile to include care partner ratings as a means of supporting conversations about differing perceptions, guiding joint intervention planning, and monitoring care-partner perceptions of change along with the implementation of supported conversation strategies.

Abstract Dysexecutive Alzheimer’s disease (dAD) manifests as a progressive dysexecutive syndrome without prominent behavioral features, and previous studies suggest clinico-radiological heterogeneity within this syndrome. We uncovered this heterogeneity using unsupervised machine learning in 52 dAD patients with multimodal imaging and cognitive data. A spectral decomposition of covariance between FDG-PET images yielded six latent factors (“eigenbrains”) accounting for 48% of variance in patterns of hypometabolism. These eigenbrains differentially related to age at onset, clinical severity, and cognitive performance. A hierarchical clustering on the eigenvalues of these eigenbrains yielded four dAD subtypes, i.e. “left-dominant,” “right-dominant,” “bi-parietal-dominant,” and “heteromodal-diffuse.” Patterns of FDG-PET hypometabolism overlapped with those of tau-PET distribution and MRI neurodegeneration for each subtype, whereas patterns of amyloid deposition were similar across subtypes. Subtypes differed in age at onset and clinical severity where the heteromodal-diffuse exhibited a worse clinical picture, and the bi-parietal had a milder clinical presentation. We propose a conceptual framework of executive components based on the clinico-radiological associations observed in dAD. We demonstrate that patients with dAD, despite sharing core clinical features, are diagnosed with variability in their clinical and neuroimaging profiles. Our findings support the use of data-driven approaches to delineate brain–behavior relationships relevant to clinical practice and disease physiology.

AbstractBackgroundResting state functional connectivity (rsfMRI) studies have shown functional network disruptions in logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA) (reduced connectivity within the left temporal language network) and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) (reduced connectivity within ventral visual network). However, little is known about how these networks compare and how connectivity differs within and between networks in these atypical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) phenotypes.MethodFifty‐nine amyloid‐positive PCA patients and eighty‐five amyloid‐positive LPA patients were recruited by the Neurodegenerative Research Group at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, and underwent structural and resting state functional MRI. Spatially preprocessed data was analyzed using the CONN functional connectivity toolbox to explore the default mode network (DMN), salience, sensorimotor, left language, visual and memory networks, which were generated by averaging multiple regions‐of‐interest (ROI) within each network. The data was analyzed at both the voxel‐level and network‐level (ROI‐ROI).ResultVoxel‐level differences in functional connectivity between PCA and LPA were observed in all networks (p<0.05; cluster size, FWE=0.05). PCA showed reduced connectivity in the occipital lobe in visual and memory networks, parietal lobe in language and DMN, and sensorimotor strip in sensorimotor network, particularly on the right, compared to LPA. Conversely, LPA showed reduced connectivity in the frontal cortex in salience, memory, visual and sensorimotor networks, inferior parietal lobe in visual network, and anterior temporal pole and sensorimotor cortex in the language network, compared to PCA. Between network differences (p<0.05; cluster size, FDR=0.05) were observed between groups, with PCA showing reduced connectivity between the visual and sensorimotor networks, while LPA showed reduced connectivity between the language and sensorimotor networks. The DMN was anti‐correlated to the language network in PCA, while it was positively correlated to the language network in LPA. In both phenotypes, the DMN was anticorrelated with the salience network. The visual network in PCA showed connections to all networks, while in LPA, it was only connected to the salience, language and DMN.ConclusionThe atypical AD phenotypes were associated with multiple disruptions in connectivity, both within and between brain networks. Phenotype specific differences in connectivity patterns were noted in visual network for PCA and language network for LPA.

AbstractBackgroundThe ability to detect malformed prion proteins using real‐time quaking‐induced conversion (RT‐QuIC) assays has transformed the diagnostic approach to sporadic Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (CJD), facilitating earlier recognition of affected patients. Recognizing this, we evaluated the frequency of clinical features and biomarker results at initial evaluation in patients with CJD and determined the relationship between these early features and CJD diagnosis and prognosis.MethodClinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients with probable or definite (pathologically confirmed) CJD assessed at Mayo Clinic from 2014‐2021. Diagnoses of probable CJD were established by clinical consensus, referencing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention diagnostic criteria. Clinical features and biomarkers results were evaluated at presentation, and associations with CJD diagnosis and symptomatic disease duration determined.ResultOne‐hundred fifteen patients were included (40, [35%] with definite CJD). Mean age‐at‐symptom onset was 64.8±9.4 years; 68 patients were female (59%). The sensitivity of clinical markers (myoclonus) and tests historically considered in patients with suspected CJD (e.g., stereotyped EEG abnormalities (16%), CSF 14‐3‐3 (60%)) was poor. Biomarkers with good diagnostic sensitivity included RT‐QuIC (93%), t‐tau levels >1149 pg/mL (88%), and characteristic signal abnormalities on MRI (77%). Multivariable linear regression confirmed shorter survival for patients with myoclonus (125.9 days, 95%CI 23.3‐15.5, p=0.026), visual/cerebellar signs (180.19 days, 95%CI 282.2‐78.2, p<0.001), positive 14‐3‐3 (193 days, 95%CI 304.9‐82.9; p<0.001), and elevated t‐tau levels (each 1000 pg/ml increase was associated with a nine‐day shorter time‐to‐death, 95%CI 1‐18; p=0.041).ConclusionCSF RT‐QuIC and elevated t‐tau levels, and stereotyped MRI abnormalities continue to be strongly associated with the diagnosis in the modern era, while other clinical findings (myoclonus) and biomarkers results traditionally ascribed to CJD (e.g., PSWC on EEG, 14‐3‐3) offered less value in the diagnostic evaluation. Detection of visual or cerebellar features, myoclonus, CSF 14‐3‐3, and t‐tau levels may predict disease duration, justifying inclusion in the evaluation of CJD‐suspected patients.

AbstractBackgroundReduced striatal uptake on ioflupane SPECT is considered an indicative biomarker for Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB), and has been proposed as an indicative biomarker for Mild Cognitive Impairment with Lewy Bodies (MCI‐LB). Little data exists on the profile of uptake on key striatal regions of interest (ROIs) in DLB or MCI‐LB.MethodParticipants with DLB or MCI‐LB at baseline based on the presence of ≥2 core clinical DLB features, and ≥2 ioflupane SPECT scans performed approximately annually, were identified from the Mayo ADRC database. Minimum brain laterality z‐score values for the putamen (whole, anterior and posterior), caudate and striatum were determined using DaTQUANT 2 software. Baseline clinical and scan data was used for all analyses, and the annualized minimum putamen z‐change was determined on serial scans. The scan was considered abnormal if the minimum putamen z‐score was <‐0.98 based on clinicopathologic data.Result27 participants were included (21 DLB and 6 MCI‐LB, 96% male). Compared to MCI‐LB, DLB had a lower mean MoCA score and a trend toward a higher UPDRS score compared to MCI‐LB; there were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, onset age or duration of cognitive decline, or presence of other core DLB features. The majority (89%) had an abnormal scan at baseline. All ROI z‐scores showed the expected general trend of DLB<MCI‐LB, and the annualized z‐change was more negative in DLB, but none of the findings reached statistical significance.ConclusionThese findings suggest in MCI‐LB and DLB that 1) an abnormal ioflupane SPECT scan is frequently present at diagnosis, 2) z‐scores become more negative over time, and 3) the annualized z‐change is similar. Similar findings in larger cohorts would support the use of ioflupane SPECT as a biomarker in both MCI‐LB and DLB clinical trials.

AbstractBackgroundFluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) is an established modality for differential diagnosis of dementia. Deriving phenotypic signatures from FDG‐PET via machine learning is challenging due to the high dimensional nature of brain images relative to the generally small number of labeled examples available for training, the class imbalance among those labels, and the cooccurrence of multiple pathologies. In this study, we developed a multi‐class, multi‐label framework to address these challenges.MethodA database of clinically acquired PET/CT images from 3,000 unique patients was used to develop a latent space model using matrix decomposition. This model was then applied to images from a separate cohort of Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center participants (n=1,745) labeled as cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n=1,436) or with the following potentially co‐occurring phenotypes: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (n=165), Lewy body dementia (DLB) (n=92), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (n=43), semantic (svPPA) (n=10) and logopenic (lvPPA) (n=13) variant PPA, and posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) (n=17). A k‐nearest neighbors classifier that is robust to these imbalanced and overlapping labels was then trained on these examples. The resulting classifier was evaluated by area under receiver‐operator characteristic curve (ROC‐AUC) via leave one out cross validation, using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard.ResultROC curves and AUC scores for each phenotype are illustrated in Fig. 1a. Because the classifier is based on a k‐nearest neighbors connectivity matrix, it has a convenient graphical representation, where images are nodes and edges are drawn between an image and its set of nearest neighbors in latent space. A self‐organizing force directed graph constructed in this way is illustrated in Fig 1b, highlighting the strong separation of CU and degenerative images, as well as the segregation of each phenotype within the neurodegenerative region of the graph.ConclusionIn this study, we developed a machine learning framework for classification of neurodegenerative disease based on k‐nearest neighbor analysis in a low dimensional latent space projection of FDG‐PET images. By leveraging low‐dimensional representations and k‐nearest neighbors analysis, this framework is robust in multi‐class, multi‐label tasks with strong class imbalance and provides a highly interpretable graphical representation.

AbstractBackgroundMulti‐compartment modelling of white matter (WM) microstructure using Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) can provide information on WM health through the neurite (axons and dendrites) density index and free water measures. We hypothesized that cerebrovascular disease (CVD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and an FDG pattern suggestive of TDP‐43 proteinopathy would be associated with distinct NODDI readouts of WM damage which would be informative for identifying the substrate for cognitive impairment.MethodWe identified two independent cohorts with multi‐shell diffusion MRI, amyloid and tau PET, and cognitive assessments. One, were participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, a population‐based cohort of 347 elderly randomly sampled from the Olmsted county, Minnesota. The second were 61 amyloid positive AD participants from the Mayo AD Research Center.ResultWe observed an increase in free water and decrease in neurite density in the genu of the corpus callosum associated with vascular risk factors, which we refer to as vascular WM component (Figure 1). Tau PET signal reflective of 3R/4R tau deposition was associated with worsening neurite density index in the temporal WM where we measured parahippocampal cingulum and inferior temporal WM bundles. Worsening temporal neurite density was associated with (antemortem confirmed) FDG TDP‐43 signature. Post‐mortem neuropathologic data on a small subset (n=9) of this sample lend support to our findings. In the population‐based cohort where vascular disease was more prevalent, the vascular WM component explained variability in global cognition (partial R2 of free water and neurite density = 8.3%) and MMSE performance (8.2%) which was comparable to amyloid PET (7.4% for global cognition and 6.6% for memory) (Table 1). In the AD dementia clinic‐based cohort, tau deposition was the greatest contributor to cognitive performance (9.6%), but there was also a non‐trivial contribution of the temporal WM component (8.5%) to cognitive performance. The differences observed between the two cohorts were reflective of their distinct clinical composition.ConclusionWhite matter microstructural damage assessed using advanced diffusion models may add significant value for distinguishing the underlying substrate (whether CVD versus neurodegenerative disease caused by tau deposition or TDP‐43 pathology) for cognitive impairment in older individuals.

AbstractBackgroundIn vivo tau‐positron emission tomography (PET) is an attractive biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis and treatment. However, tau‐PET is less widely available than other modalities. In this study, we tested cross‐modality synthesis of tau‐PET brain images from fluorodeoxyglucose F‐18 (FDG)‐PET using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN).MethodParticipants (n=1,192) who had brain FDG‐PET with 18F‐FDG and tau‐PET with Flortaucipir (F‐18‐AV‐1451) were included for training and testing. This cohort spanned normal aging (ages 26‐98), pre‐clinical, and clinical AD and related disorders including the FTD and DLB spectrum. External validation was done using ADNI (n=288). The PET scans were co‐registered to the corresponding MRI and subsequently warped to Mayo Clinic Adult Lifespan Template (MCALT) space. Tau‐PET images were SUVR‐normalized to the cerebellar crus, and FDG to the pons. A 3D dense‐U‐net model was utilized as an architecture. Cross‐validation experiments were conducted using 5‐fold validations (60% training set, 20% validation set, and 20% test set) with mean squared error as the loss function.ResultOur dense‐U‐net model successfully synthesized tau‐PET from metabolic images with good correlation and low prediction error for regional SUVRs (Figure 1A‐C). The model showed a robust prediction ability, performing accurately in an independent, external ADNI cohort (Figure 1D‐F). The model‐imputed tau‐PET significantly improved performance in classifying tau positivity (mean AUROC(±SD)=0.78±0.04 and 0.85±0.03 for FDG‐PET and synthesized tau‐PET, respectively) and diagnostic groups (cognitively unimpaired with abnormal amyloid‐PET vs. cognitively impaired with abnormal amyloid‐PET) compared to the original input FDG data (mean AUROC(±SD)=0.89±0.04, 0.85±0.05 0.91±0.04 for actual tau‐PET, FDG‐PET and synthesized tau‐PET, respectively) (Figure 2), suggesting enhanced clinical utility for metabolic images. The ADNI cohort also showed similar results (for tau positivity: AUROC=0.66 and 0.78 for FDG‐PET and synthesized tau‐PET, respectively; for CU A+ vs. CI A+: AUROC=0.86, 0.62, and 0.73 for actual tau‐PET, FDG‐PET, and synthesized tau‐PET; Figure 3).ConclusionWe showed that using a CNN model to predict tau‐PET from FDG‐PET is feasible. The synthesized tau‐PET can augment the value of FDG‐PET, facilitating the multi‐modal diagnosis of AD.

AbstractBackgroundDisruption of the default mode network (DMN) is thought to be a common feature of aging and across Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical phenotypes, while syndromic variability could be reflected in selective degeneration of macro‐scale networks optimally supporting specific mental abilities (Fig 1). As part of a collaborative effort between Mayo Clinic and the Human Connectome Project‐Aging (HCP‐A), we aimed to delineate a biomarker of global network failure across aging and the dysexecutive (dAD) and amnestic phenotypes of AD, and biomarkers of focal degeneration specific to each AD phenotype.MethodWe used a regression framework to assess the relationships between a marker of DMN dysfunction, the network failure quotient (NFQ), and factors relevant to AD such as age, cortical thickness (global cortical thickness, inferior parietal lobe), hippocampal volume, and cognition (episodic memory, cognitive flexibility) in the HCP‐A cohort, which consists of 725 non‐demented older adults. We then fit centile curves to the HCP‐A cohort to assess whether the NFQ and focal degeneration markers could distinguish dAD (n=10) and amnestic AD (n=8) patients from the HCP‐A cohort at the group‐ and individual‐level. Participants were scanned using the HCP‐A protocol, allowing for the acquisition of high‐resolution multi‐echo structural images and longer resting‐state connectivity acquisition time compared to traditional protocols.ResultThe NFQ related to age, cortical thickness, hippocampal volume, and cognition in the HCP‐A cohort. It also strongly discriminated dAD and amnestic AD from the HCP‐A cohort but did not discriminate between AD phenotypes. In contrast, markers of focal degeneration were phenotype‐specific; parieto‐frontal areas yielded largest effect sizes for dAD patients, and hippocampal and temporal areas best discriminated patients with amnestic AD (Fig 2).ConclusionThe NFQ may reflect shared system‐level pathophysiological mechanisms across aging and the dysexecutive and amnestic phenotypes of AD whereas focal degeneration markers highlight distinct pathognomonic processes across AD phenotypes. These findings suggest that inter‐individual variability in cognitive impairment in AD would be closely tied to modular, phenotype‐specific network degeneration combined with a common global functional disruption of the DMN. Such information has crucial implications for clinical biomarkers and to provide a deeper understanding of heterogeneity in AD.