Porter, Amanda

AbstractBackgroundSAAs represent a promising biomarker of Lewy Body disease (LBD), with high sensitivity (87.3%, 95%CI: 0.755‐0.947) and specificity (97.2%, 95%CI: 0.922‐0.994) for detection of patients in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative repository with positive DaT SPECT; and reasonable sensitivity (78.7%, 95%CI: 0.66‐0.88) and specificity (89.5%, 95%CI: 0.78‐0.96 referencing clinical diagnoses in participants included within national research repositories. However, test performance in heterogeneous clinical cohorts is unknown.MethodPatients with typical (n=122) and rapid progressive dementia (n=76) consented to banking of CSF at the time of clinically‐indicated diagnostic lumbar puncture. Clinical data were deidentified and uploaded to a secure research database and clinical (etiologic) diagnoses established by two neurologists following independent review of available records. SAA (SYNTap™) were run on stored CSF by Amprion Diagnostics (San Diego, CA).ResultMedian participant age was 69.1 years (18.4‐86.1); 56.3% were female. CSF was sampled median 1.4 years (0‐10.3) after symptom onset. Pathological alpha‐synuclein was detected in 28/122 patients with typically progressive dementia (including 6/18 patients with presumed LBD; sensitivity 33%, specificity 79%) and 11/76 patients with rapid progressive dementia (including 3/9 patients with presumed LBD; sensitivity 33%, specificity 88%). “Positive” SAA was associated with tremor (OR=3.2, 95%CI: 1.3‐7.8), visual hallucinations (OR=6.14, 95%CI 1.6‐23.6), and REM behavior disorder (OR=3.7, 95%CI: 1.4‐9.5) in patients with typical but not rapid progressive dementia. Brain autopsies were completed in 17 patients: Lewy bodies were detected in 2/3 patients with positive SAA and no patients with negative SAA.Conclusion“Positive” SAA demonstrated reasonable specificity but low sensitivity for the diagnosis of LBD. Additional studies in heterogeneous cohorts with neuropathologic data are needed to optimize clinical applications of SAA.

AbstractBackground and purposeReal‐time quaking‐induced conversion (RT‐QuIC) assays offer a sensitive and specific means for detection of prions, although false negative results are recognized in clinical practice. We profile the clinical, laboratory, and pathologic features associated with false negative RT‐QuIC assays and extend these to frame the diagnostic approach to patients with suspected prion disease.MethodsA total of 113 patients with probable or definite prion disease were assessed at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN; Jacksonville, FL; Scottsdale, AZ) or Washington University School of Medicine (Saint Louis, MO) from 2013 to 2021. RT‐QuIC testing for prions was performed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center (Cleveland, OH).ResultsInitial RT‐QuIC testing was negative in 13 of 113 patients (sensitivity = 88.5%). RT‐QuIC negative patients were younger (median = 52.0 years vs. 66.1 years, p < 0.001). Other demographic and presenting features, and CSF cell count, protein, and glucose levels were similar in RT‐QuIC negative and positive patients. Frequency of 14‐3‐3 positivity (4/13 vs. 77/94, p < 0.001) and median CSF total tau levels were lower in RT‐QuIC negative patients (2517 vs. 4001 pg/mL, p = 0.020), and time from symptom onset to first presentation (153 vs. 47 days, p = 0.001) and symptomatic duration (710 vs. 148 days, p = 0.001) were longer.ConclusionsRT‐QuIC is a sensitive yet imperfect measure necessitating incorporation of other test results when evaluating patients with suspected prion disease. Patients with negative RT‐QuIC had lower markers of neuronal damage (CSF total tau and protein 14‐3‐3) and longer symptomatic duration of disease, suggesting that false negative RT‐QuIC testing associates with a more indolent course.

AbstractBackgroundThe ability to detect malformed prion proteins using real‐time quaking‐induced conversion (RT‐QuIC) assays has transformed the diagnostic approach to sporadic Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (CJD), facilitating earlier recognition of affected patients. Recognizing this, we evaluated the frequency of clinical features and biomarker results at initial evaluation in patients with CJD and determined the relationship between these early features and CJD diagnosis and prognosis.MethodClinical data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients with probable or definite (pathologically confirmed) CJD assessed at Mayo Clinic from 2014‐2021. Diagnoses of probable CJD were established by clinical consensus, referencing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention diagnostic criteria. Clinical features and biomarkers results were evaluated at presentation, and associations with CJD diagnosis and symptomatic disease duration determined.ResultOne‐hundred fifteen patients were included (40, [35%] with definite CJD). Mean age‐at‐symptom onset was 64.8±9.4 years; 68 patients were female (59%). The sensitivity of clinical markers (myoclonus) and tests historically considered in patients with suspected CJD (e.g., stereotyped EEG abnormalities (16%), CSF 14‐3‐3 (60%)) was poor. Biomarkers with good diagnostic sensitivity included RT‐QuIC (93%), t‐tau levels >1149 pg/mL (88%), and characteristic signal abnormalities on MRI (77%). Multivariable linear regression confirmed shorter survival for patients with myoclonus (125.9 days, 95%CI 23.3‐15.5, p=0.026), visual/cerebellar signs (180.19 days, 95%CI 282.2‐78.2, p<0.001), positive 14‐3‐3 (193 days, 95%CI 304.9‐82.9; p<0.001), and elevated t‐tau levels (each 1000 pg/ml increase was associated with a nine‐day shorter time‐to‐death, 95%CI 1‐18; p=0.041).ConclusionCSF RT‐QuIC and elevated t‐tau levels, and stereotyped MRI abnormalities continue to be strongly associated with the diagnosis in the modern era, while other clinical findings (myoclonus) and biomarkers results traditionally ascribed to CJD (e.g., PSWC on EEG, 14‐3‐3) offered less value in the diagnostic evaluation. Detection of visual or cerebellar features, myoclonus, CSF 14‐3‐3, and t‐tau levels may predict disease duration, justifying inclusion in the evaluation of CJD‐suspected patients.

AbstractBackgroundDiagnostic criteria emphasize the use of real‐time quaking‐induced conversion (RT‐QuIC) assays in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to identify patients with rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) due to for Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (CJD; CDC Diagnostic Criteria; Oct‐2018). Yet, this test is often performed in specialized centers, leading to delays in return of results. There is a need to leverage clinical features and the results of readily available tests to distinguish patients with CJD from those with other causes (‘CJD mimics’), including patients with potentially treatment‐responsive RPD.MethodPatients with definite (pathology‐confirmed) or probable CJD (clinical features with positive RT‐QuIC) were identified through retrospective review of Mayo Clinic Enterprise (n=91) and Washington University in St. Louis records (n=14; Jan‐2014 to Dec‐2020). Demographic, clinical details and results of common investigations (e.g., neuroimaging, CSF analyses and electroencephalogram) were compared between CJD cases and ‘mimics’ who met clinical criteria for probable CJD but did not have CJD.ResultCJD mimics were diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis (n=8), neurosarcoidosis (n=1), FTLD/MND (n=1) and unknown dementia (n=1), comprising 11/155 (7%) patients enrolled with RPD at study sites. Median [range] ages‐at‐presentation (65.6 [21.9‐81.5] vs 62.4 [32.8‐76.4] years; p=0.09), % females (51% vs 46%; p>0.99) and symptoms/signs were similar between groups, with the exception of motor complaints (e.g., spasms, focal weakness), which were more common in mimics (11/11 vs 55/105; p<0.01). Electroencephalogram findings did not differ between groups. MRI findings compatible with CJD (i.e., restricted diffusion within deep nuclei/cortical ribbon) predominated in cases (80/105 vs 4/11; p<0.01), while elevations in CSF leukocytes (>5 cells/hpf: 6/11 vs 5/103; p<0.01) and protein >45 mg/dL (10/11 vs 43/103; p<0.01) were more common in mimics. Total‐tau levels >1150 pg/mL (76/84 vs 2/10; p<0.01) and ‘positive’ 14‐3‐3 (67/98 vs 3/10; p=0.03) were frequent in cases. Autoantibodies associated with autoimmune encephalitis were detected in 5/10 mimics but 0/87 cases (p<0.01). Immunosuppressant therapies were provided to 10 mimics and 24 cases, with response limited to mimics.ConclusionsAutoimmune encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis and select neurodegenerative diseases may mimic CJD at presentation. Findings from brain MRI and commonly available CSF tests may facilitate early recognition of mimics, providing an opportunity for early treatment.