AbstractPersistent chest pain (PCP) following acute COVID‐19 infection is a commonly reported symptom with an unclear etiology, making its management challenging. This scoping review aims to address the knowledge gap surrounding the characteristics of PCP following COVID‐19, its causes, and potential treatments. This is a scoping review of 64 studies, including observational (prospective, retrospective, cross‐sectional, case series, and case–control) and one quasi‐experimental study, from databases including Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Studies on patients with PCP following mild, moderate, and severe COVID‐19 infection were included. Studies with patients of any age, with chest pain that persisted following acute COVID‐19 disease, irrespective of etiology or duration were included. A total of 35 studies reported PCP symptoms following COVID‐19 (0.24%–76.6%) at an average follow‐up of 3 months or longer, 12 studies at 1–3 months and 17 studies at less than 1‐month follow‐up or not specified. PCP was common following mild—severe COVID‐19 infection, and etiology was mostly not reported. Fourteen studies proposed potential etiologies including endothelial dysfunction, cardiac ischemia, vasospasm, myocarditis, cardiac arrhythmia, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, postural tachycardia syndrome, or noted cardiac MRI (cMRI) changes. Evaluation methods included common cardiopulmonary tests, as well as less common tests such as flow‐mediated dilatation, cMRI, single‐photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Only one study reported a specific treatment (sulodexide). PCP is a prevalent symptom following COVID‐19 infection, with various proposed etiologies. Further research is needed to establish a better understanding of the causes and to develop targeted treatments for PCP following COVID‐19.
Prevalence of Surgical Procedures at Symptomatic Onset of Prion Disease
AbstractBackgroundPatients with prion disease commonly present with visual, sensorimotor or gait complaints that may prompt surgical interventions for related disorders (e.g., cataracts, carpal tunnel syndrome and joint disease). To prevent iatrogenic transmission of prion disease, surgical instruments used on patients with possible prion disease must be decontaminated or decommissioned. This is only done when the diagnosis of possible prion disease is recognized by the healthcare team. We considered the frequency with which patients with definite or probable prion disease underwent surgeries within one year of the symptomatic onset of prion disease diagnosed.MethodThe Mayo Clinic’s Advanced Cohort Explorer was used to identify patients with prion disease diagnostic codes assessed since 1/1/2014 (n=296). Patients with prion disease enrolled in prospective studies of rapidly progressive dementia beginning 2/14/2015 at Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis, MO) were also included (n=14). Charts were independently reviewed by two team members, and demographic and clinical details extracted.Result108 patients with probable or definite prion disease were identified, including 62 (57%) with autopsy‐ or genetically‐proven prion disease (57 sporadic, 4 familial, 1 fatal familial insomnia). The majority of patients experienced a rapidly progressive course (mean symptom‐duration 10.0±9.7 months). Twenty‐nine patients (26.9%) underwent 36 surgeries or invasive procedures using durable instruments, including 3 high‐risk procedures directly involving the central nervous system, and 13 intermediate‐ (e.g., joint replacement) and 20 low‐risk procedures (e.g., endoscopy). Surgeries were performed a median of 10.2 months before death (range: 0.8‐62.3), with 16 (44%) performed after symptom onset. Surgical operators were unaware of the diagnosis of possible prion disease in all but one case (diagnostic brain biopsy).ConclusionSurgeries were common in patients with prion disease in this series and were commonly performed by operators who were unaware of the diagnosis. Coordinated approaches to screening and reporting may be needed to reduce the risk of iatrogenic spread of prion disease.