Citations

e15168 Background: 2-8% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) cases are in younger adults (YAs), patients (pts) less than age 50. However, current understanding of CRC in YAs is inadequate, especially that of sporadic onset. We conducted a study to describe the landscape of genomic alterations in YA CRC pts presenting to a large academic practice. Methods: Adult pts with CRC presenting to The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center oncology clinics were offered next generation sequencing (NGS) through a customized 22-gene Ion AmpliSeq Mutation Panel as part of clinical care. Commonly mutated areas of select genes (including AKT1, ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2/4, FBXW7, FGFR1/2/3, KRAS/NRAS, MET, NOTCH1, PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53) were sequenced from tumor sections. Institutional review board approval was obtained to retrospectively analyze this NGS testing between 1/2013-3/2016. Results: 258 CRC pts underwent genomic profiling. 57 pts (22.1%) were YAs at diagnosis (range 22-49 years); 20 pts (7.8%) were 40 years old or younger. 31 YA pts (54.4%) had metastatic disease. Of the YAs with CRC, 18 pts (31.6%) were diagnosed with R-sided colon, 16 pts (28.1%) with L-sided colon, and 22 pts (38.6%) with rectal cancer. 110 genomic alterations were found in YA pts, with a mean of 1.9 mutations per tumor (range 0-6); 35 (31.8%) of these in 32 (56.1%) YA pts were actionable. Of these 110 alterations, 41.8% were in TP53, 28.2% in KRAS/NRAS, 10.0% in PIK3CA, 3.6% in BRAF, 3.6% in FBXW7, and 2.73% in PTEN. 6 YA pts (10.5%) had microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Only 1 pt had concomitant MSI-H and a BRAF mutation; 4 pts with BRAF mutations were microsatellite stable. Comparing our YA pts to a separate cohort of pts age > 50 who had testing done, no significant difference was seen in mutation incidence in KRAS/NRAS (p = 1.0), TP53 (p = 0.3), PIK3CA (p = 0.128), or BRAF (p = 1.0). Conclusions: Genomic profiling through a targeted NGS panel is feasible as part of routine clinical practice. There is disagreement in the literature on genetic mutations in YA compared to older age CRC pts. Knowledge of the genomic landscape in YAs with CRC will lead to improved understanding of the underlying biology of CRC in YAs as it differs from CRC in older pts, and could impact future care of this cohort.

4106 Background: Cancer stem cells are fundamentally important for resistance to therapy, recurrence and metastasis. Napabucasin is a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in development identified by its ability to inhibit STAT3-driven gene transcription and spherogenesis of cancer stem cells (Li et al, PNAS 112(6):1839, 2015). Preclinical studies suggest that napabucasin sensitizes heterogeneous cancer cells to chemotherapy and targeted agents. Methods: A phase Ib/II multi-center study in mPDAC pts was performed to confirm the RP2D, PK profile and evidence of anticancer activity of napabucasin in combination with nabPTX and Gem. Pts received napabucasin 240 mg BID with weekly nabPTX 125 mg/m2 and gem 1000 mg/m2for 3 out of every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) or other discontinuation criterion. Results: Of 71 intent to treat (ITT) pts enrolled, 49 (69%) were treatment-naïve and 22 (31%) received neoadjuvant treatment. There were no significant PK interactions, dose-limiting or unexpected toxicities. Most common adverse events (AEs) included grade 1 diarrhea/cramping, nausea and fatigue with grade 3 AEs noted in 12 pts: fatigue (8), electrolyte imbalance (2), diarrhea (1), dehydration (1), nausea (1) and weight loss (1). Among pts who received RECIST evaluation (60), disease control (DCR; CR+PR+SD) was observed in 55 (92%), with 1 CR (2%) and 26 PR (43%) (31 - 78% regression). Of 11 pts with non-evaluable disease, treatment stopped due to compliance (4), consent withdrawal (3), clinical PD (1), toxicity (1), insurance (1) and death (1). Among 71 ITT pts, DCR was observed in 55 (77%), with 1 CR (1.4%) and 26 PR (37%). Maturing median progression free survival and overall survival (OS) in ITT pts is >7.1 and >10.4 m, respectively. Conclusions: This study showed that napabucasin can be combined with nabPTX and gem, with encouraging signs of efficacy in mPDAC now being confirmed in a phase 3 study. Clinical trial information: NCT02231723. [Table: see text]

3612 Background: The RAS/RAF/MEK signal transduction pathway is critical to the development of colorectal cancer, and tumors harboring KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations were shown to be resistant to radiation. Thus, we conducted a phase I study of trametinib, a potent MEK1/2 inhibitor, in combination with CRT in patients with LARC. Methods: Phase I trial for patients with Stage II/III rectal cancers with a 3+3 design, and an expansion cohort of 12 patients at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Trametinib is given orally at 3 dose levels: 0.5mg, 1mg, and 2mg (Mon-Fri). CRT regimen is infusional 5-flourouracil (5FU) 225mg/m2/day (Mon-Fri) and daily fractions of 1.8 Gy (total 50.4Gy). There is a 5-day trametinib lead-in followed by trametinib and CRT. Six to 10 weeks after completion of CRT, patients then proceed to their surgery and adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint is to identify the MTD and recommended phase 2 dose of trametinib with CRT. Immunohistochemistry staining for phosphorylated –ERK (pERK) and genomic profiling is performed on the tumor samples. Results: Enrollment is complete at all dose levels with18 patients, and 15 patients evaluable for toxicity and response as of Feb 6. One dose-limiting toxicity of diarrhea was observed at the 2mg dose. Grade 3 and most common toxicities are shown in Table 1. No grade 4/5 toxicities have been observed. At 2mg dose level, 3/9 (33%) patients had pathological complete response (pCR) and 2/9 (22%) had a near pCR. Correlative studies confirm decrease in pERK levels with increasing doses of trametinib. Correlation of genomic mutational status with toxicity, response, and outcomes is being analyzed. Conclusions: The combination of trametinib with 5FU CRT is tolerable with promising preliminary activity. Final results will be presented at the meeting. Toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT01740648. [Table: see text]

3579 Background: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) indicate a host immune response that may influence survival. Immunoscore was developed using CD3+ and CD8+density and location in primary CC pts with pooled stages, varying treatment and follow-up. We determined if individual immune markers and/or Immunoscore are prognostic in resected stage III CC pts (N=600). Methods: CD3+ and CD8+ T-cell or CD20+ B lymphocyte density in central tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) was evaluated by immunostaining and quantified by image analysis. Immunoscore was calculated on a scale of I0 to I4 with high densities of CD3+ and CD8+in both CT and IM scored as I4; low densities scored as I0. Associations with disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression adjusting for covariates. Results: Data for CD3+, CD8+ and CD20+ were generated (N=595). Higher density of CD3+ CT, CD3+ IM and CD8+ IM were associated with longer DFS adjusting for covariates (Table). CD3+ IM had the strongest association with DFS, and was stronger in left-sided (HRadj.=0.81, 95% CI, 0.70-0.94, padj.= 0.0049) vs right-sided (HRadj.=0.93, 95% CI, 0.85-1.0 padj.=0.52) tumors (pinteraction=0.039). Higher density of CD3+ IM was associated with older age (p=0.034), T1/2 (p<.0001), N1 (p=0.017), right-sided (p=0.013), high TILs (p=0.0008), and deficient MMR (p=0.0003). Using a prior Immunoscore risk stratification, higher scores were associated with better DFS (HR.=0.62, CI, 0.44-0.87, p=0.006) (Table). Conclusions: Densities of CD3+ and CD8+, especially at IM, are individually prognostic in FOLFOX-treated pts. Association of CD3+IM with prognosis differed by primary CC site. Immunoscore was strongly prognostic, and this result provides validation in a clinical trial cohort. [Table: see text]

3541 Background: Pembrolizumab (PEM) has activity in patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC). Oxaliplatin (OX) and 5FU lead to immunogenic cell death and increased antigen presentation. We hypothesized that combining mFOLFOX6 and PEM may enhance immunogenic cell death and improve outcome in patients with CRC irrespective of MMR status. Methods: Subjects ≥18 years old with untreated, unresectable CRC were assigned to a single arm study. The study had a safety run in cohort of six patients (OX 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2, 5FU infusion 2400 mg/m2over 46 hours) and PEM 200 mg Q 3 weeks, followed by a phase II cohort. The primary objective was median progression free survival (mPFS), with secondary objectives: safety and toxicity per CTCAE V4.03, median overall survival, response rate, immune related response, disease control rate, and molecular correlates. Results: Between 4/2015 and 9/2016, 30 subjects were enrolled with following characteristics: 11 female, 26 Caucasian, median age: 45 years (25-75), 3 with dMMR, 22 MMR-proficient, and 5 with no available data. During the safety run in, 2 patients had G3 febrile neutropenia (FN) and 1 G4 neutropenia. The data safety monitoring committee recommended dose reduction of mFOLFOX6 to OX 68 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, 5FU of 320 mg/m2, 5FU infusion of 1920 mg/m2over 46 hours and PEM 200 mg Q 3 weeks. At the data cut off (12/29/16), median follow up was 24 weeks (10-66) and 27 patients remained on study. Rate of G3/4 toxicity associated with FOLFOX/PEM and PEM alone was 36.7% and 13.2%, respectively. No further FN was observed. No grade 5 toxicity was seen on study. Best response was recorded as: 1 complete response, 15 partial response (CR +PR = 53%), and 14 stable disease, with 100% DCR at 8 weeks. One patient with dMMR had resection after 2 months of therapy with complete pathologic response. MPFS has not been reached (95% CI: 5.5 months, NR). Conclusions: Based on these preliminary results, PEM/mFOLFOX6 has acceptable toxicity though demonstrated a suggestion of increased neutropenia in the initial cohort. Clinical activity was seen in patients with untreated advanced CRC including those with proficient MMR. Clinical trial information: NCT02375672.