Wenham, Robert M.

Abstract Objective: We examined post-traumatic reactions and quality of life in women with recurrent gynecologic cancer who underwent a pelvic exenteration (PE), a rare, potentially life-saving radical surgery associated with life-altering sequalae. Methods: Twenty-one women who had completed PE at least 6 months prior completed measures of post-traumatic stress, post-traumatic growth, depression, and quality of life. Quality of life scores were compared to normative values for the general and gynecologic cancer populations. Results: Thirty percent of women reported clinically significant post-traumatic stress symptoms and 71% endorsed clinically significant depressive symptoms. More post-traumatic stress was associated with less post-traumatic growth, more depressive symptoms, and worse quality of life. In general, women’s quality of life was worse than the general population but comparable to women with stage III-IV ovarian cancer and women with cervical cancer. Social functioning was markedly lower in our sample and women reported more pain, diarrhea, and financial difficulties post-PE compared to published norms. There were no differences in quality of life based on age, type of PE, or cancer type. Conclusions: Findings support long-term continued symptom management and the ongoing rehabilitation of patients to optimize physical, psychological, and social well-being in PE survivorship.

PURPOSE The adjunctive use of intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) is gaining acceptance as a potential means to improve outcomes for surgical resection of targetable tumors. This confirmatory study examined the use of pafolacianine for real-time detection of folate receptor–positive ovarian cancer. METHODS This phase III, open-label, 11-center study included subjects with known or suspected ovarian cancer, scheduled to undergo cytoreductive surgery. The objectives were to confirm safety and efficacy of pafolacianine (0.025 mg/kg IV), given ≥ 1 hour before intraoperative near-infrared imaging to detect macroscopic lesions not detected by palpation and normal white light. RESULTS From March 2018 through April 2020, 150 patients received a single infusion of pafolacianine (safety analysis set); 109 patients with folate receptor–positive ovarian cancer comprised the full analysis set for efficacy. In 33.0% of patients (95% CI, 24.3 to 42.7; P < .001), pafolacianine with near-infrared imaging identified additional cancer on tissue not planned for resection and not detected by white light assessment and palpation, exceeding the prespecified threshold of 10%. Among patients who underwent interval debulking surgery, the rate was 39.7% (95% CI, 27.0 to 53.4; P < .001). The sensitivity to detect ovarian cancer was 83%, and the patient false-positive rate was 24.8%. Investigators reported achieving complete R0 resection in 62.4% (68 of 109) of patients. Drug-related adverse events were reported by 30% of patients (45 of 150) and most commonly included nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. No drug-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION This phase III study of pafolacianine met its primary efficacy end point, identifying additional cancers not otherwise identified or planned for resection. Pafolacianine may offer an important real-time adjunct to current surgical approaches for ovarian cancer.

5503 Background: Pafolacianine sodium is under investigation as an adjunct to visual inspection and palpation by providing intra-operative imaging of folate receptor positive (FR+) ovarian cancer. Since complete resection (R0) is the strongest predictor of overall survival, methods to enhance detection of lesions are expected to benefit patient outcomes. Methods: For this phase 3, randomized, multicenter, single dose, open-label pivotal trial (NCT03180307), patients with ovarian cancer who were scheduled to undergo cytoreductive surgery were recruited from 11 sites in the US and Netherlands from March 2018 through April 2020. The study objectives were to confirm efficacy and safety of pafolacianine sodium (0.025 mg/kg i.v., ≥1 h prior to imaging) in combination with intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging to detect additional lesions not detected by palpation and normal white light alone. Results: Pafolacianine sodium was administered to 150 total patients (safety analysis set); 109 patients comprised the full analysis set for efficacy analyses. Patients had primarily serous adenocarcinoma (n = 72; 68.6%) and advanced stage disease (n = 83; 76.1%). In 33% of patients (36 of 109), NIRF imaging with pafolacianine sodium identified additional lesions that were not planned for resection and were not detected by normal white light and palpation ( P < 0.001, 95% CI [0.243, 0.427]). Among patients who underwent interval debulking surgery, the rate was higher, at 39.7% of patients (23 of 58; 95% CI [0.270, 0.534]). At the individual lesion level, the accuracy of pafolacianine sodium with NIRF to detect ovarian cancer is reflected by sensitivity of 83% (95% CI [73.9, 89.4]) and a false positive rate of 32.7% (95% CI [25.6, 40.7]). Investigators reported achieving complete resection (R0) in 62.4% (68 of 109) of patients. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 30% of patients (45 out of 150). The most frequently reported drug-related AEs were nausea (18.0%), vomiting (5.3%), and abdominal pain (4.7%). Infusion reactions at the time of the procedure were mostly (96%) mild or moderate in severity; 89% resolved within 24 hours of onset. No drug-related serious AEs or deaths were reported. Conclusions: This phase 3 trial of pafolacianine sodium with NIRF imaging met its primary endpoint, intraoperatively identifying additional cancer not planned for resection in a statistically significant number of patients. Therefore, pafolacianine sodium may offer a novel real-time adjunct to current surgical imaging practice in ovarian cancer surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03180307.

6040 Background: FRα is overexpressed on > 90% of high-grade EOC. We conducted a randomized double-blind multicenter phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TPIV200 (a multi-epitope FRα peptide vaccine admixed with GM-CSF adjuvant) versus GM-CSF alone as a control in patients with stage III-IV high-grade platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma in first complete or partial remission, irrespective of baseline level of FRα expression. Methods: Patients with stage III-IV high-grade serous, high-grade endometrioid, carcinosarcoma or poorly differentiated EOC who had previously completed standard upfront therapy without evidence of disease progression and who were within a year of last platinum were randomized 1:1 to intradermal vaccination of TPIV200 versus intradermal GM-CSF alone. The vaccination period included 6 administrations of the study drug at 4-week intervals. Up to 6 booster vaccinations at 12-week intervals were permitted for patients who did not have disease progression. AEs were assessed using CTCAE. Tumor response was assessed via RECIST every 12 weeks. The primary endpoint, progression free survival (PFS), was calculated from date of first vaccination to the date of progression, death or study termination. Results: Of 120 patients randomized, 63 (53%) were treated on the TPIV200 arm. The median age at study entry was 63 years (range 37-88). AEs were generally mild. Injection site reaction was more frequent in the TPIV200 (63%) versus GM-CSF arm (39%). The other most common AEs, abdominal pain (25%) and fatigue (23%), were comparable in both arms. At study termination with a median follow-up of 15.2 months (range: 1.2-28.3 months), 68 of 119 intention-to-treat patients had progressed (55% in the TPIV200 arm and 59% in the GM-CSF arm). The median PFS was 11.1 months (95% CI: 8.3-16.6 months) and there was no statistically significant difference in median PFS between the arms (10.9 months with TPIV200 versus 11.1 months with GM-CSF, HR = 0.85 [upper 90% CI = 1.17]). Conclusions: Although TPIV200 had a manageable safety profile, the study was terminated for futility after the planned interim analysis. Future development of FRα-targeted therapy will likely focus on the careful selection of patients whose cancers show high FRα expression. Clinical trial information: NCT02978222.

Abstract Background: The combination of cediranib (ced) and olaparib (olap) improves progression-free survival and overall response rates (ORR) in women with recurrent plat sensitive high-grade serous (HGS) ovarian cancer compared to olap alone. In this Phase 2 study of ced/olap in women with relapsed ovarian cancer (NCT02345265), we observed an ORR of 74% with ced/olap in plat sensitive relapsed patients (pts) and an ORR of 20% in plat resistant pts. BROCA-HR was performed to characterize tumor HRD status and to correlate this with the activity of ced/olap in the plat sensitive and resistant settings. Methods: Pts with relapsed ovarian cancer across 11 centers were enrolled to 2 cohorts, either plat sensitive or resistant. All pts received ced 30mg daily and olap tablets 200mg BID. Archival, pre-treatment, and on-treatment biopsies were collected on all pts where safely feasible; pts also had the option of undergoing a post-progression biopsy. A baseline blood sample was collected for germline testing and matched control. Available samples were sequenced with BROCA-HR, and HRD status was determined by (1) presence of an HR-related mutation or (2) an increase in loss of heterozygosity (LOH) score. Results: 72 pts were enrolled, with 70 pts receiving study treatment (35 plat sensitive and 35 plat resistant). BROCA-HR analysis is complete on 60 samples, with 10 samples in final analysis. The concordance of HRD status by presence of an HR-related mutation or by LOH score was relatively low (agreement=36/60=60%, Cohen's Kappa=0.28). In 19 pts with a germline BRCA mutation, 16 were HRD+ by LOH (LOH high), 2 were HRD- by LOH (LOH low), and 1 not quantifiable. 3 pts had a somatic BRCA mutation; 1 was LOH high, 1 LOH low, and 1 not quantifiable. 4 pts had non-BRCA somatic HR-related mutations (3 CDK12; 1 ATR); 3 were LOH high and 1 LOH low. Of the 34 pts without HR-related mutations, 15 were LOH high, 16 were LOH low, and 3 not quantifiable. In 29 plat sensitive pts with BROCA-HR results, 18 were HRD+ by mutation (12 germline BRCA, 3 somatic BRCA, 3 somatic other), and 16 were HRD+ by LOH (LOH high). The ORR in plat sensitive pts by HRD status with available HRD results was: 22/29=75.9% (13/18=72% HRDmut+; 9/11=82% HRDmut-); (12/16=75% LOH high; 6/9= 67% LOH low). In 31 plat resistant pts with BROCA-HR results, 8 were HRD+ by mutation (7 germline BRCA, 0 somatic BRCA, 1 somatic other), and 19 were HRD+ by LOH. The ORR in plat resistant pts by HRD status with available HRD results was: 7/31=22.6% (4/8=50% HRDmut+; 3/23=13% HRDmut-, P=0.05); (7/19=37% LOH high; 0/11= 0% LOH low, P=0.03). Updated results with the full data set are pending. Conclusion: Ced/olap has clinical activity in women with relapsed ovarian cancer, both in the plat sensitive and plat resistant settings. In women with plat sensitive disease, where response rates are high, HRD status by presence of an HR-related mutation or LOH status does not appear to provide significant additional information regarding likelihood of response. In women with plat resistant disease, the presence of HRD by an HR-related mutation or LOH status is correlated with a higher likelihood of response. Citation Format: Joyce F Liu, Su-Chun Cheng, Robert M Wenham, Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson, Deborah K Armstrong, Nancy Chan, David E Cohn, Jung-Min Lee, Richard T Penson, Mihaela Cristea, James Abbruzzese, Koji Matsuo, Alexander B Olawaiye, Jennifer Curtis, Geoffrey Shapiro, Ursula A Matulonis, Elise Kohn, Percy Ivy, Elizabeth M Swisher. Correlation of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status by BROCA-HR sequencing with response to combination cediranib and olaparib in relapsed ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A074. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A074

5517 Background: Anti-angiogenic therapy is active in OC; the combination of VEGF and mTOR inhibitors is hypothesized to further improve activity. This report is the OC cohort of a multi-histology phase II study assessing the activity and toxicity of B/T. Methods: Patients (Pts) with recurrent epithelial OC who had received ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens and no prior treatment with a VEGF or mTOR inhibitor were eligible. A two-stage design was used with second stage accrual if >6 pts had objective responses (OR) or >10 pts of the first 25 remained progression-free (PF) at six months (mo). Pre-defined end-points for a recommendation for further clinical trial evaluation included at least 15/50 with OR or 26/50 PF at six mo. Treatment included T 25 mg IV wkly and B 10 mg/kg IV q14 days on 28 day cycles. Results: 58 pts were enrolled (the first 50 pts are used to determine a final recommendation). Median age=62 (range 35-82). A median of 4 (range 1-23) cycles were administered. 24 were platinum-sensitive, 34 resistant. Off-study reasons included 13 adverse events and disease progression in 38. 3 refused further therapy due to toxicity. 14 of the first 50 pts had partial response (PR) (9 platinum-resistant); 25/50 remained PF (8 PR, 15 SD, 2 non-progressing) at 6 mo. Grade (gr) 3/4 toxicities occurring >2 events include: fatigue (4), stomatitis (7), hypertension (5), neutropenia (4), thrombocytopenia (4), hypokalemia (3). One rectal and one vaginal fistula, and two colonic perforations (one gr 2 and one gr 3 during cycles 3 and 1 respectively) were observed. Episodes of gr 1/2 oral, nasal, pulmonary, vaginal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were also observed. Conclusions: Although the OR and PFS did not reach pre-defined standards, the numbers of OR and 6 mo PFS suggest potential enhanced activity with a combination of mTOR inhibitor with anti-angiogenic therapy. Other combinations of these targeted agents may result in more satisfactory activity with less toxicity. N01-CM-62203 (PMH) N01-CM-62208 (Southeast Phase 2) N01 CM-62209 (CCCP) N01-CM-62204 (NYCC) N01-CM-2011-0071C (Chicago) N01-CM62205 (Mayo) Clinical trial information: NCT01010126.

5025 Background: We report the interim results of the endometrial arm of a multi-tumor protocol using temsirolimus and bevacizumab in endometrial cancer (EMCA) patients at the time of their initial recurrence. The primary aim of this trial is to assess treatment efficacy in terms of both confirmed tumor response and 6-month progression free survival (PFS). Methods: Women with a performance status of 0 or 1 who have had their first recurrence for EMCA were eligible. Subjects who had chemotherapy as part of their adjuvant treatment after front line surgical staging were also eligible. The regimen included Temsirolimus 25 mg IV weekly followed by bevacizumab 10mg/kg IV on days 1 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. A modified two-stage Simon design with fixed sample size was adopted with the null hypothesis being that the true tumor response rate is at most 25% and the true 6 month PFS rate is at most 50%. Results: We enrolled 26 evaluable subjects to the first stage of which one did not proceed with treatment. The median age at enrollment was 60 (range 40-80). 22 (85%) were white and 19 (73%) were not Hispanic/Latino. 19 (73%) of subjects had prior raditation therapy, with 4 having a prior para-aortic boost. 5 (20%) subjects had a confirmed PR and 12 (48%) were progression-free at 6 months, which fell short of the futility stopping rule. An additional 5 (20%) subjects had a best response of confirmed SD, so 10 (40%) had overall clinical benefit from this regimen. AEs attributable to treatment were modest and included 16 grade 3 adverse events, of which the most common ones included hypertension, hyperglycemia, and neutropenia. There were 2 grade 4 events that were possibly treatment related including a duodenal perforation and an anorectal infection. Conclusions: While there was clinical benefit of this regimen in women at the time of their first recurrence of EMCA, the combination of temsirolimus and bevacizumab did not achieve our prespecified efficacy assumptions. This differs from what has been reported with this combination as a second line therapy for recurrent EMCA, where prespecified response assumptions differ. Also, the regimen had comparable safety and toxicity to other cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens used in this setting.