Citations

ABSTRACT HLA‐A*02:1040:02 differs from HLA‐A*02:01:01:01 by a single nucleotide substitution in codon 283 (CCC>TCC) in exon 5.

ABSTRACT The novel HLA‐DQB1*02:02:01:28Q shows a point mutation in the intron 3 splice site.

Abstract Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have a markedly elevated risk of aggressive malignancies, yet the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this population remains limited by concerns for allograft rejection and the absence of prospective evidence. We evaluated real-world antitumor activity, graft safety, and immunosuppression-related outcomes of ICI therapy in KTRs with advanced cancers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 57 KTRs with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic malignancies treated between 2018-2025 at a single tertiary center. Thirty-three received ICIs and 24 received non-ICI systemic therapy. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival from diagnosis (OSd), overall survival from treatment initiation (OSt), acute allograft rejection, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Tumor response was assessed by RECIST v1.1. Results: ICI-treated patients achieved higher ORR (40.0% vs 26.1%) and CBR (60.0% vs 33.3%) compared with non-ICI therapy. Median OSd was 35.8 vs 23.3 months, and median PFS was 4.3 vs 3.5 months (both not statistically significant). Median OSt was significantly longer with ICIs (15.1 vs 7.9 months; p=0.012). Acute rejection occurred in 12.1% of ICI-treated patients (3% irreversible) versus 4.2% with systemic therapy; rejection events were heterogeneous in timing (3 weeks-14 months) and largely responsive to pulse-dose corticosteroids. IrAEs occurred in 27.3% of ICI patients, with grade ≥2 events in 12.1%, and no treatment-related deaths. In the cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) subgroup (n=33), ICI therapy produced an ORR of 47.4% and CBR of 63.2%, with trends toward improved survival relative to controls. Conclusions: ICIs produced clinically meaningful antitumor activity in KTRs, particularly in cSCC, with a manageable rate of allograft rejection under carefully tailored immunosuppression. Despite higher historical concerns, irreversible graft loss was uncommon. These findings support the feasibility of ICI therapy in selected transplant recipients and highlight the importance of immunosuppression strategy in balancing antitumor efficacy and graft safety. Prospective, biomarker-integrated studies are needed to define optimal immunosuppression during PD-1 blockade in this high-risk population. Citation Format: Ali Rezazadeh Roudkoli, Elena Barbir, Shahin Kavousi, Mohamed A. Aboelatta, Claudia-Denise Haivas, Byron H. Smith, Aleksandra Kukla, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in kidney transplant recipients: Real-world outcomes of antitumor activity and graft rejection risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 6544.

Abstract Background: High-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) is administered after tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) infusion to promote in-vivo expansion and persistence, yet optimal dosing and the clinical significance of out-of-specification (OOS) TIL products remain unclear. We investigated the impact of number of infused IL-2 doses and manufacturing OOS status on outcomes in metastatic melanoma treated with commercial TIL therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients treated across three Mayo Clinic sites. Planned IL-2 was 600,000 IU/kg every 12 hours for ≤6 doses; actual dosing varied based on clinical tolerance. Patients were grouped as low (0-2) vs high (≥3) IL-2 doses. TIL products were classified as within-specification or OOS per commercial release criteria. Survival associations were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression. Results: In our 31-patient cohort, the median age was 59 years (range 17-77), 58% were male, and 84% had ECOG 0. At TIL infusion, M-stage distribution was M1a 6%, M1b 10%, M1c 61%, and M1d 23%. LDH was elevated above the upper limit of normal in 42%. The median number of IL-2 infusions was 4 (range 0-6); 58% of patients received ≥3 doses, while 2 patients (6%) received none. Out-of-specification (OOS) TIL products occurred in 6 patients (19%). Best responses included complete response (26%) and partial response (23%), for an overall response rate of 48% and a disease-control rate of 61% (CR + PR + SD). Among responders, the median duration of response was 84 days (95% CI 73-95). At data cutoff, the median follow-up was 253 days (95% CI 137-370). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities occurring >14 days after TIL infusion were lymphopenia (39%), anemia (16%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 99 days (95% CI 73-125) with 20 progression events, and median overall survival (OS) was 193 days (95% CI 32-354) with 13 deaths. Number of infused IL-2 doses was dependent on patients tolerability. Receiving ≥3 IL-2 doses was associated with improved overall survival (394 vs 101 days; p < 0.001) and a trend toward longer progression-free survival (110 vs 59 days; p = 0.055). OOS products predicted inferior PFS (30 vs 110 days; p = 0.003) and showed a trend toward worse OS (120 vs 394 days; p = 0.079). In multivariate analysis, ≥3 IL-2 doses independently improved PFS (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.69; p = 0.011) and OS (HR 0.09, 0.02-0.36; p = 0.001), while OOS status increased risk of progression (HR 8.10, 2.24-29.25; p = 0.001) and death (HR 6.16, 1.35-28.20; p = 0.019). Conclusions: Higher number of infused doses IL-2 and meeting commercial TIL release criteria were independently associated with improved outcomes. Citation Format: Mohamed A. Aboelatta, Jeffrey E. Johnson, Jabra G. Zarka, Matyáš Benada, James W. Jakub, Roxana S. Dronca, Ruqin Chen, Mahesh Seetharam, Deepti Behl, Svetomir N. Markovic, Lisa A. Kottschade, Heather N. Montane, Matthew S. Block, Anastasios Dimou, Robert R. McWilliams, Paula Gill, Yi Lin, Arkadiusz Z. Dudek. Impact of number of IL-2 infusions and product out of specification status on outcomes of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3706.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Despite the clinical success of CD19-targeted approaches, relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease—often driven by antigen loss or immune escape—remains a major challenge. To overcome this, we developed a novel CAR-T cell therapy targeting BAFF-R, a receptor consistently expressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and other B-cell malignancies. We developed a new anti-BAFF-R monoclonal antibody and engineered the MC10029 CAR construct using its scFv. Antigen-specific cytotoxicity was validated in both in vitro and in vivo models, including Nalm-6 (leukemia) and Z138 (lymphoma), and CD19-knockout tumor cells to model (R/R) disease. MC10029 CAR-T cells were generated from healthy donors and CLL patients, and their cytotoxicity was evaluated against MEC-1, a CLL cell line, as well as autologous CLL patient tumor samples. These studies demonstrated potent and specific antitumor efficacy. We transitioned to clinical-grade production, using GMP-compliant lentivirus to manufacture MC10029 CAR-T cells under regulatory guidelines. With FDA IND approval, we initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate safety and dosing. Our first patient, treated with a low-dose, single infusion, achieved a complete metabolic response within 2 months. The therapy is well tolerated, with no severe advent events such as cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity, supporting both the safety and efficacy of the therapy. Conclusion: This study represents Mayo Clinic’s first homegrown CAR-T cell therapy, developed entirely in-house—from antibody discovery and CAR design to GMP manufacturing and clinical trial—marking a significant step toward personalized, next-generation immunotherapy for B-cell malignancies. Citation Format: Yan Luo, Shaohua Guo, Yaqing Qie, Martha E. Gadd, Tanya Hundal, Hemant S. Murthy, Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja, Hong Qin. From gene to bedside: Mayo Clinic’s first-in-house BAFF-R CAR-T [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 3719.

Abstract Several allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies are in clinical trials to evaluate safety, many of which rely on CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing. However, the Cas enzyme’s random repair mechanism elevates the risk of undesired, off-target effects, posing a challenge for safe allogeneic CAR T-cell generation. To mitigate the risk of therapy-related oncogenesis, we sought to pursue an alternative safe strategy to manufacture allogeneic CAR T-cells distinct from the preexisting ones in the clinic. We have developed a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) targeting T-cell receptor beta constant (TRBC) gene, which in conjunction with AsCas12a Ultra enzyme, causes site-specific editing by eliciting a predictable microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) DNA repair pathway, which mitigates off-targeting risk. Targeted amplicon sequencing was employed to evaluate off-targeting and repair mechanisms. Graft versus host alloreactivity as well as CAR T persistence was evaluated using immunocompromised mice. In vivo tumor challenge study was conducted for over 3 months. Engraftment confirmation was done using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Interestingly while evaluating the edited T-cells, we sequestered a unique T-cell population that showed TCR disruption yet remained CD3-positive and did not cause in vivo alloreactivity. These CD3-Retained, Allogeneically Functioning T-cells (CRAFT-cells) showed a similar growth rate as unedited T-cells and were then used as a platform to produce CD19-targeted CAR T-cells and BAFF-R-targeted CAR T-cells. When compared to the standard CD3-disrupted allogeneic CAR T-cells, CRAFT CAR T-cells displayed an equally robust cytotoxicity while possessing a safer genomic profile. CRAFT CAR T-cells could function as effector cells for bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and induce CD3-dependent cytotoxicity against tumor cells. Pertinently, CRAFT CAR T-cells as opposed to CD3-disrupted CAR T-cells, were present in mouse xenografts without alloreactivity. Having the onset of MMEJ-directed repair and minimal off-targeting, positions this CRAFT crRNA to generate safer allogeneic CAR T-cells with an overall reduced genotoxic profile in a clinical setting. This unique CRAFT CAR T-cell population displays in vivo persistence. Additionally, CRAFT CAR T can be combined with BiTE therapy, offering a promising and potentially more durable alternative to preexisting ex vivo allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies. Citation Format: Tanya Hundal, Yan Luo, Yaqing Qie, Martha E. Gadd, Shaohua Guo, Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja, Hong Qin. CD3-positive allogeneic CAR T-cells: A novel platform with persistence, BiTE-capture, and no alloreactivity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 4283.

Abstract Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options and a 5-year survival rate under 10%. Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3), expressed in >85% of SCLC but absent from normal tissue, represents an attractive therapeutic target. Existing DLL3-directed antibody-drug conjugates suffer from poor payload stability and limited tumor penetration. To overcome these limitations, we engineered a DLL3-targeted nano-immunoconjugate (NIC) of SN38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, using an albumin-based nanoscaffold. Methods: SN38 was encapsulated in a human serum albumin (HSA) matrix and non-covalently coated with a recombinant anti-DLL3 monoclonal antibody to yield DLL3-SN38-NIC. Stable conjugation was confirmed by HSA-IgG interactions and zeta-potential shift. Binding kinetics were evaluated using Biacore surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and Octet bio-layer interferometry (BLI) employing AHC biosensors to determine DLL3-antibody affinity and specificity. Cytotoxicity was assessed using IncuCyte live-cell imaging across five SCLC cell lines (DMS454, SHP77, NCI-H82, NCI-H889, and NCI-H211) with varying DLL3 expression. Results: DLL3-SN38-NIC retained high-affinity DLL3 binding (KD ≈ 3 × 10-10 M) and demonstrated potent cytotoxicity in SCLC cell lines. NIC formation did not reduce cytotoxic activity compared with free SN38, confirming preserved potency. Cytotoxicity trends were consistent across lines with variable DLL3 expression, and DLL3 antibody alone exhibited negligible cytotoxicity. These findings confirm that nano-immunoconjugate formation maintains drug activity and DLL3 binding; additional in-vivo studies are underway to evaluate pharmacokinetics and tumor selectivity. Conclusions: Albumin-based DLL3-SN38-NICs represent a novel nano-oncologic platform that preserves SN38 potency and achieves high-affinity DLL3 engagement. Ongoing studies will assess in-vivo selectivity, biodistribution, and therapeutic potential in DLL3-positive SCLC and other neuroendocrine malignancies. Citation Format: Mohamed Shanshal, Lin Yang, Liyi Geng, Wendy Nevala, Aaron S. Mansfield, Bharath Wootla, Konstantinos Leventakos, Kyle Korshavn, Svetomir N. Markovic. Albumin-based DLL3-targeted nano-immunoconjugates of SN38 preserve potency and demonstrate high-affinity DLL3 binding in small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 449.

Abstract Background: Primary Cardiac Lymphoma (PCL) is an exceptionally rare malignancy. While clinical case reports have postulated an association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), large-scale epidemiological data corroborating this link are limited. Objective: To determine whether HIV is associated with increased prevalence of PCL in a large, nationally representative sample of US hospitalizations. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019, representing approximately 35 million unweighted hospitalizations. Hospitalizations were identified using a proxy definition for PCL, requiring ICD-10-CM codes for both cardiomyopathy (I42.*) and extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (i.e., C83.39, C85.99). HIV status was identified using codes B20-B24 and Z21. We compared the prevalence of PCL in hospitalizations with versus without HIV and calculated odds ratios using Fisher’s Exact Test, reporting corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Results: We identified 569 hospitalizations meeting our operational definition for PCL out of 34,955,252 total discharges. The prevalence of PCL was significantly higher among hospitalizations with HIV (6.2 per 100,000) compared with those without HIV (1.6 per 100,000; p < 0.0001). HIV was associated with a 3.86-fold increased odds of PCL (OR: 3.86; 95% CI: 2.23-6.70; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In this nationwide analysis of 35 million hospitalizations, HIV was strongly associated with a higher prevalence of PCL. Hospitalizations with HIV had nearly 4-fold higher odds of PCL, as defined by co-occurrence of cardiomyopathy and extranodal lymphoma, compared with hospitalizations without HIV. This population-level finding evinces the association previously suggested in clinical case reports. Citation Format: Omar Hozayen, Jay Hozayen, Benjamin Behers, Christoph Stephenson-Moe, Maha Hameed, Matthew Miller, Laura De Jesus Herrera, Anas Abu Jad, Rheiner Kammer, Mohab Idriss, Ahmed Aboutaleb, Bashar Roumia, Patricia Riano, Nicolas Riveros Neira, Brooke Hartenstein, Robert Taylor, Manuel Rosario Espinal, Brett M. Behers, Alya Hozayen, Mohamed Ibrahim, Karen Hamad. Primary cardiac lymphoma and HIV: A nationwide analysis of hospitalizations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 215.

Background: Hepatorenal syndrome–acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is associated with high mortality in cirrhosis. Recent FDA approval of terlipressin and updated clinical guidance have expanded management options, but real-world practice patterns remain unknown. Methods: We conducted a nationwide survey of U.S. hepatology providers regarding HRS-AKI management practices. The 33-question survey assessed provider demographics, vasoconstrictor selection, treatment timing, and adherence to guideline recommendations. Results: Among 162 respondents, most were hepatologists (94%) at academic centers (83%). Only 11% obtained a nephrology consultation at AKI detection, with 44% waiting until worsening renal function. Terlipressin was available at 80% of institutions but more commonly at academic centers (84% vs. 53%, p =0.003). Consistent with guideline recommendations, 77% of providers initiate vasoconstrictors only after completing a trial of volume expansion (if no renal improvement), particularly in academic centers (80% vs. 60% non-academic, p =0.03). Terlipressin (49%) and midodrine/octreotide (44%) were preferred first-line treatments, with providers at academic centers more likely to use midodrine/octreotide (46% vs. 30%, p =0.008). Mean arterial pressure was used by 62% of providers to guide vasoconstrictor dosing. Most providers (73%) discontinued vasoconstrictor treatment after 4 days if no improvement. Conclusions: Significant variations exist between guideline recommendations and real-world HRS-AKI management, especially first-line treatment choice, treatment monitoring, and nephrology consultation. These findings highlight opportunities to improve guideline implementation and identify areas where practice patterns might inform provider education and future guidance updates.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are reshaping the therapeutic approach to advanced gastrointestinal cancers by integrating tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies with potent cytotoxic payloads to improve targeted tumor cell destruction while minimizing systemic exposure. Compared to traditional chemotherapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan has significantly improved objective response rates and overall survival in HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction tumors after trastuzumab-based therapy. This supports its role as an important second-line or later treatment option. The ongoing advancement of ADCs targeting CLDN18.2, TROP2, and CEACAM5 indicates that this therapeutic category will continue to expand across gastrointestinal neoplasms. Nonetheless, these advancements are accompanied by a specific and clinically significant toxicity profile. Hematologic suppression, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, and notably interstitial lung disease (ILD) are essential consequences that may need inpatient assessment and care. Interstitial lung disease (ILD), although uncommon, may be severe or lethal if not identified immediately and treated swiftly with medication cessation and corticosteroids. In hospitalized patients, distinguishing ADC-related toxicity from infection or disease progression is often difficult owing to overlapping clinical manifestations, requiring meticulous evaluation and interdisciplinary cooperation. As ADCs are integrated into earlier treatment lines and across a broader patient population, hospital systems must evolve to ensure prompt identification, consistent management protocols, and efficient collaboration between oncology and inpatient teams. This study analyzes the mechanisms, clinical effectiveness, and safety profile of ADCs in gastrointestinal oncology, pointing out the importance of institutional preparedness to safely incorporate these medicines into standard clinical practice. These features also align ADC therapy with personalized medicine by emphasizing biomarker-guided patient selection and individualized toxicity monitoring.