Kumar, Harendra

Study Design: Case presentation. Objective: The interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression (IE-LRD) represents a novel surgical alternative to consider in carefully selected cases, particularly when patients do not respond to conservative treatment. Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) constitutes one of the most prevalent spinal conditions in the elderly population around the world. A myriad of causes have been elucidated, and although infrequent, vertebral compression fractures (VCF) may also cause LSS. Conservative treatment might be the first option; however, patients often require surgery. Methods: A 76-year-old woman with a medical history of dementia consulted for radicular pain in her left leg during the past 6 months, without any favorable response to conservative treatment. Neurological examination revealed a positive straight leg raising test on the left. A spine MRI revealed a VCF in L5, linked with spondylolisthesis (grade I) at L5–S1. An IE-LRD was planned, as the patient did not consent to a classical open surgery. The incision was placed over the inferior medial edge of the left L4 lamina. Following sequential dilatators, the working channel was located on the inferomedial edge of the left L4 lamina. Lateral fluoroscopy (LF) guided the entire procedure. During the procedure, laminotomy was extended cranially and caudally to ensure sufficient vertebral decompression. Results: After surgery, the patient was mobilized in the first 6 hours and discharged in the next 24 hours. Her lower back pain score improved significantly to 2–3, while her leg VAS pain improved to 0–1. After a follow-up for 18 months, the patient did not manifest complications or recurrences, and no additional treatment was carried out. Conclusion: (1) IE-LRD might be a useful and safe surgical procedure for the surgical management of LSS caused by VCF. (2) Consider this surgical alternative for elderly patients without a previous response to conservative medical treatment.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for a high cancer burden and a high number of deaths all over the world, although effective screening can make it preventable to a significant extent. Stool-based tests, such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, are gaining considerable popularity as non-invasive procedures that can be a replacement for colonoscopies for people at an average risk for colon cancer. Despite evidence from several randomized controlled trials supporting the use of these tests for colorectal cancer screening, their external validity in a real-world setting is influenced by many factors such as adherence, timely follow-up post testing, the healthcare cost burden, accessibility and the capacity of the health system. In this article, we have performed an extensive narrative literature review of research published between 2020 and 2025 comparing FIT and the mt-sDNA test with reference to diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, adherence and outcomes of implementation. We discuss the issues of sensitivity and specificity, look at post-test requirements for colonoscopy and check if there is any discrimination in healthcare. These findings suggest that FIT and mt-sDNA tests should not be considered competing technologies but rather complementary screening methods, with their overall effectiveness contingent upon appropriate patient selection and widespread system-level implementation. It is crucial to combine strategic test selection with a robust follow-up infrastructure to ensure that the entire population benefits from the CRC prevention program.

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are reshaping the therapeutic approach to advanced gastrointestinal cancers by integrating tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies with potent cytotoxic payloads to improve targeted tumor cell destruction while minimizing systemic exposure. Compared to traditional chemotherapy, trastuzumab deruxtecan has significantly improved objective response rates and overall survival in HER2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal junction tumors after trastuzumab-based therapy. This supports its role as an important second-line or later treatment option. The ongoing advancement of ADCs targeting CLDN18.2, TROP2, and CEACAM5 indicates that this therapeutic category will continue to expand across gastrointestinal neoplasms. Nonetheless, these advancements are accompanied by a specific and clinically significant toxicity profile. Hematologic suppression, gastrointestinal side effects, hepatotoxicity, and notably interstitial lung disease (ILD) are essential consequences that may need inpatient assessment and care. Interstitial lung disease (ILD), although uncommon, may be severe or lethal if not identified immediately and treated swiftly with medication cessation and corticosteroids. In hospitalized patients, distinguishing ADC-related toxicity from infection or disease progression is often difficult owing to overlapping clinical manifestations, requiring meticulous evaluation and interdisciplinary cooperation. As ADCs are integrated into earlier treatment lines and across a broader patient population, hospital systems must evolve to ensure prompt identification, consistent management protocols, and efficient collaboration between oncology and inpatient teams. This study analyzes the mechanisms, clinical effectiveness, and safety profile of ADCs in gastrointestinal oncology, pointing out the importance of institutional preparedness to safely incorporate these medicines into standard clinical practice. These features also align ADC therapy with personalized medicine by emphasizing biomarker-guided patient selection and individualized toxicity monitoring.