Citations

Introduction: patients exposed to chest, breast or mediastinal RT, may present with accelerated atherosclerosis and CAD due to diffuse micro and macrovascular fibrosis. However, CAD risk has not been well established in a community-based study. Aims: Describe CAD risk in patients treated with chemotherapy with and without RT and evaluate the cumulative incidence of CAD (coronary revascularization, MI and abnormal stress test and coronary angiogram). Methods: From 1985-2010, we identified 744 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer or lymphoma, using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) who received chemotherapy with or without RT. CAD risk was assessed by a proportional hazards model for time to event. RT was treated as a time dependent co-variable, with index date being chemotherapy start date, significance was considered as a p<.05. Characteristics were evaluated by a multivariable Cox model to consider RT and time censoring. Results: 744 patients treated with chemotherapy were identified, of these 488 (65.6%) had breast cancer, 256 (34.4%) lymphoma, and 367 (49%) also received RT. The mean total RT dose was 5.5 ± 1.2 (Gy) for those that had CAD and 5.4 (Gy) ± 1.1 for non-CAD patients, p=0.4. The cumulative incidence of CAD events (accounting for death as a competing risk) at 5 and 10 years of follow-up was 1.9% (CI 1.14-3.2) and 3.06% (CI 2.01-4.7), respectively p<.05 figure1. Baseline differences between those receiving RT or not, were not significant for DM and HTN; however, males and ages 70-79 were less likely to receive RT, table1. In a multivariable model, there was no difference in the CAD outcomes between those with and without RT, HR= 1.21 [0.48-3.06] p=.69, after adjusting for age, gender, DM, and HTN and those <49 y/o had a lower risk of CAD. Table2 Conclusion: In this REP retrospective cohort study, the risk of developing a CAD event was similar between chemotherapy plus RT and chemotherapy only regimens, even after considering gender, age, HTN and DM.

1535 Background: Ambulatory management of select patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) may substantially decrease patients’ burden of illness and improve their quality of life, and is recommended by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. However, in the United States, inpatient management remains the universal standard. We hereby report the health care utilization associated with the DEFeNDR remote patient monitoring (RPM) program, which leverages technology and virtual centralized nurse monitoring to facilitate ambulatory management of FN as an alternative to hospital-based care. Methods: Adult patients with cancer hospitalized with FN were assessed daily for eligibility to participate in the DEFeNDR program. Eligibility criteria included MASCC score >21 (per ASCO guidelines), and clinical judgment of the attending provider. Patients receiving cellular therapy (CAR-T, BMT) in the prior 100 days were excluded. Eligible patients agreeing to participate in the 30-day program were provided a kit containing cellular-enabled, pre-connected devices to facilitate monitoring, including twice-daily vital signs and electronic symptom questionnaires. Data were EHR-integrated in real-time and embedded decision trees facilitated alerts for adverse trends. RPM nurses responded to alerts and escalated care as indicated by pre-specified care pathways. Program assessment was performed at 20 weeks after full implementation. The primary outcome was the mean proportion of evaluable days spent inpatient (mPEDI) within 30 days of eligibility compared between those who participated in the program vs. those who declined. Results: 35 patients were offered participation in the DEFeNDR program. Of these, 17 participated and 18 declined. Baseline characteristics are provided. Participating patients experienced mPEDI of 6.9% (Standard Error [SE], 3.7%), compared with 17.7% (SE, 3.6%) for patients who declined participation. Due to small sample size, this difference (10.8%) did not reach statistical significance (Wilcoxon Rank Sums p-value, 0.15). 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. Mean inpatient days were also lower for patients participating in the program. Additionally, when readmitted, patients participating in RPM experienced a trend toward shorter length of stay and lower rates of intensive care unit utilization. Conclusions: A trend towards decreased burden of inpatient care is evident among patients participating in the DEFeNDR program. Further studies are warranted to assess comparative effectiveness of this model vs usual care.[Table: see text]

e13100 Background: Aurora-A mitotic kinase (AURKA) plays a pivotal role in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) progression through activation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)-mediated cancer cell plasticity. Cancer cells that undergo EMT acquire a CD44high/CD24low and/or ALDHhigh cancer stem-like phenotype (Cancer Stem Cells) characterized by high self-renewal capacity and intrinsic drug resistance. Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) also shows high PD-L1 expression that plays a critical role in inducing tumor immune escape through CD8+ T-cells exhaustion. For these reasons, molecular characterization of oncogenic pathways that promote stemness and intra-tumoral PD-L1 expression is essential to evaluate whether novel combinatorial therapeutic strategies aimed to inhibit cancer cell plasticity, immune evasion capacity and organ metastasis may impact cancer progression. Methods: (1) TNBC Models: MDA-MB 231 and variant MDA-MB 231/LM cells, and unique TNBC-M40 cells established from metastatic PDXs; (2) In Vitro Studies: TNBC cells were treated with the AURKA inhibitor alisertib (50nM). PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunoblotting assay. Apoptosis was measured by immunofluorescence using Cleaved-PARP antibodies. To assess stemness capacity, TNBC cells were cultured under non-adherent conditions to form mammospheres. ALDH activity (functional stemness marker) was measured using the Aldefluor Kit. (3) In Vivo Studies: 1x106 MDA-MB 231/LM cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of humanized NSG-CD34+ female mice. Animals were randomized into four groups (5 mice per group) and treated with anti-PD-L1 ICI atezolizumab (20 mg/Kg) and alisertib (25 mg/Kg) as monotherapy or in combination. Control groups were treated with saline solution placebo. PD-L1, CD44, Vimentin expression and tumor infiltration of CD8+ T-cells were assessed by immunofluorescence. Results: Treatment of MDA-MB 231/LM xenografts with alisertib decreased the levels of CD44 and PD-L1 expression and increased CD8+ T-cells tumor infiltration. Because PD-L1 genetic targeting enhanced in vitro alisertib-induced apoptosis, MDA-MB 231/LM xenografts were treated with alisertib and the anti-PD-L1 ICI atezolizumab. Combination of atezolizumab and alisertib resulted in the reduced expression of the EMT marker vimentin that was linked to lack of organ metastasis. Remarkably, combination of atezolizumab and alisertib also induced a significant reduction of ALDHHigh CSC in ex-vivo 3D-Organoids established from TNBC-M40 cells. Conclusions: This study provides innovative pre-clinical rationale for combining AURKA inhibitors with ICIs to impair cancer cell plasticity, immune evasion capacity and halt the progression of metastatic TNBCs that currently has limited effective therapeutic options.

AbstractRight heart (RH) structure and function are major determinants of symptoms and prognosis in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RH imaging provides detailed information, but evidence and guidelines on the use of RH imaging in treatment decisions are limited. We conducted a Delphi study to gather expert opinion on the role of RH imaging in decision‐making for treatment escalation in PAH. A panel of 17 physicians with expertise in PAH and RH imaging used three surveys in a modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the role of RH imaging in PAH. Survey 1 used open‐ended questions to gather information. Survey 2 contained Likert scale and other questions intended to identify consensus on topics identified in Survey 1. Survey 3 contained Likert scale questions derived from Survey 2 and summary information on the results of Survey 2. The Delphi panel reached consensus that RH imaging is likely to improve the current risk stratification algorithms and help differentiate risk levels in patients at intermediate risk. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, right ventricular fractional area change, right atrial area, tricuspid regurgitation, inferior venae cavae diameter, and pericardial effusion should be part of routine echocardiography in PAH. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is valuable but limited by cost and access. A pattern of abnormal RH imaging results should prompt consideration of hemodynamic evaluation and possible treatment escalation. RH imaging is an important tool for decisions about treatment escalation in PAH, but systematically collected evidence is needed to clarify its role.

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

Abstract Aims We sought to investigate the outcomes of heart transplant patients supported with Impella 5.5 temporary mechanical circulatory support. Methods and results Patient demographics, perioperative data, hospital timeline, and haemodynamic parameters were followed during initial admission, Impella support, and post-transplant period. Vasoactive-inotropic score, primary graft failure, and complications were recorded. Between March 2020 and March 2021, 16 advanced heart failure patients underwent Impella 5.5 temporary left ventricular assist device support through axillary approach. Subsequently, all these patients had heart transplantation. All patients were either ambulatory or chair bound during their temporary mechanical circulatory support until heart transplantation. Patients were kept on Impella support median of 19 days (3–31) with the median lactate dehydrogenase level of 220 (149–430). All Impella devices were removed during heart transplantation. During Impella support, patients had improved renal function with median creatinine serum level of 1.55 mg/dL decreased to 1.25 (P = 0.007), pulmonary artery pulsatility index scores increased from 2.56 (0.86–10) to 4.2 (1.3–10) (P = 0.048), and right ventricular function improved (P = 0.003). Patients maintained improved renal function and favourable haemodynamics after their heart transplantation as well. All patients survived without any significant morbidity after their heart transplantation. Conclusions Impella 5.5 temporary left ventricular assist device optimizes care of heart transplant recipients providing superior haemodynamic support, mobility, improved renal function, pulmonary haemodynamics, and right ventricular function. Utilizing Impella 5.5 as a direct bridging strategy to heart transplantation resulted in excellent outcomes.

Abstract Purpose: Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. Methods: Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p=0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p<0.001). Conclusion: Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.

ImportanceAurora A kinase (AURKA) activation, related in part to AURKA amplification and variants, is associated with downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER) α expression, endocrine resistance, and implicated in cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, upregulates ERα and restores endocrine sensitivity in preclinical metastatic breast cancer (MBC) models. The safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib was demonstrated in early-phase trials; however, its activity in CDK 4/6i–resistant MBC is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the effect of adding fulvestrant to alisertib on objective tumor response rates (ORRs) in endocrine-resistant MBC.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted through the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, which enrolled participants from July 2017 to November 2019. Postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)–negative MBC who were previously treated with fulvestrant were eligible. Stratification factors included prior treatment with CDK 4/6i, baseline metastatic tumor ERα level measurement (&amp;lt;10%, ≥10%), and primary or secondary endocrine resistance. Among 114 preregistered patients, 96 (84.2%) registered and 91 (79.8%) were evaluable for the primary end point. Data analysis began after January 10, 2022.InterventionsAlisertib, 50 mg, oral, daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17 of a 28-day cycle (arm 1) or alisertib same dose/schedule with standard-dose fulvestrant (arm 2).Main Outcomes and MeasuresImprovement in ORR in arm 2 of at least 20% greater than arm 1 when the expected ORR for arm 1 was 20%.ResultsAll 91 evaluable patients (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [11.3] years; 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native [1.1%], 2 Asian [2.2%], 6 Black/African American [6.6%], 5 Hispanic [5.5%], and 79 [86.8%] White individuals; arm 1, 46 [50.5%]; arm 2, 45 [49.5%]) had received prior treatment with CDK 4/6i. The ORR was 19.6%; (90% CI, 10.6%-31.7%) for arm 1 and 20.0% (90% CI, 10.9%-32.3%) for arm 2. In arm 1, the 24-week clinical benefit rate and median progression-free survival time were 41.3% (90% CI, 29.0%-54.5%) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-10.0), respectively, and in arm 2 they were 28.9% (90% CI, 18.0%-42.0%) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8), respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events attributed to alisertib were neutropenia (41.8%) and anemia (13.2%). Reasons for discontinuing treatment were disease progression (arm 1, 38 [82.6%]; arm 2, 31 [68.9%]) and toxic effects or refusal (arm 1, 5 [10.9%]; arm 2, 12 [26.7%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that adding fulvestrant to treatment with alisertib did not increase ORR or PFS; however, promising clinical activity was observed with alisertib monotherapy among patients with endocrine-resistant and CDK 4/6i–resistant MBC. The overall safety profile was tolerable.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02860000

Abstract Background: Two poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are currently FDA-approved for the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). This study explores the clinical outcomes of MBC patients treated with a PARPi. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included MBC patients treated with a PARPi between January 2017 and February 2022 at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, and Mayo Clinic Health Systems). We used the Kaplan Meier method to estimate the time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and the log-rank test to compare different subsets. In addition, predictors of TTF were identified in a multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression model, including age at PARPi initiation, race, ethnicity, histology, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression of the tumor, the number of prior therapies, type of PARPi, and PV carrier status (germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 vs. somatic BRCA1/2 vs. other). Results: Sixty-five patients treated with PARPi (olaparib: 51; talazoparib: 14) were included in the final analysis. Fifty-five patients were carriers of germline PVs in BRCA1 (n=24, 37%), BRCA2 (n=27, 42%) or PALB2 (n=4, 6%), whereas ten patients (15%) had no germline PVs but the tumor had a somatic mutation in the homologous recombination-related (HRR) genes (7 in BRCA1/2, 2 in ATM, and 1 in CDKN2A and CDH1). At the data cutoff, 48 (74%) patients had discontinued PARPi due to progression or death. Fifteen (23%) patients required a dose reduction due to side effects. Occurrence of grade ≥ 3 side effects: anemia in 8, fatigue in 4, neutropenia in 2, and thrombocytopenia in 2 patients. Eight (15.7%) patients in the olaparib group and seven (50%) patients in the talazoparib group required a dose reduction for side effects. No patient on olaparib required drug discontinuation due to side effects, whereas two patients on talazoparib were switched to olaparib due to cytopenias and could tolerate olaparib. Median TTF in the overall population was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4 – 9.6), and there was no difference (p=0.64) in TTF between the olaparib and talazoparib groups. Median TTF in the germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PV carriers were 7, 8, and 11 months, respectively (p=0.57). Among patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, the median TTF was 4 months. Numerically, patients with HER2-positive tumors (n=8) had a shorter TTF compared to HER2-negative tumors (Median TTF: 4 vs. 8 months, p=0.098). No significant difference in TTF was observed by ER or PR status of the tumor, age at initiation of PARPi, the number of prior therapies, and prior use of platinum-based chemotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitors. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.0, 95% CI: 2.2 – 29.4, p=0.002), somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (HR: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.2 – 50.0, p=0.03) and somatic mutations in other HRR genes (HR: 19.1, 95% CI: 3.1 – 118.6, p=0.002) were associated with worse TTF. Conclusions: In the real world, PARPi were well-tolerated with promising time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) benefits comparable to data from clinical trials. Notably, relatively shorter TTF was observed in patients with somatic BRCA1/2 and other HRR gene mutations and HER2-positive MBC. These findings improve our understanding of the role of PARPi in MBC and will help to guide treatment decisions with PARPi in the clinical setting. Citation Format: Nusrat Jahan, Jodi Taraba, Karthik V. Giridhar, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Amye J. Tevaarwerk, Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy J. Hobday, Kathryn Ruddy, Lida A. Mina, Pooja Advani, Felipe Batalini, Matthew P. Goetz, Tufia C. Haddad, Fergus J. Couch, Siddhartha Yadav. Clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): the Mayo Clinic experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-22.