Toro-Manotas, Rafael

Recent data suggest that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors have cardioprotective benefits. This effect may extend towards cardioprotection in cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, with proposed mechanisms extending beyond glycemic control to include anti-inflammatory effects, oxidative stress reduction, and metabolic reprogramming. This review synthesizes potential mechanisms, observational data, and emerging trial evidence to support sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as a primary prevention strategy for cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, particularly in anthracycline-exposed populations.

Introduction: Multiple Valvular Heart Disease (VHD), defined as at least moderate stenotic or regurgitant lesions in ≥2 valves, mixed VHD as combination of lesions in the same valve and mitral annular calcification (MAC) are common conditions. Association between multiple-mixed VHD (MMVHD), MAC and MACE in patients exposed to Radiation Therapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT) who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) has not been studied. Aim: Assess the presence of MMVHD and MAC in cancer patients with prior RT and/or CT and their correlation with MACE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure) after TAVR. Methods: 544 patients were included and divided into 3 groups: 187 with prior chest RT and CT (RT/CT), 155 CT only, and 202 without CT/RT as controls (Table 1). Data was obtained from the pre-procedure echocardiogram and quantified in a 1-6 scale (none, mild, mild/moderate, moderate, moderate/severe and severe). Fisher’s exact test or chi-square were used to compare categorical. Multiple VHD-MACE correlation was evaluated through multivariable Cox analysis using a proportional hazards model. Results: The prevalence of Multiple VHD was 37.4% in RT/CT, 23.2% in CT, and 13.9% in controls p<0.001(Figure 1). The RT/CT group had a significantly higher prevalence of severe MAC. Multiple VHD predicted MACE at 18 months after TAVR in RT/CT (HR 3.42, CI 1.93-6.08, p<0.001) and in CT (HR 2.55, CI 1.39-4.66, p=0.002) (Table 2). In RT/CT, severe MAC also predicted MACE (HR 3.68, CI 2.13-6.37, p<0.001), while it was not a predictor in the other groups. Stenotic or regurgitant VHD was more prevalent in the RT/CT group (Figure 2). Conclusions: Multiple VHD was found higher in RT/CT and predicted MACE at 18 months post-TAVR, including CT only patients. Severe MAC was also a strong predictor of the outcome in RT/CT patients. Pre-TAVR evaluation of MMVHD lesions is crucial for optimal patient management.

Introduction: Assessing baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is crucial for identifying cancer patients at higher risk of cardiotoxicity (CT). While both CT specific scores, including Heart Failure Association-International Cardio Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) and our institutional score, as well as general CV scores like Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), have been used to assess CT risk; in lymphoma patients undergoing anthracycline therapy, their utility remains unknown. Aim: Evaluate the performance of each risk score to predict CT in a cohort of newly diagnosed lymphoma patients undergoing anthracycline treatment, followed for a median of 5.4 years. Methods: 326 Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated and followed from 2013 to 2021 were prospectively assessed. Baseline measurements of the three risk scores were obtained. ASCVD score was not assessed in patients >80 or <40 years old or without baseline cholesterol. CT was defined during or after one year of chemotherapy as severe, moderate, or mild according to 2022 ESC guidelines. Logistic regression and AUC were used to assess the association of each score and compare the models. Results: Among 326 patients, 78 developed CT (8 severe, 21 moderate, 49 mild). A high-risk score from HFA-ICOS was significantly associated with severe and moderate CT(OR: 6.1, p=0.001), sensitivity 37%, and specificity 88%. A very high-risk classification of the institutional score was associated with severe and moderate CT (OR: 8.4, p=0.006), sensitivity 44%, and specificity 81%. No association was found between the ASCVD score stratification and CT. When mild CT was included in the analysis, the AUC values were lower (see Table 1). Conclusions: Cardio-oncology risk scores were associated with severe and moderate CT, outperforming ASCVD, but their predictive capacity was weak. Incorporating other serum or imaging biomarkers into the models may improve the predictive accuracy of CT risk assessment.

Background: CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is a novel cancer treatment for B-cell malignancies. Systemic inflammation due to Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) can occur. Elevated levels of cytokines have been linked to valve damage. Hypothesis: Evaluate changes in valve morphology or progression of valvular heart disease in adult patients after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and by clinical CRS grade. Methods: Patients that underwent CD19 CAR T-cell therapy with both a baseline and a post-treatment transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were included. Patient characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. CRS was categorized as CRS<2 and CRS ≥2 for all patients using the ASTCT 2019 criteria. Valve thickening was graded as a dichotomous variable. Valve disease (regurgitation or stenosis) was ranked on a 1-to-6-point numeric scale (none, mild, mild-moderate, moderate, moderate-severe, severe) and grade point value difference was calculated. Variables were compared by Chi Squared and Student’s t tests. Results: 114 patients were included with a median TTE follow-up of 44 days, 54% developed CRS ≥2 (Table 1a). Overall, no statistically significant changes in valve morphology and valve disease progression were observed in the cohort (Figure 1a, 1b). Among CRS groups, valve morphology changes and valve disease progression were similarly distributed (21% in CRS <2 vs 19% in CRS ≥2, p=0.623 and 28% in CRS <2 vs 24% in CRS ≥2, p=0.62 respectively) (Fig. 1a). In the cases that progression was observed, it was mostly mild, and regurgitation was the most common pattern (Fig. 1c). Conclusions: This is the first study to evaluate the incidence of cardiac valve disease progression or thickening in patients treated with CD19 CAR T therapies. We can conclude that no progression of valve disease or changes in valve morphology were observed in its entirety or by CRS groups. Longer follow up is needed to validate these findings.

Introduction: Exercise Stress Echocardiography (ESE) is recommended as a screening tool for the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in patients with suspected Radiation-Induced Heart Disease (RIHD). Up to now, studies have only evaluated its association with the extent of CAD. Hypothesis Cancer survivors treated with chest Radiotherapy (RT) that undergo an ESE and have a +ESE develop more MACE than those who have -ESE. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study was conducted. Patients who had chest RT and underwent ESE with Treadmill Bruce Stress Protocol, from 2000 to 2012, at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health System were included. A univariate analysis was performed to characterize the population. An analysis including Kruskal Wallis and Pearson Chi-Squared tests was completed to identify variables associated with + SE (Table 1). Multivariable Cox Model for MACE was conducted and is shown in Table 2. A time-to-event curve using Kaplan-Meier estimates is shown in Figure 1. Results: We identified 113 patients, with a mean age of 67 years and a median follow-up of 15.1 years. Of those, 99% were female, 98% were breast cancer survivors, 59% had HTN, 14% DM, 11% AFib, 2% COPD, and 12% had a history of MI. All the patients received >3000cGy of Photon RT, and 57% were treated with systemic cancer therapies. A +ESE was seen in 20.3% of the patients with no significant difference in METS achieved compared with patients who had a -ESE. COPD, RT dose, and systemic therapies, specifically doxorubicin, were associated with a +ESE. The cumulative incidence of MACE was higher in the group of +ESE (p=0.029). After adjustment for HTN, DM, smoking history, hyperlipidemia, and prior MI, the HR for MACE associated with a +ESE was 1.97 (1.09-3.59). Conclusion: MACE was more frequent in patients with a +ESE who received chest RT and doxorubicin versus -ESE. These results support the usefulness of ESE in cancer survivors after RT as a cardiovascular screening tool.

Introduction: patients exposed to chest, breast or mediastinal RT, may present with accelerated atherosclerosis and CAD due to diffuse micro and macrovascular fibrosis. However, CAD risk has not been well established in a community-based study. Aims: Describe CAD risk in patients treated with chemotherapy with and without RT and evaluate the cumulative incidence of CAD (coronary revascularization, MI and abnormal stress test and coronary angiogram). Methods: From 1985-2010, we identified 744 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer or lymphoma, using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) who received chemotherapy with or without RT. CAD risk was assessed by a proportional hazards model for time to event. RT was treated as a time dependent co-variable, with index date being chemotherapy start date, significance was considered as a p<.05. Characteristics were evaluated by a multivariable Cox model to consider RT and time censoring. Results: 744 patients treated with chemotherapy were identified, of these 488 (65.6%) had breast cancer, 256 (34.4%) lymphoma, and 367 (49%) also received RT. The mean total RT dose was 5.5 ± 1.2 (Gy) for those that had CAD and 5.4 (Gy) ± 1.1 for non-CAD patients, p=0.4. The cumulative incidence of CAD events (accounting for death as a competing risk) at 5 and 10 years of follow-up was 1.9% (CI 1.14-3.2) and 3.06% (CI 2.01-4.7), respectively p<.05 figure1. Baseline differences between those receiving RT or not, were not significant for DM and HTN; however, males and ages 70-79 were less likely to receive RT, table1. In a multivariable model, there was no difference in the CAD outcomes between those with and without RT, HR= 1.21 [0.48-3.06] p=.69, after adjusting for age, gender, DM, and HTN and those <49 y/o had a lower risk of CAD. Table2 Conclusion: In this REP retrospective cohort study, the risk of developing a CAD event was similar between chemotherapy plus RT and chemotherapy only regimens, even after considering gender, age, HTN and DM.