Vallejo, Bryan

Introduction: Exercise Stress Echocardiography (ESE) is recommended as a screening tool for the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in patients with suspected Radiation-Induced Heart Disease (RIHD). Up to now, studies have only evaluated its association with the extent of CAD. Hypothesis Cancer survivors treated with chest Radiotherapy (RT) that undergo an ESE and have a +ESE develop more MACE than those who have -ESE. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, cohort study was conducted. Patients who had chest RT and underwent ESE with Treadmill Bruce Stress Protocol, from 2000 to 2012, at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health System were included. A univariate analysis was performed to characterize the population. An analysis including Kruskal Wallis and Pearson Chi-Squared tests was completed to identify variables associated with + SE (Table 1). Multivariable Cox Model for MACE was conducted and is shown in Table 2. A time-to-event curve using Kaplan-Meier estimates is shown in Figure 1. Results: We identified 113 patients, with a mean age of 67 years and a median follow-up of 15.1 years. Of those, 99% were female, 98% were breast cancer survivors, 59% had HTN, 14% DM, 11% AFib, 2% COPD, and 12% had a history of MI. All the patients received >3000cGy of Photon RT, and 57% were treated with systemic cancer therapies. A +ESE was seen in 20.3% of the patients with no significant difference in METS achieved compared with patients who had a -ESE. COPD, RT dose, and systemic therapies, specifically doxorubicin, were associated with a +ESE. The cumulative incidence of MACE was higher in the group of +ESE (p=0.029). After adjustment for HTN, DM, smoking history, hyperlipidemia, and prior MI, the HR for MACE associated with a +ESE was 1.97 (1.09-3.59). Conclusion: MACE was more frequent in patients with a +ESE who received chest RT and doxorubicin versus -ESE. These results support the usefulness of ESE in cancer survivors after RT as a cardiovascular screening tool.

Abstract Background Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has shown to be a good tool to foresee early myocardial dysfunction in lymphoma patients who receive anthracycline based chemotherapy. Conventional STE such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a good predictor of cardiotoxicity in these patients, however, a more in-depth characterization of conventional and comprehensive STE parameters to predict a hard end-point as chemotherapeutic related heart failure (HF) has not been evaluated. Purpose The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate predictability of cancer therapeutic-related clinical HF by conventional and comprehensive STE. Methods We enrolled 269 Hodgkin & non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who underwent chemotherapy at Mayo Clinic from 2013 through 2021. All patients had an echocardiogram performed at baseline (T0), during chemotherapy (T1) and after (T2). HF was diagnosed by a cardiologist and defined as the first occurrence after the initiation of chemotherapy. Conventional (GLS) and comprehensive strain analyses that included: global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), global longitudinal early diastolic strain rate (GLSRe), global longitudinal systolic strain rate (GLSRs), global circumferential early diastolic strain rate (GCSRe), global circumferential systolic strain rate (GCSRs), global radial early diastolic strain rate (GRSRe), and global radial systolic strain rate (GRSRs), were performed offline. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of 2D and 3D STE measurements with the development of clinical HF. Results Overall, 215 (79.9%) patients had non-Hodgkin lymphoma while 54 (20.1%) had Hodgkin lymphoma. Mean age was 58.4±16.1 years and 64.7% of the patients were males. The most prevalent comorbidities were hypertension (101/37.5%), dyslipidemia (87/32.3%) and diabetes (28/10.4%). HF occurred in 21 (7.8%) patients, including 9 (3.3%) during chemotherapy and 12 (4.5%) after chemotherapy. The best predictors of HF were: i) GLSRe and GCSRs performed at baseline (T0) to predict HF at T1 with an AUC of 0.85 each and p values of 0.0006 and 0.0005 respectively (Table 1); ii) GCSRs and GCS at baseline (T0) to predict HF at T1 or T2 with AUCs of 0.82 (p, <0.0001) and 0.81 (p, 0.0004), respectively. Basic strain (GLS) was able to predict HF when measured at T0 but not when measured at T1. All the AUCs for GLS were below 0.75 (Figure 1). Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first study to evaluate the use of conventional and comprehensive STE to predict a hard end-point as heart failure in patients with lymphoma who received anthracyclines. Comprehensive STE measurements as GLSRs, GLSRe, GCS, GCSRs and GCSRe are better than GLS to predict HF in patients with lymphoma who received anthracycline based chemotherapy. These findings can be crucial for the management of these patients by guiding when to start cardioprotection and/or avoid interruptions of cancer treatment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of cardiovascular diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Abstract Background Assessing cardiac performance of patients receiving chemotherapy is a cornerstone for adequate cardiovascular care. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) has been considered as a surrogate for Ejection Fraction (EF). However, little is known about its role in predicting Cardiotoxicity or Heart Failure in Lymphoma patients, as its relationship with Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and EF. Purpose Our aims were: i) to evaluate if MAPSE and GLS can predict the development of CT and/or HF in lymphoma patients treated with anthracyclines and ii) to evaluate its correlation with GLS and EF. Methods For this prospective observational study, 325 Hodgkin (HL) & non-Hodgkin (NHL) lymphoma patients (n=325) treated with anthracyclines were recruited from 2013 to 2021 and followed for 1 year. MAPSE by M-mode and GLS by Speckle-Tracking (ST) were measured at baseline (T0), during treatment (T1), and up to 1 year after chemotherapy completion (T2). CT was defined as a decrease in EF by >10% to a value <50% and HF by a cardiologist as the first occurrence after the initiation of anthracyclines. Logistic regression analyses with Receiving operator characteristics (ROC) and Area under the curve (AUC) were performed. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also calculated. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Two hundred sixty-four patients (81.2%) had NHL and 61 (18.8%) HL. Of these, fifteen (4.6%) and 21 individuals (6.4%) developed CT at T1 and T2, respectively. Nine subjects (2.8%) developed HF at T1 and 14 (4.3%) at T2. MAPSE at T0 had the highest AUC to predict both HF at T1 (AUC=0.865, cut-off 14.9, sensitivity 100%, specificity 63%, p=0.008) and at T2 (AUC=0.757, cut-off 10.9, sensitivity 67%, specificity 93%, p=0.045). This same variable at T1 predicted HF at T2 with an AUC of 0.752 (cut-off 11.4, sensitivity 67%, specificity 94%, p=0.004). For CT prediction at T2, MAPSE at T1 had an AUC of 0.738 (cut-off 12.5, sensitivity 56%, specificity 85%, p<0.0001). GLS at T0 predicted CT at T1 (AUC=0.657, cut-off −19, sensitivity 67%, specificity 63%, p=0.012) and when obtained at T1, it predicted CT at T2 (AUC=0.776, cut-off −17, sensitivity 74%, specificity 75%, p-value <0.0001) (Table 1). Pearson's correlation between MAPSE and GLS at T0 (coefficient −0.25, p=0.023) at T1 (coefficient −0.38, p<0.0001) at T2 (coefficient −0.037, p<0.0001) and MAPSE with EF at T0 (coefficient 0.33, p=0.0002) at T1 (coefficient 0.28, p<0.0001) and T2 (coefficient 0.29, p<0.001). Conclusions To our best knowledge, this is the first time that MAPSE and GLS were compared to predict CT and HF in lymphoma patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy; we have demonstrated that MAPSE measured at T0 was a very good predictor of HF at T1. Either MAPSE or GLS assessment at T0 and T1 were able to predict CT or HF. Future studies could explore the combination of these two variables to predict either CT or HF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Cardiovascular Medicine. Mayo Clinic, Rochester-MN