Citations

Background: Pancreatitis significantly alters the microbial composition of the oral and intestinal compartments, causing dysbiosis that may contribute to disease mechanisms and potentially serve as a basis for diagnosis or treatment. Objective: To determine whether the oral or gut microbial signature can classify chronic pancreatitis (CP). Methods: Stool samples (n=707) were collected from participants in the Prospective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for Epidemiologic and Translational Studies (PROCEED). Samples were distributed among 200 healthy (HC), 310 CP, 49 acute pancreatitis (AP), and 148 recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). In addition, saliva samples were collected for a subset of participants (n=156). Whole genome sequencing was performed to assess microbiome composition. Machine learning algorithms were utilized to identify a signature with microbial features predictive of CP. Results: Gut alpha diversity was significantly decreased in AP, RAP, and CP compared with HC, with CP exhibiting the lowest diversity. In contrast, oral microbial diversity showed no significant variation across groups. Beta diversity analysis revealed distinct gut microbiome compositions between HC and pancreatitis subtypes, with CP showing the most pronounced differences. Random forest models using gut microbial species demonstrated robust predictive performance for CP using a minimum of 10 species (Area under the curve—AUC: 0.834; accuracy: 0.774). Despite similarities in gut microbiome composition across pancreatitis subtypes, a unique gut microbial signature for CP was identified highlighting the microbiome’s potential in CP diagnosis. Conclusion: Our study reveals a gut microbial signature predictive of CP using machine learning models in a large US multi-institutional cohort.

ABSTRACT The epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) is challenging to define due to inconsistent reporting, complex diagnostic procedures, and evolving diagnostic criteria. Using the National MDS Natural History Study—a prospective cohort with centrally adjudicated histopathology and genetic variant review—we characterized the landscape of MDS across the United States and identified differences across demographics. Among 2115 participants, 64% (1346) had an MDS spectrum condition, including MDS (24%), MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (5%) and precursor conditions—clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (22%) and idiopathic cytopenia/dysplasia of undetermined significance (13%). The median age was 74 years, and participants were predominantly male (66%), White (91%), and Non‐Hispanic (92%). Myeloid‐associated variants were detected in 68% of participants, most commonly in TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1, SF3B1, and SRSF2 . Black, compared to White, participants were younger at diagnosis (69 vs. 74 years, p = 0.01), had equal or increased prevalence of higher‐risk MDS, lower hemoglobin, and higher peripheral blood blasts, yet were less likely to receive MDS‐directed therapy (14% vs. 42%, p = 0.008). Black and Hispanic participants had fewer detectable gene mutations than White participants. Females had lower variant allele frequencies and fewer RNA splicing gene mutations than males. After multivariable adjustment, TP53 mutations, MDS diagnosis, and higher‐risk disease were associated with worse progression‐free and overall survival; age was also associated with overall survival. Black race trended toward improved progression‐free survival. These findings highlight the need for enhanced understanding of MDS pathogenesis across patient groups and refined prognostic tools to improve personalized management of MDS spectrum conditions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02775383

Abstract Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Out-of-specification (OOS) CAR T cells not meeting criteria for commercial release are considered an investigational product; the expanded access protocol (EAP) allows release of OOS product for administration. The manufacturing analysis of capability, reliability, and timely delivery of ide-cel in the United States over >3 years since its approval included patients with RRMM who underwent leukapheresis for ide-cel treatment after ≥2 prior lines of therapy between 23 February 2021 and 1 November 2024. Additionally, the BB2121-EAP-001 study evaluated safety and efficacy of OOS ide-cel and included patients who had undergone leukapheresis for commercial ide-cel treatment not meeting commercial release specifications, most commonly due to high CD137 activation or low-infused dose. Primary end point was safety. Secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). At data cutoff (1 November 2024), the manufacturing success rate of ide-cel improved from 95.3% in 2021 to 96.8% in 2024. Turnaround time also improved from 31 days in 2021 to 24 days in 2024. In BB2121-EAP-001, 68 (72.3%) patients experienced ≥1 cytokine release syndrome event (mostly grade 1/2) and 15 (16.0%) had neurological toxicities (2 grade 3, 13 grade 1/2). ORR was 75.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.1-85.2), and CRR was 35.4% (95% CI, 23.9-48.2). The manufacturing success of ide-cel is reliable and consistently high, and when OOS ide-cel products emerged, they demonstrated consistent clinical efficacy and safety. The BB2121-EAP-001 study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04771078.

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.

Context.— The Goldman criteria are widely used to categorize diagnostic discrepancies in autopsy reports for hospital quality assurance. Despite their adoption, little is known about how consistently they are applied across institutions. Objective.— To evaluate the interrater reliability among academic pathologists applying the Goldman criteria to classify missed diagnoses in autopsy cases. Design.— Thirty autopsy cases from 2 academic hospitals were reviewed by 5 experienced autopsy pathologists. Each reviewer independently assigned Goldman classification scores (class I–IV) to missed diagnoses based on the original 1983 definitions. Consensus was defined as at least 60% agreement (≥3 of 5 raters). Fleiss κ and Gwet AC1 were calculated to assess interrater reliability. Results.— A total of 196 missed diagnoses were identified by at least 1 rater. Only 26% (51 of 196) achieved a consensus Goldman classification, and just 4% (8 of 196) had unanimous classification agreement. Most diagnoses (65%; 127 of 196) were not identified by at least 3 raters. Among consensus classification ratings, 49% (25 of 51) were class IV. Fleiss κ was 0.176 (slight agreement) while Gwet AC1 was 0.390 (fair agreement). Collapsing major (classes I–II) and minor (classes III–IV) categories modestly improved agreement. Conclusions.— Interrater agreement in applying the Goldman criteria is only fair to moderate, suggesting significant subjectivity in their application. As the criteria are used for institutional comparison and quality metrics, efforts to standardize definitions and provide reviewer training are warranted to improve reproducibility and utility.