Citations

BACKGROUND: Anemia is common in critically ill patients and may be exacerbated through phlebotomy-associated iatrogenic blood loss. Differences in phlebotomy practice across patient demographic characteristics, clinical features, and practice environments are unclear. This investigation provides a comprehensive description of contemporary phlebotomy practices for critically ill adults. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study of adults ≥18 years of age requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, at a large academic medical center. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize all phlebotomy episodes throughout hospitalization, with each phlebotomy episode defined by unique peripheral venous, central venous, or arterial accesses for laboratory draws, exclusive of finger sticks. Secondarily, financial costs of phlebotomy and the relationships between phlebotomy practices, hemoglobin concentrations, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 6194 patients were included: 59% were men with a median (interquartile range) age of 66 (54–76) years and median ICU and hospital durations of 2.1 (1.4–3.9) and 7.1 (4.3–11.8) days, respectively. The median number of unique laboratory draws was 41 (18–88) throughout hospitalization, with a median volume of 232 (121–442) mL, corresponding to 5.2 (2.6–8.8) draws and 29 (19–43) mL per day. Waste (ie, discard) volume was responsible for 10.8% of total phlebotomy volume. Surgical patients had a higher number of phlebotomy episodes and greater total phlebotomy volumes compared to nonsurgical patients. Phlebotomy practices differed across ICU types, with the greatest frequency of laboratory draws in the cardiac surgical ICU and the greatest daily phlebotomy volume in the medical ICU. Across hospitalization, ICU environments had the greatest frequency and volumes of laboratory draws, with the least intensive phlebotomy practice observed in the general hospital wards. Patients in the highest quartile of cumulative blood drawn experienced the longest hospitalizations, lowest nadir hemoglobin concentrations, and greatest RBC transfusion utilization. Differences in phlebotomy practice were limited across patient age, gender, and race. Hemoglobin concentrations declined during hospitalization, congruent with intensity of phlebotomy practice. Each 100 mL of phlebotomy volume during hospitalization was associated with a 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–1.17; P < .001) multiplicative increase in RBC units transfused in adjusted analyses. Estimated annual phlebotomy costs exceeded $15 million (approximately $2500 per patient admission). CONCLUSIONS: Phlebotomy continues to be a major source of blood loss in hospitalized patients with critical illness, and more intensive phlebotomy practices are associated with lower hemoglobin concentrations and greater transfusion utilization.

This case involves a patient with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and massive pulmonary embolism requiring mechanical ventilation. His clinical course was complicated by delirium likely triggered by his critical illness and failed initial extubation, isolation from family, and escalating fear and desperation. In hopeful preparation for subsequent successful extubation, a unique approach was taken to decrease the risk of panic, delirium, and decompensation leading to reintubation. As a means of orienting him to his treatment pathway and to provide encouragement for continued recovery, an impromptu patient-directed checklist was constructed. The recovery checklist, written in simplified language, outlined the stages of severe illness that the patient had overcome after his emergent intubation. The list also outlined the tasks he needed to complete prior to hospital discharge. Unexpectedly, the checklist received a great deal of engagement from both the patient and medical team and played an important role in this patient’s successful recovery and rehabilitation.

Background The intensive care unit environment exposes patients to stressful conditions contributing to distressing symptoms. Discomfort is an infrequently and inconsistently described symptom experienced by intensive care unit patients. Objective To complete a narrative literature review to summarize the currently available literature on discomfort assessment in critical care practice and identify knowledge gaps to direct future intervention research. Methods A review of the currently available literature was guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. No parameters were set for publication years or specific study designs. Inclusion criteria were patients aged at least 18 years, description of patient reports of discomfort in the intensive care unit, and English language. Results This narrative review includes 10 studies that used 4 distinct self-reported, discomfort-related symptom assessment instruments. Two studies assessed overall discomfort. Only 1 assessment instrument, Inconforts des Patients de Reanimation, is validated for use in the intensive care unit. Conclusion The reviewed literature highlights the current gap in discomfort symptom assessment during the intensive care unit stay. An assessment instrument specific for intensive care unit–related discomfort, such as the Inconforts des Patients de Reanimation, would allow for prompt recognition and mitigation of intensive care unit–related patient discomfort.

AbstractBackgroundInfection remains a major complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Implantable devices that avoid transvenous leads, such as the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (S‐ICD), can reduce the risk of serious infection‐related complications, such as bloodstream infection and infective endocarditis. While the 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines include recommendations for S‐ICD use for patients at high risk of infection, currently, there are no clinical trial data that address best practices for the prevention of S‐ICD infections. Therefore, an expert panel was convened to develop a consensus on these topics.MethodsAn expert process mapping methodology was used to achieve consensus on the appropriate steps to minimize or prevent S‐ICD infections. Two face‐to‐face meetings of high‐volume S‐ICD implanters and an infectious diseases specialist, with expertise in cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections, were conducted to develop consensus on useful strategies pre‐, peri‐, and postimplant to reduce S‐ICD infection risk.ResultsExpert panel consensus on recommended steps for patient preparation, S‐ICD implantation, and postoperative management was developed to provide guidance in individual patient management.ConclusionAchieving expert panel consensus by process mapping methodology for S‐ICD infection prevention was attainable, and the results should be helpful to clinicians in adopting interventions to minimize risks of S‐ICD infection.

Abstract Background: Delirium is a highly prevalent and morbid syndrome in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Music is a promising non-pharmacological intervention with beneficial effects on anxiety and stress, while its effects on delirium duration and severity are not well understood.Methods/design: Our study is a two-arm, randomized parallel-group, clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of music intervention compared to a silence-track attention control on delirium/coma duration in mechanically ventilated critically ill older adults. One-hundred-sixty mechanically ventilated adults 50 years of age or older will be randomized to one of two arms within 72 hours of ICU admission: (1) one-hour music listening sessions twice daily through noise-cancelling headphones, or (2) one-hour sessions of a silence track twice daily through noise-cancelling headphones. Our primary aim is to compare delirium/coma free days after randomization during the 7-day study intervention phase using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM ICU) and the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) for delirium and coma. Secondary outcomes include pain and anxiety evaluated twice daily during the intervention phase and throughout the duration of ICU stay using the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Visual Analogue Scale-Anxiety (VAS-A). Enrolled participants will be followed after hospital discharge to further measure cognition as well as screening for depression and anxiety using the following telephone-based instruments: Indiana University Telephone-Based Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (IU TBANS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7).Discussion: This randomized clinical trial will measure the efficacy of a music listening intervention for delirium and coma duration early in the intensive care unit among older adults.Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04182334

Abstract Rationale Cardiovascular instability/collapse is a common peri-intubation event in patients who are critically ill. Objectives To identify potentially modifiable variables associated with peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse (i.e., systolic arterial pressure &lt;65 mm Hg [once] or &lt;90 mm Hg for &gt;30 minutes; new/increased vasopressor requirement; fluid bolus &gt;15 ml/kg, or cardiac arrest). Methods INTUBE (International Observational Study to Understand the Impact and Best Practices of Airway Management In Critically Ill Patients) was a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients who were critically ill and undergoing tracheal intubation in a convenience sample of 197 sites from 29 countries across five continents from October 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019. Measurements and Main Results A total of 2,760 patients were included in this analysis. Peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse occurred in 1,199 out of 2,760 patients (43.4%). Variables associated with this event were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.03), higher heart rate (OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.004–1.012), lower systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.98–0.99), lower oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/Fi O2 before induction (OR, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.997–0.999), and the use of propofol as an induction agent (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.57). Patients with peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse were at a higher risk of ICU mortality with an adjusted OR of 2.47 (95% CI, 1.72–3.55), P &lt; 0.001. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method identified the use of propofol as the only factor independently associated with cardiovascular instability/collapse (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.49). When administered before induction, vasopressors (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.84–2.11) or fluid boluses (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.96–1.44) did not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular instability/collapse. Conclusions Peri-intubation cardiovascular instability/collapse was associated with an increased risk of both ICU and 28-day mortality. The use of propofol for induction was identified as a modifiable intervention significantly associated with cardiovascular instability/collapse. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03616054).

Abstract ObjectivePrevious studies suggested that hypernatremia or hyperosmolarity may have protective effects in lung injury. We hypothesized that hypernatremia and/or hyperosmolarity would prevent ARDS in those at risk of lung injury and associated with favorable outcomes in ARDS patients.SubjectsAll admissions at medical, surgical, and multidisciplinary intensive care units in Mayo Clinic, Rochester from the year of 2009 to 2019.DesignRetrospective cohort study. The occurrence of ARDS was identified using a validated computerized search strategy. The association between serum sodium/osmolarity and the occurrence of ARDS was analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model. The relationship between serum sodium/osmolarity and outcomes of ARDS was analyzed using linear and logistic regression models.ResultsAmong 50,498 patients, the serum sodium level on admission did not have a significant association with the occurrence of ARDS, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.95 [95% CI (0.86, 1.05)]. There was no significant association between calculated serum osmolarity and the occurrence of ARDS, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.03 [95% CI (1.00, 1.07)]. 1560 patients developed ARDS during the ICU stay. Their serum sodium level did not have a significant association with their outcomes [adjusted estimated difference in 28-day ICU-free days, 0.08 days, 95% CI (-0.85, 1.02), adjusted estimated difference in 28-day ventilator-free days, -0.02, 95% CI (-0.62, 0.58), adjusted odds ratio of 28-day mortality 1.02, 95%CI (0.84, 1.24)]. There was no significant association between their calculated serum osmolarity and their outcomes [adjusted estimated difference in 28-day ICU-free days, -0.26, 95% CI, (-0.63, 0.12); adjusted estimated difference in 28-day ventilator-free days, -0.05, 95% CI (-0.28, 0.19); adjusted odds ratio of 28-day mortality, 1.07, 95% CI (0.99, 1.15)].ConclusionsAdmission serum sodium or serum osmolarity were not associated with the occurrence or outcomes of ARDS in ICU.