Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

613 citation(s) found for "Qi, Ying".

Current and Future Utilization of Optical Genome Mapping: Insights From the 2024 College of American Pathologists Supplemental Questionnaire
Gardner, Juli-Anne, Nusapan, Rangsinee , Tan, Julian, Levy, Brynn , Fang, Min , Velagaleti, Gopalrao V.N. , Cao, Yang , Astbury, Caroline , Mixon, James Christopher, Souers, Rhona J., Tang, Guilin , Peterson, Jess F. , Zou, Ying

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | November 27, 2025 | Volume: 150 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 354-359

10.5858/arpa.2025-0472-cp | PMID 41308031 Get It

Context.— Optical genome mapping (OGM) represents a promising cytogenomic technology that detects structural variants, including fusions, rearrangements, copy number variants, and loss of heterozygosity, in a single assay. Unlike karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization, or chromosomal microarray, OGM leverages long-molecule imaging to map the whole genome with high resolution. This positions OGM as a novel tool for constitutional and somatic/cancer genomics. However, its current and planned utilization in clinical and research settings remains unknown, necessitating further investigation. Objective.— To investigate the current utilization of OGM in clinical and research laboratories, assess its applications, and evaluate future utilization strategies. Design.— In 2024, a supplemental questionnaire was incorporated into 6 College of American Pathologists proficiency testing programs to evaluate OGM’s utilization. Results.— Of 921 returned questionnaires, 712 were analyzed after duplicates were removed. Sixty-seven (9.4%) currently offered OGM testing: 5.2% (37) for research only, 1.8% (13) for only clinical use, and 2.4% (17) for both. Future adoption plans showed 7.6% (53 of 700 laboratories) and 7.9% (55 of 700 laboratories) aiming to implement OGM clinically within 12 and 24 months, respectively. The most common applications included hematologic malignancies and constitutional/germline postnatal disorders, followed by prenatal testing. International laboratories demonstrated statistically higher utilization rates than domestic laboratories ( P = .001). Conclusions.— This first survey on OGM clinical utilization reveals its status as a niche technology, with 67 laboratories currently using it. Its primary clinical applications are in constitutional/germline analysis and hematologic malignancies. Although international laboratories led in 2024, 108 laboratories (domestic and international) plan clinical adoption within 24 months, signaling OGM’s potential for broader integration.
DUSP2 is a master epigenetic regulator that controls memory versus exhaustion trajectories at the branch point of effector CD8 T cells 3743
Li, Ying , Liu, Xin , Gicobi, Joanina K. , Yan, Yiyi , Hirdler, Jacob, Dellacecca, Emilia R. , Barham, Whitney , Hirdler, Jacob B. , Dong, Haidong

The Journal of Immunology | November 21, 2025 | Volume: 214 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jimmun/vkaf283.1508 Get It

Abstract Description CD8 T cell programming creates a pool of naïve, effector, memory, or exhausted subsets, however the regulation of these trajectories is not expansively elucidated and has serious implications for cancer immunity and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We found a significant decrease of Dual Specificity Phosphatase 2 (DUSP2) in CX3CR1+ CD8s, a highly resilient subset, from ICI responders. Thus, we hypothesized that DUSP2 negatively regulates CD8 T cells in responses to ICI therapy. DUSP2 knockdown (KD) statistically improved CD8 cytotoxicity and expression of NKG7, a vital effector molecule. DUSP2 KD also increased SMARCA4 expression, a BRG/BRM-associated factor (BAF) complex ATPase, and increased open chromatin regions of BAF components. BAF complexes are chromatin remodelers implicated in CD8 differentiation pathways. In line with this, we found CD8s from DUSP2 conditional knockout (cKO) mice demonstrated a trend in defective memory generation. DUSP2 cKO CD8s also trended towards decreased PD-1 and increased CX3CR1 expression, demonstrating a more effector like phenotype. DUSP2 cKO mice did not show a significant difference in tumor protection in-vivo, presumably due to skewing of CD8 fates via BAF. Promisingly, DUSP2 KD increased ex-vivo cytotoxic functionality in about 50 percent of tested cancer patient PBMCs. Adjuvant BAF inhibition with DUSP2 KO versus KD in a specific CD8 subset may enhance responses further, providing a novel avenue for improving ICI efficacy. Funding Sources Supported by NCI 1F31CA287495-01 Topic Categories Immune Response Regulation: Molecular Mechanisms (IRM)
Radiosurgery for Sporadic Facial Nerve Schwannoma: An International Multi-institutional Study of 60 Cases
Marinelli, John P. , Lloyd, Simon , Steiner, Nejc , Babajanian, Eric E. , Lohse, Christine M. , Sheehan, Jason , Kutz, Joe Walter , Duke, Simon, Link, Michael J., Carlson, Matthew L. , Cottrell, Justin , Borsetto, Daniele , Mantziaris, Georgios , Meng, Ying , Axon, Patrick , Kondziolka, Douglas , Roland, J. Thomas

Otology & Neurotology | November 13, 2025 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 350-355

10.1097/mao.0000000000004758 | PMID 41225703 Get It

Objective: To characterize patient outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the management of sporadic facial nerve schwannoma. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Six tertiary referral centers across the United States and United Kingdom. Patients: Adults undergoing SRS from 2000 through 2023 for sporadic facial nerve schwannoma along any segment of the facial nerve were included. Patients with NF2-related schwannomatosis were excluded. Intervention: Stereotactic radiosurgery. Main outcome measure: Long-term tumor control. Results: Among 60 patients meeting inclusion, the median age at SRS was 52 years (IQR: 41 to 64) with a median tumor size of 19.5 mm (IQR: 14.7 to 22.8). Tumors commonly involved the internal auditory canal (73%), cisternal (49%), geniculate/labyrinthine (47%), and tympanic segments (22%). Two patients experienced SRS failure and underwent salvage treatment; salvage-free survival rates (95% CI; number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after SRS were 100% (100 to 100; 55), 100% (100 to 100; 36), 100% (100 to 100; 18), and 87% (72 to 100; 9), respectively. Among 31 (52%) patients with House-Brackmann (HB) grade I facial function at presentation, only 6 demonstrated worse facial function at a median of 3.2 years (IQR: 1.7 to 6.6) after SRS. Of 18 patients with serviceable hearing (AAO-HNS class A/B) at SRS, 13 maintained serviceable hearing at a median of 1.0 years (IQR: 0.5 to 4.9) of post-SRS audiometric follow-up. Conclusions: Durable tumor control after primary SRS for sporadic facial nerve schwannoma is achieved in most patients. Among those with HB grade I facial function at presentation, treatment with SRS harbors limited additional risk of facial paresis beyond observation alone.
IMG-121. BraTS-Pathology 2024: Insights and Future Directions Informed by the AI-RANO & RANO-RGP Effort to Assess Glioblastoma Heterogeneity
Thakur, Siddhesh , Malec, Sylwia , Pitarc, Carla, Linardos, Akis , Innani, Shubham , Adap, Sanyukta, Moassefi, Mana, Nasrallah, MacLean P. , Gubbiotti, Maria A. , López, Giselle Y. , Karargyris, Alexandros , Kassem, Hasan, Miller, Michael L. , Baheti, Bhakti , Zhang, Juexin , Weng, Ying , Kumar, Rithik, Vinit, Vinit, Dhingra, Twinkle, Zahra, Syed Rameem , Sandino, Alvaro, Cooper, Lee , Bell, Robert , Faghani, Shahriar , Moassefi, Mana , Ahrendsen, Jared T. , Barresi, Valeria , Lucas, Calixto‐Hope G. , Chung, Verena , Miller, Michael, Pati, Sarthak , Wodziński, Marek , Müller, Henning , Chen, Ke , Kumar, Rithik, Arora, Madhav, Gupta, Ankur , Tiwari, Pallavi , Huse, Jason T. , Bakas, Spyridon

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v303-v304

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1200 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma is the most common malignant adult brain tumor with poor prognosis, largely due to its heterogeneous landscape. The AI-RANO and RANO-RGP groups organized the BraTS-Pathology 2024 challenge, providing a publicly-available dataset and a benchmarking environment for AI models to automatically identify six clinically-relevant histopathologic sub-regions in H&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs). METHODS We reclassified the TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG data according to the WHO 2021 criteria and identified diagnostic WSIs of 188 glioblastoma (IDH-wt, CNS WHO Gr.4) patients. A well-defined annotation protocol was communicated to eight neuropathologists, across eight institutions, who created “ground truth” annotations for Cellular Tumor (CT), Geographic Necrosis, Cortical Infiltration, Pseudopalisading Necrosis (PN), Microvascular Proliferation, and Penetration into White Matter (PWM). Comprehensive WSI curation for elimination of artifactual content and follow up partitioning resulted in approximately 300,000 data samples/patches. FINDINGS Inter-observer variability assessment highlighted difficulties in establishing a “gold standard”. The least annotated sub-regions (PWM and PN) were the most challenging to the participating methods, whereas all methods achieved their highest accuracy in the most annotated sub-region (CT). The highest average performance across sub-regions was obtained by a foundation model-based method. However, this top-ranked solution achieved an F1 score of 0.51 (Accuracy=0.65, Sensitivity=0.56, Specificity=0.93). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that achieving state-of-the-art performance, in automatically identifying clinically-relevant glioblastoma sub-regions, remains an unsolved research problem. Analysis of the ground-truth annotations underscores the critical need for more precisely defined and neuropathologically standardized annotation protocol. Current AI algorithms are facing difficulties in addressing glioblastoma’s heterogeneous histologic landscape in the absence of large, comprehensively, and consistently annotated data. Building upon these findings, and towards developing more accurate AI algorithms, the 2025 iteration of the BraTS-Path challenge is currently on-going by leveraging two million data samples, aiming to enhance our disease understanding and improve diagnostic accuracy, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.
Evaluation of Interventions for Cognitive Symptoms in Long COVID
Koltai, Deborah, Laskowitz, Daniel T. , Wisnivesky, Juan P., Federman, Alex D. , Silverstein, Adam M. , Lokhnygina, Yuliya, Haddad, Michelle M., Mahncke, Henry W. , Vleet, Tom Van, Huang, Rong , Cox, Wendy C., Terry, Diana, Karwowski, Jeannie, McCray, Netia, Lin, Jenny , Singh, Upinder , Geng, Linda N. , Reece, Rebecca , Moy, James N., Arvanitakis, Zoe , Parthasarathy, Sairam , Patterson, Thomas F., Gupta, Aditi , Parsonnet, Jeffrey, Kiriakopoulos, Elaine T. , Mullington, Janet , Jolley, Sarah E. , Shah, Nirav S. , Morimoto, Sarah Shizuko , Lee‐Iannotti, Joyce , Isache, Carmen, Frontera, Jennifer , O’Steen, Ashley, James, Melissa, Harper, Barrie, Zimmerman, Kanecia O. , Lawler, Andrew , Johnson, Brandon M. , Pitsch, Chloe E. , Feuerriegel, Elen , McKeehan, Jeffrey, Molden, Joie, Reid, Kayleigh M., Dowling, Sarah , Wodushek, Thomas, Canton, Diara, Turut, Dilara, Sheppard, Ethan , Scott‐Sutherland, Jennifer, Shaughnessy, Lynn, Beck, Michelle L. , Heisey, Sabrina, Katragadda, Vaishanvi, Yusuff, Amidat, Perlack, Amy, Merisme, Christie, Krause, David, Schulte, Duncan, Dupre, Fabiola, Sanchez, Gina A. Montealegre , Asupoto, Olanike, Simmons, Quinneil, Schroeder, Ryan W. , Timlin, Shannon, Devis, Ycar, Carter, Della, Caceres, Leomaris Caba, Rodríguez, Miguel Grande, Alvarez, Zariya , Yakubov, Amin , Engelson, Celia, Reyes, Michael, Youkhana, Alvin, Jennings, Cheryl , Naquiallah, Dina, Behun, Dylan , Stephen, Ellen, Timm, Emily , Bilimoria, Farrah, Li, Grace , Stricker, Thomas, Michelle, Kang, Minnie, Suarez, Rebeca Tojo, Carmona, Tania, Ramírez, Ana, Kadubek, Grace, Baker, Aileen, Romo-Serna, Andrea, Predki, Barbara, Leman, Cindy, Panhans, Cristina, Roth, Genevieve E., Rudraraju, Gowrisree , Miller, Hannah , DeLisa, Julie A., Williams, Kat, Woodson, Kimberly S., Jennette, Kyle J. , Villanueva, Laura, Norwick, Maria, Martínez, M. T., Rowley, Matt, Carrithers, Michael D. , Pliskin, Neil H. , Pérez, Nicolás , Durkin, Nicole M., Maniar, Nikita, Beety, Rachel, Daspgupta, Raktima, Ramchandran, Ramaswamy, Jaramillo, R., Hasek, Sharon, Macías, S Aguirre, Schuh, Tina , Ialacci, Sarah, Bailey, Christopher , Labbato, Danielle, Hautmann, Amanda , Smith, Beth, Nath, Dia, Meyer, Jessica , DiFrancesco, Kathryn, Pettinato, Kimberly, Curtis, Lynette, Daher, Joviane , Koberssy, Ziad , Mavar, Caleb, Andrefsky, John, Merheb, Alexander, Hernandez, Carla, Baissary, Jhony , Atieh, Ornina , Pereira, Carol, Carpenter, Deborah, Raynor, Jennifer , Brunton, Kristine, Podgoreanu, Andreea, Bunch, P. C., O’Brien, Sean M. , Dickey, Sheila, McNulty, Steven E., Gajjar, Varsha, Neale, Alec C. , Cohen, Cari, Geary, Elizabeth, Campanella, Franco, Anderson, Kirsten, Prestige, Laura, Guidotti-Breting, Leslie, Biewer, Megan, Morton, Melissa , Mathenia, Nicholas, Adeyemi, Oluwadamilola A. , Hengst, Samanike, Ning, Wei , Vanderloo, Adam, Caplan, Amanda, Chen, July, Acree, Mary Ellen , Nakhate, Mukund, Dan, Zaw Nu, Pk, Switzer, Aryal, Shambhu , Sanchez, Jessica, Sims, Luke, Ferdinand, Rebecca , Mammadova, Mehriban, Grimes, Carolyn Z. , Vidales, Elizabeth, Pham, Hau , Nielsen, Laura, Keller, Maryjane, Uruba, Syeda, Hernandez, Maria, Patel, Bela , Umana-Sanchez, Virginia, Pak, Chong, Gainer, Jeffery, BURR, R, Trapuzzano, Ashleigh, Celso, Brian G. , Bienkowski, Grace, Bowman, Jennifer, Verdecia, Jorge , Zerwekh, Kathryn, Serrano, Liliana , Marotz, Meghan, Propp, Piper, Sarig, Yonatan , Murphy, Annie, Comfort, Brandon, Torres, Iri, Klein, Jeffrey A. , Walker, John, Moore, John J., Tempest-Browning, Lisa, Arain, Mudassar, Kemp, Pamela, Sullivan, Samantha, Way, Sonja, Chevalier, Jessica, Sykes, Carly, Kruck, Carrie L., Sackett, L. W., Bang, Claire, Hynes, Mary, Gallagher, Torrey L., Childers-Kakos, Margaret, Zia, Ahmad, South, AP, Oravets, Anne, Ferreyra, Carolyn, Glaze, Chad, Villanueva, Daphne-Dominique , Blystone, Erica, Pritchard, Jane, Alyward, Laura, Cooper, Melissa, Chidester, Michelle, Alderson, R. Matt , Clark, Renee D., Hodder, Sally , Sarwari, Arif R, Juskowich, Joy, Welch, Shelly, Civil, Alyssa, Bendl, Ashley, Dicker, Elisa, Hanson, Hannah, Viola, Heather, Morinigo, Janice, Pantaleon, Karisma, Marcon, Kathryn, Stone, Kimberly, Stewart, Kiwan, Evo-Ortega, Lorraine, McVeety, Megan, Guliyeva, Sabina , Watson, Eric , Pehel, Shayna, Ko, Tim, Caropolo, Leah, Kocas, H. Deniz , O’Donnell, Andrew, Saperia, Corey , Thai, Daniel, Pathak, Divya , Keller, Jennifer M. , Olszewski, Kelly, Clinton, Kimberly, Cherian, Kirsten , Dutton, L M, Elepano, Ma, Mohapatra, Sukanya , Chen, Ting , Wroolie, Tonita, Leang, Zenita, Shashidhar, Sumana, Nguyen, T L, Ravisankar, Ashwath, Weiden, Brycie, Bolliger, Dawn, Glesne, Heather, Dixon, Jennifer , Chebrolu, Praneeth, Gazali, Zarine, Hurst, Whitney, Fry, Avery, Murthy, Ganesh, Grischo, Garrett, Erickson, Heidi L. , Gomez, Isaias, Copeland, Jacquelynn, Galaz, Judy, Autry, Lynn, DiLise-Russo, Marjorie, Marshell, Nikki, Borwege, Sabine, Vadovicky, Sheila, Marsh, Stephanie, Hartley, William, Murtagh, Linda, Kennedy, Anna, Meltzer-Christensen, Annie, Stringham, Caitlyn, Gaskin, Ella, Judd, Melissa, Côté, Sarah , Mahasenan, Shreya, Bjorklund, Todd, Farner, Cheryl E., Taylor, Barbara S. , Soileau, Bridgette, Cote, Cyrena , Hromas, Gabrielle A., Scholler, Irma, Longoria, Lisa, Heard, Patricia, Jones, Johnnie, Tragus, Robin , Harris, Maya, Pinones, Alexis, Anderson, Alyssa , Hastings, Gabrielyd, Courtright, jessica, Jayakumar, Madhumita, Fischer, M, Solis, Pamela, Harteloo, Alex, Elias-Warren, Anna, Nguyen, Daniel , McDonald, Dylan , Rau, Holly , Mernaugh, Jean, Pagulayan, Kathleen F. , Watanabe, Kino, Huden, Kristen, Peabody, Laurel, Mei, Tiffany, Ogunwuyi, Catherine, Cobbina, Esther, Sankar, Ian, Nguyen, Lisa , Fromm, N., Arnold, R. Douglas, Ogu, Stephanie, Yuan, Ying , Ibrahim, Homam , Szum, Izabella, Patel, Jignesh, Sultan, Sonia, Jazayeri, Yasmin, Anderson, Betty Lise, Muñoz, Isabel , Rhys, Logan, Vane, Ryan, Kim, Jessica , Diaz, Leticia M., Yee, Nathan, Gruhn, Robert, Browngoetz, Sarah, Johnson, Elisha, Chand, Arista , Bottrill, Kenneth , Henderson, Kymberly, Johnson, DeArmond, Richard C., Hughes, Trina, Silverstein, A , Silverstein, Adam P , Frontera, Jennifer , Geng, Linda N. , Knopman, David S. , Becker, Jacqueline , Charvet, Leigh , Pilloni, Giuseppina , Huang, Rong, Cox, Wendy, Karwowski, Jeannie, McComsey, Grace A. , Chu, Helen Y. , Ostrosky‐Zeichner, Luis , Fong, Tamara G. , Killgore, William D. S. , Dwyer, Brigid C. , Stringer, William W. , Krishnan, Jerry A , James, Melissa, Johnson, Brandon, Erlandson, Kristine M. , Dowling, Sarah, Hauser, Kristine , Doyle, Michael, Beck, Michelle, Tran, Anh, Altaras, Caroline , Sanchez, Gina, Krengel, Maxine , Ly, Monica T. , Asupoto, Olanike, Schroeder, Ryan, Rodriguez, Miguel, González, David Andrés , Torres, Jimena, García, Maria Luisa , Carrera, Laura, Rutherford, Melissa, Perez, Nicolas, Jaramillo, Ruthie, Smith, Beth, Walkup, Kevin, Scott, Sarah , Mavar, Caleb B., Carpenter, Deborah, Bunch, Pyper, Brown, Richard, Escobar, Carolina, Campanella, Franco, Mathenia, Nicholas, Glickman, Michael S. , Sims, Luke A., Pham, Hoai Phuang, Lopez, John, Hernandez, Maria, Lin, Matthew Junda , Gainer, Jeffery, Brown, Gina , Klein, Jeffrey, Reed, Jessica, Walker, John, Sackett, Lisa, Kaden, Sarah J. , Childers-Kakos, Margaret G, South, Amy, Blystone, Erica, Cooper, Melissa, Alderson, Rachael, Clark, Renee, Bardes, James M. , Hanson, Hannah, Loizos, Maria , Caropolo, Leah J., Fernandez, Luis, Keller, Jennifer, Lin, Rebecca, Brown, Daniel, Dixon, Jennifer, James, Michelle, Kala, Mrinalini , Smith, Ryan S. , Mahasenan, Shreya, Johnson, Hillary, Anderson, Alyssa, Hernandez, Jessica, Sullivan, Michael, Nguyen, Helen , Logue, Jennifer, Mei, Tiffany, Arnold, Rowan, Szum, Izabella , Hatlen, Timothy J. , Anderson, Betty, Munoz, Isabel, Wright, Matthew, Diaz, Leticia, DeCato, Thomas W. , Ortiz, Ernesto, Hildebrand, Lindsey L. , DeArmond, Richard

JAMA Neurology | November 10, 2025 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 49

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.4415 | PMID 41212544 Get It

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .
Comparison of Bare Metal vs Covered Proximal Stent Fixation During Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Lima, Guilherme Baumgardt Barbosa , Huang, Ying , Kanamori, Lucas Ruiter , Saqib, Naveed, Macedo, Thanila A. , Mendes, Bernardo C. , Oderich, Gustavo S. , Lima, Guilherme B , Tenorio, Emanuel R , Oderich, Gustavo S , Tenorio, Emanuel R. , Schmid, Bruno , Maximus, Steven

Journal of Endovascular Therapy | November 10, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/15266028251388749 | PMID 41211656 Get It

Purpose: Fenestrated stent-grafts with proximal bare-metal fixation stent (BMFS) may provide better rotational movement to facilitate vessel catheterization, but novel designs with covered fixation stents (CFSs) have been increasingly utilized with lower profile fabric. This study aimed to evaluate procedural metrics and outcomes of fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR) using BMFS and CFS devices. Methods: Clinical data of 502 consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective, non-randomized investigational device exemption (IDE) study were reviewed. Patients with 4-vessel fenestrated stent-grafts with BMFS or CFS for treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) and Extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) were included. Patients with Extent I-III TAAAs and stent-grafts designed with <4 fenestrations or scallops were excluded. Endpoints were technical success, radiation exposure, major adverse events (MAEs), patient survival, freedom from secondary interventions, and target artery instability (TAI). Results: There were 147 patients (29%; 85% male, median 75 years old) treated by FEVAR using 4-vessel fenestrated stent-grafts with BMFS in 79 patients or CFS in 68 patients. Patients treated with BMFS designs had significantly (p<0.05) higher prevalence of cigarette smoking and peripheral artery disease and less often had Extent IV TAAAs. Use of BMFS designs decreased from 88% (64/73) to 20% (15/74) after 2018 (p<0.001). Technical success was similar in patients treated with or without BMFS designs (99% vs 100%, p=0.47), but total operating time and cumulative air karma were significantly lower (p<0.05) in patients with CFS designs. Overall 30-day mortality was 1%, with no difference in mortality and MAEs among patients treated with or without BMFS (1% vs 1%, p=1.0 and 15% vs 12%, p=0.59), respectively. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was 95%±2%, and 85%±4% for all patients with no difference between groups (p=0.51). Freedom from secondary interventions was 88%±3.6% for patients with BMFS and 86%±4.6% for those with CFS at 1 year (p=0.71), with also no difference at 3 years (p=0.55). Conclusion: FEVAR for CAAAs and Extent IV TAAAs was performed with high technical success, low mortality, and MAEs, independent of the use of BMFS. There is no difference in patient survival and freedom from secondary interventions in patients treated with or without BMFS. Clinical Impact One hundred forty-seven patients were treated with bare-metal fixation-stent (79) or covered fixation stents (68). Technical success was similar (p=.47). Overall 30-day mortality was 1%, with no difference in major adverse events (MAEs; p=.59). At 1- and 3-year, there was no difference in patient survival (p=.51), freedom from secondary intervention (p=.71). In conclusion, FEVAR for CAAAs and Extent IV TAAAs was performed with high technical success, low mortality and MAEs, independent of the use of bare-metal fixation stent.
281 T cell metabolic pathway enrichment profiles associated with clinical response in CD19 CAR-T therapy for aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Tan, Melinda Si Yun , Wang, Panwen , Corraes, Andre De Menezes Silva , Wu, Chen , Shao, Zuoyi , Regan, Kevin M., Ma, Audrey, Khurana, Arushi , Bennani, Nabila N, Hampel, Paul J. , Johnston, Patrick B. , Ansell, Stephen M. , Bennani, Nabila N, Wang, Yucai , Paludo, Jonas , Durani, Urshila , Villasboas, José C. , Mondello, Patrizia , Zeng, Hu , Dong, Haidong , Li, Ying , Lin, Yi

Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts | November 5, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: A314-A314

10.1136/jitc-2025-sitc2025.0281 Get It

Abstract 4365687: Arteriovenous fistula creation results in cardiac dysfunction and remodeling in a uremic pig model
Montonye, Dan , Lutgens, Esther, Kane, Jamie , Singh, Prabh G. , Kilari, Sreenivasulu , Baranwal, Gaurav , Naskar, Atanu, Montonye, Dan , Lutgens, Esther , Wang, Ying , Negm, Ahmed S , Collins, Jeremy D. , Lee, Timmy , Misra, Sanjay

Circulation | November 3, 2025 | Volume: 152 | Issue: Suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.152.suppl_3.4365687 Get It

Background: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is a requirement for hemodialysis therapy in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. A consequence of AVF creation is compensatory cardiovascular hemodynamics, which are subsequently associated with cardiac remodeling. Relatedly, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are elevated in ESKD patients, which worsens in dialysis patients. Currently, no suitable uremic large animal models exist to investigate the underlying mechanisms of AVF-induced cardiac remodeling. Research Question: This study aims to characterize cardiovascular changes secondary to AVF creation, supported by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in a uremic pig model. Methods: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was induced via renal embolization, followed by AVF creation 28 days later. The AVF was created by anastomosis of the left common carotid artery to the left external jugular vein. AVF stenosis was alleviated 28 days thereafter via PTA, and cardiac MRI was performed at 14-, 28-, and 42-days post-PTA. Results: Increased end-diastolic volumes were observed in the left and right ventricles at day 42 vs 14 (200.8ml to 249.5ml, p=0.0457, and 204.6ml to 260.0ml, p=0.0268 respectively), while systolic function was preserved. Left ventricle (LV) stroke volume and blood flow through the aorta, pulmonary artery, and vena cava were also increased. In perivascular areas of the free wall of the LV at day 42 vs control, senescence markers showed increased p16 expression (fold change 10.21, p=0.0086) and decreased p21 expression (fold change 0.07, p=0.0357). The LV showed perivascular fibrosis (0.2% to 0.59%, p=0.021), via picrosirius red, reduced collagen-type IV expression (fold change 0.81, p=0.0089), and increased MMP2 levels (fold change 14.33, p=0.0213). Cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area was increased (from 800.9 µm 2 to 1250.0 µm 2 , p=0.0296), without CD4+ or CD68+ cell LV infiltration. Conclusion: In conclusion, AVF creation leads to modified left and right ventricular function and increased peripheral flow, potentially mediated by cellular senescence and fibrosis, resulting in progressive cardiac remodeling. This model of uremic kidney disease can now be used to evaluate mechanisms of AVF induced cardiac disease and test the efficacy of therapeutics like senolytics and anti-fibrotic agents.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor B Modulates Cardiac Functions via Ferroptosis Pathways in Post-Myocardial Infarction
Varanasi, Sai Manasa , Sabharwal, Ankit , Mukherjee, Shreyartha , Muhammad, Huzaifa, Kar, Riya, Magnano, Carter , Dorai-Raj, A., Wang, Enfeng , Dutta, Shamit K., Das, Pritam , Mukhopadhyay, Debabrata , Angom, Ramcharan Singh , Dorairaj, Anya, Dutta, Shamit, Mukhopadhyay, Debabrata , Singh Angom, Ramcharan , Mukherjee, Shreyartha , Kar, Riya, Dorairaj, Anya, Ekker, Stephen C. , Wang, Ying

Cells | October 21, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 20 | Pages: 1642

10.3390/cells14201642 | PMID 41148858 Get It

Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, yet effective cardioprotective strategies remain limited in clinical settings. Vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGFB) has emerged as a promising therapeutic candidate in MI, but the role of its co-receptor, Neuropilin-1 (NRP1), in cardiomyocyte (CM) survival under ischemic stress remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated VEGFB-NRP1 signaling using an in vivo zebrafish model of cardiac injury as well as in vitro hypoxia models in CMs. We demonstrated that VEGFB overexpression conferred protection against ischemic injury and enhanced cardiac regeneration in the zebrafish heart. Mechanistically, we showed that VEGFB treatment enhances CM viability through reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS), ferroptosis activation, and preserving mitochondrial integrity. We also demonstrated that NRP1 knockdown in the CMs abolished the VEGFB-mediated protective effects, indicating the significant role of NRP1 signaling in VEGFB-induced cardioprotective effects in MI. Lastly, using transcriptome analysis, we confirmed that VEGFB induces anti-apoptotic and anti-ferroptosis gene programs in CMs in response to hypoxic stress. Collectively, our findings provide mechanistic insight into cell death activation pathways, including ferroptosis, in response to ischemic stress and further validate the therapeutic potential of VEGFB in promoting CM survival in ischemic heart disease.
Consensus-based disease definitions for endocrine immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Zhu, Ling , Cheung, Yee-Ming Melody , Mammen, Jennifer S. , Quandt, Zoe , Jones, Renisha, McDunn, Jon, Al-Bahadili, Huda , Warner, Allison Betof , Blackwell, Susan, Cho, Tracey , Dougan, Michael , Funchain, Pauline , Johnson, Douglas B. , Kennedy, Randol , Lim, Annette M. , Overton, Laura, Perdigoto, Ana Luisa , Sachithanandan, Nirupa , Spain, Lavinia , Tsai, Katy K., Reynolds, Kerry L. , Shariff, Afreen , Quandt, Zoe , Betof Warner, Allison , Funchain, Pauline , Herndon, Justine , Lim, Annette M , Tsai, Katy , Reynolds, Kerry L , Cho, Tracey A , Chiang, Cherie Ying , Gallagher, Emily J. , Hamnvik, Ole‐Petter R. , Jones, Renisha, McDunn, Jon , Angell, Trevor E. , Bancos, Irina , Calabrese, Cassandra M. , Ferreira, Michelle , Kheterpal, Meenal , Khouri, Michel G. , Lechner, Melissa G , Markova, Alina , Meara, Alexa Simon , Overton, Laura, Sharon, Elad , Yarchoan, Mark

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | October 15, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e011865

10.1136/jitc-2025-011865 | PMID 41093625 Get It

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important class of cancer treatment. Endocrine immune-related adverse events (E-irAEs) account for a significant proportion of irAEs in ICI-treated patients. Diagnosing E-irAEs accurately and timely can be challenging in the absence of clear categorization and standardization across oncology, endocrinology and other specialties. While existing guidelines provide some broad directions to diagnosis and management, they lack clarity on irAE-specific symptom evaluation and work-up, as well as assessment of severity. These limitations can then impact triage, time-sensitive management and care escalation to specialists such as oncoendocrinologists. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based statements on disease definitions for E-irAEs. A core working group of endocrinologists with expertise in the oncoendocrinology field drafted a survey with statements outlining the general approach to E-irAEs, disease definition and management approach of six specific diagnoses: ir-thyroiditis thyrotoxic phase, ir-thyroiditis hypothyroidism, ir-Graves’ disease, ir-hypophysitis, ir-adrenalitis and ir-type 1 diabetes mellitus. Severity grading tables were drafted for three disease categories—“thyroid”, “pituitary and adrenal”, and “diabetes mellitus”. A two-round modified Delphi process, using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method, was employed. In this process, a 25-member voting panel consisting of endocrinologists, oncologists and other specialists and healthcare providers with experience in management of ICI-treated patients and irAEs was recruited. The panel rated anonymously on usability, accuracy, appropriateness or agreement of 41 items on a 9-point scale in Survey 1, after which a meeting was convened. Statements were modified based on voting results from Survey 1 and Meeting 1, and the process was repeated in Survey 2 and Meeting 2. At the end of this process, consensus was achieved for all statements. Our study findings address the gap in standardized nomenclature, clinical, laboratory and radiological evaluations, and management principles of E-irAEs. With consensus achieved from a panel of experts from a variety of disciplines, we anticipate that the statements can form the basis for standardization of the diagnostic process and improvement of patient care.