Angell, Trevor E.

Abstract Context Recent studies suggest glucagon-like peptide receptor-1 agonists (GLP-1RA) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) may contribute to altered calcium metabolism. Objective This study examines the association between GLP-1RA/GIP-RA use and risk of post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia. Methods This propensity-matched cohort study utilized the TriNetX Platform to analyze adult patients who underwent total thyroidectomy (2010 to 2024). The intervention cohort included patients with a GLP-1RA or GIP-RA prescription 1 year before thyroidectomy; the control group had no GLP-1RA/GIP-RA history. Propensity score matching controlled for demographics and relevant clinical covariates. Primary outcomes included risk of hypocalcemia at 0-1 month, 1-6 months, and 6-12 months after surgery. Using Poisson regression, odds ratios were reported (alpha = 0.05). Results Among 70 665 patients, 1759 (2.59%) received a GLP-1RA or GIP-RA. Each matched cohort contained 1732 patients with similar preoperative parathyroid hormone or calcium levels. The GLP-1RA/GIP-RA cohort had a 12% lower risk of hypocalcemia from 0 to 1 month after surgery (relative risk [RR] 0.88; 95% CI: 0.81-0.97). In the sensitivity analysis considering postoperative calcitriol supplementation, recipients with GLP-1RA/GIP-RAs use were less likely to develop hypocalcemia in the month after surgery (RR 0.84; 0.74-0.96), as were those with GLP-1RA/GIP-RAs who never received calcitriol in the month after surgery (RR 0.81; 0.72-0.90). Under subgroup analysis, semaglutide was the sole agent associated with a reduced risk of hypocalcemia. Conclusion Patients with a history of GLP-1RA/GIP-RA use may experience a lower risk of short-term hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy, suggesting personalized supplementation strategies may be required for this population.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important class of cancer treatment. Endocrine immune-related adverse events (E-irAEs) account for a significant proportion of irAEs in ICI-treated patients. Diagnosing E-irAEs accurately and timely can be challenging in the absence of clear categorization and standardization across oncology, endocrinology and other specialties. While existing guidelines provide some broad directions to diagnosis and management, they lack clarity on irAE-specific symptom evaluation and work-up, as well as assessment of severity. These limitations can then impact triage, time-sensitive management and care escalation to specialists such as oncoendocrinologists. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based statements on disease definitions for E-irAEs. A core working group of endocrinologists with expertise in the oncoendocrinology field drafted a survey with statements outlining the general approach to E-irAEs, disease definition and management approach of six specific diagnoses: ir-thyroiditis thyrotoxic phase, ir-thyroiditis hypothyroidism, ir-Graves’ disease, ir-hypophysitis, ir-adrenalitis and ir-type 1 diabetes mellitus. Severity grading tables were drafted for three disease categories—“thyroid”, “pituitary and adrenal”, and “diabetes mellitus”. A two-round modified Delphi process, using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) Appropriateness Method, was employed. In this process, a 25-member voting panel consisting of endocrinologists, oncologists and other specialists and healthcare providers with experience in management of ICI-treated patients and irAEs was recruited. The panel rated anonymously on usability, accuracy, appropriateness or agreement of 41 items on a 9-point scale in Survey 1, after which a meeting was convened. Statements were modified based on voting results from Survey 1 and Meeting 1, and the process was repeated in Survey 2 and Meeting 2. At the end of this process, consensus was achieved for all statements. Our study findings address the gap in standardized nomenclature, clinical, laboratory and radiological evaluations, and management principles of E-irAEs. With consensus achieved from a panel of experts from a variety of disciplines, we anticipate that the statements can form the basis for standardization of the diagnostic process and improvement of patient care.