Citations

Abstract Background Transthoracic echocardiography is the primary modality used for the assessment of the pericardial space. Guidelines recommend semi-qualitative assessment of the size of a pericardial effusion with characterization as trace, small, moderate or large. The reproducibility and association of this characterization is variable. Whether simple 2D-based quantitative measures of effusion size better associate with pericardial volumes is unclear. An accurate measure of pericardial volume would be helpful for tracking patients over time. Purpose To test whether 2D-based measures of the pericardial space could accurately predict pericardial volumes. Methods We retrospectively assessed a series of echos performed immediately prior to pericardiocentesis. 2D-based area tracings from the parasternal long and short axis at the papillary muscle level as well as 2D volumetric tracings from the apical 4 chamber view using the Simpson's method were tested with the operator blinded to the true pericardial volume (recorded at pericardiocentesis). Patients who underwent pericardiocentesis in setting of acute perforation were excluded as were patients where pericardiocentesis was unsuccessful or incomplete. Pericardial fluid area or volume was calculated by taking the difference between the measures obtained by tracing the epicardial border of the heart and pericardium (figure 1). Results The median pericardiocentesis (n=118) fluid volume was 500 mL (IQR 350 – 750 mL) with a range, 95–2300 mL. The pericardial fluid was serous (22%), sero-sanguineous (37%) and sanguineous in 41%. The effusion was malignant in 24 cases and due to inflammation in 42 cases. Pericardial area traces from either the parasternal short (r=0.56, p<.0001) or long axis (r=0.62, p<.0001) correlated modestly with measured pericardial volume. The average volume estimated echocardiographically by the Simpson’s method was 580 ± 359 mL (range, 85.8–2419 mL). There was stronger linear correlation between echocardiographic (apical 4-chamber measurement) and pericardiocentesis-derived volumes (r=0.92, p < 0.0001; figure 2A). Etiology of the pericardial effusion was not associated with estimates of pericardial volumes. There was a large overlap in pericardial volume amongst the reading physician qualitative grading of effusion size (figure 2B). Categorization of pericardial effusion size was improved when based on volumetric estimates (Kappa 0.65) rather than physician estimates (Kappa 0.32; Figure 2B). Variation between measured pericardial volume and actual pericardial volume was most related to the quality of the image and the likely extent to which the pericardial fluid was not entirely captured in the image window. Conclusion Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using biplane Simpson’s method of disks can simply and reasonably accurately estimate the pericardial effusion volume. This technique may add value in the serial assessment of pericardial effusions. Figure 2

Abstract Background Heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous entity including patients with different phenotypes of reduced, normal, and supernormal left ventricular (LV) function. Objectives To assess the value of resting LV elastance with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to identify HFpEF phenotypes. Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study, 2380 HFpEF patients were recruited from July 2016 to May 2024 by 35 certified laboratories of 15 countries. HFpEF was diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured. We assessed wall motion score index (WMSI), LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), EF, force (SBP/ESV), stroke volume (SV), arterial elastance (AE, SBP/SV), ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC, as SV/ESV), and left atrial volume index (LAVI). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was available in 1164 (48.9%) patients. In 271 (11.4%) patients, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was assessed. Patients were divided into three groups based on rest force: low rest force group (< 25% percentile, Group 1), median rest force group (≥ 25% percentile & ≤ 75% percentile, Group 2), and high rest force group (> 75% percentile, Group 3). Results 330 (13.9%) patients presented with ischemic RWMA. The 3 groups showed a gradient with descending values (Group 3>2>1) for SBP, EF, GLS, AE, and VAC, with the opposite gradient (Group 1> 2> 3) for EDV, EDVi, ESV, ESVi, SV, SVi, and LAVI values (all P<0.01). Patients in Group 3 have higher NTproBNP level and higher percentage of B-line compared to groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05). The 3 groups were similar for values of coronary flow velocity, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and E/e’ (see table). Univariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was correlated with force (r = 0.271, p < 0.001), VAC (r = 0.194, p = 0.001), LAVI (r = 0.327, p < 0.001), LVEDV (r = -0.245, p < 0.001), LVEDVi (r = -0.261, p < 0.001), LVESVi (r = -0.190, p = 0.002) and LVESV (r = -0.187, p = 0.002) (see figure). However, multivariable linear regression analysis showed that NTproBNP was independently associated with LAVI (β= 0.211, p < 0.001) and force (β= 1.804, p = 0.002). Conclusions HFpEF patients present with different LV contractile phenotypes, easily identified with resting LV force and volumetric TTE. LV force is linearly correlated with cardiac natriuretic peptide levels. The dominant hemodynamic feature of hypocontractile phenotype is a preload recruitment with dilation of LV EDV and normal SV, while the hypercontractile phenotype is characterized by a small LV with reduced SV. heat map

Abstract Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) improves quality of life and lowers cardiovascular adverse events. However, AF recurrence rates remain high - thus the need for better or improved predictors of AF recurrence. The role of left atrial (LA) stiffness remains unclear, as prior findings were controversial. Purpose To explore the relationship between a noninvasive LA stiffness index (LAstiffn) and AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Methods We analyzed a prospectively recruited cohort of patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF, were in sinus rhythm at 3 months post-ablation, had no significant (< moderate) valvular disease, and had LA volumes and LA diastolic function prospectively measured. LAStiffn was calculated as (E/e’)/LA emptying fraction (LAEF) ratio (abnormal defined as >15/45≈0.3). Outcome endpoint was the first documented AF/atrial flutter episode, lasting >30s, beyond 3 months post ablation (end of blanking period). Results A total of 589 patients were studied (mean age 60±10 years; 75% men; 50% with persistent AF; Table 1). At 3 months post-ablation, mean LAVI(Left atrial volume index) was 36±10 mL/m2 and LAstiffn 0.32±0.22. LAstiffn tended to be higher in older patients, in females, and patients with persistent AF and comorbidities (hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2, etc). At multivariable regression analysis, LAstiffn correlated with LV size and mass, degree of mitral/tricuspid regurgitation, and right ventricular systolic pressure. At 1 year, 3 years, and 8 years follow up, AF recurred in 118, 191, and 347 patients, respectively. At univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, LAstiffn index >0.3 was significantly associated with AF recurrence at 1 year (log-rank P=.0005), 3 years (P=.0002), and 8 years follow up (P<.0001; Figure). In multivariate analysis including all clinical and laboratory factors with P<.10 in univariate analysis, LAstiffn >0.3 remained an independent factor for AF recurrence only at 3-years (adjusted HR 1.40 [1.03-1.91], P=.03) and 8 years follow up (adjusted HR 1.65 [1.29-2.13], P<.0001) after adjustment for age, sex, type of AF (persistent/paroxysmal), LA volume index (LAVi), obstructive sleep apnea, and prior pacemaker/ICD implantation (best independent factors); P=.14 at 1 year follow up. In ROC analysis, LAstiffn (AUC 0.61, P=.001) performed slightly better than LA deformation LAEF (AUC 0.59, P=.002) or E/e’ (AUC 0.58, P=.03), though with modest sensitivity/specificity (58%/62%). Conclusions LAstiffn may reflect LA myopathy that is likely due to the cumulative effects of comorbidities, diastolic dysfunction, and intrinsic LA tissue remodeling. LA stiffening may be a substrate facilitating redevelopment of AF, thus patients with increased LAstiffn may need more frequent monitoring to prevent/treat AF recurrence earlier.

Abstract Background AI-enhanced electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) is a cost-effective tool for left ventricular dysfunction screening. However, its cost-effectiveness for other forms of structural heart disease (SHD) is unknown. While AI-ECG is inexpensive, the relatively low positive predictive value (PPV) of many models can lead to high costs from unnecessary follow-up tests like transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Therefore, strategies to improve the yield of AI-ECG-based screening are needed. Purpose To evaluate the cost savings of a stepwise approach to SHD screening using AI-ECG followed by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) compared to AI-ECG alone. Methods 286 adult outpatients undergoing AI-ECG were randomly selected to undergo same-day POCUS. All participants were required to have a recent TTE, our gold standard for SHD diagnosis, for comparison purposes. We evaluated four SHDs: aortic stenosis, cardiac amyloidosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular dysfunction (defined as left ventricular ejection fraction <50%). The costs of AI-ECG ($75/test) and TTE ($1,305/test) were sourced from Healthcare Bluebook, while the cost of POCUS ($100/test) was independently estimated. We compared the costs of screening with AI-ECG alone to stepwise screening with AI-ECG followed by POCUS. Costs were analyzed for two paradigms: screening for all forms of SHD in parallel and screening for each SHD individually. Results AI-ECG alone identified potential SHD in 125 out of 286 patients. When compared to TTE, only 39 out of 125 were true positives (31% PPV). Among the AI-ECG-positive patients, POCUS demonstrated findings of SHD in 52 out of 125 cases. When compared to TTE, this stepwise approach yielded 32 true positives and 20 false positives (62% PPV). In the parallel screening paradigm, the cost per patient diagnosed with SHD was $4,733 with AI-ECG alone, which decreased to $3,182 with stepwise screening (33% cost savings). For the individual SHD screening paradigm, cost reductions were as follows: aortic stenosis ($18,724 to $6,315, 66% savings), cardiac amyloidosis ($21,023 to $12,230, 42% savings), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy ($9,883 to $6,175, 38% savings), and left ventricular dysfunction ($4,019 to $3,582, 11% savings). Conclusions Stepwise SDH screening with AI-ECG followed by POCUS markedly reduces costs compared to AI-ECG alone. The greatest cost savings for individual SHD screening were observed for aortic stenosis and cardiac amyloidosis, conditions where AI-ECG models have lower PPVs. Parallel screening for multiple SHDs is also less costly than screening for any individual SHD alone. Therefore, a parallel screening approach may maximize SHD detection while minimizing screening costs. Stepwise Screening Approach for SHD SDH Screening Costs

Abstract Background/Introduction Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular disease associated with increased mortality. There is a need for tools to assess the interaction between the pulmonary artery (PA) circulation and the right ventricle (RV) in patients with TR and to investigate their association with outcomes. Various echo parameters have emerged that assess RV-PA coupling, including the ratio of TAPSE to RV systolic pressure (RVSP) and the PA pulsatility index (PAPi). The effective PA elastance (PA Ea) is a composite measure of RV afterload that refers to the measure of the pulmonary vascular load that the RV must overcome to eject blood into the PA. PA Ea is simple to estimate by echo and found to be an independent haemodynamic risk measure in various left heart and pulmonary hypertension (PH) diseases. Whether PA Ea discriminates risk in unselected patients with significant TR and how it compares to other measures of RV-PA coupling is untested. Purpose To ascertain the prognostic value of PA Ea in patients with TR. Methods In consecutive patients with a first diagnosis of ≥ moderate TR (regardless of aetiology), we compared all-cause mortality at five years based on the PA Ea (defined as the RVSP/stroke volume as measured by transthoracic echocardiography). As stroke volume was measured by Doppler at the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, patients with > moderate aortic valve regurgitation were excluded. The Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) score was calculated as previously described. PA Ea was separated into 4 groups for comparison based on the separation of quartiles of PA Ea rounded to one decimal place. Results In the 13,608 patients studied, PA Ea could be calculated in 12,682 patients (94.4%). The median PA Ea was 0.68 mmHg/mL (IQR 0.50, 0.92). Increasing levels of PA Ea were associated with clinical comorbidities including heart failure, liver and kidney disease and clinical markers of risk such as the TRIO score. Increasing levels of PA Ea were also associated with larger RVs, worse RV systolic function, higher NT-pro BNP levels, and greater degrees of right heart failure (Table). Each quartile of PA Ea was associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality (Figure). After adjusting for age and sex, PA Ea was associated with higher risk of death (HR 2.41 (2.28-2.56); p<.0001). While worsening degrees of PA Ea correlated with both declining levels of TAPSE/PASP and PAPi (Table), PA Ea was independently predictive of outcome in a combined model: PA Ea HR 1.65 (1.51-1.80, Chi-squ 120, p<.0001); PAPi HR 0.84 (0.80-0.89, Chi-squ 48, p<.0001) and TAPSE/PASP HR 0.32 (017-0.60, Chi-squ 12, p=.0004). Conclusion(s) In patients with significant TR, PA Ea is highly feasible and higher PA Ea is progressively associated with RV dysfunction, right heart failure, and worse survival. Incorporating PA Ea into the routine echo assessment may help stratify disease severity in patients with significant TR. Table Assoc. of PA Ea with mortality in TR

Abstract BACKGROUND We sought to characterize the cognitive profile among individuals with mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) to help guide future clinical criteria. METHODS Systematic review and meta‐analysis included MCI‐LB studies with cognitive data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO (January 1990 to March 2023). MCI‐LB scores were compared to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI‐AD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) groups with random‐effects models. RESULTS We included 26 studies and 2823 participants. Across all domains, the MCI‐LB group performed worse than controls and better than DLB. Compared to MCI‐AD, the MCI‐LB group performed worse in attention/processing speed ( g = –0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: –0.35, –0.12), attention/executive ( g = –0.42, 95% CI: –0.56, –0.28); better in verbal immediate recall ( g = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.59) and delayed memory ( g = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.58). DISCUSSION The cognitive profiles in MCI‐LB and MCI‐AD are consistent with established profiles in DLB and AD. Neuropsychological assessment may be helpful in differential diagnosis, even in early disease states. Highlights We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis for cognition in mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB). Compared to MCI due to Alzheimer's disease (MCI‐AD), MCI‐LB had worse attention, executive function, and processing speed. Compared to MCI‐AD, MCI‐LB had better verbal immediate and delayed recall. The MCI‐LB group was worse on all cognitive domains than controls, and better than dementia with Lewy bodies. Studies used different tests and there is a need for global efforts for harmonization.

AbstractBackgroundProdromal dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) research criteria were recently published and further work is needed to characterize the neuropsychological profile and refine clinical criteria. We performed a meta‐analysis to compare the cognitive performance of mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) groups to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer’s disease (MCI‐AD), and DLB.MethodFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched the literature for 1) English‐language studies on MCI‐LB; 2) published January 1990‐March 2023, 3) with ≥1 standardized cognitive measure; and 4) comparison data from controls, MCI‐AD, and/or DLB. Pooled means with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for demographics. Effect sizes were calculated for group comparisons on cognitive domains. Random effects meta‐analysis models were used for group comparisons.ResultThere were 3440 participants from 27 studies across 10 countries. Mean age did not differ between groups. The percentage of female subjects was lower in the MCI‐LB group than the MCI‐AD group. Mean years of education for the MCI‐LB group was lower than the controls, but similar to MCI‐AD and DLB groups (Table 1). Compared to controls, the MCI‐LB group had lower scores for the global screening, executive function, visuospatial, language, learning, and memory domains. Compared to MCI‐AD, MCI‐LB performed better on learning and delayed recall, but similarly across other domains. Compared to DLB, MCI‐LB had better scores for global screening, executive function, language, and delayed recall (Table 2). Recognition for MCI‐LB vs. MCI‐AD; visuospatial, learning, and recognition for MCI‐LB vs. DLB could not be assessed, as fewer than 3 studies reported this data.ConclusionCognitive measures can help differentiate MCI‐LB from controls and DLB. Neuropsychological measures of learning and memory may be required to discriminate MCI‐LB from MCI‐AD in clinical practice but global screening measure scores appear insufficient in this regard. High heterogeneity across MCI‐LB studies highlights the need for harmonized neuropsychological research protocols.

SummaryGlobal obesity rates have risen dramatically, now exceeding deaths from starvation. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), initially for severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), is performed globally over 500 000 times annually, offering significant metabolic benefits beyond weight loss. However, varying eligibility criteria globally impact patient care and healthcare resources. Updated in 2022, ASMBS and IFSO guidelines aim to standardise MBS indications, reflecting current understanding and emphasising comprehensive preoperative assessments. Yet, clinical variability persists, necessitating consensus‐based recommendations. This modified Delphi study engaged 45 global experts to establish consensus on perioperative management in MBS. Experts selected from bariatric societies possessed expertise in MBS and participated in a two‐round Delphi protocol. Consensus was achieved on 90 of 169 statements (53.3%), encompassing multidisciplinary team composition, patient selection criteria, preoperative testing, and referral pathways. The agreement highlighted the critical role of comprehensive preoperative assessments and the integration of healthcare professionals in MBS. These findings offer essential insights to standardise perioperative practices and advocate for evidence‐based guidelines in MBS globally. The study underscores the need for unified protocols to optimise outcomes and guide future research in MBS.

Background:Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) often receive immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs; eg, lenalidomide), proteasome inhibitors (eg, bortezomib), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as part of their initial treatment. However, most pts relapse following initial treatment, with increasing attrition rates observed at each subsequent line of therapy (LOT), creating an unmet need for treatment options for pts with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) who have prior exposure to these agents. Current regimens for pts who have prior exposure to lenalidomide and anti-CD38 mAbs include elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EPd; approved in Europe and the US) and pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd; approved in Europe and Australia), but disease control, as well as depth and durability of response, could be improved. Talquetamab (tal) and teclistamab (tec), targeting CD3 and either G protein-coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5D, tal) or B-cell maturation antigen (tec), are the first T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved as monotherapies in Europe and the US for the treatment of pts with triple-class exposed (TCE) RRMM. Use of these novel immunotherapies in earlier LOTs, either with a dual-antigen targeting approach or by enhancing the activity of the BsAb with an IMiD (pomalidomide), may provide deeper, more durable responses and improve pt quality of life. Preliminary data using these combination treatments have shown promising results: in the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study (NCT05050097), tal+pomalidomide (tal-P) demonstrated overall response rates (ORRs) of >84% in pts with RRMM with ≥2 prior LOTs and in the phase 1b/2 RedirecTT-1 study (NCT04586426), tal+tec (tal-tec) showed ORRs of >77% in pts with TCE RRMM. MonumenTAL-6 (NCT06208150) is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy of tal-P vs investigator's choice of EPd or PVd and tal-tec vs investigator's choice of EPd or PVd in pts with RRMM with 1-4 prior LOTs, including lenalidomide and an anti-CD38 mAb. Study Design and Methods: Eligibility includes pts aged ≥18 years with documented MM per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, with measurable disease at screening, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, who have received 1-4 prior LOTs (including lenalidomide and an anti-CD38 mAb in any prior LOT), and have progressive disease on or after their last therapy. Pts with prior exposure to pomalidomide, tec, or GPRC5D-directed therapies are excluded. Approximately 795 pts are randomized 1:1:1 to receive tal-P, tal-tec, or investigator's choice of EPd or PVd. Tal is administered subcutaneously at 0.8 mg/kg every other week (Q2W), and tec is administered subcutaneously at 3.0 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) following step-up doses of each. Pts are permitted to switch from Q2W to Q4W tal dosing following a confirmed very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) at cycle 5. Pomalidomide, EPd, and PVd are administered per approved dosing schedules. Randomization is stratified by number of prior LOTs (1 vs ≥2), International Staging System stage at screening (I vs II/III), and investigator's choice of treatment (EPd vs PVd). Pts receive study treatment until disease progression, start of subsequent anti-MM treatment, death, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or end of study, whichever occurs first. A finite dosing approach is employed for tal and tec. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include ORR assessed per IMWG 2016 criteria, ≥VGPR rate, complete response (CR) or better rate, rate of minimal residual disease-negative CR, overall survival, PFS on next LOT, time-to-next treatment, and pt-reported outcomes. This study is actively recruiting, with more than 160 locations in 26 countries. Results will provide insights into the efficacy of the combination of BsAbs in therapeutic strategies that exploit their different mechanisms of action to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes of pts with TCE RRMM in earlier LOTs.

Nanoparticle (NP)-based drug delivery systems have received widespread attention due to the excellent physicochemical properties of nanomaterials. Different types of NPs such as lipid NPs, poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) NPs, inorganic NPs (e.g., iron oxide and Au), carbon NPs (graphene and carbon nanodots), 2D nanomaterials, and biomimetic NPs have found favor as drug delivery vehicles. In this review, we discuss the different types of customized NPs for intravascular drug delivery, nanoparticle behaviors (margination, adhesion, and endothelium uptake) in blood vessels, and nanomaterial compatibility for successful drug delivery. Additionally, cell surface protein targets play an important role in targeted drug delivery, and various vascular drug delivery studies using nanoparticles conjugated to these proteins are reviewed. Finally, limitations, challenges, and potential solutions for translational research regarding NP-based vascular drug delivery are discussed.