Robertson, Andrew G.

Abstract Aims This systematic review evaluated the impact of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) on weight loss, glycaemic control, insulin requirements and postoperative complications. Methods A PRISMA‐compliant, PROSPERO‐registered systematic review and meta‐analysis (CRD42025123500) was conducted. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CENTRAL were searched. Primary outcomes were changes in body weight, BMI, HbA1c and insulin requirements following MBS. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS‐I and RoB‐2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results Twenty‐two studies, including 1324 adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (mean age 42.2 ± 11.6 years; mean follow‐up 31.6 ± 18.2 months), were analysed. Of 753 participants with reported sex, 74.6% were women ( n = 562). A total of 1304 procedures were performed, most commonly Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (44.5%; n = 580) and sleeve gastrectomy (39.2%; n = 512), followed by adjustable gastric banding (13.0%; n = 170). Meta‐analysis demonstrated significant reductions in body weight (mean difference 29.55 kg; 95% CI 25.72 to 33.39; I 2 = 20%) and BMI (11.35 kg/m 2 ; 95% CI 10.36 to 12.34; I 2 = 32%). HbA1c decreased by 4 mmol/mol (95% CI 2.05 to 6.78; I 2 = 19%), and insulin requirements declined by 43%–48% (0.20 U/kg; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.26; I 2 = 58%). Postoperative complications included diabetic ketoacidosis (15/182, 8%) and severe hypoglycaemia (21/516, 4%); any complication occurred in 21/495 (4%). Evidence quality was low. Conclusion MBS achieves weight loss and reduces insulin requirements in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus and obesity, but glycaemic improvements are minimal. Given the observational evidence base and inconsistent safety reporting, true metabolic risk remains uncertain. High‐quality prospective studies with standardised outcome definitions are needed.

Abstract Background: With over 1 billion individuals affected globally, obesity and obesity related diseases is now a leading cause of death. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has emerged as a cornerstone intervention for severe obesity and its associated comorbidities. Despite its efficacy, postoperative care and follow-up after MBS remains highly variable worldwide. Objective: The PARTNER study aimed to evaluate global clinical practices in the postoperative management following MBS by surveying multidisciplinary healthcare professionals . Methods: This study was an international online survey conducted between October 2024 and January 2025. A multidisciplinary team developed the questionnaire based on existing literature and international guidelines. The survey assessed five domains: follow-up care, postoperative treatment, dietary management, patient support, and measurement of surgical outcomes. Responses were analysed descriptively. Results: A total of 262 responses were received from 62 countries. Most respondents were bariatric surgeons (72.1%) working in public healthcare systems (73.3%). While 78.7% reported conducting three-month postoperative reviews, only 23.7% offered indefinite follow-up. Hybrid models of care (virtual and in-person) were common (56.9%). VTE prophylaxis and postoperative PPI use were recommended by 64.1% and 84.3% respectively. Nearly all respondents (98.1%) provided dietary advice, with protein and micronutrient supplementation widely endorsed. Only 56.1% routinely referred patients for psychological follow-up. Definitions of surgical success and failure varied widely, with inconsistent objective outcome measures. Conclusion: The PARTNER study reveals significant international variation in postoperative management practices following MBS. These findings underscore the need for more standardized, evidence-based guidelines to improve long-term outcomes and equity of care worldwide.

Background and Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), closely associated with obesity, contributes to increased morbidity and mortality due to complications such as cardiometabolic disease. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) and endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) in achieving diabetes remission and to examine key predictors influencing remission outcomes. Materials and Methods: This review synthesizes data from studies on MBS and EBT outcomes, focusing on predictors for diabetes remission such as preoperative insulin use, diabetes duration, HbA1c, and C-peptide levels. Additionally, predictive scoring systems, including the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS), DiaRem, Advanced-DiaRem, ABCD, and Robert et al. scores, were analyzed for their utility in forecasting remission likelihood. Results: Key predictors of T2D remission include shorter diabetes duration, lower HbA1c, and higher C-peptide levels, while prolonged insulin use, and higher insulin doses are associated with lower remission rates. Scoring models like IMS and DiaRem demonstrate that lower scores correlate with a higher likelihood of remission, especially for procedures such as Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). RYGB generally shows higher remission rates compared to sleeve gastrectomy (SG), particularly among patients with mild disease severity, while EBTs like ESG and IGBs contribute 5–20% total weight loss (TWL) and moderate glycemic control improvements. Conclusions: Both MBS and EBTs are effective for T2D management, with predictive scoring models aiding in individualized patient selection to optimize remission outcomes. Further research to validate these predictive tools across diverse populations could enhance treatment planning for both surgical and endoscopic interventions.

SummaryGlobal obesity rates have risen dramatically, now exceeding deaths from starvation. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), initially for severe obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2), is performed globally over 500 000 times annually, offering significant metabolic benefits beyond weight loss. However, varying eligibility criteria globally impact patient care and healthcare resources. Updated in 2022, ASMBS and IFSO guidelines aim to standardise MBS indications, reflecting current understanding and emphasising comprehensive preoperative assessments. Yet, clinical variability persists, necessitating consensus‐based recommendations. This modified Delphi study engaged 45 global experts to establish consensus on perioperative management in MBS. Experts selected from bariatric societies possessed expertise in MBS and participated in a two‐round Delphi protocol. Consensus was achieved on 90 of 169 statements (53.3%), encompassing multidisciplinary team composition, patient selection criteria, preoperative testing, and referral pathways. The agreement highlighted the critical role of comprehensive preoperative assessments and the integration of healthcare professionals in MBS. These findings offer essential insights to standardise perioperative practices and advocate for evidence‐based guidelines in MBS globally. The study underscores the need for unified protocols to optimise outcomes and guide future research in MBS.