Citations

PURPOSE Detection of bone marrow disease has been a major component of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) staging with bilateral bone marrow aspirates/biopsies (BMAB) from the iliac crests considered the diagnostic gold standard. This study's goal was to determine if 2- 18 F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([ 18 F]FDG PET/CT) or PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may replace BMAB in RMS staging. METHODS Patients were recruited in Europe and North America. Medical records, FDG PET/CT or FDG PET/MRI (PET), and BMAB reports were collected retrospectively. Images were re-reviewed by nuclear medicine physicians at the patients' home institutions if PET reports indicated increased FDG uptake at bone/bone marrow sites or if tumor cells were detected in bone marrow samples. RESULTS PET imaging and BMAB were performed before chemotherapy and tumor resection in 301 patients with FDG-avid RMS. Bone marrow metastases were detected by PET and BMAB in 54, by PET only in 24, and by BMAB only in one of 301 patients with FDG-avid primary tumors. Absence of bone marrow metastases was confirmed by PET and BMAB in 222 of 301 patients. These observations translated into 98% sensitivity and 90% specificity for PET in detecting bone marrow metastases when BMAB was considered as gold standard. FDG-avid marrow disease was patchy (1-5 foci) in one third of cases. Patients with marrow disease indicated by PET and BMAB had more FDG-avid bone marrow foci, more metastatic sites, and lower survival than those with marrow disease indicated by PET only, suggesting more advanced disease stages. CONCLUSION Bone marrow sampling may be omitted in patients without evidence of FDG-avid bone marrow disease by PET. If there are FDG-avid bone marrow lesions, further investigation by MRI and/or biopsy should be considered.

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) stratified by age, number of previously attempted antiseizure medications (ASMs), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status. Methods In this post hoc analysis, data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with DS (2–18 years) were pooled and stratified by age (<4; ≥4 years), number of previous ASMs (1–3; 4–6; ≥7), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status ( SCN1A +; SCN1A −). Stratified groups were assessed and compared with the pooled placebo group (change in monthly convulsive seizure frequency [MCSF], longest convulsive seizure‐free interval, and Clinical Global Impression–Improvement [CGI–I] scale scores rated by parents/caregivers and investigators), and safety (treatment‐emergent adverse events [TEAEs]: frequency, days to onset, and proportion resolved). Results Among 348 patients included in the RCTs, 216 were randomized to fenfluramine (0.7 mg/kg/day, n = 88; 0.4 mg/kg/day [with stiripentol], n = 43; 0.2 mg/kg/day, n = 85) and 132 to placebo. Compared with placebo, fenfluramine treatment (all doses combined) resulted in greater MCSF reductions, greater increases in longest convulsive seizure‐free intervals, and a higher proportion of parents/caregivers and investigators reporting clinically meaningful improvement (“Much Improved”, “Very Much Improved”) on CGI–I scores across all stratified groups. CGI–I scores were consistent across fenfluramine doses in most stratified groups, but patients with the fewest number of previous ASMs had the greatest frequency of clinically meaningful improvement on investigator‐rated CGI–I scores. Safety outcomes were similar across all strata. Most TEAEs resolved by end‐of‐study. Significance Fenfluramine treatment was associated with improved seizure outcomes and global functioning compared with placebo regardless of age, number of previous ASMs, and SCN1A status in patients with DS. Fenfluramine was well‐tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. Further studies with larger sample sizes (including adults) and a priori inferential analyses of stratified groups are warranted. Plain Language Summary Patients with Dravet syndrome struggle with seizures and everyday life. In three studies, patients aged 2–18 years received fenfluramine or placebo (sugar pill). Fenfluramine lowered seizures without many side effects. Researchers combined results from these studies to see how fenfluramine worked in different patient groups based on age, number of previous medications, and a gene called SCN1A . They looked at seizure reduction and whether doctors felt patients had improved. In all groups, fenfluramine worked better than placebo, with similar side effects. Researchers believe fenfluramine helped these patients, but some groups were small, so these results need to be confirmed.

Background New antiamyloid therapies (AAT) for treating patients with early Alzheimer disease (AD) have become available in the past 3 years. Although AAT can be beneficial in slowing progression of AD, they also come with potentially serious side effects, particularly for patients requiring anticoagulation or thrombolysis for cardiovascular conditions. Given that most patients with AD are older and likely to have cardiovascular risk factors, there is urgent need for additional guidance for clinicians about potential risks and benefits associated with AAT for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, best practices for management of these patients, and special considerations with respect to emergency evaluation and treatment of patients on AAT who develop acute neurological symptoms. Methods The American Heart Association convened 75 multidisciplinary experts for the Amyloid‐Related Imaging Abnormalities Summit: Cardiovascular and Stroke Considerations for β‐Amyloid Immunotherapy in AD in July 2025. These experts were divided into 8 work groups to evaluate the current evidence related to AAT usage in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and conditions and develop consensus‐based guidance for clinicians. Results This statement outlines the outcomes of the Summit, including considerations for prescribers, primary care professionals, emergency personnel, and health care system stakeholders. These considerations are intended to improve identification of patients as appropriate candidates for AAT, management of patients with co‐occurring AD and cardiovascular conditions, and their emergency evaluation and treatment. The statement also includes guidance for shared decision‐making, implementation of system changes for improving dementia care, and recommendations for future research and data collection to add to the body of evidence for treating patients with concomitant AD and cardiovascular conditions. Conclusions Building on lessons learned from the establishment of stroke systems of care, the consensus‐based considerations outlined in this document can serve as a foundation for AD systems of care aimed at ensuring optimal use of these ground‐breaking therapies.

Importance Many patients are diagnosed with atypical lesions or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS); however, evidence- and consensus-based guidelines for the management of many of these lesions are limited. Observations The American Society of Breast Surgeons, in collaboration with the Society of Breast Imaging and College of American Pathology, assembled a steering group to create guidelines for the management of atypical lesions and LCIS, inclusive of flat epithelial atypia (FEA), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), classic LCIS (C-LCIS), and the variant LCIS forms pleomorphic LCIS (P-LCIS) and florid LCIS (F-LCIS). The natural history of ADH, ALH, and C-LCIS suggests that these lesions are associated with an elevated future breast cancer risk; therefore, patients diagnosed with these lesions should be recommended to undergo comprehensive risk assessment and counseling about breast cancer risk-reducing strategies. The magnitude of future breast cancer risk associated with P-LCIS and F-LCIS remains uncertain, yet if these lesions are determined to be hormone receptor positive, risk-reducing medications should be considered. There is no evidence that FEA is associated with an elevated future breast cancer risk. A second pathology review confirmation is recommended for ADH, should be considered for FEA, and is not necessary for ALH or LCIS. Currently available evidence supports the need to diagnostically excise most ADH, P-LCIS, and F-LCIS cases identified on core biopsy, although some ADH cases fulfilling strict criteria and multidisciplinary consensus can be observed. P-LCIS and F-LCIS require a negative margin, but ADH does not. ALH and C-LCIS can be safely observed if the core biopsy diagnosis is concordant with imaging features (ie, radiographic-pathologic concordance is established). Provided radiologic-pathologic concordance is confirmed, diagnostic excision is generally not indicated after a diagnosis of FEA alone. Conclusions and Relevance These guidelines provide evidence-informed, consensus-based recommendations for the management of atypical lesions of the breast, including ADH, ALH, FEA, C-LCIS, P-LCIS, and F-LCIS. Practicing clinicians who treat patients with atypical breast lesions or LCIS should consider integrating these guidelines into clinical management.

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of certain sites within the body. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of mesotheliomas. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for evaluation and treatment in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The NCCN Guidelines will continue to be updated annually based on available clinical evidence and panel consensus.

Abstract Background Recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) is not uncommon. However, real-world long-term data on clinical outcomes of rhythm control strategies in patients with recurrent AF after CA remain limited. Methods Using the TriNetX database, we identified adult patients (≥18 years) with recurrent AF after index CA. A 3-month blanking period was applied, during which no rhythm-control therapy was received. Patients were classified into two groups: repeat CA or initiation of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure (HF) exacerbation, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding over 5 years. Results Among 4,056 patients with recurrent AF post-CA, 17.2% underwent repeat CA. After PSM, 697 patients in the repeat CA group (mean age 68.9 ± 9.6 years; 35.7% female) and 697 in the AAD group (mean age 68.4 ± 10.0 years; 37.6% female) were analyzed. Repeat CA was associated with lower all-cause mortality (3.3% vs 8.2%; HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27–0.72; P &lt; 0.01), all-cause hospitalization (42.8% vs 56.4%; HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.82; P &lt; 0.01) and HF exacerbation (12.5% vs 24.8%; HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39–0.64; P &lt; 0.01). No differences were observed in ischemic stroke (5.3% vs 4.7%; HR 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77–1.96; P = 0.40) or major bleeding (4.6% vs 6.2%; HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52–1.29; P = 0.39). Conclusions Repeat CA was associated with lower mortality, hospitalization, and HF exacerbation over 5 years.

Abstract Background Multi-modality therapy has improved survival for many patients with brain metastases. However, neurocognitive sequelae remain a challenge. While advances in radiotherapy have reduced toxicity, the potential interaction with targeted therapy and immunotherapy and the consequent impact on neurocognitive outcomes remain poorly defined. We appraised the current evidence on neurocognitive outcomes in the era of modern combined-modality therapy. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included clinical trials reporting neurocognitive outcomes in patients with brain metastases receiving radiotherapy ± concurrent systemic therapies. Studies published through December 31, 2024 were identified through PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science using pre-defined MeSH term-based search strings. Results 39 studies from 1997-2024 involving 6,617 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 27 whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]; n = 12 radiosurgery), including six studies evaluating combined-modality therapy in 1,161 patients. Baseline cognitive evaluation was performed inconsistently, but neurocognitive deficits were frequently observed prior to treatment. Most randomized trials reported improved cognitive outcomes and quality of life with advanced radiotherapy techniques (e.g., hippocampal avoidance, radiosurgery) vs WBRT. Among 20 randomized trials comparing radiotherapy with or without a concurrent investigational systemic therapy, only four included neurocognitive assessments. There was no evidence of cognitive sequelae with combined-modality therapy, though evaluable trials were limited due to inconsistent reporting of neurocognitive functioning. Conclusion As survival improves in patients with brain metastases, preserved cognition is an important outcome measure. The lack of neurocognitive endpoints in pivotal brain metastasis trials represents a critical evidence gap. The interaction between radiotherapy and novel systemic therapies, and their combined effects on neurocognition, remain unknown. To address this, we recommend 1) integrating sensitive, pragmatic, and tailored neurocognitive assessments into oncology trials to quantify additive toxicity, 2) early and systematically incorporating neuropsychology into care pathways, 3) expanding radiation dose-sparing and radioprotective strategies, and 4) evaluating the utility of cognitive rehabilitation programs.