Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R.

192 Background: Rectal cancer treatment paradigm has been evolving over time. Historically, for locally advanced rectal cancer, standard therapy (ST) consisted of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) approach that delivers both neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CAPOX or FOLFOX) and chemoradiation (or radiation only) prior to surgery is increasingly being utilized. The prognostic and predictive values of mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) in rectal cancer is not well characterized. Most dMMR patients receive the same treatment as MMR proficient (pMMR) patients although there is limited data that dMMR rectal cancer patients may not have the same level of benefits from neoadjuvant treatment. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinicopathological/molecular characteristics, disease response, and clinical outcomes in dMMR localized rectal cancer patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive adult patients with a diagnosis of dMMR rectal cancer who were treated at Mayo Clinic between January 2000 to September 2021. Patients who presented with concurrent primary non-colorectal malignancies were excluded. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarkers, and outcome data were collected. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were stratified by treatment arms to determine significance of treatment strategies. Results: Forty-one patients were identified with a median age of 45.3 years. Thirty (73.2%) pts were male. The most common MMR were loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (12/42; 29.3%) followed by loss of MLH1 and PMS2 (10/42; 24.4%) and solitary loss of MSH2 (4/42; 9.8%). The treatment, pathological response, and clinical outcomes are listed in table. With a median follow up of 101 months, only 6 patients (14.3%) died and median overall survival was not reached. Conclusions: Our findings showed dMMR localized rectal cancer responded to both ST and TNT with good clinical outcomes.[Table: see text]

TPS514 Background: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), which represent approximately 70% of NETs, frequently develop metastatic disease with limited treatment options. Current standard therapies for well-differentiated high grade 2 and grade 3 GEP-NETs include cytoreductive procedures, somatostatin analogues, molecular targeted therapies (everolimus or sunitinib), chemotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), with no specified sequence of use. PRRT may stabilize disease and induce objective tumor responses. This treatment uses radiolabeled somatostatin analogues to selectively target somatostatin receptor expressing (SSTR+) tumor cells. 177 Lu-edotreotide is an innovative radiolabeled somatostatin analogue with a favorable safety profile and promising efficacy. Retrospective data in metastatic GEP-NETs treated with two or more 177 Lu-edotreotide cycles demonstrated a progression free survival (PFS) of at least 30 months. The currently recruiting Phase III COMPETE trial compares the efficacy and safety of 177 Lu-edotreotide, versus everolimus, in grade 1 and grade 2 GEP-NETs. Methods: COMPOSE (NCT04919226) is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multi-center Phase III study, in patients with well-differentiated high grade 2 and grade 3 (Ki-67 index 15−55%), SSTR+, GEP-NETs. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of first- or second-line treatment with 177 Lu-edotreotide PRRT compared to best standard of care. It aims to randomize 202 patients 1:1 to a defined number of cycles of 177 Lu-edotreotide or an active comparator (either chemotherapy [CAPTEM or FOLFOX] or everolimus, according to investigator´s choice). The primary endpoint is PFS, assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression (RECIST v1.1), or death, whichever occurs earlier. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, assessed up to 2 years after disease progression. Study recruitment for COMPOSE commenced in September 2021. It is expected that COMPOSE will inform optimal treatment options for patients with well-differentiated high grade 2 and grade 3 SSTR+ GEP-NETs, including for first-line therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04919226.

Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177 Lu-dotatate is a novel therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine cancers. It undergoes reabsorption at the proximal tubule; after the breakdown of the peptide fragment, 177 Lu is retained and continues its decay process exposing the nephron to continuous low dose radiation. Pivotal NETTER-1 trial did not include patients with eGFR <50 and so its effects in CKD patients is not known. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all consecutive adult patients that received 177 Lu-dotatate over 1 year at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. We analyzed renal and hematological laboratory data obtained prior to each of four treatment cycles and at 3- and 6-month post completion of all treatment. We defined CKD as eGFR <60 ml/min and AKI as creatinine increase of ⩾0.3 from baseline by AKIN criteria. Results: Overall 86 patients were included in the study with 39 (45%) with known CKD. About three patients had CKD, four with eGFR of 20–30 ml/min. About 4 (4.6%) patients had AKI and the predominant cause being hypotension. Among the CKD patients the average eGFR improved after the first cycle of PRRT therapy from baseline of 49 (13) to 53.5 (17) ml/min ( p = 0.01) with no significant decline of renal function noted at 3- and 6-months post treatment follow up. Rate of thrombocytopenia and leukopenia were significantly more in the CKD patients starting even after single treatment. No drug dose correlation was noted. Conclusion: Patients with CKD are at a higher risk of hematological toxicity especially with thrombocytopenia and require close monitoring and ongoing dose adjustment. Ongoing safety studies to assess the long-term impact of 177 Lu-dotatate on the kidney are needed.

Abstract BACKGROUND Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET/CT is utilized with increasing frequency in the clinical treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Incidental CNS lesions are commonly noted and presumed to be meningiomas, however 68Gallium (Ga-68)-DOTATATE radionuclide use lacks specificity for meningioma identification. Currently there is no established SSTR-based imaging criteria for classification of incidental CNS lesions. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients across clinical and radiological databases at Mayo Clinic who had undergone both Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT and brain MR imaging who had an incidental CNS lesion identified with clinical or radiographic prediction of meningioma. Known meningioma diagnoses prior to imaging were excluded. Imaging indication, semi-quantitative measures, and corresponding clinical history were analyzed to identify metrics impacting both the predictive and descriptive utility of SSTR-based imaging as compared to corresponding MRI prediction in incidental CNS lesions. RESULTS Among 59 patients with a CNS lesion identified on both imaging modalities, most scans were performed for a history of neuroendocrine tumor (71%). Cases with concordant lesion type prediction of meningioma between imaging modalities (N = 25) displayed a higher median SUV max and Krenning score on Ga-68-DOTATATE PET compared to cases with concordant prediction of other lesions (N=10) or discordant prediction of meningioma (N=24). Ga-68-DOTATATE was more likely to discordantly predict meningioma as compared to the corresponding patient MRI in cases with lower SUV max values. The addition of Qclear technology was significantly associated with diagnostic clarification in cases of imaging discordant tumor type prediction. Prior cranial radiation or use of a somatostatin mimetic did not affect quantitative radiographic measures in lesion characterization, and MRI-based tumor size was similar across groups. CONCLUSION The continued development of SSTR-based imaging biomarker signatures across incidental CNS lesion subtypes will further define the role of this imaging modality in the clinical diagnosis and management of presumed meningiomas.

Von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL) is a multineoplasm inherited disease manifesting with hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system and retina, adrenal pheochromocytoma, renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and cysts, and neoplasms/cysts of the ear, broad ligament, and testicles. During 2018‐2020, the VHL Alliance gathered several committees of experts in the various clinical manifestations of VHL to review the literature, gather the available evidence on VHL, and develop recommendations for patient management. The current report details the results of the discussion of a group of experts in the pancreatic manifestations of VHL along with their proposed recommendations for the clinical surveillance and management of patients with VHL. The recommendations subcommittee performed a comprehensive systematic review of the literature and conducted panel discussions to reach the current recommendations. The level of evidence was defined according to the Shekelle variation of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation grading system. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Categories of Evidence and Consensus defined the committee members' interpretation of the evidence and degree of consensus. The recommendations encompass the main aspects of VHL‐related pancreatic manifestations and their clinical management. They are presented in a clinical orientation, including general planning of screening and surveillance for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, utility of biochemical biomarkers, the optimal choice for imaging modality, indirect risk stratification, indications for tissue sampling of VHL‐related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and interventions. These recommendations are designed to serve as the reference for all aspects of the screening, surveillance, and management of VHL‐related pancreatic manifestations.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) encompass a diverse group of malignancies marked by histological heterogeneity and highly variable clinical outcomes. We performed a systematic review on potential prognostic biomarkers in PNETs by searching the PubMed database. A total of 472 manuscripts were reviewed in detail, of which 52 multivariate studies met the inclusion criteria proposed by the Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies. These altogether analyzed 53 unique targets, and 36 of them were statistically associated with survival.

Objectives This study sought to better characterize patient characteristics, treatment options, and outcomes for osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas, a rare subtype of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients with osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of pancreatic origin treated at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to present. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment modalities utilized, and outcomes were compiled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis with a significance level of P ≤ 0.05. Results Fifteen patients met criteria for inclusion. Four patients had distant metastases at diagnosis, the remaining 11 with locoregional disease. Median OS for the entire cohort was 11 months. Metastatic disease was associated with significantly shorter OS (3.5 vs 14.1 months; P = 0.005). Three patients had no evidence of disease at time of analysis; all 3 were treated with complete resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions Osteoclast-like giant cell carcinoma of the pancreas is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. For patients with locoregional disease, surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation may play a role in extended disease-free survival. Metastatic disease presents a challenging entity to treat with little data to support any effective chemotherapy regimens.

Abstract Background Grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 GEPNENs) are often aggressive, and the optimal treatment is unclear for this subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Temozolomide (TEM)-based regimens have been increasingly used to treat grade 1–2 NENs, but their efficacy in G3 NENs remains undetermined. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of TEM-containing regimens in advanced grade 3 GEPNENs. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective review (2008–2018) of patients with metastatic/unresectable G3 GEPNENs who received a TEM-containing regimen was undertaken within a North American partnership to pool data. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Radiologic response was extracted from local reports. Results One hundred and thirty patients in six high-volume NEN centers were included (median age 55, 64% male, 18% functional, 67% pancreatic NEN). Forty-nine percent were well-differentiated, 35% poorly differentiated, and 15% unknown based on local pathology reports. The regimen used was capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) in 92% and TEM alone in 8%. Radiological response by local assessment was seen in 36% of patients. Median TTF was 3.6 months and median overall survival (OS) 19.2 months. Six percent of patients required discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. TTF was longer in first-line treatment (7.8 months vs. 2.9 months; hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–2.36; p = .015) and in patients with pancreatic NENs (panNENs) compared with gastrointestinal NENs (5.8 months vs 1.8 months; p = .04). The overall response rate was higher in the first-line setting (51% vs 29%; p = .02) and in panNEN (41% vs 23%; p = .04). Conclusion This is the largest TEM treatment series in G3 NEN, involving collaboration of several major North American NEN centers as a partnership. Thirty-six percent of patients showed some degree of radiographic response, and treatment was generally well tolerated, although the median duration of response was short. Response rates and time to treatment failure were superior in the first-line setting. CAPTEM should be considered a viable treatment option in this setting. Further randomized trials are warranted. Implications for Practice Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous, and optimal treatment for aggressive grade 3 (G3) NENs remains undetermined. The capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimen has been used in low-grade pancreas NENs but there are few data for its safety and efficacy in the G3 setting. This article reports on the efficacy of temozolomide-containing regimens, particularly CAPTEM, in management of G3 NENs. The good tolerance and response rate show that CAPTEM should be considered a viable regimen in treatment of G3 NENs pending confirmatory prospective studies.