Singh, Simron

Abstract Incretin‐based therapies, including glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RA) and dual incretin agonists, are increasingly used for the management of diabetes, obesity, and cardiometabolic disease. Although their systemic benefits are well established, uncertainty remains regarding their safety in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), a biologically heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse molecular profiles. Preclinical studies suggest that GLP‐1 receptor activation may promote tumor growth in select receptor‐expressing models, although receptor expression varies widely across NEN subtypes and is often absent in common tumors such as ileal neuroendocrine tumors. Population‐level and retrospective clinical data have not demonstrated a consistent increase in oncologic risk but are limited by methodological constraints. In this expert consensus statement, the authors synthesize current evidence and provide a practical framework for the use of incretin mimetics in patients with NENs. The authors emphasize individualized risk assessment, shared decision‐making, and multi‐disciplinary collaboration, balancing potential but unquantified oncologic risks against substantial cardiometabolic benefits. Until prospective data are available, careful patient selection, dose optimization, and close clinical and radiologic surveillance remain essential to guide safe and effective use of these agents in this population.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies ranging from relatively indolent well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) to more aggressive poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The advent of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)–targeting therapies, particularly radioligand therapy (RLT), has transformed the therapeutic landscape of NETs. Ongoing efforts are aimed at maximizing the therapeutic benefit of RLT and include retreatment and combination strategies as well as novel α-emitter–based radiopharmaceuticals. The increasing use of molecular profiling has led to the identification of recurrent canonical alterations in pancreatic NETs, including in MEN1 , ATRX / DAXX , PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and angiogenic signaling pathways, facilitating the development of effective targeted therapies. However, despite the addition of newer targeted therapies to the therapeutic armamentarium, resistance remains inevitable and highlights the need for improved predictive markers to inform therapy sequencing and novel biomarker-selected therapies. In addition, the development of novel therapeutic strategies including SSTR antagonists, nonpeptide drug conjugates, and novel radiopharmaceutical constructs highlights the potential of biomarker-informed therapies in this space. By contrast, treatment options for NECs remain limited, with modest therapeutic benefit of platinum-based chemotherapy. The identification of delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) as a therapeutic target in high-grade NENs has led to the development of novel targeted therapies such as T-cell engagers, which have demonstrated promising activity in early phase clinical trials. In addition, other DLL3-targeting agents such as antibody-drug conjugates, trispecific engagers, and cellular therapies remain under investigation. Collectively, these advances underscore the potential of biomarker-informed treatment approaches to personalize treatment decisions and improve long-term outcomes across the NEN spectrum.

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more. PURPOSE To develop a clinical practice guideline and recommendations for symptom management of patients with well-differentiated grade 1 to grade 3 metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to develop a clinical practice guideline by reviewing the literature for relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies to develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS The literature review identified eight guidelines, 19 systematic reviews, and three RCTs that informed the development of guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations are included for carcinoid syndrome, carcinoid heart disease and carcinoid crisis, and functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor syndromes. Recommendations are provided for surgical management, liver-directed therapy, and systemic therapy options, as well as palliative care. Limited guidance is provided for sequencing of interventions. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

4131 Background: NETTER-2 (NCT03972488) is the first randomized study to evaluate radioligand therapy ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE; hereafter 177Lu-DOTATATE) at first line (1L) in patients (pts) with advanced, well-differentiated higher grade (G2 and G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Significant improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR) were observed for pts receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE. This sub-analysis of NETTER-2 assessed safety and time to response (TTR). Methods: Eligible pts (n=226) were newly diagnosed with somatostatin receptor-positive high G2 or G3 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤55%) advanced GEP-NETs and were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE (4 × 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks [Q8W]) plus 30 mg octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) Q8W during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment then Q4W (177Lu-DOTATATE arm), or 60 mg octreotide LAR Q4W (control arm). Hematologic adverse events (AEs) and laboratory toxicities were scored according to CTCAE grade. Response was assessed centrally based on conventional imaging (RECIST 1.1 criteria). Results: The AE pattern in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm was consistent with the established safety profile. Among laboratory abnormalities, grade 3/4 decreases in lymphocytes (38.1% vs 2.7%), leukocytes (4.1% vs 0), neutrophils (3.4% vs 0), platelets (2.0% vs 0) and hemoglobin (1.4% vs 2.7%) were observed in 177Lu-DOTATATE (n=147) and control (n=73) arms, respectively; median time to first occurrence of hematologic toxicities was 4.4 months among pts with immediate hematotoxicities. These events were transient and manageable. There was no notable difference in infection rates between treatment arms (31.3% 177Lu-DOTATATE and 27.4% control). One case of myelodysplastic syndrome was observed (177Lu-DOTATATE arm ~14 months after first cycle). Five fatal AEs occurred during the randomized treatment period; all considered unrelated to treatment and attributed to GEP-NET progression. AEs leading to 177Lu-DOTATATE dose interruption, reduction and discontinuation occurred in 14 (9.5%), 2 (1.4%) and 3 (2.0%) pts, respectively. Among 65 responders in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm (ORR 43 %), median TTR (Q1, Q3) was 5.7 months (4.1, 8.3). Most responses occurred during the 4-cycle treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Conclusions: In pts with advanced G2 and G3 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤55%) GEP-NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE at 1L the most common hematologic toxicity was lymphopenia, but infection rates were similar vs control. With a median TTR of 5.7 months, most responses to 177Lu-DOTATATE occurred during scheduled treatment. Overall, the study confirmed the safety profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE and supports its use at 1L for this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT03972488 .

LBA588 Background: Currently, there is no universally accepted first line (1L) therapy for higher grade, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and an unmet medical need remains in these patients (pts). Radioligand therapy (RLT) is an innovative cancer treatment that crosses the traditional domains of systemic, radiation or surgical therapies. The Phase 3 NETTER-2 study (NCT03972488) evaluated [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE (hereafter 177Lu-DOTATATE) as 1L treatment in pts with Grade (G) 2 and G3 advanced GEP-NETs. This is the first trial to assess 1L RLT in any solid tumor. Methods: Eligible pts were newly diagnosed with somatostatin receptor-positive high G2 or G3 (Ki-67 ≥10% and ≤55%) advanced GEP-NETs within the last 6 months prior to enrollment. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE (4 × 7.4 GBq) plus 30 mg octreotide long-acting release (LAR) at 8-weekly intervals during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment then every 4 weeks (177Lu-DOTATATE arm), or 60 mg octreotide LAR every 4 weeks (control arm), stratified by grade (G2 vs G3) and tumor origin (pancreas vs other). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), centrally assessed using RECIST 1.1. Objective response rate (ORR), a key secondary endpoint, was tested hierarchically after PFS. Results: Overall, 226 pts were randomized to the 177Lu-DOTATATE (n = 151) or control (n = 75) arms. Most tumors originated in the pancreas (54.4%) or small intestine (29.2%); G3 tumors were reported in 35.0% of pts. Median cumulative dose of 177Lu-DOTATATE was 29.2 GBq, with 87.8% of pts receiving all 4 doses. Median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was significantly prolonged by ~14.3 months from 8.5 months (7.7, 13.8) in the control arm to 22.8 months (19.4, not estimable) in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm; stratified hazard ratio 0.276 (95% CI: 0.182, 0.418; p < 0.0001). The ORR was significantly higher in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm (43.0%) vs the control arm (9.3%); stratified odds ratio 7.81 (95% CI: 3.32, 18.4; p < 0.0001). PFS and ORR results were consistent across all pre-specified demographic and prognostic subgroups. Among adverse events of special interest to RLT, G3/4 leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in ≤3 pts each in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm. One case of myelodysplastic syndrome was reported (177Lu-DOTATATE arm). Conclusion: 177Lu-DOTATATE significantly prolonged PFS and demonstrated a clinically meaningful ORR, compared with high-dose octreotide LAR, in pts with newly diagnosed advanced G2 and G3 GEP-NETs. Safety was in line with the established profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE. This is the first randomized study to demonstrate efficacy of RLT as 1L treatment in any malignancy and will change clinical practice. Further investigations of RLT as a therapeutic option in other settings is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03972488 .

PURPOSE To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. RECOMMENDATIONS Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)–positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Abstract Background Grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 GEPNENs) are often aggressive, and the optimal treatment is unclear for this subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Temozolomide (TEM)-based regimens have been increasingly used to treat grade 1–2 NENs, but their efficacy in G3 NENs remains undetermined. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of TEM-containing regimens in advanced grade 3 GEPNENs. Materials and Methods A multicenter retrospective review (2008–2018) of patients with metastatic/unresectable G3 GEPNENs who received a TEM-containing regimen was undertaken within a North American partnership to pool data. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Radiologic response was extracted from local reports. Results One hundred and thirty patients in six high-volume NEN centers were included (median age 55, 64% male, 18% functional, 67% pancreatic NEN). Forty-nine percent were well-differentiated, 35% poorly differentiated, and 15% unknown based on local pathology reports. The regimen used was capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) in 92% and TEM alone in 8%. Radiological response by local assessment was seen in 36% of patients. Median TTF was 3.6 months and median overall survival (OS) 19.2 months. Six percent of patients required discontinuation of therapy due to adverse events. TTF was longer in first-line treatment (7.8 months vs. 2.9 months; hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–2.36; p = .015) and in patients with pancreatic NENs (panNENs) compared with gastrointestinal NENs (5.8 months vs 1.8 months; p = .04). The overall response rate was higher in the first-line setting (51% vs 29%; p = .02) and in panNEN (41% vs 23%; p = .04). Conclusion This is the largest TEM treatment series in G3 NEN, involving collaboration of several major North American NEN centers as a partnership. Thirty-six percent of patients showed some degree of radiographic response, and treatment was generally well tolerated, although the median duration of response was short. Response rates and time to treatment failure were superior in the first-line setting. CAPTEM should be considered a viable treatment option in this setting. Further randomized trials are warranted. Implications for Practice Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous, and optimal treatment for aggressive grade 3 (G3) NENs remains undetermined. The capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) regimen has been used in low-grade pancreas NENs but there are few data for its safety and efficacy in the G3 setting. This article reports on the efficacy of temozolomide-containing regimens, particularly CAPTEM, in management of G3 NENs. The good tolerance and response rate show that CAPTEM should be considered a viable regimen in treatment of G3 NENs pending confirmatory prospective studies.

41 Background: Provider experience and physician burnout has been recognized as a critical issue in medicine. Ontario, Canada has a single payer cancer system run by Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario) with a mandate covering system level planning and delivery of cancer services, funding, and quality improvement. As part of a larger provincial initiative to address clinician burnout, we examined the prevalence and drivers of burnout in practicing physician oncologists in Ontario. Methods: In November-December 2019, surgical, medical, hematological, and radiation oncologists in Ontario were invited to complete an anonymous online survey to assess burnout and its drivers. Burnout prevalence was assessed through the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS MP). Data on demographic, workplace, engagement, and practice profiles were collected. Logistic regression modeling was conducted to assess key variables associated with “high” burnout using a common definition of high scores on the MBI subscales of emotional exhaustion (EE) (> 27) and/or depersonalization (DP) (>10). Results: Response rate to the survey was 44% (n=418) with 72% reporting high levels of burnout. Mean scores for EE (30.7, SD 12.1) and DP (9.9, SD 6.7) were consistent with high burnout. Participants endorsed known drivers of burnout including: 1) a poor culture of wellness at work (e.g., not comfortable talking to leadership (72%), 2) inefficiencies of practice (e.g. feeling insufficient documentation time (67%)) and 3) personal resilience (e.g. not feeling they are contributing professionally in ways they value (21%)). Age (<45yrs) (OR: 2.15), poor/marginal control over workload (OR: 4.42), feeling used/unappreciated (OR: 2.63), working atmosphere that feels hectic/chaotic (OR: 2.68), and insufficient time for documentation requirements (OR: 2.52) significantly impacted the odds of high burnout in the regression model (p<0.05). Conclusions: The high rate of burnout among oncology physicians in a single payer public cancer system in Ontario is concerning for the wellbeing of providers, patients and system sustainability. Drivers important for maintaining a culture of wellness and efficiency of practice will require local, regional and provincial health policy to improve. Next steps will include raising awareness with provincial initiatives/policy to address key burnout drivers, and examining the impact of working under pandemic conditions (Covid-19) on oncologist burnout.

AbstractThis article is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the medical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The guidelines panel consisted of medical oncologists, pathologists, gastroenterologists, endocrinologists, and radiologists. The panel reviewed a series of questions regarding the medical management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors as well as questions regarding surveillance after resection. The available literature was reviewed for each of the question and panel members voted on controversial topics, and the recommendations were included in a document circulated to all panel members for a final approval.

321 Background: G3 NENs are aggressive, and optimal systemic treatment is unclear. Temozolomide (TEM)-based regimens have been used to treat grade 1-2 NETs, but their efficacy in G3 NENs (Ki-67 > 20%) remains undetermined. Aims: To assess the clinical efficacy of TEM-containing regimens in advanced grade III gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEPNENs). Methods: A multicentre retrospective review (2008-2017) of patients with metastatic/unresectable G3 GEPNENs who received a TEM-containing regimen. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Radiologic response was extracted from local reports without formal RECIST criteria. Results: 118 patients in six centers were included (median age 55, 65% male, 15% functional, 75% pancreatic NEN). 57% were well-differentiated, 35% poorly-differentiated, and 18% unknown based on local pathology reports. The regimen used was CAPTEM in 93% and TEM in 7%. Best radiological responses were: complete response (1%), partial response (39%), stable disease (22%), progressive disease (31%), unknown (7%) not by RECIST. Median TTF was 150 days and median overall survival (OS) 18.0 months. Fifteen patients (14%) required dose reductions/discontinuation due to adverse events. TTF was shorter for patients on TEM alone (p = 0.02, Table 1). Well-differentiated NENs had better response rate (52% vs 26%, p = 0.02) and overall survival (30.1 vs 12.0 mo, p = 0.008) compared to poorly-differentiated NEN. Conclusions: This is the largest TEM treatment series in G3 NEN, involving collaboration of several major North American NET centers. 40% of patients showed some degree of response, and treatment was generally well-tolerated. TEM-based regimens should be considered a viable treatment option in this setting. Prospective confirmatory trials (such as EA2142) may face difficulties in accrual due to disease rarity. [Table: see text]