Pavel, Marianne

e16286 Background: GEP-NET is a rare disease with variable tumor biology. An indolent disease course with subtle symptoms renders timely diagnosis difficult; 2/3 of patients (pts) are diagnosed at locally advanced or metastasized stage. In clinical decision-making, disease-specific factors, patient (pt) age and long-term disease control must be balanced against the aggressiveness of therapies. NCCN, NANETS and ENETS guidelines recognize the diversity of mGEP-NET by recommending individualized treatment approaches. We aimed to describe treatment (Tx) utilization patterns in mGEP-NET. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases spanning 07/01/2017-01/31/2023. Eligible were GEP-NET pts with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims, a subsequent new diagnosis of metastatic disease (index), no secondary malignancy, and follow-up time of ≥12 months (m) after index. Results: Of 16218 GEP-NET pts, 2002 (mean age 60y; 50% female) met inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up time after index was 17m, with 49%, 27% and 15% followed up for ≥12, 24 and 36m, resp. Medical history (12m baseline before index) included mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.62, with hypertension (HTN), type 2 diabetes (T2DM), chronic liver disease (CLD), asthma/COPD, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) present in 56, 26, 22, 18, 17 and 10% of pts, resp.; 5% had carcinoid syndrome. In total, 949 pts (47.4%) received first-line (1L) systemic Tx: somatostatin analogs (SSA; 61.6%) of either very short or long duration (median 116d vs 775d), chemotherapy (38.8%), targeted therapies (3.4%) and PRRT (0.5%). Relative to NCCN cancer surveillance guidelines, 49.5% received more and 36.8% received fewer than 4 scans in the first year of treatment. Conversely, 1053 (52.6%) did not receive any 1L systemic Tx. With the exception of CLD, pts with vs without 1L Tx had similar proportions of medical conditions during the 12m baseline and during follow-up (HTN 72.4 vs 66.5%; T2DM 34.0 vs 30.3%; asthma/COPD 16.5 vs 19.3%; CVD 27.3 vs 36.9%; CKD 18.9 vs 17.9%; however, CLD 54.0 vs 36.7%). See Table comparing both cohorts on insurance, treatments, and health care utilization during follow-up. Conclusions: This claims analysis reveals treatment differences among mGEP-NET pts that cannot be explained by the parameters assessed herein. Further research should investigate factors influencing diagnosis and treatment decision-making, applying also pt-level health record data; and analyze economic barriers to diagnosis and treatment. [Table: see text]

4131 Background: NETTER-2 (NCT03972488) is the first randomized study to evaluate radioligand therapy ([177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE; hereafter 177Lu-DOTATATE) at first line (1L) in patients (pts) with advanced, well-differentiated higher grade (G2 and G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Significant improvements in progression-free survival and objective response rate (ORR) were observed for pts receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE. This sub-analysis of NETTER-2 assessed safety and time to response (TTR). Methods: Eligible pts (n=226) were newly diagnosed with somatostatin receptor-positive high G2 or G3 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤55%) advanced GEP-NETs and were randomized (2:1) to receive 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE (4 × 7.4 GBq every 8 weeks [Q8W]) plus 30 mg octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) Q8W during 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment then Q4W (177Lu-DOTATATE arm), or 60 mg octreotide LAR Q4W (control arm). Hematologic adverse events (AEs) and laboratory toxicities were scored according to CTCAE grade. Response was assessed centrally based on conventional imaging (RECIST 1.1 criteria). Results: The AE pattern in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm was consistent with the established safety profile. Among laboratory abnormalities, grade 3/4 decreases in lymphocytes (38.1% vs 2.7%), leukocytes (4.1% vs 0), neutrophils (3.4% vs 0), platelets (2.0% vs 0) and hemoglobin (1.4% vs 2.7%) were observed in 177Lu-DOTATATE (n=147) and control (n=73) arms, respectively; median time to first occurrence of hematologic toxicities was 4.4 months among pts with immediate hematotoxicities. These events were transient and manageable. There was no notable difference in infection rates between treatment arms (31.3% 177Lu-DOTATATE and 27.4% control). One case of myelodysplastic syndrome was observed (177Lu-DOTATATE arm ~14 months after first cycle). Five fatal AEs occurred during the randomized treatment period; all considered unrelated to treatment and attributed to GEP-NET progression. AEs leading to 177Lu-DOTATATE dose interruption, reduction and discontinuation occurred in 14 (9.5%), 2 (1.4%) and 3 (2.0%) pts, respectively. Among 65 responders in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm (ORR 43 %), median TTR (Q1, Q3) was 5.7 months (4.1, 8.3). Most responses occurred during the 4-cycle treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Conclusions: In pts with advanced G2 and G3 (Ki67 ≥10% and ≤55%) GEP-NETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE at 1L the most common hematologic toxicity was lymphopenia, but infection rates were similar vs control. With a median TTR of 5.7 months, most responses to 177Lu-DOTATATE occurred during scheduled treatment. Overall, the study confirmed the safety profile of 177Lu-DOTATATE and supports its use at 1L for this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT03972488 .