Agrawal, Yuri

Abstract Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors, including vestibular schwannomas (VS), often require microsurgical resection. These are typically surgical procedures performed by co-surgeons, and some controversy and confusion exist regarding use of common procedural terminology (CPT) codes for billing, given the American Medical Association (AMA) describes two distinct coding sets for such cases. This investigation endeavored to: (1) Comprehensively review all surgical coding options; (2) instruct on application; and (3) explore contemporary coding trends among surgeons. A multi-disciplinary task force (otologist/neurotologists and neurosurgeons) performed direct correspondence with various surgical societies, private consultancies, and the AMA. Survey instruments were distributed to active surgeons. Investigational period: 2022 to 2025. Survey instruments distributed at the 2023 American Neurotology Society (ANS) Fall Meeting. ANS, American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO-HNSF), and the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) representatives. Usage rate for CPT code sets (percentage of responders). Two CPT coding systems are currently accepted for surgical management of CPA tumors. The traditional/legacy codes (Indicator-2) allow use of co-surgery modifiers (-62). The newer approach/resection codes (skull base codes; Indicator-1) restrict modifier use. The history, application, and controversies surrounding the codes are detailed herein. About 40% of surgeons reported use of the traditional codes, while 45 to 49% use the skull base codes. Response rate was 31% of the active ANS membership in 2023. The AMA recognizes two CPT code sets for surgical management of CPA tumors. Both are appropriate, if properly applied. Contemporary surgeons likely utilize the sets in equal proportions.

In 2007, the Bárány Society embarked on a project to establish definitions of vestibular syndromes and disorders based on best available evidence, referred to as the International Classification of Vestibular Disorders (ICVD). Since then, numerous publications providing consensus-driven diagnostic criteria for vestibular symptoms, syndromes, and disorders have been published. Here, we reflect on the rationale for developing the ICVD as well as its subsequent achievements, challenges, and outlook. In this summary of the work of the ICVD to date, the authors will focus on practical aspects to help improve the utility and applicability of these diagnostic criteria moving forward.