Driscoll, Colin LW

Abstract Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors, including vestibular schwannomas (VS), often require microsurgical resection. These are typically surgical procedures performed by co-surgeons, and some controversy and confusion exist regarding use of common procedural terminology (CPT) codes for billing, given the American Medical Association (AMA) describes two distinct coding sets for such cases. This investigation endeavored to: (1) Comprehensively review all surgical coding options; (2) instruct on application; and (3) explore contemporary coding trends among surgeons. A multi-disciplinary task force (otologist/neurotologists and neurosurgeons) performed direct correspondence with various surgical societies, private consultancies, and the AMA. Survey instruments were distributed to active surgeons. Investigational period: 2022 to 2025. Survey instruments distributed at the 2023 American Neurotology Society (ANS) Fall Meeting. ANS, American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO-HNSF), and the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) representatives. Usage rate for CPT code sets (percentage of responders). Two CPT coding systems are currently accepted for surgical management of CPA tumors. The traditional/legacy codes (Indicator-2) allow use of co-surgery modifiers (-62). The newer approach/resection codes (skull base codes; Indicator-1) restrict modifier use. The history, application, and controversies surrounding the codes are detailed herein. About 40% of surgeons reported use of the traditional codes, while 45 to 49% use the skull base codes. Response rate was 31% of the active ANS membership in 2023. The AMA recognizes two CPT code sets for surgical management of CPA tumors. Both are appropriate, if properly applied. Contemporary surgeons likely utilize the sets in equal proportions.

Background Jugular paragangliomas represent a surgical challenge due to their vascularity and proximity to vital neurovascular structures. Preoperative embolization aids in reducing intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, and improves surgical visualization. Several embolization agents have been used. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PVA in pre-operative embolization of jugular paragangliomas. Methods A retrospective review of all patients who underwent jugular paraganglioma resection with pre-operative embolization between 2000 and 2020 was performed. Pre-operative data including baseline patient and tumor characteristics were documented. Outcomes of preoperative embolization including extent of devascularization and post-embolization complications were recorded. Early and long-term postoperative outcomes were reported. Results Twenty-nine patients met study criteria with a median age of 38 years. Average tumor size was 3.4±1.8 cm. The most commonly encountered arterial feeder was the ascending pharyngeal artery followed by the posterior auricular artery. More than 50% reduction in tumor blush was achieved in 25 patients (86.2%). None of the patients experienced new or worsening cranial neuropathy following embolization. Gross total or Near total resection was achieved in 13 patients (44.8%). A STR or NTR was chosen in these patients to preserve cranial nerve function or large vessel integrity. Average intraoperative estimated blood loss was 888 ml, 9 patients (31%) required intra-operative transfusion of blood products. Extent of resection and post-operative complications did not correlate with extent of devascularization. Conclusion Pre-operative embolization of jugular paraganglioma tumors with PVA particles is an effective strategy with a high safety profile.