Stevens, Shawn M.

Abstract Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors, including vestibular schwannomas (VS), often require microsurgical resection. These are typically surgical procedures performed by co-surgeons, and some controversy and confusion exist regarding use of common procedural terminology (CPT) codes for billing, given the American Medical Association (AMA) describes two distinct coding sets for such cases. This investigation endeavored to: (1) Comprehensively review all surgical coding options; (2) instruct on application; and (3) explore contemporary coding trends among surgeons. A multi-disciplinary task force (otologist/neurotologists and neurosurgeons) performed direct correspondence with various surgical societies, private consultancies, and the AMA. Survey instruments were distributed to active surgeons. Investigational period: 2022 to 2025. Survey instruments distributed at the 2023 American Neurotology Society (ANS) Fall Meeting. ANS, American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO-HNSF), and the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) representatives. Usage rate for CPT code sets (percentage of responders). Two CPT coding systems are currently accepted for surgical management of CPA tumors. The traditional/legacy codes (Indicator-2) allow use of co-surgery modifiers (-62). The newer approach/resection codes (skull base codes; Indicator-1) restrict modifier use. The history, application, and controversies surrounding the codes are detailed herein. About 40% of surgeons reported use of the traditional codes, while 45 to 49% use the skull base codes. Response rate was 31% of the active ANS membership in 2023. The AMA recognizes two CPT code sets for surgical management of CPA tumors. Both are appropriate, if properly applied. Contemporary surgeons likely utilize the sets in equal proportions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery is a popular intervention for small vestibular schwannomas in patients with preserved hearing. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) represent 2 alternative modalities, with CKRS potentially allowing for the delivery of higher doses over multiple sessions. However, the optimal dosing and hearing outcomes of CKRS remain unclear. This study systematically reviewed all literature describing outcomes following treatment of vestibular schwannomas with CKRS, with a focus on tumor control, hearing preservation, and dosing schema. METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were queried to identify primary retrospective studies reporting local tumor control and hearing preservation rates following CKRS for vestibular schwannoma. Studies were reviewed, and the systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA and meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with study periods ranging from 1998 to 2018 were included. These studies comprised 2018 patients (mean age, 60.2 years; range, 11-91 years; 52% female), of whom 64 had neurofibromatosis type 2. The mean follow-up was 40 (range, 6-120) months, and 309 patients had undergone prior treatment (surgery and/or stereotactic radiosurgery). In aggregate, local control at the last follow-up was 96% (95% CI, 95%-98%), and 73% (95% CI, 66%-81%) of patients had preserved hearing. The most common major complications after CKRS were facial neuropathy (1.4%), trigeminal neuralgia (1.3%), and hydrocephalus (0.5%). CKRS provides a high rate of short-term and mid-term tumor control with hearing preservation comparable with GKRS, but long-term outcomes remain under investigated. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that CKRS offers high rates of tumor control and hearing preservation in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. Current data suggest that CKRS is a reasonable, safe therapeutic option for patients with small tumors and preserved hearing. Further exploration in larger cohorts and direct comparison with GKRS is merited.

Purpose of review To explore key management principles and outcomes following surgical intervention for spontaneous CSF leaks of the lateral skull base. Recent findings Outcomes following surgery for spontaneous CSF leaks of the lateral skull base depend on the surgical approach utilized. The approach reported most frequently in the literature is currently the middle fossa approach. Mean leak recurrence rates, regardless of approach, were approximately 6%. The lowest leak recurrence rates were associated with the combined middle cranial fossa-transmastoid approach. A multilayer closure was employed in all of the reviewed investigations, but the choice of reconstructive material did not significantly affect outcomes. Direct surgical complications rates, overall, were low at less than 2%. Meningitis, intracranial hemorrhage, and perioperative seizure activity were only rarely encountered. A concomitant diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension was found to be associated with increased rates of leak recurrence and sequential leak development at other skull base sites. Summary Postoperative management of patients with spontaneous CSF leaks of the lateral skull base has unique challenges. Observation of key treatment principles can lead to good outcomes and limit morbidity. A high index of suspicion should exist for concomitant idiopathic intracranial hypertension.