Lawton, Michael T

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery is a popular intervention for small vestibular schwannomas in patients with preserved hearing. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) represent 2 alternative modalities, with CKRS potentially allowing for the delivery of higher doses over multiple sessions. However, the optimal dosing and hearing outcomes of CKRS remain unclear. This study systematically reviewed all literature describing outcomes following treatment of vestibular schwannomas with CKRS, with a focus on tumor control, hearing preservation, and dosing schema. METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were queried to identify primary retrospective studies reporting local tumor control and hearing preservation rates following CKRS for vestibular schwannoma. Studies were reviewed, and the systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA and meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with study periods ranging from 1998 to 2018 were included. These studies comprised 2018 patients (mean age, 60.2 years; range, 11-91 years; 52% female), of whom 64 had neurofibromatosis type 2. The mean follow-up was 40 (range, 6-120) months, and 309 patients had undergone prior treatment (surgery and/or stereotactic radiosurgery). In aggregate, local control at the last follow-up was 96% (95% CI, 95%-98%), and 73% (95% CI, 66%-81%) of patients had preserved hearing. The most common major complications after CKRS were facial neuropathy (1.4%), trigeminal neuralgia (1.3%), and hydrocephalus (0.5%). CKRS provides a high rate of short-term and mid-term tumor control with hearing preservation comparable with GKRS, but long-term outcomes remain under investigated. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that CKRS offers high rates of tumor control and hearing preservation in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. Current data suggest that CKRS is a reasonable, safe therapeutic option for patients with small tumors and preserved hearing. Further exploration in larger cohorts and direct comparison with GKRS is merited.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Predicting functional outcomes after surgical management of ruptured aneurysms is essential. This study sought to validate the modified Southwestern Aneurysm Severity Index (mSASI), which predicts functional outcomes 1 year after treatment. METHODS: The surgical arm of a randomized controlled trial, the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial, was used to validate the mSASI model. mSASI scores incorporating the Hunt and Hess scale, Non-Neurological American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification Status, imaging findings, and other modifiers were assigned and evaluated against the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 1 year. The model's performance was assessed for discrimination and calibration. Similar evaluations were constructed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as the 1-year functional outcome measurement. Long-term outcomes (3, 6, 10 years) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 280 clinical trial patients treated surgically, 242 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 54.1 ± 12.9 years; 31% were men. Favorable GOS score (4-5) and mRS score (0-2) at 1 year were observed in 73.6% and 66.1% of patients, respectively. The mSASI model predicted unfavorable GOS score at 1 year with fair to good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.68-0.82) and accurate calibration (R 2 = 0.98). Similar results were obtained when mRS was used as the outcome measure (area under the curve = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.68-0.82; R 2 = 0.95). CONCLUSION: The mSASI model was externally validated in our cohort to predict functional outcomes using the GOS or mRS scores 1 year after surgery. This index may be used for prognosticating outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for ruptured aneurysms at short-term and long-term intervals.

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are complex, and rare arteriovenous shunts that present with a wide range of signs and symptoms, with intracerebral hemorrhage being the most severe. Despite prior societal position statements, there is no consensus on the management of these lesions. ARISE (Aneurysm/bAVM/cSDH Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts) was convened to discuss evidence-based approaches and enhance our understanding of these complex lesions. ARISE identified the need to develop scales to predict the risk of rupture of bAVMs, and the use of common data elements to perform prospective registries and clinical studies. Additionally, the group underscored the need for comprehensive patient management with specialized centers with expertise in cranial and spinal microsurgery, neurological endovascular surgery, and stereotactic radiosurgery. The collection of prospective multicenter data and gross specimens was deemed essential for improving bAVM characterization, genetic evaluation, and phenotyping. Finally, bAVMs should be managed within a multidisciplinary framework, with clinical studies and research conducted collaboratively across multiple centers, harnessing the collective expertise and centralization of resources.